ETSI TR 123 924-2016 Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) Feasibility study on Non-Access Stratum (NAS) node selection function above Base Station Controller (BSC) Ra.pdf

《ETSI TR 123 924-2016 Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) Feasibility study on Non-Access Stratum (NAS) node selection function above Base Station Controller (BSC) Ra.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ETSI TR 123 924-2016 Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) Feasibility study on Non-Access Stratum (NAS) node selection function above Base Station Controller (BSC) Ra.pdf（42页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、 ETSI TR 1Universal Mobile TelFeasibility study on Nonfunction above / Radio N(3GPP TR 23.9TECHNICAL REPORT 123 924 V13.0.0 (2016elecommunications System (on-Access Stratum (NAS) nodBase Station Controller (BSNetwork Controller (RNC) .924 version 13.0.0 Release 1316-01) (UMTS); ode selection SC) 13)

2、 ETSI ETSI TR 123 924 V13.0.0 (2016-01)13GPP TR 23.924 version 13.0.0 Release 13Reference RTR/TSGS-0223924vd00 Keywords UMTS ETSI 650 Route des Lucioles F-06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex - FRANCE Tel.: +33 4 92 94 42 00 Fax: +33 4 93 65 47 16 Siret N 348 623 562 00017 - NAF 742 C Association but non lu

3、cratif enregistre la Sous-Prfecture de Grasse (06) N 7803/88 Important notice The present document can be downloaded from: http:/www.etsi.org/standards-search The present document may be made available in electronic versions and/or in print. The content of any electronic and/or print versions of the

4、 present document shall not be modified without the prior written authorization of ETSI. In case of any existing or perceived difference in contents between such versions and/or in print, the only prevailing document is the print of the Portable Document Format (PDF) version kept on a specific netwo

5、rk drive within ETSI Secretariat. Users of the present document should be aware that the document may be subject to revision or change of status. Information on the current status of this and other ETSI documents is available at http:/portal.etsi.org/tb/status/status.asp If you find errors in the pr

6、esent document, please send your comment to one of the following services: https:/portal.etsi.org/People/CommiteeSupportStaff.aspx Copyright Notification No part may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm except as author

7、ized by written permission of ETSI. The content of the PDF version shall not be modified without the written authorization of ETSI. The copyright and the foregoing restriction extend to reproduction in all media. European Telecommunications Standards Institute 2016. All rights reserved. DECTTM, PLUG

8、TESTSTM, UMTSTMand the ETSI logo are Trade Marks of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members. 3GPPTM and LTE are Trade Marks of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Organizational Partners. GSM and the GSM logo are Trade Marks registered and owned by the GSM Associati

9、on. ETSI ETSI TR 123 924 V13.0.0 (2016-01)23GPP TR 23.924 version 13.0.0 Release 13Intellectual Property Rights IPRs essential or potentially essential to the present document may have been declared to ETSI. The information pertaining to these essential IPRs, if any, is publicly available for ETSI m

10、embers and non-members, and can be found in ETSI SR 000 314: “Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs); Essential, or potentially Essential, IPRs notified to ETSI in respect of ETSI standards“, which is available from the ETSI Secretariat. Latest updates are available on the ETSI Web server (https:/ipr.e

11、tsi.org/). Pursuant to the ETSI IPR Policy, no investigation, including IPR searches, has been carried out by ETSI. No guarantee can be given as to the existence of other IPRs not referenced in ETSI SR 000 314 (or the updates on the ETSI Web server) which are, or may be, or may become, essential to

12、the present document. Foreword This Technical Report (TR) has been produced by ETSI 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). The present document may refer to technical specifications or reports using their 3GPP identities, UMTS identities or GSM identities. These should be interpreted as being re

13、ferences to the corresponding ETSI deliverables. The cross reference between GSM, UMTS, 3GPP and ETSI identities can be found under http:/webapp.etsi.org/key/queryform.asp. Modal verbs terminology In the present document “shall“, “shall not“, “should“, “should not“, “may“, “need not“, “will“, “will

14、not“, “can“ and “cannot“ are to be interpreted as described in clause 3.2 of the ETSI Drafting Rules (Verbal forms for the expression of provisions). “must“ and “must not“ are NOT allowed in ETSI deliverables except when used in direct citation. ETSI ETSI TR 123 924 V13.0.0 (2016-01)33GPP TR 23.924

15、version 13.0.0 Release 13Contents Intellectual Property Rights 2g3Foreword . 2g3Modal verbs terminology 2g3Foreword . 5g3Introduction 5g31 Scope 6g32 References 6g33 Definitions, symbols and abbreviations . 6g33.1 Definitions 6g33.2 Abbreviations . 6g34 General Description 7g34.1 Architecture Assump

16、tions 7g34.2 Overview 7g34.2.1 Issues with deploying NNSF in BSC nodes for MSC pool. 7g34.2.1.1 In certain networks some existing BSC/RNC nodes do not support the feature . 7g34.2.1.2 Mesh TDM circuit connection between BSCs with MSCs is required . 8g34.2.1.3 Complex O 2 presented to TSG for approva

