ASTM E1488-2012e1 Standard Guide for Statistical Procedures to Use in Developing and Applying Test Methods《研制和运用试验方法用的统计程序的标准指南》.pdf

《ASTM E1488-2012e1 Standard Guide for Statistical Procedures to Use in Developing and Applying Test Methods《研制和运用试验方法用的统计程序的标准指南》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ASTM E1488-2012e1 Standard Guide for Statistical Procedures to Use in Developing and Applying Test Methods《研制和运用试验方法用的统计程序的标准指南》.pdf（8页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Designation: E1488 121An American National StandardStandard Guide forStatistical Procedures to Use in Developing and ApplyingTest Methods1This standard is issued under the fixed designation E1488; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case

2、 of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1NOTEEditorial corrections were made to 3.1.25 in April 2013.1. Scope1.1 This guide identifies statistic

3、al procedures for use indeveloping new test methods or revising or evaluating existingtest methods, or both.1.2 This guide also cites statistical procedures especiallyuseful in the application of test methods.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2E177 Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and

4、 Bias inASTM Test MethodsE178 Practice for Dealing With Outlying ObservationsE456 Terminology Relating to Quality and StatisticsE691 Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study toDetermine the Precision of a Test MethodE1169 Practice for Conducting Ruggedness TestsE1402 Guide for Sampling Desig

5、nE2282 Guide for Defining the Test Result of a Test MethodE2489 Practice for Statistical Analysis of One-Sample andTwo-Sample Interlaboratory Proficiency Testing ProgramsE2554 Practice for Estimating and Monitoring the Uncer-tainty of Test Results of a Test Method in a SingleLaboratory Using a Contr

6、ol Sample ProgramE2586 Practice for Calculating and Using Basic StatisticsE2587 Practice for Use of Control Charts in StatisticalProcess ControlE2655 Guide for Reporting Uncertainty of Test Results andUse of the Term Measurement Uncertainty in ASTM TestMethods3. Terminology3.1 DefinitionsFor a more

7、extensive list of terms in E11standards, see Terminology E456.3.1.1 bias, nthe difference between the expectation of thetest results and an accepted reference value. E1773.1.1.1 DiscussionStatistical procedures include the sam-pling considerations or the experiment design for the collectionof data,

8、or both, and the numerical and graphical approaches tosummarize and analyze the collected data.3.1.2 coeffcient of variation, CV, nfor a nonnegativecharacteristic, the ratio of the standard deviation to the meanfor a population or sample. E25863.1.3 component of variance, na part of a total variance

9、identified with a specified source of variability.3.1.4 control chart, nchart on which are plotted a statis-tical measure of a subgroup versus time of sampling along withlimits based on the statistical distribution of that measure so asto indicate how much common, or chance, cause variation isinhere

10、nt in the process or product. E25873.1.5 observation, nthe process of obtaining informationregarding the presence or absence of an attribute of a testspecimen, or of making a reading on a characteristic ordimension of a test specimen. E22823.1.6 observed value, nthe value obtained by making anobserv

11、ation. E22823.1.7 precision, nthe closeness of agreement betweenindependent test results obtained under stipulated conditions.E1773.1.8 proficiency testing, ndetermination of laboratorytesting performance by means of interlaboratory comparisons.E24893.1.9 repeatability, nprecision under repeatabilit

12、y condi-tions. E1773.1.10 repeatability conditions, nconditions where inde-pendent test results are obtained with the same method onidentical test items in the same laboratory by the same operatorusing the same equipment within short intervals of time. E1771This guide is under the jurisdiction of AS

13、TM Committee E11 on Quality andStatistics and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E11.20 on Test MethodEvaluation and Quality Control.Current edition approved Aug. 1, 2012. Published September 2012. Originallyapproved in 1992. Last previous edition approved in 2009 as E1488 09. DOI:10.1520/

14、E1488-12E01.2For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Dri

15、ve, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States13.1.11 repeatability limit r, nthe value below which theabsolute difference between two individual test results obtainedunder repeatability conditions may be expected to occur with aprobability of approximately 0.95 (95 %). E1773.1.12

16、repeatability standard deviation, sr,nthe standarddeviation of test results obtained under repeatability condi-tions. E1773.1.13 reproducibility, nprecision under reproducibilityconditions. E1773.1.14 reproducibility conditions, nconditions where testresults are obtained with the same method on iden

