NASA NACA-TR-485-1935 The drag of airplane wheels wheel fairings and landing gears - I《飞机机轮 机轮整流罩和起落架的阻力 I》.pdf
《NASA NACA-TR-485-1935 The drag of airplane wheels wheel fairings and landing gears - I《飞机机轮 机轮整流罩和起落架的阻力 I》.pdf》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《NASA NACA-TR-485-1935 The drag of airplane wheels wheel fairings and landing gears - I《飞机机轮 机轮整流罩和起落架的阻力 I》.pdf(30页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、REPORT No. 485THE DRAG OF AIRPLANE WHEELS, WHEEL FAIRINGS, AND LANDINGGEARS-IBY mLLTAM E HEBBNsmm, Jr. ad DAVID BIQLMANNWJMMARYTe8t8 were made in the 7- by X)-foot m“nd tumndand in the f?O-foot tunnel of the iVatM AdvisoryCom those in the 7- by 10-foot tunnel weremzde a-t air speede up to 0 miik per
2、 hour and t7w8ein the i?O-foot tunml were low-premure wheei% adtire8 maybe wed the proper wheel faihg mm.yredwce thedrag due to a landing gear me than any other re-fhlP#lt;fdtingOfand zunding g88 halving a L?lk3 supporting 8t7Wthave ks drag than my other types of nonretraetimJgears. Ao, the theaerod
3、ynamic interference between wheels and struts;the drag of a wheel with various wheel fairings; thethe drag of difkttypes of larding gears; the effect of wings and aradial air-cooled engine on landing-gear drag; the ef-f ect of changes in pitch angle on landing-gear drag;and the effect of various mod
4、ifications to landingjggarson their drag. From these data an analysis oflanding-gem drag was made and an indication of the10wA drag obtainable with a nonretracting landinggear obtained. The investigation included tests of5 pes of wheels, 6 types of wheel fairings with 8modifications, and 22 differen
5、t lanclhg gears -with atotal of 55 moditkations to these gears.All the landing gears tested were attached to anopen-cockpit fuselage and the tests were made withoutpropeller slipstream. Most of the test-swere made at0 pitch angle and without wings or an enggineattached to the fuselage. Howeverj the
6、effects ofwings, of a radial air-cooled engine with and without193Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-. .194 REPORT NATIONAL ADVTSOBY (JOMMITTEE FOB AEBONAUTI(YScowling, and of pitch Me on a number of diilerentlanding gears were measured.
7、The IanO-gear program has been extended to in-clude tests on other pes of landing gears, the resultsof which will be presented in subsequentreports.APPARATUS AND METHODSTUNNELSThe 7- by 10-foot wind tunnel, in which a part ofthe lanw-gear dpg investigation was made, is fullydescribed in reference 4.
