[考研类试卷]考研英语(翻译)模拟试卷2及答案与解析.doc
《[考研类试卷]考研英语(翻译)模拟试卷2及答案与解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《[考研类试卷]考研英语(翻译)模拟试卷2及答案与解析.doc(9页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、考研英语(翻译)模拟试卷 2 及答案与解析Part CDirections: Read the following text carefully and then translate the underlined segments into Chinese. (10 points) 0 Scientists are supposed to change their minds.【F1】Having adopted their views on scientific questions based on an objective evaluation of empirical evidence,
2、 they are expected to willingly, even eagerly, abandon cherished beliefs when new evidence undermines them. So it is remarkable that so few of the essays in a new book in which scientists answer the question in the title, “What Have You Changed Your Mind About?“ express anything like this ideal.Many
3、 of the changes of mind are just changes of opinion or an evolution of values. One contributor, a past supporter of manned spaceflight, now thinks its pointless, while another no longer has moral objections to cognitive enhancement through drugs. Other changes of mind have to do with broken predicti
4、ons, such as that computer intelligence would soon rival humans.【 F2】Rare, however, are changes of mind by scientists identified with either side of a controversial issue. There is no one who rose to fame arguing that a disease is caused by sticky brain plaques and who has now been convinced by evid
5、ence that the plaques are mostly innocent bystanders, not crimes. But really, we shouldnt be surprised.【F3】Advocates of a particular viewpoint, especially if their reputation is based on the accuracy of that viewpoint, cling to it like a shipwrecked man to floats. Studies that undermine that positio
6、n, they say, are fatally flawed.In truth, no study is perfect, so it would be crazy to abandon an elegant, well supported theory because one new finding undermines it.【F4】 But its fascinating how scientists with an intellectual stake in a particular side of a debate tend to see flaws in studies that
7、 undermine their dearly held views, and to interpret and even ignore “facts“ to fit their views. No wonder the historian Thomas Kuhn concluded almost 50 years ago that a scientific paradigm falls down only when the last of its powerful advocates dies. The few essays in which scientists do admit they
8、 were wrongand about something central to their reputation therefore stand out.【F5】Physicist Marcelo Gleiser of Dartmouth breaks ranks with almost every physicist since Einstein, and with his own younger self, in now doubting that the laws of nature can be unified in a single elegant formulation. Gl
9、eiser has written dozens of papers proposing routes to the unification of gravity and quantum mechanics through everything from superstrings to extra dimensions, but now concedes that “all attempts so far have failed. “ Unification may be esthetically appealing, but its not how nature works.1 【F1】2
10、【F2】3 【F3】4 【F4】5 【F5】5 Some great men insist that education should he confined to some particular and narrow end, and should issue in some definite work, which can he weighed and measured.【F1】They argue as if every thing, as well as every person, had its price; and that where there has been a great
11、 expenditure, they have a right to expect a return in kind. This they call making education and instruction “useful,“ and “Utility“ becomes their watchword.【 F2】With a fundamental principle of this nature, they very naturally go on to ask, what there is to show for the expense of a University and wh
12、at is the real worth in the market of the article called “a Liberal Education,“ on the supposition that it does not teach us definitely how to advance our manufactures, or to improve our lands, or to better our civil economy.Such then is the enunciation of the theory of utility in education.【F3】Cert
13、ainly it is apparently right to contend that nothing is worth pursuing but what is useful, and that life is not long enough to expend upon interesting, or curious, or brilliant trifles. In one sense, I will grant it is true; but, if so, how do I propose directly to meet the objection? I have really
14、met it already, in laying down, that intellectual culture is its own end; for what has its end in itself, has its use in itself also. 1 say, if a Liberal Education consists in the culture of the intellect, and if that culture be in itself a good, here, without going further, is an answer to the ques
15、tion; for if a healthy body is a good in itself, why is not a healthy intellect?【F4】If a College of Physicians is a useful institution, because it contemplates bodily health, why is not an Academical Body, though it were simply and solely engaged in imparting vigor and beauty and grasp to the intell
16、ectual portion of our nature?Let us take “useful,“ in its proper and popular sense, meaning not what is simply good, but what tends to be good, or is the instrument of good, “Good“ indeed means one thing, and “useful“ means another; but I lay it down as a principle, that, though the useful is not al
17、ways good, the good is always useful.【F5】If the intellect is so excellent a portion of us, and its cultivation so excellent, it is not only beautiful, perfect, admirable, and noble in itself, but in a true and high sense it must be useful to the possessor and to all around him.6 【F1】7 【F2】8 【F3】9 【F
18、4】10 【F5】10 Cities, the largest of human-made environments, have historically always assumed a dominant role in cultural issues. Each city of the past embodied a unique local culture, reflected in many ways.【F1】Physically, this uniqueness is seen in the architecture and street patterns of cities whi
19、ch have been preserved and maintained; archeological diggings also revealed it in those that have perished. As specialization developed and facilitated commerce, and thus a more interdependent world began to evolve, this uniqueness began to exhibit a similarity of environmental designs.【F2 】More rec
20、ently, to accommodate an accelerating population increase, entire new cities are built, and old cities are rebuilt and major additions made. These reveal the universal appeal of results of science, technology, industrialization and the accompanying economic rationale for planning these environments.
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 考研 试卷 英语 翻译 模拟 答案 解析 DOC
