ITU-T A 1-2016 Working methods for study groups of the ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (Study Group TSAG)《对国际电信联盟的电信标准化部门研究组的工作方法(研究组TSAG)》.pdf

《ITU-T A 1-2016 Working methods for study groups of the ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (Study Group TSAG)《对国际电信联盟的电信标准化部门研究组的工作方法(研究组TSAG)》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ITU-T A 1-2016 Working methods for study groups of the ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (Study Group TSAG)《对国际电信联盟的电信标准化部门研究组的工作方法(研究组TSAG)》.pdf（26页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、 I n t e r n a t i o n a l T e l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n U n i o n ITU-T A.1 TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR OF ITU (10/2016) SERIES A: ORGANIZATION OF THE WORK OF ITU-T Working methods for study groups of the ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector Recommendation ITU-T A.1 Rec. IT

2、U-T A.1 (10/2016) i Recommendation ITU-T A.1 Working methods for study groups of the ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector Summary Recommendation ITU-T A.1 describes general work methods for ITU-T study groups. It provides guidelines related to work methods, such as the conduct of meetings, p

3、reparation of studies, management of study groups, joint coordination groups, the role of rapporteurs and the processing of ITU-T contributions and TDs. History Edition Recommendation Approval Study Group Unique ID* 1.0 ITU-T A.1 1996-10-18 TSAG 11.1002/1000/3963 2.0 ITU-T A.1 2000-10-06 TSAG 11.100

4、2/1000/5194 3.0 ITU-T A.1 2004-10-14 TSAG 11.1002/1000/7417 4.0 ITU-T A.1 2006-07-07 TSAG 11.1002/1000/8789 5.0 ITU-T A.1 2008-10-30 TSAG 11.1002/1000/9638 6.0 ITU-T A.1 2012-11-29 TSAG 11.1002/1000/11920 7.0 ITU-T A.1 2016-10-28 TSAG 11.1002/1000/13163 Keywords Contributions, joint coordination, ra

5、pporteur, study group management, TD, working methods. * To access the Recommendation, type the URL http:/handle.itu.int/ in the address field of your web browser, followed by the Recommendations unique ID. For example, http:/handle.itu.int/11.1002/1000/11830-en. ii Rec. ITU-T A.1 (10/2016) FOREWORD

6、 The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications, information and communication technologies (ICTs). The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying tec

7、hnical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which

8、, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-Ts purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and I

9、EC. NOTE In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration“ is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to e

10、nsure, e.g., interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words “shall“ or some other obligatory language such as “must“ and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words d

11、oes not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTSITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerni

12、ng the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by paten

13、ts, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database at http:/www.itu.int/ITU-T/ipr/. ITU 2017 All rights reserved. No part of this public

14、ation may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. Rec. ITU-T A.1 (10/2016) iii Table of Contents Page 1 Study groups and their relevant groups 1 1.1 Frequency of meetings . 1 1.2 Coordination of work . 1 1.3 Preparation of studies and meetings . 1 1.4 Con

15、duct of meetings . 2 1.5 Liaison statements 3 1.6 Correspondence activities . 4 1.7 Preparation of reports of study groups, working parties or joint working parties, Recommendations and new Questions 4 1.8 Definitions 5 2 Study group management . 6 2.1 Study group structure and distribution of work

16、6 2.2 Joint coordination activities 7 2.3 The roles of rapporteurs 10 3 Submission and processing of contributions 13 3.1 Submission of contributions . 13 3.2 Processing of contributions 13 3.3 TDs . 14 3.4 Electronic access 15 Annex A Template to describe a proposed new Recommendation in the work p

17、rogramme 16 Appendix I Rapporteur progress report format . 17 Rec. ITU-T A.1 (10/2016) 1 Recommendation ITU-T A.1 Working methods for study groups of the ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector 1 Study groups and their relevant groups 1.1 Frequency of meetings 1.1.1 Study groups meet to facilit

18、ate the approval of Recommendations. Such meetings shall only be held with the approval of the Director of the Telecommunication Standardization Bureau (TSB), and with due consideration of the physical and budgetary capabilities of the ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T). To minimiz

19、e the number of meetings required, every effort should be made to resolve questions by correspondence (No. 245 of the ITU Convention). 1.1.2 In the establishment of the work programme, the timetable of meetings must take into account the time required for participating bodies (administrations of Mem

20、ber States and other duly authorized entities) to react and prepare contributions. Meetings should not be held more frequently than is necessary to make effective progress and should take into account TSBs capabilities to provide the necessary documentation. A meeting scheduled so that its separatio

21、n from a preceding meeting, upon which it depends, is less than six months may incur the possibility of full documentation from the previous meeting not being available. 1.1.3 Meetings of study groups having common interests or dealing with problems possessing affinities should, if possible, be arra

22、nged so as to enable participating bodies to send one delegate or representative to cover several meetings. As far as possible, the arrangement chosen should enable the study groups meeting during the period to exchange any information they may require without delay. Furthermore, it should enable sp

23、ecialists from all over the world in the same or related subjects to have direct contacts with each other of benefit to their organizations. It should likewise enable the specialists concerned to avoid leaving their home countries too often. 1.1.4 The timetable of meetings shall be prepared and comm

24、unicated to participating bodies well in advance (one year), to give them time to study problems and submit contributions within the prescribed time-limits and to give TSB time to distribute the contributions. In this way, study group chairmen and delegates will be given the opportunity to consider

25、the contributions in advance, thus helping to make meetings more efficient and reduce their length. A study group chairman, in conjunction with the Director, may schedule short additional study group or working party meetings for the purpose of making the consent, determination or decision, as appro