17、tical testitems in different laboratories with different operators usingdifferent equipment. E1773.1.15 reproducibility limit, R, nthe value below whichthe absolute difference between two test results obtained underreproducibility conditions may be expected to occur with aprobability of approximatel

18、y 0.95 (95 %). E1773.1.16 reproducibility standard deviation, sR,nthe stan-dard deviation of test results obtained under reproducibilityconditions. E1773.1.17 ruggedness, ninsensitivity of a test method todepartures from specified test or environmental conditions.E11693.1.18 ruggedness test, na plan

19、ned experiment in whichenvironmental factors or test conditions are deliberately variedin order to evaluate the effects of such variation. E11693.1.19 standard deviation, nof a population, , the squareroot of the average or expected value of the squared deviationof a variable from its mean of a samp

20、le x, the square root ofthe sum of the squared deviations of the observed values in thesample divided by the sample size minus 1. E25863.1.20 state of statistical control, nprocess conditionwhen only common causes are operating on the process. E25873.1.21 statistical procedures, nthe organized techn

21、iquesand methods used to collect, analyze, and interpret data.3.1.21.1 DiscussionStatistical procedures include thesampling considerations or the experiment design for thecollection of data, or both, and the numerical and graphicalapproaches to summarize and analyze the collected data.3.1.22 test de

22、termination, nthe value of a characteristic ordimension of a single test specimen derived from one or moreobserved values. E22823.1.23 test method, na definitive procedure that producesa test result. E22823.1.24 test observation, nsee observation. E22823.1.25 test result, nthe value of a characteris

23、tic obtainedby carrying out a specified test method. E22824. Significance and Use4.1 The creation of a standardized test method generallyfollows a series of steps from inception to approval andongoing use. In all such stages there are questions of how wellthe test method performs.4.1.1 Assessments o

24、f a new or existing test method gener-ally involve statistical planning and analysis. This standardrecommends what approaches may be taken and indicateswhich standards may be used to perform such assessments.4.2 This standard introduces a series of phases which arerecommended to be considered during

25、 the life cycle of a testmethod as depicted in Fig. 1. These begin with a design phasewhere the standard is initially prepared. A development phaseinvolves a variety of experiments that allow further refinementand understanding of how the test method performs within alaboratory. In an evaluation pha

26、se the test method is thenexamined by way of interlaboratory studies resulting in preci-sion and bias statistics which are published in the standard.Finally, the test method is subject to a monitoring phase.4.3 All ASTM test methods are required to include state-ments on precision and bias.34.4 Sinc

27、e ASTM began to require all test methods to haveprecision and bias statements that are based on interlaboratorytest methods, there has been increased concern regarding whatstatistical experiments and procedures to use during the devel-opment of the test methods. Although there exists a wide rangeof

28、statistical procedures, there is a small group of generallyaccepted techniques that are beneficial to follow. This guide isdesigned to provide a brief overview of these procedures and tosuggest an appropriate sequence of carrying out these proce-dures.4.5 Statistical procedures often result in inter

29、pretations thatare not absolutes. Sometimes the information obtained may beinadequate or incomplete, which may lead to additional ques-tions and the need for further experimentation. Informationoutside the data is also important in establishing standards andin the interpretation of numerical results

30、.5. Summary of Guide5.1 Outlined below is a suggested sequence of four phasesuseful in the development of a test method. A flowchart isprovided in Fig. 1. Such a sequence of analyses may need to bemodified in specific situations. The assistance of a qualifiedstatistician is recommended at each revie

31、w phase.5.2 Design Phase:5.2.1 This phase includes the formalization of the scope andthe significance and use sections. It may include determiningthe purpose and describing a general approach to the testmethod but usually does not involve statistical studies.5.2.2 Studies may be conducted to evaluat

32、e the basicperformance of the method. The draft test method is preparedand sampling requirements and the test result (see GuideE2282) are clearly defined.5.2.3 A flow chart is extremely valuable to identify thesequence of operations involved in a test method, for example,the sampling steps required

33、to obtain the test specimens,definition of the test determination, how a test result is to becomputed, and running the tests on the specimens.5.3 Development Phase:3See the Form and Style Manual for ASTM Standards that specifies, whenpossible, precision statements shall be estimated based on the res

