【考研类试卷】考研英语(一)-25及答案解析.doc
《【考研类试卷】考研英语(一)-25及答案解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《【考研类试卷】考研英语(一)-25及答案解析.doc(16页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、考研英语(一)-25 及答案解析(总分:100.00,做题时间:90 分钟)一、Reading Comprehensio(总题数:0,分数:0.00)三、Text 1(总题数:1,分数:20.00)An old saying has it that half of all advertising budgets are wastedthe trouble is, no one knows which half. In the internet age, at least in theory, this fraction can be much reduced. By watching what
2、 people search for, click on and say online, companies can aim “behavioral“ ads at those most likely to buy. In the past couple of weeks a quarrel has illustrated the value to advertisers of such fin e-grained information: should advertisers assume that people are happy to be tracked and sent behavi
3、oral ads? Or should they have explicit permission? In December 2010 America“s Federal Trade Commission (FTC) proposed adding a “do not track“ (DNT) option to internet browsers, so that users could tell advertisers that they did not want to be followed. Microsoft“s Internet Explorer and Apple“s Safar
4、i both offer DNT; Google“s Chrome is due to do so this year. In February the FTC and Digital Advertising Alliance (DAA) agreed that the industry would get cracking on responding to DNT requests. On May 31st Microsoft set off the row: It said that Internet Explorer 10, the version due to appear in Wi
5、ndows 8, would have DNT as a default. Advertisers are horrified. Human nature being what it is, most people stick with default settings. Few switch DNT on now, but if tracking is off it will stay off. Bob Liodice, the chief executive of the Association of National Advertisers, one of the groups in t
6、he DAA, says consumers will be worse off if the industry cannot collect information about their preferences. “People will not get fewer ads,“ he says. “They“ll get less meaningful, less targeted ads.“ It is not yet clear how advertisers will respond. Getting a DNT signal does not oblige anyone to st
7、op tracking, although some companies have promised to do so. Unable to tell whether someone really objects to behavioral ads or whether they are sticking with Microsoft“s default, some may ignore a DNT signal and press on anyway. Also unclear is why Microsoft has gone it alone. After all, it has an
8、ad business too, which it says will comply with DNT requests, though it is still working out how. If it is trying to upset Google, which relies almost wholly on advertising, it has chosen an indirect method: there is no guarantee that DNT by default will become the norm. DNT does not seem an obvious
9、ly huge selling point for Windows 8though the firm has compared some of its other products favorably with Google“s on that count before. Brendon Lynch, Microsoft“s chief privacy officer, blogged: “we believe consumers should have more control.“ Could it really be that simple?(分数:20.00)(1).It is sugg
10、ested in Paragraph 1 that “behavioral“ ads help advertisers to(分数:4.00)A.ease competition among themselves.B.lower their operational costs.C.avoid complaints from consumers.D.provide better online services.(2).“The industry“ (Para. 3) refers to(分数:4.00)A.online advertisers.B.e-commerce conductors.C.
11、digital information analysis.D.internet browser developers.(3).Bob Liodice holds that setting DNT as a default(分数:4.00)A.many cut the number of junk ads.B.fails to affect the ad industry.C.will not benefit consumers.D.goes against human nature.(4).Which of the following is true according to Paragrap
12、h 6?(分数:4.00)A.DNT may not serve its intended purpose.B.Advertisers are willing to implement DNT.C.DNT is losing its popularity among consumers.D.Advertisers are obliged to offer behavioral ads.(5).The author“s attitude towards what Brendon Lynch said in his blog is one of(分数:4.00)A.indulgence.B.und
13、erstanding.C.appreciation.D.skepticism.四、Text 2(总题数:1,分数:20.00)Bankers have been blaming themselves for their troubles in public. Behind the scenes, they have been taking aim at someone else: the accounting standard-setters. Their rules, moan the banks, have forced them to report enormous losses, an
14、d it“s just not fair. These rules say they must value some assets at the price a third party would pay, not the price managers and regulators would like them to fetch. Unfortunately, banks“ lobbying now seems to be working. The details may be unknowable, but the independence of standard-setters, ess
15、ential to the proper functioning of capital markets, is being compromised. And, unless banks carry toxic assets at prices that attract buyers, reviving the banking system will be difficult. After a bruising encounter with Congress, America“s Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) rushed through
16、 rule changes. These gave banks more freedom to use models to value illiquid assets and more flexibility in recognizing losses on long-term assets in their income statement. Bob Herz, the FASB“s chairman, cried out against those who “question our motives.“ Yet bank shares rose and the changes enhanc
17、e what one lobby group politely calls “the use of judgment by management.“ European ministers instantly demanded that the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) do likewise. The IASB says it does not want to act without overall planning, but the pressure to fold when it completes its recons
18、truction of rules later this year is strong. Charlie McCreevy, a European commissioner, warned the IASB that it did “not live in a political vacuum“ but “in the real world“ and that Europe could yet develop different rules. It was banks that were on the wrong planet, with accounts that vastly overva
19、lued assets. Today they argue that market prices overstate losses, because they largely reflect the temporary illiquidity of markets, not the likely extent of bad debts. The truth will not be known for years. But bank“s shares trade below their book value, suggesting that investors are skeptical. An
20、d dead markets partly reflect the paralysis of banks which will not sell assets for fear of booking losses, yet are reluctant to buy all those supposed bargains. To get the system working again, losses must be recognized and dealt with. America“s new plan to buy up toxic assets will not work unless
21、banks mark assets to levels which buyers find attractive. Successful markets require independent and even combative standard-setters. The FASB and IASB have been exactly that, cleaning up rules on stock options and pensions, for example, against hostility from special interests. But by giving in to
22、critics now they are inviting pressure to make more concessions.(分数:20.00)(1).Bankers complained that they were forced to(分数:4.00)A.follow unfavorable asset evaluation rules.B.collect payments from third parties.C.cooperate with the price managers.D.reevaluate some of their assets.(2).According to t
23、he author, the rule changes of the FASB may result in(分数:4.00)A.the diminishing role of management.B.the revival of the banking system.C.the banks“ long-term asset losses.D.the weakening of its independence.(3).According to Paragraph 4, McCreevy objects to the IASB“s attempt to(分数:4.00)A.keep away f
24、rom political influences.B.evade the pressure from their peers.C.act on their own in rule-setting.D.take gradual measures in reform.(4).The author thinks the banks were “on the wrong planet“ in that they(分数:4.00)A.misinterpreted market price indicators.B.exaggerated the real value of their assets.C.
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 考研 试卷 英语 25 答案 解析 DOC
