ASTM D2777-2006 Standard Practice for Determination of Precision and Bias of Applicable Test Methods of Committee D19 on Water《D19水委员会应用试验方法的精确性及偏差测定的标准实施规范》.pdf

《ASTM D2777-2006 Standard Practice for Determination of Precision and Bias of Applicable Test Methods of Committee D19 on Water《D19水委员会应用试验方法的精确性及偏差测定的标准实施规范》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ASTM D2777-2006 Standard Practice for Determination of Precision and Bias of Applicable Test Methods of Committee D19 on Water《D19水委员会应用试验方法的精确性及偏差测定的标准实施规范》.pdf（19页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Designation: D 2777 06Standard Practice forDetermination of Precision and Bias of Applicable TestMethods of Committee D19 on Water1This standard is issued under the fixed designation D 2777; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of re

2、vision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 This practice establishes uniform standards for estimat-ing and expressing the precision and bias

3、 of applicable testmethods for Committee D19 on Water.1.2 Except as specified in 1.3, 1.4, and 1.5, this practicerequires the task group proposing a new test method to carryout a collaborative study from which statements for precision(overall and single-operator standard-deviation estimates) andbias

4、 can be developed. This practice provides general guidanceto task groups in planning and conducting such determinationsof precision and bias.1.3 If a full-scale collaborative study is not technicallyfeasible, due to the nature of the test method or instability ofsamples, the largest feasible scaled-

5、down collaborative studyshall be conducted to provide the best possible limited basis forestimating the overall and single-operator standard deviations.1.3.1 Examples of acceptable scaled-down studies are thelocal-area studies conducted by Subcommittee D19.24 onmicrobiological methods because of inh

6、erent sample instabil-ity. These studies involve six or more completely independentlocal-area analysts who can begin analysis of uniform samplesat an agreed upon time.1.3.2 If uniform samples are not feasible under any circum-stances, a statement of single-operator precision will meet therequirement

7、s of this practice. Whenever possible, this state-ment should be developed from data generated by independentmultiple operators, each doing replicate analyses on indepen-dent samples (of a specific matrix type), which generally fallwithin specified concentration ranges (see 7.2.5.2( 3).1.3.3 This pr

8、actice is not applicable to methodology involv-ing continuous sampling or continuous measurement, or both,of specific constituents and properties.1.3.4 This practice is also not applicable to open-channelflow measurements.1.4 A collaborative study that satisfied the requirements ofthe version of thi

9、s practice in force when the study wasconducted will continue to be considered an adequate basis forthe precision-and-bias statement required in each test method.If the study does not satisfy the current minimum requirementsfor a collaborative study, a statement listing the studysdeficiencies and a

10、reference to this paragraph shall be includedin the precision-and-bias statement as the basis for an exemp-tion from the current requirements.1.5 This paragraph relates to special exemptions not clearlyacceptable under 1.3 or 1.4. With the approval of CommitteeD19 on the recommendation of the Result

11、s Advisor and theTechnical Operations Section of the Executive Subcommitteeof Committee D19, a statement giving a compelling reasonwhy compliance with all or specific points of this practicecannot be achieved will meet both ASTM requirements (1)2and the related requirements of this practice. In addi

12、tion,Committee D19, through a Main Committee ballot, mayapprove publication of a “Preliminary” Standard Method for aperiod not to exceed 5 years. Preliminary Standards mustcontain a minimum of a single-operator precision-and-biasstatement and a Quality Control section based on the singleoperator dat

13、a. Publication of a Preliminary Standard is condi-tional on the approval of a full D 2777 collaborative studydesign for the standard. Precision-and-bias statements autho-rized by this paragraph shall include the date of approval byCommittee D19.1.6 In principle, all test methods are covered by thisp

14、ractice.1.7 In Section 12 this practice shows exemplary precision-and-bias-statement formats for: (1) test methods yielding anumerical measure, (2) test methods yielding a non-numericalreport of success or failure based on criteria specified in theprocedure, and (3) test methods specifying that proc

15、edures inanother ASTM test method are to be used with only insignifi-cant modifications.1.8 All studies, even those exempt from some requirementsunder 1.3 or 1.5, shall receive approval from the ResultsAdvisor before being conducted (see Section 8) and aftercompletion (see Section 13).1This practice

