ASTM E2666-2009 Standard Practice for Correlations of Mu Values of Continuous Friction Measurement Equipment to Determine Maintenance Levels for Use at Airports《根据连续摩擦测量设备穆值的相关性来确定.pdf

《ASTM E2666-2009 Standard Practice for Correlations of Mu Values of Continuous Friction Measurement Equipment to Determine Maintenance Levels for Use at Airports《根据连续摩擦测量设备穆值的相关性来确定.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ASTM E2666-2009 Standard Practice for Correlations of Mu Values of Continuous Friction Measurement Equipment to Determine Maintenance Levels for Use at Airports《根据连续摩擦测量设备穆值的相关性来确定.pdf（4页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Designation: E 2666 09Standard Practice forCorrelations of Mu Values of Continuous FrictionMeasurement Equipment to Determine Maintenance Levelsfor Use at Airports1This standard is issued under the fixed designation E 2666; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforigin

2、al adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 This practice covers the method of calculating frictionalvalues f

3、rom correlations of continuous friction measurementequipment (CFME), using the Specification E 1551 tire, for usein performing airport summer maintenance evaluations.1.2 The practice is intended to provide a unified frictionindex of levels for use in harmonizing the output of devices.1.3 Airport ope

4、rators use a variety of CFMEs to assess thefriction levels of their paved runway surfaces. The measure-ments are used to determine when the surfaces should beconsidered for or subjected to maintenance. However, manyare built differently and produce different values when mea-suring the same pavement

5、surfaces. This practice provides amethod to harmonize these measurements so that the frictionvalues generated can be used to determine the maintenancerequirements as established by the operating authority.1.4 The practice provides correlations for four maintenancelevels of friction: New Design/Const

6、ruction with grooves, NewDesign/Construction without grooves, Maintenance Planning,and Minimum Acceptable.1.5 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded asstandard. No other units of measurement are included in thisstandard.1.6 ASTM International takes no position with respect tothe validity o

7、f any patent rights asserted in connection with anyitem mentioned in this standard. Users of this standard areexpressly advised that determination of the validity of any suchpatent rights, and the risk of infringement of such rights, areentirely their own responsibility.1.7 This standard does not pu

8、rport to address all of thesafety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2E

9、 1551 Specification for Special Purpose, SmoothTreadTire, Operated on Fixed Braking Slip Continuous FrictionMeasuring EquipmentE 1960 Practice for Calculating International Friction Indexof a Pavement SurfaceE 2100 Practice for Calculating the International RunwayFriction Index2.2 Related Documents3

10、FAA Advisory Circular AC/150/5320-12 Measurement,Construction, and Maintenance of Skid Resistant AirportPavement Surfaces Friction Tester Manufacturers In-struction and Servicing Manuals3. Terminology3.1 Definitions:3.1.1 brake force coeffcient (BFC), nfiltered mean of anumber of instantaneous frict

11、ion readings divided by thenormal force over a defined length.3.1.2 braking slip ratio, nratio of relative braking slipRPM to identical unbraked wheel RPM. An equivalent defini-tion is the ratio of the relative braking slip velocity to thehorizontal velocity of the wheel axle.3.1.3 continuous readin

12、g, fixed slip measuring equipment(CFME), nan apparatus that can be moved over the testsurface at the chosen test speed and that includes a test wheel,a system for retarding the test wheel and instrumentation formeasuring the resulting frictional force or the wheel torquebetween the test tire and tes

13、t surface.3.1.4 friction reading, nlongitudinal force divided bynormal load or torque on the test wheel generated by longitu-dinal force divided by load times tire radius (moment arm).1This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E17 on Vehicle -Pavement Systems and is the direct respon

14、sibility of Subcommittee E17.21 on FieldMethods for Measuring Tire Pavement Friction.Current edition approved Aug. 1, 2009. Published September 2009.2For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStanda

15、rds volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.3Available from Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), 800 IndependenceAve., SW, Washington, DC 20591, http:/www.faa.gov.1Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19

16、428-2959, United States.3.1.5 reporting length, ndefined length over which theBFC is calculated.3.1.6 standard test water film thickness, nwater flow ratedivided by the vehicle velocity times the width of application.3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:3.2.1 certifying calibration, nv

17、erification of test equip-ment, calibration equipment (separate or built-in), calibrationprocedures and equipment operation, recommended to beperformed once a year. This procedure records both as foundvalues and adjusted values.3.2.2 field calibration, nprimary force calibration or theequivalent car

18、ried out before each test or series of tests by atrained operator using calibration equipment supplied by themanufacturer.3.2.3 routine friction testing, nmeasurement of the fric-tion of a surface under standardized test conditions, whichnormally includes a standard test speed and a rate of water fl

19、owwhich gives a standard test water film thickness.3.2.4 test tire, nstandard tire for pavement friction testing.3.3 Acronyms:3.3.1 CVcoefficient of variation (standard deviation di-vided by the mean).3.3.2 CFMEcontinuous friction measuring equipment.3.3.3 EF60device estimate of the IFI F60.3.3.4 F6

