ITU-T G 126-1993 Listener Echo in Telephone Networks (Study Group 12)《电话网中的受话回声 传输系统和媒介 形成国际连接部分的国内系统的一般特性 研究12组》.pdf

《ITU-T G 126-1993 Listener Echo in Telephone Networks (Study Group 12)《电话网中的受话回声 传输系统和媒介 形成国际连接部分的国内系统的一般特性 研究12组》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ITU-T G 126-1993 Listener Echo in Telephone Networks (Study Group 12)《电话网中的受话回声 传输系统和媒介 形成国际连接部分的国内系统的一般特性 研究12组》.pdf（10页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、ITU-T RECMN*G*LZb 93 4862593 0585576 696 INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION ITU-T TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR OF ITU G.126 (03/93) TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS AND MEDIA GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF NATIONAL SYSTEMS FORMING PART OF INTERNATIONAL CONNECTIONS LISTENER ECHO IN TELEPHONE NETWORKS

2、ITU-T Recommendation G.126 (Previously “CCITT Recommendation”) ITU-T RECMN*G.126 93 m 4862591 0585577 522 m FOREWORD The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the International Telecom- munication Union. The IT-T is responsible for studying technical, operating

3、 and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, established the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn

4、, produce Recommendations on these topics. ITU-T Recommendation G.126 was revised by the ITU-T Study Group XII (1988-1993) and was approved by the WTSC (Helsinki, March 1-12, 1993). NOTES 1 As a consequence of a reform process within the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the CCITT ceased

5、to exist as of 28 February 1993. In its place, the ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) was created as of 1 March 1993. Similarly, in this reform process, the CCIR and the IFRB have been replaced by the Radiocommunication Sector. In order not to delay publication of this Recommendati

6、on, no change has been made in the text to references containing the acronyms “CCITT, CCIR or IFRB” or their associated entities such as Plenary Assembly, Secretariat, etc. Future editions of this Recommendation will contain the proper terminology related to the new ITU structure. 2 telecommunicatio

7、n administration and a recognized operating agency. In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a O ITU 1994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, incl

8、uding photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU. ITU-T RECMN*G*12b 93 4862593 0585578 469 CONTENTS 1 Introduction and scope . 2 Definitions 3 Effect of listener echo 3.1 General 3.2 Effect on voice transmission . 3.3 Effect on voice-band data transmission 3.4 Effect of l

9、istener echo in a connection with multiple 4-wire loops Limits of listener echo 4.1 Voice transmission 4.2 Voice-band data transmission . References . 4 Page 1 1 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 7 Recommendation G.126 (0-3) i - ITU-T RECNN*G-LZb 93 48b259L 0585579 3T5 Recommendation G.126 LISTENER ECHO IN TELEPHONE

10、NETWORKS (Helsinki, 1993) 1 Introduction and scope A telephone connection between two subscribers in telephone networks usually contains one or more 2-4-2-wire loops (further referred to as 4-wire loop), as the connection may encounter a mixture of 2- and 4-wire analogue and digital switching and tr

11、ansmission systems, including PBXs. Signal reflections may occur due to the impedance mismatch at both hybrids that terminate a 4-wire loop. A portion of the main signal will thus be reflected at the far end of the 4-wire loop, return to the near end and be reflected again. Therefore the reflected s

12、ignal will finally arrive at the listeners end some time later than the original signal. The delayed signal is called listener echo. Listener echo signals can: - lead to objectionable “hollowness“ in voice transmissions; and - impair the bit error ratio of voice-band data transmissions. The effect o

13、f listener echo on transmission performance can be characterized by the additional loss and additional delay in the listener echo path relative to the direct signal path. The minimum value of the additional listener echo path loss over the frequency band involved provides a margin against singing di

14、stortion. Recommendation G. 122 provides guidance on the influence of national networks on stability and talker echo in international connections. This Recommendation provides planning guidance for listener echo in telephone networks with the aim of obtaining satisfactory speech and voice-band data

15、transmission performance. 2 Definitions For the purpose of this Recommendaition, the following definitions apply: 2.1 receiving voice-band data equipment, etc. listener echo (receive end echo): echo produced by double reflected signals and disturbing the listener, NOTES 1 The term “received end echo

16、“ is a term preferred by some Administrations. 2 With small delay against the wanted Signal (less than about 3 ms) listener echo may cause hollowness in telephony. In transmission of voice-band data signals, listener echo may cause bit errors and, in any case, reduces the margin against other distur

