大学英语六级274及答案解析.doc
《大学英语六级274及答案解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《大学英语六级274及答案解析.doc(28页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、大学英语六级 274及答案解析(总分:428.04,做题时间:132 分钟)一、Part I Writing (3(总题数:1,分数:30.00)1.For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a short essay entitled Should High School Students Study Abroad? You should write at least 150 words following the outline given below: (分数:30.00)_二、Part II Reading C(总题数:1,分
2、数:71.00)Animal tests More than a cosmetic (化妆品) change Every time you reach for an eye-drop or reapply a lip salve, you do be so confident that the chemicals they contain are safe to use. But the toxicology (毒物学) tests on which regulators rely to gather this information are largely based on wasteful
3、 and often poorly predictive animal experiments. Efforts in Europe are about to change this, and the man charged with bringing toxicology into the twenty-first century is a plain-talking German: Thomas Hartung. Although Hartung acknowledges the immense challenges ahead, he sees this as an opportunit
4、y for toxicology “to turn itself at last into a respectable science“. Three years ago, when Hartung became director of the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) in Ispra, Italy. ECVAM was set up in 1993 to support European Union policy aimed at reducing the number of anim
5、als used in regulatory testing. The centre, which sits on the sleepy shores of Lake Maggiore in the Italian Alps, originally had ten members of staff and faced an uphill struggle to cut back the millions of animal tests carried out in Europe every year. Then in 2003, two major policy changes were an
6、nounced from above, increasing the pressure on the centres labs. ECVAM found itself facing an unexpectedly short deadline for delivering a slew of animal-free methods for testing chemical toxicity. Rule change The first change was to the European Unions Cosmetics Directive, which phases out over ten
7、 years the use of animals in cosmetics testing. A short while later, the European Commission proposed its controversial REACH legislation (Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals). Europe produces some 30,000 chemicals for which toxicity data have never been registered. REACH aims to
8、 make registration mandatory for both future and existing chemicals even those that have been on the market for decades. If, as expected, the REACH directive is approved next year, it will come into effect in 2007. Animal-welfare groups fear that this will mean millions more animals will be used in
9、tests to meet the regulatory requirements. And industry claims that the testing process could cost billions of euros. Almost overnight, industrys interest in cheaper, animal-free testing skyrocketed. Last month ECVAM was put in charge of developing, with industry and regulatory agencies, the testing
10、 strategies for REACH. Now commanding 50 staff, Hartung is rising to the challenge. “The toxicity tests that have been used for decades are simply bad science“, he explains. “We now have an opportunity to start with a clean slate and develop evidence-based tests that have true predictive value.“ Man
11、y of the animal tests used today were developed under crisis conditions. The notorious Draize test, which assesses the irritation or damage caused by chemicals simply by putting them into the eyes of rabbits, is a prime example. It was developed by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1944 after r
12、eports in the 1930s that some cosmetics were causing permanent eye injuries. One 38-year-old woman had gone blind after dyeing her lashes with Lash-Lure, a product that contained a derivative of coal tar. Then came the calamity of thalidomide (镇静剂), which was given to pregnant women in the late 1950
13、s to control morning sickness, but which caused horrific birth defects. By this time, governments were highly sensitive to public concerns and called on their authorities to develop animal-based tests that would predict all conceivable toxic effects of drugs and chemicals. The principles behind most
14、 of those tests remain more or less unchanged today. Safety catch Each chemical that goes through the multiple tests required for registration can use up to 5,000 animals or 12,000 if the chemical is a pesticide. The cost of doing this for the 30,000 unregistered chemicals so that they comply with R
15、EACH has been estimated at between 5 billion (US$6 billion) and 10 billion. In the decade since ECVAM was established, the number of animals used in toxicology testing has fallen slightly, although it still hovers at about one million per year. This reduction is a result of the refinement of existin
16、g tests, and the introduction of some alternative methods that rely on in vitro (试管) tests using cell cultures. ECVAM believes that it can halve the total number of animals used for regulatory testing within a decade. It has just completed its first large-scale validation study of an in vitro cytoto
17、xicity test, which monitors death of cultured cells following short-term exposure to a chemical. Chemicals shown to be harmful in this test would be excluded from any LD50 animal tests. At least 70% of the chemicals registered in the past two decades fall into this category, says Hartung. And this i
18、s just the beginning. Poor prediction Most animal tests over-or under-estimate toxicity, or simply dont mirror toxicity in humans very well. The relevant industries also acknowledges the poor quality of those tests. Take the embryotoxicity test in which chemicals are fed to pregnant animals and the
19、fates of their embryos, and the progeny of two subsequent generations, are studied. “Animal embryotoxicity tests are not reliably predictive for humans,“ says Horst Spielmann, a toxicologist at the Federal Institute for Risk Assessment in Berlin. “When we find that cortisone is embryotoxic in all sp
20、ecies tested except human, what are we supposed to make of them?“ The same goes for cancer. To test a single chemical for its potential to cause cancer takes five years and involves 400 rats, each of which is treated with the maximum tolerated dose. It is dramatically over-predictive: more than 50%
21、of the results are positive, of which 90% are false positive. Yet the number of compounds proved to be carcinogenic to humans is very low the International Agency for Research on Cancer in Lyons, France, has identified just 95 proven and 66 probable human carcinogens (致癌物质). Life or death Scientists
22、 also cannot assume that in vitro alternatives are automatically better, says Spielmann. In 1971, a comparison of animal Draize tests in different labs revealed the test to be hopelessly non-reproducible. But Spielmanns 1995 study of animal-free alternatives to the Draize test showed that they were
23、equally unreliable. Since then the in vitro tests have been standardized, and they are intrinsically more reproducible. “Although reproducibility and relevance are not the same thing,“ Spielmann cautions. Relevance requires a good match between the test results and human data. At an ECVAM workshop i
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 大学 英语六级 274 答案 解析 DOC