20、0IFI F60 as per Practice E 1960.3.3.5 FM60IFI F60 maintenance level from the originalMuMeter Mark II.3.3.6 FR60FR65(S) adjusted to a slip speed of 60 km/hr.3.3.7 FR65(S)CFME measurement at 65 Km/hr at its slipspeed, S.3.3.8 FR95(S)CFME measurement at 95 Km/hr at its slipspeed, S.3.3.9 FBS(60)back ca

21、lculation for the device from the IFIvalue F60 giving by the friction classification calculated fromthe Mu Meter.3.3.10 FB65(S)FBS adjusted for speed from 60 km/hr tothe devices slip speed (S) at 65 km/hr, and is the value that theCFME must measure to meet a maintenance level.3.3.11 IFIinternational

22、 friction index (Practice E 2100)with values F60 and Sp.3.3.12 MPDmean profile depth.3.3.13 MTDmean texture depth.3.3.14 SpIFI speed gradient as per Practice E 1960.3.3.15 SD ERRstandard error.3.3.16 SMpspeed gradient for a maintenance level thatgoes with FM60.4. Summary of Practice4.1 Since the ben

23、chmark (FAAs Mark II Mu Meter) wasretired in early 1990s, a new measure of friction had to befound that could be correlated back to the Boeing 727 frictionrequirements for the different maintenance levels. Fifteen yearsof NASA Wallops testing data was studied to find a measurethat could be related t

24、o the Mark II Mu Meter. Of all thefriction measurements made since 1993, only the InternationalFriction Index (IFI)4(1, 2)5F60 values were found to be stableand repeatable over the 15 years. To establish a correlationbetween 1990 based values and the present, the IFI wasemployed. The IFI was develop

25、ed to compare and harmonizefriction measurements taken with different equipment to acommon calibrated index expressed as calibrated wet frictionat 60 km/h (F60) and the speed constant (Sp). Using data froma 1993 NASAfriction workshop, the FAAs Mark II Mu Meterwas used to determine the IFI friction v

26、alues, called FM60 andSMp, associated with each of the maintenance classifications.These IFI friction values which are now fixed in time and canbe used from 1993 forward to determine what a CFME mustmeasure to satisfy each of the maintenance classifications.4.2 A CFME is calibrated to IFI per Practi

27、ce E 1960. TheIFI constant values (A and B) found for the CFME are used todetermine what the CFMEs must measure (FB65(S) for eachmaintenance classification.4.3 The FB65(S) for each classification of maintenance isthen the friction level that CFME must measure to meet themaintenance level at 65km/hr.

28、4.4 A second order regression is made from the CFMEmeasurements (FR65(S) at 65 km/hr to its measurements(FR95(S) on the same surfaces at 95 km/hr.4.5 The second order regression constants (A, B and C) arethen used to convert the 65 km/hr (40 mph) maintenance levelsto 95 km/hr levels.4.6 At least 5 r

29、uns should be made on at least 5 surfaces,whose friction levels cover the range of 0.2 to 0.7. Each surfaceshall be uniform in friction and texture. However; it isrecommended that if more than five surfaces are available theyshould be used.5. Significance and Use5.1 IntroductionMu numbers (friction

30、values) measuredby CFME can be used as guidelines for evaluating the surfacefriction deterioration of runway pavements and for identifyingappropriate corrective actions required for safe aircraft opera-tions. The original levels were based on the work of theFAA/AS-90-1 (3). The report states that ba

31、sed on frictionvalues from a Mu Meter Mark II using Dunlop tires, and testsconducted by NASA in the 1970s using a Boeing 727, Table 1of Mu Meter friction level classifications for runway pavementsurfaces was established for friction measurements at testspeeds of 65 Km/hr. Additionally, tests were co

32、nducted againwith the Mu Meter Mark II outfitted with the Dico tire at 95Km/h. Then a second order correlation was performed for the4An ASTM International Standard methodology specified by Practice E 1960International Friction Index (IFI).5The boldface numbers in parentheses refer to a list of refer

33、ences at the end ofthis standard.TABLE 1 Original Mu Meter Friction Classifications of RunwayPavement Surfaces for 65 km/hr Test SpeedMu Value Classification40 Minimum50 Maintenance Planning70 New Design/ConstructionE2666092Mu Meter operating at 95 Km/h and at 65 Km/h resulting in thevalues shown in

34、Table 2.These values were then fixed and usedwith correlations of other CFMEs to establish the presentmaintenance levels given in Table 3.2 of FAA AdvisoryCircularAC/150/5320-12. From the Wallops 1993 data, the IFIvalues were calculated and the 65 Km/hr data in Table 2 wasused to calculate the FM60

35、value for each level. The data forthe two speeds for the four CFMEs in the FAA report (3) wereused to establish the SMp values for each level. Then a newlevel, New Grooved, was added based on the differences ofgrooved and un-grooved sites at the NASA Wallops testfacility. Table 3 is a list of these