17、bances. 2.2 listener echo loss (receive echo loss): degree of attenuation of the double reflected signal with respect to the wanted signal. In terms of the absolute losses of both signals, the listener echo loss is (see Figure VG.100): LE = LQ - LI. NOTE - For practical purposes the listener echo lo

18、ss is equal to the open-loop loss (valid if the latter exceeds 8 dB). The listener echo loss characterizes the degree of disturbance by hollowness, as well as the disturbing effect on voice-band data modem receivers. 2.3 “hollow sound“, i.e. as if the talker would speak into some hollow vessel. holl

19、owness: distortion in telephony caused by double reflected signals and subjectively perceived as a NOTE - Hollowness is to be distinguished from listener echo. Recommendation G.126 (03193) 1 ITU-T RECMN*G.326 93 4862573 0585580 O37 2.4 open-loop loss (OLL): in a loop formed by a 4-wire circuit (or a

20、 cascade connection of two or more 4-wire circuits) and terminated by 2-wire ends (.e. having “4-wire terminating sets”, or hybrids, at both ends), the loss measured by breaking the loop at some point, injecting a signai and measuring the loss incurred in traversing the open loop. All impedance cond

21、itions should be preserved while making the measurement. See Figure 2/G.100. NOTES 1 In practice the OLL is equal to the listener echo loss. 2 The OLL is also qual to the sum of the two semi-loop losses associated with a loop. 2.5 path a-t-b (transmission loss of .); semi-loop loss: the transmission

22、 loss between the points “a” and “b” of the 4-wire termination (as defined at the virtual switching points) independent of whether there exists or not a physical poi nt “t”. 2.5.1 Possible alternative to the definition in 2.5 Semi-loop loss In an arrangement comprising a 4-wire circuit (or a cascade

23、 connection of several 4-wire circuits) with unwanted coupling between the go and return direction at the ends of the circuit - usually via a 4-wire terminating set, or via acoustical coupling - the loss measured between the input and output. See Figure 3/G.100. NOTES 1 The semi-loop loss is an impo

24、rtant quantity in determining echo balance return loss, echo loss, listener echo loss (see also open-loop loss). 2 Distinction may be made between the semi-loop loss of a given piece of equipment and the semi-loop loss of a national system. The latter is measured at equi-level points in an ISC which

25、 serves as a national gateway exchange. 2.6 singing margin (SM): the minimum listener echo loss in dB over the frequency band involved. 2.7 delay of the 4-wire transmission path, which is equal to listener echo path delay. round-trip delay (DL): the delay in ms around the closed 4-wire loop, determi

26、ned primarily by the two-way 2.8 by the following equation: weighted listener echo path loss (WEPL): WEPL is the weighted mean value of listener echo loss expressed 34p EPL(f) - WEPL = -2olOglo - I J io 2o df 3200 200 Where EPL (B = magnitude of listener echo loss in dB at the frequency$ This concep

27、t was originally used in North America, in the transmission rating model, which can be used to derive the subjectively equivalent effects of listener echo on voice transmission performance regardless of the frequency response of the listener echo loss in the connection. 2 Recommendation G.126 (03/93

28、) ITU-T RECMN*G-LZb 93 m 4862593 0585582 99T m 3.3 Effect on voice-band data transmission Listener echo causes ripples in the frequency response of the received voice-band data signal and impairs its bit error ratio. In order to obtain satisfactory transmission performance, the value of OLL in the b

29、and 500 to 2500 Hz should be higher than that for voice transmission in the band 300 - 3400 Hz due to the strict performance requirement of voice- band data transmission. In addition, the round-trip delay factor may be disregarded when characterizing the effect of listener echo on voice-band data tr

30、ansmission performance, since voice-band data error performance does not appear to be related to the delay. The results of some experiments show that the OLL required for satisfactory voice-band data transmission mainly depends on the data transmission speed, but sometimes also on the type of modems

31、 3. 3.4 Effect of listener echo in a connection with multiple 4-wire loops If there is more than one 4-wire loop in a connection, several reflected signals will accumulate at the receiving end as shown in Figure 2 (for the sake of simplicity, higher order reflections are not shown). L r Taker f, -4-

32、 -I- T1203550-911402 FIGURE YG.126 Signai reflections in a connection with multiple 4-wire loops in a connection with multiple 4-wire loops, the effect of listener echo on transmission performance depends not only on the OLL of each 4-wire loop, but also on the one-way loss of each 4-wire loop and t