8、 The standard force-testmodel support was used. Tests were made in thistunnel to determine the drag of whids, the aerody-namic interference between wheels and struts, thedrag of the 8.50-10 wheel with various wheel fairings,the drag of half of landing gear 2a with variousmodiikationsj and the drag o
9、f the 8.50-10 wheel andhalf of landing gear 2a in yaw.The 20-foot propeller-research wind tunnel, in whichthe remainder of the tests were made, is described inreference 5. The method of supporting the test set-ups on the balance is shown in fiege L Tests weromade in this tunnel to determine the drag
10、 due to lancl-ing gears used in conjunction with a fuselage, wings,and a radial air-cooled engine.TESTMODELSAll models tested were designed for an airplane of3,000 pounds gross weight because full-scale modelscorresponding to this weight were the largest thmtcould be conveniently accommodated in the
11、 tunnelsused for the testing.Wheels.-The five different wheels and tires usedin the tests were: An 8.50-10 low-pressure wheel andtire; a 27-inch streamline wheel and tire; a 25 by11-4 extra-low-pressure wheel and tire; a 30 by 5 diskwheel with a 30 by 5 high-pressure tire; and a 30 by 6disk wheel wi
12、th a 82 by 6 high-pressure tire. (Seefig. 2) The 2 wheels vviththe high-pressure tires weretaken from service; the other 3 were wooden modelsFxciunnl.Landlng gem 3b with wheel Mr3ng A mounted on td fusohwaProvided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,
13、-,-,. -,1! .THE DRAG OF AlBl?IiAN33 WELS, HEEL ImmGSj AND IL.41WIWGGEAIt inolusive, with numerals addedvdlen necessary to indicata mod.il.lcationsto the basicform. (See figs. 4 to 9.) Fairings A, B, and C dif-fer only in cross section; fairing D difEers in crosssection mndhas a cut-out in the side e
14、qual to the tirediameter (8.50-10 wheel and tire) ; f airing E consistsof a short tail and a small fairing that partly coversl,he inside of the wheel; and f-o F covers only asmall portion of the inside of the wheel. All thefairings were made from sheet aluminum.Fuselage, wings, and engine.-In order
15、to conformwith the other models, the fuselage used in conjunc-tion with the landing-gear tests was constructed tothe average fuselage dimensions of an open-cockpitairplane of 3,000 pol.mdsgross weight. (See fig. 17.)Two rectanear wings of Clark Y section wereattached to the fuselage for part of the
16、tesks. A W2-by 15-foot wing was used to simulate the lower wingof Qbiplane cellule and a 6- by 18-foot wu was usedto represent the wing of a low-wing monoplane. AWasp radial air-cooled engine, cowled and uncowled,was used during some of the tests to determine itseffect on the landing-gear drag. The
17、relative loca-tion of the fuselage, the engine, the wings, and thelanding gears is shown in fiewes 17 and 40.Landing gears,-The lapding gears numbered la tollb (see figs. 18 to 34) were attached directly to thefuselage. Gears 12 to 14c (figs. 35 to 39) were at-tached to the fuselage and the 6- by 18
18、-foot wing.All landing gears were designed to comply with therequirements of the Aeronautic Branch, Departmentof Commerce. Design outside dimensions were strictlyadhered to in the fabrication of the various parts.Although information concerning the relative weightsof the landing gears would be of co
19、nsiderable interest,any attempt at weight analysis would be too involvedto come within the scope of this repofi The standarddimension chosen for the vertical travel of the wheelwas Ginches, and for the wheel tread, 6 feet 6 inches.All round struts were encased in fairings of Navy 1strut section, fin
20、eness ratio 3. In cases where stream-lined tubing was used, the tubhg was of “ standard”section, which is a modification of Navy 1 strut sec-tion. In some instances tandem struts were fairedtogether, this being done in accordance with the rc-ommendations of reference 6. A few of the landinggears inc
21、orporated wire bracing in their structures.The type of wire used was, in all cases,that commonlyreferred to as Cstreamlined) wire, although it isreally lenticular in cross section.The oleo action of all gears was strictly conven-tional with the following exceptions: Gears lb, lc,2b, 2c, ha, and llb,
22、 as tested, would have to use anoleo shock absorber in the fuselage with a suitablelinkage to give the required “wheeltravel or have oneincorporated in the. vtheel. GearalQ wod:. have theoleo shock absorber in the wheel or ihside the wheelfniring. ,Gears 3b, 3c, 13, and 14a would require asplined ol
23、eo shock absorber or its equivalent. Gear12 could have a conventional oleo strut but the wheelwould swing about a point directly in its rear.TESTSThe only measurementstaken during the tests wereair speed and drag. The maximum air speed used inthe 7- by 10-foot tunnel was 80 miles per hour, thatbeing
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
10000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- NASANACATR4851935THEDRAGOFAIRPLANEWHEELSWHEELFAIRINGSANDLANDINGGEARSI 飞机 机轮 整流 起落架 阻力 IPDF

链接地址:http://www.mydoc123.com/p-836478.html