REG NASA-LLIS-0787--2000 Lessons Learned Acoustic Noise Requirement.pdf

《REG NASA-LLIS-0787--2000 Lessons Learned Acoustic Noise Requirement.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《REG NASA-LLIS-0787--2000 Lessons Learned Acoustic Noise Requirement.pdf（9页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Best Practices Entry: Best Practice Info:a71 Committee Approval Date: 2000-04-14a71 Center Point of Contact: JPLa71 Submitted by: Wil HarkinsSubject: Acoustic Noise Requirement Practice: Impose an acoustic noise requirement on spacecraft hardware design to ensure the structural integrity of the vehi

2、cle and its components in the vibroacoustic launch environment. Acoustic noise results from the propagation of sound pressure waves through air or other media. During the launch of a rocket, such noise is generated by the release of high velocity engine exhaust gases, by the resonant motion of inter

3、nal engine components, and by the aerodynamic flow field associated with high speed vehicle movement through the atmosphere. This environment places severe stress on flight hardware and has been shown to severely impact subsystem reliability.Abstract: Preferred Practice for Design from NASA Technica

4、l Memorandum 4322A, NASA Reliability Preferred Practices for Design and Test.Benefit:The fluctuating pressures associated with acoustic energy during launch can cause vibration of structural components over a broad frequency band, ranging from about 20 Hz to 10,000 Hz and above. Such high frequency

5、vibration can lead to rapid structural fatigue. The acoustic noise requirement assures that flight hardware- particularly structures with a high ratio of surface area to mass- is designed with sufficient margin to withstand the launch environment.Definition of an aggressive acoustic noise specificat

6、ion is intended to mitigate the effects of the launch environment on spacecraft reliability. It would not apply to the Space Station nor to the normal operational environment of a spacecraft.Implementation Method:The failure modes produced by acoustic noise excitation are similar to those associated

7、 with other types of vibratory structural fatigue. These include failures due to excessive displacement, in which one deflecting component makes contact with another, as well as fractured structural members and loose fasteners. Broken solder joints and cracked circuit boards and wave guides can also

8、 occur. Electronic components whose function depends on the motion of structural parts, such as relays and pressure switches, are particularly susceptible.Large flat panels are most susceptible to damage by acoustic energy as they can undergo large displacements while oscillating at low frequency. F

9、or a typical spacecraft, this means that a fixed, high gain antenna must be carefully designed and stiffened to avoid bending failures, debonding of composite members, and related problems. In general, any structure with a high ratio of surface area to mass can be expected to experience potential pr

10、oblems in the acoustic noise environment of spacecraft launch. For small payloads, however, random vibration testing is commonly preferred over acoustic noise testing.A typical acoustic noise requirement is illustrated in Figure 1.Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted

11、without license from IHS-,-,-refer to D descriptionD Figure 1: Typical Acoustic Noise Requirement Such a figure specifies the level of input sound pressure over the spectrum of frequencies at which the pressure can fluctuate. The pressure is expressed in units of decibels (dB), defined as refer to D

12、 descriptionD where P is measured in Pascals (Pa) and Prefis ostensibly the audible limit of the human ear, with a value defined as 2 x 10-5Pa. The decibel pressure levels in acoustic noise spectra are not generally provided at each and every frequency. Instead, they are often specified over bands o

13、f width D f, which span 1/3 of a frequency octave. With this method, 3 sound pressure levels will be provided over any interval in which the frequency doubles. Table 1 is an example of Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-such a 1/3 octave

14、 band specification for the curve data of Figure 1.refer to D descriptionD Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Table 1: 1/3 Octave Band Specification When pressure levels are defined with these methods, it is convenient to provide a measu

15、re of the overall acoustic noise intensity. The overall sound pressure level (OASPL) provides just such a measure and, for 1/3 octave band specifications, can be calculated as the decibel equivalent of the root sum square (RSS) pressure. Table 2 illustrates such a calculation for the data of Table 1

16、, and shows that the OASPL is 144.9 dB. It should be noted that this figure is greater than any individual sound pressure level in the specification, because it represents an intensity of the spectrum as a whole.refer to D descriptionProvided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitt

17、ed without license from IHS-,-,-D Table 2: Calculation of Overall Sound Pressure Level To quantify the acoustic environment during launch, launch vehicles are often instrumented with internal microphones, which measure noise levels within the rocket fairing. This data is telemetered to the ground fo