16、 is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D19 on Water andis the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D19.02 on General Specifications,Technical Resources, and Statistical Methods.Current edition approved Aug. 15, 2006. Published August 2006. Originallyapproved in 1969. Last previous edition app

17、roved in 2003 as D 2777 03.2The boldface numbers in parentheses refer to the list of standards at the end ofthis practice.1Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.1.9 This practice satisfies the QC requirements of Practice D58

18、47.1.10 It is the intent of this practice that task groups makeevery effort to retain all the data from their round-robin studies.Values should not be eliminated unless solid evidence exists fortheir exclusion. The Results Advisor should work closely withthe task groups to effect this goal.2. Refere

19、nced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:3D 1129 Terminology Relating to WaterD 1141 Practice for the Preparation of Substitute OceanWaterD 1193 Specification for Reagent WaterD 4375 Practice for Basic Statistics in Committee D19 onWaterD 5790 Test Method for Measurement of Purgeable OrganicCompounds in Wat

20、er by Capillary Column GasChromatography/Mass SpectrometryD 5847 Practice for Writing Quality Control Specificationsfor Standard Test Methods for Water AnalysisD 5905 Practice for the Preparation of Substitute Wastewa-terD 6091 Practice for 99 %/95 % Interlaboratory DetectionEstimate (IDE) for Analy

21、tical Methods with NegligibleCalibration ErrorD 6512 Practice for Interlaboratory Quantitation EstimateE 177 Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias inASTM Test MethodsE 178 Practice for Dealing With Outlying ObservationsE 456 Terminology Relating to Quality and StatisticsE 1169 Guide for C

22、onducting Ruggedness Tests3. Terminology3.1 DefinitionsFor definitions of terms used in this prac-tice, refer to Terminologies D 1129, D 4375 and E 456, andPractice E 177.3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:3.2.1 accuracya measure of the degree of conformity ofa single test result gen

23、erated by a specific procedure to theassumed or accepted true value, and includes both precisionand bias.3.2.2 biasthe persistent positive or negative deviation ofthe average value of a test method from the assumed oraccepted true value.3.2.3 laboratorya single and completely independent ana-lytical

24、 system with its own specific apparatus, source ofreagents, set of internal standard-operating procedures, etc.Different laboratories will differ from each other in all of theseaspects, regardless of how physically or organizationally closethey may be to each other.3.2.4 operatorusually the individu

25、al analyst within eachlaboratory who performs the test method throughout thecollaborative study. However, for complicated test methods,the operator may be a team of individuals, each performing aspecific function throughout the study.3.2.5 precisionthe degree of agreement of repeated mea-surements o

26、f the same property, expressed in terms of disper-sion of test results about the arithmetical-mean result obtainedby repetitive testing of a homogeneous sample under specifiedconditions. The precision of a test method is expressedquantitatively as the standard deviation computed from theresults of a

27、 series of controlled determinations.4. Summary of Practice4.1 After the task group has assured itself that the testmethod has had all preliminary evaluation work completed, thetask group should prepare the test-method write-up in finalform. The plan for collaborative study is developed in accor-dan

28、ce with this practice and submitted along with the test-method write-up to the Results Advisor for concurrence exceptas specified in 1.3, 1.4, and 1.5. Upon receipt of concurrence,the collaborative test is conducted, data analyzed, andprecision-and-bias statements formulated by the task group.The fi

29、nal precision-and-bias statistics must be based on usabledata from at least six independent laboratories. The statements,with backup data including the reported-results summary, thecalculations leading up to the statements, and the test-methodwrite-up with precision-and-bias statements included are

30、sub-mitted to the subcommittee vice-chairman, who in turn sends acopy to the Results Advisor for concurrence before balloting.This procedure assures having an acceptable copy of thecollaborative-study results to send to ASTM for items on themain-committee ballot. In most instances, the collaborative

31、study shall be complete before a subcommittee ballot. If thecollaborative study is not complete, the test method may go onthe ballot as a provisional test method rather than a standardtest method. Copies of the test data, approved calculations, andstatistical results shall be filed atASTM Headquarte

32、rs when thetest method is submitted by the subcommittee chairman as anitem for the main-committee ballot.4.1.1 The appendix shows an example of “FormAApproval of Plans for Interlaboratory Testing,” as Fig.X1.1.4.1.2 For examples of data-reporting forms, see AppendixX3, 6.0.4.1.3 In addition, the app

