[考研类试卷]考研英语(阅读)模拟试卷257及答案与解析.doc
《[考研类试卷]考研英语(阅读)模拟试卷257及答案与解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《[考研类试卷]考研英语(阅读)模拟试卷257及答案与解析.doc(14页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、考研英语(阅读)模拟试卷 257 及答案与解析Part ADirections: Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. (40 points)0 There was a great deal to be troubled by in a report by the International Committee of the Red Cross documenting the kinds of torture and abuse inflicte
2、d on terrorism suspects by the Central Intelligence Agency. One disturbing footnote is that medical personnel were deeply involved in facilitating the abuses, which were intended to coerce suspects into providing intelligence.The report, prepared in 2007 but kept secret until it was published by The
3、 Nexv York Review of Books , was based on Red Cross interviews in late 2006 with 14 “high-value detainees“, who include some of the most dangerous terrorists in custody. The prisoners complaints gain credibility because they described similar abuses and had been kept in isolation at different locati
4、ons, with no chance to concoct a common story. Various prisoners said they had been subjected to waterboarding, forced to stand for days with their arms shackled overhead, confined in small boxes, beaten and kicked, slammed repeatedly into walls, prevented from sleeping, deprived of solid food, forc
5、ed to remain naked for weeks or months at a stretch, often in frigid cells and immersed in cold water. All were kept in continuous solitary confinement for their C. I. A. detention, ranging from 16 months to more than four years.Medical personnel seem to have been involved mostly as facilitators rat
6、her than torturers or interrogators. In one case, they monitored a detainees oxygen saturation with a device attached to his finger so waterboarding could be stopped before the prisoner suffocated. In another case, an amputee forced to stand with his arms shackled overhead had his intact leg checked
7、 daily for signs of dangerous swelling. Several detainees said health workers sometimes instructed interrogators to continue, adjust or stop particular methods of abuse.Such activities violate the ethical codes of major health organizations, both national and international. The Red Cross called it “
8、a gross breach of medical ethics“ that in some cases “amounted to participation in torture and/or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment“.None of the health personnel wore identification, but the prisoners inferred that they were physicians or psychologists. They also could have been paramedics, phys
9、icians assistants or other less-trained personnel.The report underscores the need to have a full-scale investigation into these abusive practices and into who precisely participated in them. Only then will we know whether indictments or, in the case of physicians, the loss of medical licenses, are w
10、arranted.1 What troubled us most in the report was that_.(A)health workers assisted C. I. A. to abuse prisoners(B) it documented the torture inflicted on prisoners(C) terrorism suspects were cruelly tortured by C. I. A.(D)prisoners were compelled to provide intelligence2 The information exposed in t
11、he report was credible since_.(A)it was based on Red Cross interviews with detainees(B) the New York Review of Books had a high reputation(C) it was provided by some dangerous terrorists in custody(D)the abuses described by prisoners kept in isolation were similar3 It was reported that medical staff
12、_.(A)compelled an amputee to stand with his arms shackled overhead(B) had terrorism suspects confined in frigid cells for months or years(C) forced prisoners to remain naked continuously for weeks or months(D)directed torturers or interrogators to use a particular abusive method4 If a physician were
13、 found to he involved in abusing prisoners, he_.(A)might have his medical license revoked(B) might be charged with committing a crime(C) would be condemned for breaching ethics(D)would be pronounced guilty or sentenced5 The proper title for this text should be_.(A)Detainees Abused by C. I. A.(B) Med
14、ically Assisted Torture(C) Abusive Practices in Prisons(D)Terrorism Suspects in Custody5 Although Consumers Union concedes that “ no confirmed cases of harm to humans from manufactured nanoparticles have been reported“, it adds that “there is cause for concern based on several worrisome findings fro
15、m the limited laboratory and animal research so far. “ It worries that particles that are nontoxic at normal sizes may become toxic when nanosized; that these nanoparticles, which are already present in cosmetics and food, can more easily “enter the body and its vital organs, including the brain“, t
16、han normal particles; and that nanomaterials will linger longer in the environment. All of this really comes down to pointing out that some particles are smaller than others. Size is not a reliable indicator of potential harm to human beings, and nature itself is filled with nanoparticles. But the d
17、efault assumption of danger from the new is palpable.Anti-nanotech sentiment has not been restricted to Consumers Union s relatively short list of concerns. In France, groups of hundreds of protesters have rallied against even such benign manifestations of the technology as the carbon nanotubules th
18、at allow Parkinsons sufferers to stop tremors by directing medicine to their own brains. In England members of a group called THRONG(The Heavenly Righteous Opposed to Nanotech Greed)have disrupted nanotech business conferences dressed as angels. In 2005 naked protesters appeared in front of an Eddie
19、 Bauer store in Chicago to condemn one of the more visible uses of nanotech: stain-resistant pants.These nanopants employ billions of tiny whiskers to create a layer of air above the rest of the fabric, causing liquids to roll off easily. Its not quite what Kurzweil and Crichton had in mind, nor is
20、it “little robots in your pants“, as CNN put it. But nanotechnology arguably embraces any item that incorporates engineering at the molecular level, including mundane products like this one.Just as the nano label can be broadly applied to products for branding and attention-grabbing purposes, so too
21、 can critics use the label to condemn barely related developments by linking them to the(still hypothetical)problems of nanopollution and gray goo. But theres a danger in thinking of nanotech only in god-or-goo terms. People at both extremes of the controversy fail to appreciate the humble, incremen
22、tal, yet encouraging progress that nanotech researchers are making. And focusing on dramatic visions of nanotech heaven or hell may foster restrictions that delay or block innovations that can extend and improve our lives.6 What worries Consumers Union is that nanoparticles _.(A)linger in environmen
23、t and are omnipresent in nature(B) can enter the brain more easily than normal particles(C) become essential components of cosmetics and food(D)present in products may cause harm to human beings7 The word “palpable“ in the last sentence of the first paragraph most probably means _.(A)tangible(B) ava
24、ilable(C) detectable(D)understandable8 The example of carbon nanotubules is cited to show that _.(A)anti-nanotech sentiment predominates in France(B) nanotech relieves the pain of Parkinsons sufferers(C) even potential benefit of nanotech may cause worry(D)Consumers Unions worry about nanotech is ne
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 考研 试卷 英语 阅读 模拟 257 答案 解析 DOC
