GMW GMW15049-2011 Key Characteristic Designation System Process Issue 3 English《主要特性标识系统进程 第3次出版(英文版本)》.pdf

《GMW GMW15049-2011 Key Characteristic Designation System Process Issue 3 English《主要特性标识系统进程 第3次出版(英文版本)》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《GMW GMW15049-2011 Key Characteristic Designation System Process Issue 3 English《主要特性标识系统进程 第3次出版(英文版本)》.pdf（11页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、 WORLDWIDE ENGINEERING STANDARDS General Specification GMW15049 Key Characteristic Designation System Process Copyright 2011 General Motors Company All Rights Reserved June 2011 Originating Department: North American Engineering Standards Page 1 of 11 1 Introduction Variation is inherent in any manu

2、facturing and/or assembly process. Knowledge of the magnitude and consequences of this variation helps Engineers design appropriate products and processes within appropriate parameters that meet or exceed customer requirements. The Key Characteristic Designation System (KCDS) helps the Product Engin

3、eer communicate additional product and process requirements to the manufacturing/assembly community. The Key Characteristic Designation System aids in the economical manufacture of quality products by supporting the control and reduction of variation in the manufacturing/assembly process and by supp

4、orting the development of robust designs (e.g., Design for Six Sigma). Note: Nothing in this standard supercedes applicable laws and regulations. Note: In the event of conflict between the English and domestic language, the English language shall take precedence. 1.1 Scope. This standard does: 1.1.1

5、 Apply to all General Motors planning, product and process designs, manufacturing and assembly processes. 1.1.2 Apply to all Suppliers (internal and external) of products and processes to General Motors that are used in the design, manufacture, assembly, and distribution of GM products. 1.2 Mission/

6、Theme. To define how General Motors uses the Key Characteristic Designation System (KCDS) to standardize its approach for the identification, documentation and communication of characteristics that requires additional care to ensure consistency and compliance to customer requirements and government

7、regulations within GM and its supplier community. 1.2.1 Policy. This standard is intended to ensure a method of application that is clear, uniform and consistent with other standards used at General Motors and its supplier community. This standard also supports the understanding that: All dimensions

8、, specifications, and tolerances displayed on product drawings or Master Process Documents (MPD) are important. All part dimensions and specifications must meet requirements and be produced within tolerance. 1.3 Classification. Not applicable. 2 References Note: Only the latest approved standards ar

9、e applicable unless otherwise specified. 2.1 External Standards/Specifications. None 2.2 GM Standards/Specifications. GMW3059 GMW15862 2.3 Additional References. Not applicable. 2.3.1 For GM Internal Users of this Standard. KCDS Web Page. Use this URL to locate KCDS Templates, GM KCDS RASICs, Global

10、 KCDS Designation Reference spreadsheets, and additional reference standards. http:/ For GM Powertrain users, reference the Global Quality Requirements GQR-120.16 and EtQ-114 Global Powertrain KCDS Procedure and Design Standard. 2.3.2 Additional Information. Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) A

11、dvanced Product Quality Planning and Control Plan, APQP-2 AIAG Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis AIAG Statistical Process Control, SPC-3 DaimlerChrysler, Ford Motor Company, and General Motors Supplier Quality Requirements Automotive Industry Action Group/American Society for Quality (AIAG

12、/ASQ )reference material obtained through the GM Quality Network or the AIAG at www.aiag.org. Copyright General Motors Company Provided by IHS under license with General Motors CompanyNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-GM WORLDWIDE ENGINEERING STANDARD

13、S GMW15049 Copyright 2011 General Motors Company All Rights Reserved June 2011 Page 2 of 11 Supplier Quality Statement of Requirements 1927-3. The Deming Route by William W. Scherkenbach 3 Method 3.1 Planning Stage. During the Planning Stage, parts and/or systems that need to go through the KCDS pro

14、cess are selected based on new unique design or technology, past history and current items listed on KCDS templates. 3.1.1 Multidisciplinary Team. Implementing KCDS within any product program timing requires a multidisciplinary (cross-functional) team approach, including departments and regions. App

15、ropriate and affected functional areas should be involved in the selection of all parts, part features and/or assemblies requiring Additional Care and their related process control plans for a given part, subsystem, system, of a vehicle or program. 3.1.2 Team Identification. The KCDS Cross-Functiona