34、ults of aninterlaboratory test program.E1488 12125.3.1 The test method is examined for such concerns as itsstability, ruggedness, statistical control and the contributions tovariability. The completion of this phase should result inpreliminary estimates of precision and the identification andsuggest

35、ed ways to estimate potential contributors to uncer-tainty.5.3.2 Evaluation of Short Term Control of Test MethodAtest method must exhibit an ability to provide consistent resultsat least over short time periods. Preliminary studies or a pilottest should be conducted to evaluate the short term stabil

36、ity ofthe test method. A small series of repeated tests should beconducted.5.3.3 Analysis of VariabilityStatistically designed experi-ments conducted in one or two laboratories can be used toassess the relative magnitudes of different sources or potentialcontributors to variability of the test resul

37、ts. Such studies canprovide estimates of intermediate measures of precision.5.3.4 Ruggedness TestA ruggedness test (see PracticeE1169) is a statistically designed experiment that helps identifyproblems in running the test method, clarifies errors, and pointsout possible environmental conditions, whi

38、ch may adverselyaffect the test method or point out need for tightening require-ments. The ruggedness test can assist in locating ways ofreducing variability in the test method.5.3.5 Preliminary Estimates of PrecisionFrom the variousstudies conducted in accordance with 5.3.2-5.3.4, preliminaryestima

39、tes of repeatability standard deviations should be devel-oped and published in this test method. Until an interlaboratorystudy is performed, these estimates generally are considered tobe provisional. Information on how a lab should developuncertainty estimates should also be provided.5.3.6 Statistic

40、al ControlA test method must show capa-bility of performing in a consistent way over time. The use ofcontrol charts (see Guide E2655)3to monitor a proposed, orexisting, test method over time is one recommended way toexamine the controllability or stability of a test method. Thisstatistical control s

41、hould be demonstrated in one or twolaboratories using homogeneous material (test specimen).5.4 Evaluation Phase:5.4.1 The test method is subjected to interlaboratory studiesto provide estimates of within-laboratory repeatability andbetween-laboratory reproducibility. Additional information issupplie

42、d from proficiency studies when conducted.5.4.2 Interlaboratory Study (ILS)In accordance withASTM Form and Style Manual, whenever feasible, an inter-laboratory study must be conducted. This procedure willprovide specific estimates of variation anticipated when usingthe test method.5.4.3 Protocol for

43、 the ILS, Practice E691, provides a guidefor developing the ILS for the test method. A first step is thewriting of an ILS Protocol, which will set out what needs to bedone before the test specimens (or test materials) are distrib-uted to the participating laboratories.FIG. 1 Sequence of StepsE1488 1

44、2135.4.4 Precision StatementsUsing the estimates of varia-tion obtained in the interlaboratory test, one may prepareprecision statements using Practices E691 and E177 or equiva-lent procedures.5.5 Monitoring Phase:5.5.1 After a test method is approved and in use it isimportant to ensure that the pub

45、lished precision and biasstatistics for the test method remain achievable and consistentover time or amongst different groups conducting the tests.5.5.2 Monitoring Within a Single LocationIt is importantfor any laboratory or organization that will use a particular testmethod over time that a means o

46、f monitoring to ensure themethod results using quality control samples are stable and incontrol. Regular evaluation of the uncertainty (Practice E2554)or use of a control charting method (Practice E2587) are twoways to monitor the test method.5.5.3 Between Laboratory ComparisonsProficiency test-ing

47、programs measure the typical variation amongst ordinarylaboratories. The specific laboratories involved also obtaininformation about how well they perform compared to otherlaboratories.6. Development of Test Method6.1 Proposed standards that are under development shouldbe treated in a formal manner

48、following as many of thesuggested procedures as possible. Standards that are already inexistence as approved test methods or in general practicerequire periodic review that would include selected procedures.6.2 Under DevelopmentThe development stage involvestest methods that are in the preliminary s

49、tages during whichequipment may not have been fully tested, practices are notagreed upon, and operators have yet to be adequately trained.Often this stage also applies to standards that have not yet beenapproved.6.2.1 It is essential that tests for statistical control,ruggedness, and variability analyses be conducted prior to anyinterlaboratory test programs.6.2.2 After all major environmental contributors have beenidentified, controlled, and incorporated into the test method,and after adequate standardized equipment is available, an