17、l; 3 or greater indicates TSG approved document under change control. y the second digit is incremented for all changes of substance, i.e. technical enhancements, corrections, updates, etc. z the third digit is incremented when editorial only changes have been incorporated in the document. Introduct

18、ion The solution for support of the Intra Domain Connection of RAN Nodes to Multiple CN Nodes for GSM and UMTS systems in TS 23.236 2 has some issues for MSC Pool with existing deployments and implementations, e.g. upgrade of existing nodes. This TR studies whether these issues can be resolved by de

19、ploying a function above the BSC/RNC nodes which provides similar functions as the NNSF in BSC/RNC nodes that is specified in TS 23.236 2. ETSI ETSI TR 123 924 V13.0.0 (2016-01)63GPP TR 23.924 version 13.0.0 Release 131 Scope This Technical Report evaluates the feasibility of implementing a function

20、 above the BSC/RNC nodes to provide similar functions as the NNSF function in BSC/RNC nodes that is specified in TS 23.236 2. This Technical Report also identifies the impacts on specifications. 2 References The following documents contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute

21、 provisions of the present document. - References are either specific (identified by date of publication, edition number, version number, etc.) or non specific. - For a specific reference, subsequent revisions do not apply. - For a non-specific reference, the latest version applies. In the case of a

22、 reference to a 3GPP document (including a GSM document), a non-specific reference implicitly refers to the latest version of that document in the same Release as the present document. 1 3GPP TR 21.905: “Vocabulary for 3GPP Specifications“. 2 3GPP TS 23.236: “Intra-domain connection of Radio Access

23、Network (RAN) nodes to multiple Core Network (CN) nodes“. 3 3GPP TS 25.413: “UTRAN Iu interface Radio Access Network Application Part (RANAP) signalling“. 4 3GPP TS 23.251: “Network sharing; Architecture and functional description“. 5 3GPP TS 48.008: “3GPP TS 48.008: “Mobile Switching Centre - Base

24、Station System (MSC BSS) interface; Layer 3 specification“. 6 ITU-T Recommendation Q.714: “Specifications of Signalling System No. 7 - Signalling connection control part (SCCP): Signalling connection control part procedures“. 3 Definitions, symbols and abbreviations 3.1 Definitions For the purposes

25、of the present document, the terms and definitions given in TR 21.905 1 and the following apply. A term defined in the present document takes precedence over the definition of the same term, if any, in TR 21.905 1. Serving Node Selection Function: A logical function above the BSC/RNC nodes used to a

26、ssign an MSC Server to serve a mobile station and subsequently route the traffic to the assigned network resource. 3.2 Abbreviations For the purposes of the present document, the terms and definitions given in TR 21.905 1 and TS 23.236 2 and the following apply. A term defined in the present documen

27、t takes precedence over the definition of the same term, if any, in TR 21.905 1 and TS 23.236 2. SNRI SCCP Network Resource Identifier SNSF Serving Node Selection Function ETSI ETSI TR 123 924 V13.0.0 (2016-01)73GPP TR 23.924 version 13.0.0 Release 134 General Description 4.1 Architecture Assumption

28、s Figure 4.1-1 illustrates the set of network elements related to deploying the SNSF node for MSC Pool. Figure 4.1-1: Network Architecture of deploying SNSF node for MSC Pool Serving Node Selection Function is a newly introduced function which is between the BSC/RNC nodes with the MSC Servers for co

29、ntrol plane. As implementation options, SNSF node is a logical function; it may be standalone or co-located with existing nodes. See clause 5.6 for the detail of the SNSF processing. To resolve the issues identified from deploying NNSF within the BSC/RNC nodes for MSC pool illustrated in clause 4.2

30、and to avoid any potential update requirement on existing BSC/RNC equipments, the A/Iu-CS interface is used between BSC/RNC with SNSF. 4.2 Overview 4.2.1 Issues with deploying NNSF in BSC nodes for MSC pool In certain networks and with certain implementations, some deployment issues have been identi

31、fied relative to the deployment of the MSC Pool feature as specified in TS 23.236 2. Such issues associated with deploying NNSF in BSC/RNC for MSC pool are described in the following clauses. 4.2.1.1 In certain networks some existing BSC/RNC nodes do not support the feature In certain networks, most

32、 of the existing BSC/RNC nodes do not support the feature, and it is not easy to update them to support the feature and to be maintained in the future. New BSC/RNC nodes can be required to support the function, but some of the existing BSC/RNC can not be upgraded. Therefore the advantage of deployin

33、g MSC Pool can not be fully exploited within certain networks. ETSI ETSI TR 123 924 V13.0.0 (2016-01)83GPP TR 23.924 version 13.0.0 Release 13Figure 4.2.1.1.1: Part of BSC/RNC nodes support connecting to multiple MSS In the real-world example provided in Figure 4.2.1.1.1, nine BSC/RNC nodes do not s