16、l Team includes the full range of activities from Engineering to manufacturing including but not limited to design, supplier development, Quality/Reliability, and supplier communities (internal and external). Identifying variable characteristics (KPC and product quality characteristics (PQC) and att

17、ribute quality characteristics (Product Traceability and Confirmation), which require additional care, involves judgment and experience and is best done through a Cross-Functional Team and a broad range of experience. 3.1.3 Team Member Selection. The list of team members is intended to be functional

18、 in nature and actual membership or titles of the people could vary widely from group to group. Some members of the team are required on an “as needed basis”. As a minimum, the team must include representation from Product Engineering, Quality/Reliability and Manufacturing Engineering/Supplier Quali

19、ty Engineering. For example: Design Release Engineer/Designing Engineer KCDS Engineer/Facilitator Supplier Quality Engineer Manufacturing Engineer Manufacturing/Assembly Representative Quality/Reliability Engineer Dimensional Management Engineer Service Engineer Product Safety Representative Fasteni

20、ng Engineer Software Engineer 3.2 Stage 1 - Additional Care Selection. It is important in this Stage for the team, lead by the Design Release Engineer/Designing Engineer, to review Standard Care practices and procedures (Glossary, 5.1.1) and discuss standard care expectations of the assembly/manufac

21、turing facility prior to selecting the items which need additional care. These specific standard care expectations/instructions/process capability data documentation can fall into the following four (4) categories and are to be documented on the MPD, on the part drawing (with an attribute quality ch

22、aracteristic (AQC) or documentation required (DR) symbol), in the Statement of Requirements (SOR), and control plan: Functional Check Special Component Handling Engineering Standard Work Expectations Documentation Required (DR) Following the review of the standard care expectations, the team reviews

23、 the parts and/or systems identified in the planning stage and determine which parts, part features and/or assembly characteristics require additional care in manufacturing/assembly. See Figure B1. Data and Engineering judgment are required to arrive at the best list with which to begin. Both discus

24、sion and trials help establish confidence in choices. Product Engineering may request documentation of process capability data on specified standard product characteristics with a DR symbol. The goal is to arrive at the critical few, rather than the non-critical many. Select characteristics that pro

25、mote prevention rather than detection. Communicate the importance of the critical characteristic in a clear and unambiguous fashion. To ensure a robust design, the work in Stage 1 should be reiterated periodically throughout the entire process to reduce the need for long term/continuous additional c

26、are. See Appendix A for information on how to identify special characteristics. Copyright General Motors Company Provided by IHS under license with General Motors CompanyNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-GM WORLDWIDE ENGINEERING STANDARDS GMW15049 Cop

27、yright 2011 General Motors Company All Rights Reserved June 2011 Page 3 of 11 3.2.1 Variable Characteristic Criteria. A KPC or PQC or DR is traceable back to the design/performance requirements. Other selection criteria are: Part tolerance around a target dimension and/or other variables that affect

28、 final build quality (e.g., tolerance on hole size, form, orientation, location (Regardless of Feature Size (RFS), part length tolerance). Measurable and controllable. Released in global product description system (GPDS) and/or on the part drawing. If a final build characteristic, (e.g., clearance,

29、compression ratio, transmission smoothness, leak rate, product performance specification), is selected, focus must be placed on the individual parts and their contribution to the overall variation. Templates (for Vehicle) and Bill of Design (BOD) (for Powertrain) are available/linked from the GM Glo

30、bal KCDS web site. (KCDS Web Page, 2.3.1) Note: A variable characteristic should not be designated a Key Product Characteristic or Product Quality Characteristic (PQC) just because it is important that the specification be met, since all specifications must be met. 3.2.1.1 Key Product Characteristic

31、 Criteria. Selection should be based on or indicated by a loss function or other method to identify a customer based target. 3.2.1.2 Product Quality Characteristic Criteria. Selection should be based on or indicated by a loss function or other method to identify a customer based tolerance. 3.2.1.3 D

32、ocumentation Required. Selection should be based on the specifications importance to the function of the part; where by providing documentation of meeting the specification is required. 3.2.2 Attribute Quality Characteristic Criteria. Attribute characteristics that are listed on KCDS templates apply

33、 to all parts of the same functional name, unless otherwise specified on the template. New designs and their new parts/assemblies not listed should be reviewed for error proofing of the critical attributes. When designating an attribute that requires additional care, an attribute control method (whi