18、r processing and ultimately plotted in the form of a sound pressure level versus frequency spectrum. Since the acoustic forcing function is stochastic, depending on many atmospheric and other variables, data from a number of such flights are generally gathered, and an envelope, such as that of Figur

19、e 1, is developed to encompass the historical record of microphone data.This process can be extended and applied to data from a number of launch vehicles. If a launch platform has not yet been manifested for a particular payload, acoustic profiles from a number of candidate rockets can be enveloped,

20、 producing an aggressive specification which will ensure design adequacy for the spacecraft. Figure 2 reflects such a process, providing an envelope which encompasses the acoustic environments from three launch vehicles.Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without lic

21、ense from IHS-,-,-refer to D descriptionD Figure 2: Envelope of Acoustic Flight Data Technical Rationale:The rationale for acoustic noise testing is straightforward, as acoustic energy is the primary source of vibration input to a space launch vehicle. During the initial phases of a rocket launch, h

22、igh velocity gases are ejected from motor nozzles and reflected from the ground, creating turbulence in the surrounding air and inducing a vibratory response of the rocket structure. During the subsequent ascent phase of a launch, as the vehicle accelerates through the atmosphere to high velocity, a

23、erodynamic turbulence induces pressure fluctuations which again cause structural vibration. These pressure fluctuations increase in severity as the vehicle approaches and passes through the speed of sound, due to the development and instability of local shock waves. The high-level acoustic noise env

24、ironment continues during supersonic flight, generally until the maximum dynamic pressure or “max Q“ condition is reached.Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Acoustic energy is transmitted to the mission payload in two ways. First, fluctu

25、ating pressures within the payload fairing impinge directly on exposed spacecraft surfaces, inducing vibration in high gain antennae, solar panels and other components having a large ratio of area-to-mass. Secondarily, the fluctuating external pressure field causes an oscillatory response of the roc

26、ket structure, which is ultimately transmitted through the spacecraft attachment ring in the form of random vibration. From the spacecraft perspective, this random input is generally lowest at the launch vehicle attachment plane, and increases upward along the payload axis.At the integrated spacecra

27、ft level, then, acoustic noise is a primary source of vibration excitation. It is a real world environment, should be reflected in spacecraft design requirements, and should be included in virtually any space vehicle test program. These requirements relate specifically to the launch environment and

28、do not apply to the normal operational environment of a spacecraft.References:1. MIL-STD-1540C, Test Requirements for Launch, Upper-Stage and Space Vehicles, United States Air Force Military Standard, 1994.2. Steinberg, D. S., Vibration Analysis for Electronic Equipment, New York: John Wiley & Sons,

29、 1986.3. Himelblau, H., Fuller, C. and Scharton, T., “Assessment of Space Vehicle Aeroacoustic Vibration Prediction, Design and Testing,“ NASA CR-1596, July, 1970.4. NASA STD XXXX-94, Standard for Payload Vibroacoustic Test Criteria, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1994 (Unreleased).5

30、. Combination Methods for Deriving Structural Design Loads Considering Vibro-Acoustic, etc., Responses, Reliability Preferred Practice No. PD-ED-1211.6. Powered-On Vibration, Reliability Preferred Practice No. PT-TE-1405.7. Sinusoidal Vibration, Reliability Preferred Practice No. PT-TE-1406.8. Assem

31、bly Acoustic Tests, Reliability Preferred Practice No. PT-TE-1407.9. Environmental Test Sequencing, Reliability Preferred Practice No. PT-TE-1412.10. Random Vibration Testing, Reliability Preferred Practice No. PT-TE-1413.11. Vibroacoustic Qualification Testing of Payloads, Subsystems, and Component

32、s, Reliability Preferred Practice No. PT-TE-1419Impact of Non-Practice: Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-In the absence of an acoustic noise requirement for spacecraft design and test, critical hardware which would likely survive other

33、 mission phases may fail when exposed to the mechanical stresses of launch. Since the primary vibroacoustic environment occurs at the very beginning of a mission, such failures are likely to have a greater mission impact than failures induced by other space environments over time.Related Practices: N/AAdditional Info: Approval Info: a71 Approval Date: 2000-04-14a71 Approval Name: Eric Raynora71 Approval Organization: QSa71 Approval Phone Number: 202-358-4738Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-