34、upport MSC Pool feature while two other ones support it. Only for mobile stations moving with the coverage of the 2 BSC/RNC nodes, which support NNSF and where the NNSF function is enabled, the interaction between MSC servers and HLR and inter-MSC handover are reduced, while moving to the coverage o

35、f any other BSC/RNC nodes, the interaction and the handover will still be required as if no MSC Pool feature is deployed. And when MS is in the coverage of one of the other 9 BSC/RNC nodes that do not support NNSF, only one MSC server that the BSC/RNC node connects to can serve for the subscriber, t

36、hus the resources of the MSC servers in this pool area cannot be shared. Very little advantages could be seen from the feature in such a network configuration. 4.2.1.2 Mesh TDM circuit connection between BSCs with MSCs is required While deployment of AoIP (A interface bearer over IP) removes the mes

37、h TDM connection of BSC nodes with MSC nodes, only TDM connections are supported by the existing BSC, and not all the existing BSC nodes can be updated to IP mode. The mesh TDM circuit connection between BSC nodes with MSC nodes is still a deployment issue in the absence of AoIP, and is described in

38、 this clause. If the MSC Pool feature is deployed per TS 23.236 2, the feature enabled BSC will be required to have signaling and bearer connection with all the MSCs in the pool area. Figure 4.2.1.2.1 shows the mesh connection between 3 BSC/RNC nodes and 3 MSCs. Figure 4.2.1.2.1: BSC/RNC connects to

39、 each MSS in the pool area ETSI ETSI TR 123 924 V13.0.0 (2016-01)93GPP TR 23.924 version 13.0.0 Release 13That is, the mesh TDM circuit connections between BSC with MSC Servers will be required because each BSC is needed to be able to connect to each MSC server in the pool area, and it will be extre

40、mely hard to implement as the POOL scale increases. When adding a new MSC into the pool area, the TDM circuit connection between all the BSCs with the new MSC must be installed (either by re-planing the TDM circuits between the BSCs with the MSCs or installing new circuits between the BSCs with the

41、new MSC). A physical mesh connection can be avoided by introducing virtual MGWs between BSCs and MSC servers, but the TDM circuit configuration between each pair of BSC and MSC is still required as shown in Figure 4.2.1.2.2. The TDM circuits between each pair of BSC and MSC can not be used by any ot

42、her pair, e.g. circuits used for the pair BSC 1 and MSC 1 can not be re-used for the pair BSC 1 and MSC 2. Thus, the usage of the TDM circuits (specifically, the circuits in each BSC virtual MGW pair) is limited by configuration. Any changes in the core network (e.g. adding a new MSC into the pool a

43、rea) will require the TDM circuits between the BSCs with the virtual MGWs to be re-installed (either by re-planing the TDM circuit configuration between the BSCs with the virtual MGWs or by installing new TDM circuits, i.e. adding new TDM circuits between BSCs with the virtual MGW for the new MSC).

44、Figure 4.2.1.2.2: MGW between BSCs and MSC servers used as intermediary node But if each BSC/RNC only connects with one or two intermediary nodes, thus keeping the number of intermediary nodes small, it will mitigate the abovementioned need as shown in figure 4.2.1.2.3 that illustrates just a single

45、 intermediary node See clause 4.9.1 for BSC/RNC is connected to several intermediate nodes for the control plane. Figure 4.2.1.2.3: BSC and MSS connect to a single intermediary node Furthermore, if the TDM circuits are reused between each pair of BSC and MSC, the likelihood of circuit exhaust will b

46、e much less, for example by means of managing the TDM circuits between the intermediary node and BSC nodes as normal resources and managed by the intermediary node itself. ETSI ETSI TR 123 924 V13.0.0 (2016-01)103GPP TR 23.924 version 13.0.0 Release 134.2.1.3 Complex O as such, SGSN Pool is consider

47、ed as being out of the scope of this feasibility study. 4.3 Load Balancing The Serving Node Selection Function balances the signalling load between the available MSC Servers same as specified in clause 4.5 of TS 23.236 2. The load-balancing algorithm is implementation specific. 4.4 Load Re-Distribut

48、ion Signalling load re-distribution shall be performed as the procedures defined in clause 4.5a.1 of TS 23.236 2 that the Serving Node Selection Function performs the same as the NAS Node Selection Function. 4.5 Mobility Management No impacts upon mobility management result from the deployment of SN

49、SF. See clause 4.6 of TS 23.236 2. 4.6 Default CN node No impacts to the default CN node concept result from the deployment of SNSF. See clause 4.7 of TS 23.236 2. 4.7 Support of combined mobility management procedures No impacts to the support of combined mobility management procedures result from the deployment of SNSF. See clause 4.8 of TS 23.236 2. The configurations of the Gs interface are illustrated in figure 4.7-2. Deploying NNSF within the BSS/RAN nodes ETSI ETSI TR 123 924 V13.0.0 (2016-01)123GPP TR 23.924 version 13.0.0