ASTM E1959-2005(2011) Standard Guide for Requests for Proposals Regarding Medical Transcription Services for Healthcare Institutions《视为医疗保健机构医药处方服务建议要求的标准指南》.pdf

《ASTM E1959-2005(2011) Standard Guide for Requests for Proposals Regarding Medical Transcription Services for Healthcare Institutions《视为医疗保健机构医药处方服务建议要求的标准指南》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ASTM E1959-2005(2011) Standard Guide for Requests for Proposals Regarding Medical Transcription Services for Healthcare Institutions《视为医疗保健机构医药处方服务建议要求的标准指南》.pdf（8页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Designation: E1959 05 (Reapproved 2011)An American National StandardStandard Guide forRequests for Proposals Regarding Medical TranscriptionServices for Healthcare Institutions1This standard is issued under the fixed designation E1959; the number immediately following the designation indicates the y

2、ear oforiginal adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 This guide covers recommended guidelines to health-ca

3、re institutions for the development and issuance of requestsfor proposals (RFPs), as well as guidelines for medicaltranscription service organizations (MTSOs) responding torequests for proposals. It does not purport to address all of thelegal aspects of the RFP, if any, associated with its use. It i

4、s theresponsibility of the user of this guide to establish appropriatelegal guidelines prior to use.1.2 It is appropriate for healthcare institutions to issue RFPsfrom time to time or at regular contractual intervals for thepurpose of facilitating the process of contracting for medicaltranscription

5、services.1.3 It is anticipated that both a commercial contract forservices and a HIPAA Business Associate Agreement will bebased upon the responding proposals submitted to the RFP.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2E1384 Practice for Content and Structure of the ElectronicHealth Record (EHR)

6、E1762 Guide for Electronic Authentication of Health CareInformationE1869 Guide for Confidentiality, Privacy, Access, and DataSecurity Principles for Health Information Including Elec-tronic Health RecordsE1902 Specification for Management of the Confidentialityand Security of Dictation, Transcriptio

7、n, and TranscribedHealth Records3E2117 Guide for Identification and Establishment of aQuality Assurance Program for Medical TranscriptionE2184 Specification for Healthcare Document Formats3E2344 Guide for Data Capture through the Dictation Pro-cess2.2 Other DocumentsAmerican Association for Medical

8、Transcription (AAMT),Metrics for Measuring Quality in Medical Transcription,20054AAMT Book of Style, Second Edition, 20024Medical Transcription Industry Association (MTIA), BillingMethod Principles5Public Law 1004-191 Health Insurance Portability and Ac-countability Act of 1996 (HIPAA)63. Terminolog

9、y3.1 Definitions:3.1.1 audit traila record of users that is documentaryevidence of monitoring each operation performed. Audit trailsmay be comprehensive or specific to the individual and event(that is, document routing, version control, access, etc.).3.1.2 authenticationprocess of (1) verifying auth

10、orship,for example, by written signature, identifiable initials, orcomputer key, or (2) verifying that a document is what it ispurported to be, such as comparison with other records, orboth.3.1.3 Certified Medical Transcriptionistmedical tran-scriptionist who has met the qualifications for voluntary

11、certification set by the American Association for MedicalTranscription (AAMT), by demonstrating proficiency in thefield, meeting accepted standards, and maintaining the desig-nation through continuing education activities as required bythe certification process established by AAMT.3.1.4 compliance c

12、lauseitem in a contract that definesremedies for default of contract specifications.3.1.5 data destructioneradication of data to a useless andirretrievable state.1This guide is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E31 on HealthcareInformatics and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E31.

13、15 on HealthcareInformation Capture and Documentation.Current edition approved July 1, 2011. Published August 2011. Originallyapproved in 1998. Last previous edition approved in 2005 as E1959 05. DOI:10.1520/E1959-05R11.2For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact

14、ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.3Withdrawn. The last approved version of this historical standard is referencedon www.astm.org.4Available from American Association for Medic

15、al Transcription, www.aam-t.org.5Available from Medical Transcription Industry Association, .6Available from U.S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Docu-ments, 732 N. Capitol St., N.W., Mail Stop: SDE, Washington, DC 20401. See alsohttp:/aspe.hhs.gov/admnsimp.1Copyright ASTM Internationa

16、l, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.3.1.6 data elementsunits of fundamental informationfrom a healthcare record, organized in an analytical manner.3.1.7 data extractionspecification of a subset of data froma master data source for a new data format.

17、3.1.8 data miningextraction of selected elements ofstored data to be used for a purpose other than the one forwhich the information was originally intended.3.1.9 dictationinformation that is stated or read aloud tobe transcribed by another.3.1.10 dictatorone who dictates information to be tran-scrib

18、ed by another; also known as originator.3.1.11 digital dictationinformation that is stated or readaloud and recorded by a digital recording system.3.1.12 documentreport in any form (print, electronic, orvoice file).3.1.13 document accessability to enter, exit, and, in somecircumstances, edit or make

19、 use of a document.3.1.14 document destructioneradication of all elements ofa document to a useless state.3.1.15 document distributiondelivery of a document ordocuments (original or copies) to appropriate recipients, in anyform (print, electronic, or voice file), authenticated or notauthenticated.3.