33、he 2-wire circuit loss between adjacent 4-wire loops. The one-way loss of 4-wire loops and the 2-wire circuit loss govern the interaction among 4-wire loops 4. Because of accumulated impairments and interactions, the OLL of each 4-wire loop in a connection with multiple 4-wire loops has to be much h

34、igher than that in a single 4-wire loop connection in order to achieve the same transmission performance. In a connection with multiple 4-wire loops, the effect of listener echo on voice-band data transmission is extremely significant. References 4 and 5 illustrate the relationship between voltage a

35、nd power accumulation of listener echoes in a connection with multiple 4-wire loops. In general, uncorrelated echoes should be assumed for multiple 4-wire loop connections and the power addition criterion should be used to achieve satisfactory performance. This means that the OLL required for each 4

36、-wire loop should be increased by 10 log m dB, where m is the total number of 4-wire loops. However, for connections with very low loss, the required increment for the OLL of each 4-wire loop may be 16.6 log m dB and for connections with intermediate loss, the addition of 13.3 log m dB may be necess

37、ary. 4 Recommendation 6.126 (03/93) ITU-T RECMN*G-L26 93 H 4862571 0585583 82b 4 Limits of listener echo 4.1 Voice transmission The degree to which listener echo affects the quality of a voice connection depends on two factors: I) the Weighted Listener Echo Path Loss (WEPL); and 2) the round trip de

38、lay. Transmission quality degrades when the WEPL is reduced and when the round trip delay is increased. See 2.8 for the definition of WEPL. The transmission planner must select appropriate values of WEPL and round trip delay to achieve a desired level of transmission quality for connections in a tar

39、get population. The target population is that set of connections which it is, possible to construct and which involves the listener echo path or paths of interest. For example, take the simple case of connections involving subscriber lines connected through a digital local office. If any of the N su

40、bscriber lines can connect to any of the other N lines, then the target population of connections consists of the N(N- 1)/2 possibilities. Once the transmission planner has identified the target population of connections and the desired level of transmission quality, then the information contained i

41、n Recommendation P. 11 and Supplement No. 3 can be used to calculate the minimum value of WEPL and maximum value of round trip delay required to provide that degree of transmission quality. To illustrate the procedure, an example is given in Figure 3 and Table 1. The information in the figure and ta

42、ble was derived for use in the North American network. Using the North American Transmission Rating Model found in Supplement No. 3, values of WEPL and round trip delay were calculated such that listener echo would add only a small additional impairment to the overall transmission quality. The objec

43、tive that was used was a reduction of no more than 2% Good or Better average grade of service. The target population was the connections of subscriber loops through digital local offices. The curves in Figure 3 and date in Table 1 are to be interpreted as follows. For a given desired (or required) v

44、alue of round trip delay, no more than 50% of the connections in the target population may have WEPL less than the value given by the curve marked “50”, no more than 5% of connections may have WEPL less than the value given by the curve marked 95”. and so forth. For example, if the round trip delay

45、is specified to be 4 ms, then in the target population no more than 50% of connections may have WEPL I 18 dB, no more than 5% may have WEPL I 13 dB, and no more than 1% may have WEPL I 9 dB. In addition to the WEPL, the minimum value of singing margin for any connection in the target population must

46、 conform to Recommendation G.122. After identifying the required maximum round trip delay, minimum WEPL, and minimum singing margin for the target population of connections, the transmission planner must then make sure that the equipment in the network e.g. subscriber lines and telephones, 2/4-wire

47、hybrids and balancing method) and the network transmission losdlevel plan are adequate to assure that these requirements are met for the target population of connections. This is not always easy to do. For example in the North American network it was necessary to equip the digital local switches wit

48、h adjustable echo balancing networks, which can be automatically adjusted to achieve the best echo balance with the mix of subscriber lines in the network. 4.2 Voice-band data transmission The following consideration provides an example and can serve as an indication of what values of OLL might be r

49、equired by existing types of modems with a bit rate of up to 2.4 kbit/s, in order to obtain high quality data transmission: - a complete connection should not contain more than five (exceptionally seven) physical loops; - loops with very high OLL (exceeding, e.g. 45 dB) need not be included in the number of loops in the connection; - the OLL of each loop at any frequency in the band 500-2500 Hz should not be less than the values indicated in Table 2 (based on OLL = 18 + 10 log m, where m = total number of loops). Recommendation 6.126 (03i93) 5 1TLJ-T RECflN*G=LZ