36、values to be the standardvalues FM60 and SMp for any future calibration of CFME.5.2 AirportsRoutine testing is carried out in order toobtain data for scheduling remedial work on the runwaysurface. A single run on either side of the centerline may beregarded as sufficient or a set of runs covering th

37、e whole widthof the runway may be preferred. At 3m spacing, the frictionmap which can be prepared from a set of runs of this kindprovides excellent information on rubber buildup and surfacepolishing. Standard test speeds are typically 65 km/hr or 95km/hr and standard test water film thickness is typ

38、ically 1 mm.6. Method for Determining CFME Friction Levels at 65km/hrNOTE 1All calculations here are in Km/hr.6.1 The CFMEs slip speed is determined by multiplying theslip ratio times the vehicle speed of 65 km/h.S 5 Slip Ratio 3 65 or % Slip 365100(1)6.2 Following Practice E 1960, the FR60 value (f

39、or eachcalibration site tested) is calculated from the CFME measure-ment at 65 km/h called the FRS65. The Sp is calculated fromthe MPD measured for that site during calibration and S is per6.1.FR60 5 FRS65 3 expSS260!SPD(2)6.3 Again per Practice E 1960, a linear correlation of FR60with F60 measured

40、for all sites is performed to get thecorrelation constants (A and B), as well as the value of R2andthe standard error, SD ERR.F60 5 A 1 B 3 FR60 (3)6.4 Using the FM60 values from the original Mu MeterMark II given in Table 3, the procedure is reversed using Eq1-3 (with theAand B obtained in Section

41、6.3) to get the valuesfor the CFME (FB65(S) for that maintenance level at 65Km/hr as follows:6.4.1 First the back calculation FB60 is found from revers-ing the calculation of Eq 3 and using the A and B determined.FB60 5FM60 A!B(4)6.4.2 Then the value that the CFME must measure for thatFM60 maintenan

42、ce level is calculated from:FB65S! 5 FB60 expS602S!SMpD(5)where:FR65(S) = the CFME measurement at 65 km/h at its slipspeed, S to meet that maintenance level,Sp = the speed constant measured for the site duringcalibration per Practice E 1960,FR60 = FR65(S) adjusted to a slip speed of 60 Km/hr,FB60 =

43、the back calculation for the device from the IFIvalue FM60 giving by the Friction Classifica-tion calculated from the Mu Meter, Table 3,FB65(S) = FB60 adjusted for speed from 60 Km/hr to thedevices slip speed (S) at 65 km/h, and is thevalue for the CFME must measure to meet thatmaintenance level.SMp

44、 = the speed gradient given in Table 3 for themaintenance level being calculated.7. Method for Determining CFME Friction Levels at 95Km/hrNOTE 2This method is what was used by the FAA (3) to establish thepresent Table 3.2 at 95 Km/hr.7.1 A second order regression is made from the CFMEmeasurements FR

45、S65 at 65 km/hr to FRS95. Use the CFMEmeasurements on the same surfaces at 95 km/hr to find theregression constants a, b and c.Also, R2and SD ERR are to becalculated.FRS95 5 a 1 b 3 FRS65 1 c 3 FRS652(6)7.2 The second order regression is then used to convert the65 km/hr maintenance levels, FB65(S),

46、to 95 km/hr levelsFB95(S).FB95S! 5 a 1 b 3 FB65S! 1 c 3 FB65S!2(7)8. Report8.1 The test report for each test surface shall contain thefollowing items:8.1.1 Date of friction and texture profile measurement,8.1.2 Number of surfaces used for correlation,8.1.3 Location and identification of the test sur

47、face,8.1.4 Description of the surface types,8.1.5 Observations of surface condition such as excessivecracking, potholes, etc,TABLE 2 Mu Meter Friction Classifications with a Dico Tire ofRunway Pavement Surfaces for 65 km/hr and 95 km/hr TestSpeedMu Value65 km/hr 95 km/hr Classification42 26 Minimum5

48、2 38 Maintenance Planning72 66 New Design/ConstructionTABLE 3 Recommended Friction Classification Levels from theMu Meter for 65 km/hr65 km/hr Mu Meter FR65(S) SMp km/h FM60Minimum 0.42 77 0.289Maintenance 0.52 120 0.370Construction 0.72 161 0.493New Grooved 01.00 185 0.547E26660938.1.6 The position

49、 of the friction measurement and profileon the surface, for example in relation to the wheel track, etc,8.1.7 Identification of the friction and texture profile equip-ment and its operators,8.1.8 Measurement speed,8.1.9 Percentage of invalid readings eliminated,8.1.10 Total length measured and the number of segmentsanalyzed,8.1.11 The IFI values, F60 and Sp for each test site,8.1.12 The FR65(S) and FR95(S) for each test site,8.1.13 The CFME friction level (FB65(S) for the fourmaintenance levels for 65 km/hr and the R2, SD ERR, and CV