33、endix shows a sample calculationof precision and bias from real collaborative-test data, therelated table of statistics, and the related precision-and-biasstatement.5. Significance and Use5.1 Following this practice should result in precision-and-bias statements that can be achieved by any laborator

34、y properlyusing the test method studied. These precision-and-bias state-ments provide the basis for generic limits for use in the QualityControl section of the test method.5.2 The method specifies the matrices for which the testmethod is appropriate. The collaborative test corroborates thewrite-up w

35、ithin the limitations of the test design. An extensivetest can only use representative matrices so that universalapplicability cannot be implied from the results.3For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book

36、of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.D27770625.3 The fundamental assumption of the collaborative studyis that the matrices tested, the concentrations tested, and theparticipating laboratories are a representative and fair evalua-tion of

37、 the scope and applicability of the test method as written.6. Preliminary Studies6.1 Considerable pilot work on a test method must precedethe determination of its precision and bias (2,3). This pilotwork should explore such variables as preservation require-ments, reaction time, concentration of rea

38、gents, interferences,calibration, and sample size. Potentially significant factorsmust be investigated and controlled in the written test methodin advance of the collaborative test. Also, disregard of suchfactors may introduce so much variation among operators thatresults are misleading or inconclus

39、ive (4) (see 9.3 and 9.4). Aruggedness study conducted in a single laboratory is particu-larly useful for such investigations and should be conducted toprove a test method is ready for interlaboratory testing (seeGuide E 1169 for details).6.2 Only after a proposed test method has been tried,proved,

40、and reduced to unequivocal written form should adetermination of its precision and bias be attempted.6.3 If the test method will require calculation of a detectionestimate (for example, IDE, Practice D 6091) or calculation ofa quantitation estimate (for example, IQE, Practice D 6512), orboth, then t

41、he following guidelines may be followed.6.3.1 To minimize the number of samples required, datawould be gathered in two phases:Phase ISingle-laboratory characterization. In this phase, themethod developer would run a sufficient number of samples ata sufficient number of concentrations to characterize

42、 fullyresponse vs. concentration, as well as error vs. concentration.The lowest concentration would be the level of the blank or thelowest concentration that could be measured; the highestconcentration would be at the upper limit of the analyticalrange.Phase II. Collaborative study. Using the result

43、s of Phase I,the method developer would estimate the minimum numberand the magnitude of concentrations necessary to meet therequirements of the documents of interest.7. Planning the Collaborative Test7.1 Based upon the task groups knowledge of a test methodand the unequivocal write-up, several facto

44、rs must be consid-ered in planning the collaborative test to assess the precision ofthe test method properly. The testing variables that must beconsidered in planning are discussed below. In the collabora-tive study, it is generally not acceptable to control significantsources of variability that ca

45、nnot be controlled in routine use ofthe test method, because this control leads to false estimates ofthe test-method precision and bias. In addition, the task groupmust determine within the resources available how best toestimate the bias of the test method.7.2 Testing Variables:7.2.1 It is desirabl

46、e to develop a test methods precisionstatement that indicates the contribution to overall variation ofselected causes such as laboratory, operator, sample matrix,analyte concentration, and other factors that may or have beenshown to have strong effects on the results. Since any testmethod can be tri

47、ed in only a limited number of applications,the standard deviation calculated from the results of a study canbe only an estimate of the universe standard deviation. For thisreason, the symbol s (sample standard deviation) is usedherein. The precision estimates generated from the study datawill usual

48、ly be the overall standard deviation (sT) and thepooled single-operator standard deviation (so) for each samplematrix and concentration studied.7.2.2 Laboratories, operators, sample matrices, and analyteconcentrations are the only sources of variability represented inthe precision-and-bias statement

49、s resulting from the usualcollaborative study. These sources may not represent theadditional influence that can arise from differences in samplesplitting, field preservation, transportation, etc., all of whichmay influence routine analytical results as shown in the generalprecision definitions in Terminology D 1129.7.2.3 LaboratoriesThe final precision-and-bias statisticsfor each analyte, matrix, and concentration must be based ondata from at least six laboratories that passed any outlier tests(see 10.3) (that is, usable data). To be assured of meeting thisrequirement, i