26、priate, on a draft new or revised Recommendation. 1.1.5 Subject to physical and budgetary limitations and in consultation with the Director, the work of the study groups should be on a continuous basis and dissociated from the interval between world telecommunication standardization assemblies (WTSA

27、). 1.2 Coordination of work 1.2.1 A joint coordination activity (JCA) may be formed to coordinate work relating to more than one study group. Its primary role is to harmonize planned work effort in terms of subject matter, time-frames for meetings and publication goals (see clause 2.2). 1.3 Preparat

28、ion of studies and meetings 1.3.1 At the beginning of each study period, an organization proposal and an action plan for the study period shall be prepared by each study group chairman with the help of TSB. The plan should take into account any priorities and coordination arrangements recommended by

29、 the Telecommunication Standardization Advisory Group (TSAG) or decided by WTSA. 2 Rec. ITU-T A.1 (10/2016) How the proposed action plan is implemented will depend upon the contributions received from the members of ITU-T and the views expressed by participants in the meetings. 1.3.2 A collective le

30、tter with an agenda of the meeting, a draft work plan and a listing of the Questions or proposals under the general areas of responsibility to be examined shall be prepared by TSB with the help of the chairman. The work plan should state which items are to be studied on each day, but it must be rega

31、rded as subject to change in the light of the rate at which work proceeds. Chairmen should try to follow it as far as possible. This collective letter should be received by bodies participating in the activities of particular ITU-T study groups, as far as practicable, two months before the beginning

32、 of the meeting. The collective letter shall include registration information for these bodies to indicate participation in the meeting. Each Member State administration, Sector Member, Associate and regional or international organization should send to TSB a list of its participants at least one mo

33、nth before the start of the meeting. In the event that names cannot be provided, the expected number of participants should be indicated. Such information will facilitate the registration process and the timely preparation of registration materials. Individuals who attend the meeting without pre-reg

34、istration may experience a delay in receiving their documents. If the meeting in question has not been previously planned and scheduled, a collective letter should be received at least three months before the meeting. 1.3.3 If an insufficient number of contributions or notification of contributions

35、has been submitted, no meeting should be held. The decision whether to cancel a meeting or not shall be taken by the Director, in agreement with the chairman of the study group or working party concerned. 1.4 Conduct of meetings 1.4.1 The chairman shall direct the debates during the meeting, with th

36、e assistance of TSB. 1.4.2 The chairman is authorized to decide that there shall be no discussion on Questions on which insufficient contributions have been received. 1.4.3 Questions which have not elicited any contributions should not be placed on the final agenda of the meeting, and according to p

37、rovisions of 7.4.1 of WTSA Resolution 1, may be deleted if no contributions have been received for the previous two study group meetings. 1.4.4 Study groups and working parties may set up working teams (which should be as small as possible and are subject to the normal rules of the study group or wo

38、rking party) during their meetings, to study Questions allocated to those study groups and working parties. 1.4.5 For projects involving more than one study group, baseline documents may be prepared in order to provide the basis for coordinated study among the various study groups. The term “baselin

39、e document“ refers to a document which contains the elements of common agreement at a given point in time. 1.4.6 Chairmen will ask, during each meeting, whether anyone has knowledge of patents or software copyrights, the use of which may be required to implement the Recommendation being considered.

40、The fact that the question was asked shall be recorded in the working party or study group meeting report, along with any affirmative responses. 1.4.7 Study groups shall establish and maintain a work programme, which includes target dates for consenting or determining each draft Recommendation. The

41、work programme is available in a database which is searchable from the study group website. For each work item under development, the database contains the Recommendation number (or provisional mnemonic designation), the title, scope, editor, timing, priority, identification of any liaison relations

42、hips, any editor assigned, the location of the most recent text, the approval process, and the status for documents in the approval Rec. ITU-T A.1 (10/2016) 3 process. The database is updated to reflect progress or completion of work, re-planning of in-progress items, or addition of new work items.

43、The decision to add a new work item to the work programme should be documented in the report of the meeting using the template in Annex A. Note that this may not be necessary to document the continuation of existing work (e.g., an amendment or revision of an existing Recommendation). A work item may

44、 be considered for discontinuation from the work programme if it has not given rise to any contribution in the time interval of the previous two study group meetings. 1.5 Liaison statements 1.5.1 The following information shall be included in liaison statements prepared at study group, working party

45、 or rapporteur group meetings. When necessary, between scheduled meetings, the liaison statement may be prepared by an appropriate correspondence process and approved by the study group chairman in consultation with the study group management team. List the appropriate Question numbers of the origin

46、ating and destination study groups. Identify the study group, working party or rapporteur group meeting at which the liaison statement was prepared. Include a concise title appropriate to the subject matter. If this is in reply to a liaison statement, make this clear, e.g., “Reply to liaison stateme

47、nt from (source and date) concerning .“. Identify the study group(s) and working party(ies) (if known) or other standards organizations to which it has been sent. (A liaison statement can be sent to more than one organization.) Indicate the level of approval, e.g., study group or working party, or s

48、tate that the liaison statement has been agreed at a rapporteur group meeting. Indicate if the liaison statement is sent for action or comment or information. (If sent to more than one organization, indicate this for each one.) If action is requested, indicate the date by which a reply is required.

49、Include the name and address of the contact person. The text of the liaison statement should be concise and clear, using a minimum of jargon. An example of the information required in a liaison statement is shown in Figure 1-1. 4 Rec. ITU-T A.1 (10/2016) Figure 1-1 Example of the information required in a liaison statement 1.5.2 Liaison statements should be forwarded to the appropriate destinations as soon after the meeting as possible. Copies of all liaison statements should also be sent to the chairmen of the study groups and working parties involve