34、ch insures 100% compliance) shall be used. This method should only be used where the costs are offset by reductions in the risks and costs of product problems, including costs of detection and remedy. Data, which may be obtained from design failure mode and effects analysis (DFMEA), design review ba

35、sed on failure mode (DRBFM), process failure mode and effects analysis (PFMEA), customer returns or warranty claims, should be available to support this request. Attribute characteristics are selected by the type of attribute, and may fall into the following categories as defined above and are relea

36、sed into global product description system (GPDS), MPD and/or on the part drawing (with an AQC symbol): Confirmation Verification Secondary Assembly Function Compliance Product Traceability 3.3 Stage 2 - Controls and Process Selection. In this stage, the Team, lead by the Manufacturing Engineer, det

37、ermines the controls and/or process requirements for all parts/part features and/or assemblies requiring additional care. They also own the development of the process control plans used to document the control or reduction of KPC/PQC variation with a key control characteristics (KCC). See Figure B2.

38、 3.3.1 Key Control Characteristic Criteria. Many factors can affect the relationship between a KPC and/or a PQC and its KCC. Examples are changes in material, equipment, and the methods and systems that are used to make a product. Ongoing control of the KPC/PQC is required and documented on a Proces

39、s Control Plan. Once KCCs are defined and process control is in place, product checks for the KPC/PQC should be reduced to a product or process verification/validation level. A method for adjusting the KCC to set the KPC/PQC to its nominal value is required. 3.3.2 Key Control Characteristic Identifi

40、cation Guidelines. 3.3.2.1 It is directly traceable to a KPC/PQC. 3.3.2.2 There is a strong causal relationship to the KPC/PQC. 3.3.2.3 It is particularly significant in ensuring a KPC/PQC achieves its target value. 3.3.2.4 It is not (usually) specified on product drawings or product documentation.

41、3.3.2.5 Is documented on a Process Control Plan. The tests apply to characteristics that are measured by either variable or attribute data. 3.3.3 Key Control Characteristic Methodology. Identify the operations that impact each KPC/PQC with a flowchart of the process. Copyright General Motors Company

42、 Provided by IHS under license with General Motors CompanyNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-GM WORLDWIDE ENGINEERING STANDARDS GMW15049 Copyright 2011 General Motors Company All Rights Reserved June 2011 Page 4 of 11 Identify any process parameters in

43、 each operation that impact each KPC/PQC. A Fishbone (Cause and Effect) Diagram is a useful tool for this. Determine the causal relationship to the characteristics. Process characteristics with the strongest causal relationship become control characteristics. Record the information on a process cont

44、rol plan. 3.3.4 Attribute Characteristic Methodology. Controls for attribute characteristics, which have been identified as needing additional care, require 100% conformance to requirements and therefore error proofing is the best method. 3.4 Stage 3 - Required Actions. In this stage, controls of th

45、e parts requiring additional care are implemented into the manufacturing/assembly process to ensure product conformance. Controls on the KCC are implemented to ensure that variation is controlled or reduced. 3.4.1 Key Product Characteristic. The manufacturing/assembly plant must control the target n

46、ominal for each KPC. Controls shall include: statistical process control (SPC), process control plans, quality procedures or 100% variable inspection. Continuous improvement is required up to Cpk 2.0 (6 sigma). 3.4.2 Product Quality Characteristic. The manufacturing/assembly plant must maintain the

47、tolerance for each PQC through appropriate process control plans and quality procedures. 3.4.3 Documentation Required. The manufacturing/assembly plant must maintain the tolerance for each DR through appropriate process control plans and quality procedures. 3.4.4 Attribute Quality Characteristic. Th

48、e following two designations fall under AQC. 3.4.4.1 Confirmation. The manufacturing/assembly plant must ensure that all attribute characteristics designated with a Confirmation minimally have 100% check for conformance to requirements, and other specific additional tasks as described by Product Eng

49、ineering and shown designation on the MPD or part drawings. This could include 100% secondary check. Three types of Confirmation are: Verification, Secondary Assembly Function, and Compliance. 3.4.4.2 Product Traceability. The manufacturing/assembly plant must ensure that all parts designated for traceability must be documented/tracked to the suppliers lot number, date of manufacture, and Vehicle Identif