20、1.16 document storagerepository for reports in anyform (print, electronic, or voice files), authenticated or notauthenticated, for later use or retrieval.3.1.17 electronic authenticationverification of authorshipof a document or verification that a document is what it ispurported to be, or both, acc

21、omplished by electronic means orin an electronic format.3.1.18 electronic protected health informationindividually identifiable health information in any electronicmedium, protected by HIPAA Privacy and Security Regula-tions.3.1.19 full-time equivalentwork force equivalent of oneindividual working f

22、ull-time for a specific period, which maybe made up of several part-time individuals or one full-timeindividual.3.1.20 healthcare institutionany facility whose primarypurpose is delivery of health care, for example, hospital, clinic,physician practice, multi-campus healthcare system.3.1.21 medical t

23、ranscriptionprocess of interpreting andtranscribing dictation by physicians and other healthcare pro-fessionals regarding patient assessment, workup, therapeuticprocedures, clinical course, diagnosis, prognosis, etc., intoreadable text, whether on paper or on computer, in order todocument patient ca

24、re and facilitate delivery of healthcareservices.3.1.22 medical transcription service organization(MTSO)provider of transcribed healthcare documentation;also referred to as vendor or contractor.3.1.23 on-site usersindividuals who use a facilitys com-puter system via a terminal and other hardware ele

25、ments thatare physically connected to that system.3.1.24 protected health informationindividually identifi-able health information, protected by HIPAA Privacy andSecurity Regulations.3.1.25 remote usersindividuals who use a facilitys com-puter system via modem or wide area network connection.3.1.26

26、taped dictationinformation that is stated or readaloud and recorded by an analog tape system, such as a cassetterecorder, as opposed to a digital system.3.1.27 turnaround time (TAT)elapsed time beginning withavailability of the voice file to the contractor (also known asMTSO or vendor) for transcrip

27、tion and ending when thetranscribed document is delivered to the healthcare institution.3.1.28 unit of measuredefined unit of production fortranscription, including but not limited to a character, word,line, minute; measure used to quantify transcription produced.3.1.28.1 DiscussionBecause productio

28、n statistics mayvary based on counting methods used, electronic or otherwise,even though units of measure are the same, the contractorshould clearly define the unit of measure being used, and thehealthcare institution should require full disclosure of themethods used to quantify production.3.1.29 ve

29、ndor siteany MTSO where patient health infor-mation is stored, processed, or produced.3.2 Acronyms:Acronyms:AAMT = American Association for Medical TranscriptionCMS = Centers for Medicare Medical TranscriptionMTIA = Medical Transcription Industry AssociationMTSO = Medical Transcription Service Organ

30、izationPHI = Protected Health InformationRFP = Request for ProposalTAT = Turnaround Time4. Significance and Use4.1 This guide is intended to assist healthcare institutions increating appropriate requests for proposals to be issued formedical transcription services.4.2 This guide provides recommended

31、 guidelines for theessential elements to be included in requests for proposalsissued to medical transcription services. The purpose of theserequests is contracting for the production and delivery oftranscribed patient care documentation for a healthcare insti-tution.4.3 This guide recognizes the nec

32、essity of a HIPAA Busi-ness Associate Agreement.4.4 This guide recognizes the necessity of researching local,state, and federal requirements that may apply.5. The Current RFP Process5.1 Healthcare institutions often outsource the production ofpatient care documentation to an external vendor known as

33、 amedical transcription service organization (MTSO). Thereforerequests for proposals (RFPs) for those services are moreE1959 05 (2011)2important than ever for management consideration. Establish-ing sensible standards for the RFP process is a necessarybeginning for successful partnerships between he

34、althcare insti-tutions and MTSOs. RFP standards will help to ensure that thehealthcare institutions goals and expectations become anintegral part of the working relationship with the MTSO.5.2 In reviewing RFPs presently in use, it is clear that noparticular standards are being followed in their comp

35、osition.5.2.1 The information necessary to select an appropriateMTSO should be realistic in order to achieve the desiredresults. Otherwise, inadequate service may result or otherdifficulties may arise after the contract is awarded. If an RFPdoes not ask for sufficient information about the MTSO for

36、thehealthcare institution to be able to judge the company fairly orto make an informed decision, or does not give enoughinformation to enable the MTSO to provide an informedresponse or set up the account adequately, the outcome may beunsatisfactory to all parties. This may leave the healthcareinstit

37、ution with poor service, no service, or rebidding. Further-more, the cost to the healthcare institution of repeatedlyre-establishing relationships with MTSOs can be excessive,and the quality of service during the transition may be less thanoptimal, adversely impacting patient care and patient safety

38、.5.2.2 The healthcare documentation process and quality ofthe data are enhanced by well-defined requirements as set forthin the RFP. High-quality data supports quality patient care,improves efficiency, and results in cost-effective services.6. Systematic Approach to Writing RFPs6.1 A systematic appr

39、oach to the RFP includes items thatmake the situation of the healthcare institution clear to theMTSO, including the healthcare institutions existing state oftranscription, goals for the future, and the requirements forsuccess: response criteria, confidentiality fundamentals, secu-rity, disaster reco

40、very, document or data destruction guidelines,or both, as well as MTSO disclosure and reference requests.6.1.1 The RFP structure should include:6.1.1.1 Current status of the healthcare institution,6.1.1.2 Expectations of the healthcare institution to includescope of work,6.1.1.3 Response requirement

41、s,6.1.1.4 Terms and conditions of contract,6.1.1.5 Confidentiality issues,6.1.1.6 Information security issues,6.1.1.7 Disaster recovery issues,6.1.1.8 Document and data destruction,6.1.1.9 MTSO disclosure,6.1.1.10 Reference requests,6.1.1.11 Scope of services (to include quality improvementprogram,

42、staffing capabilities, and transition plan),6.1.1.12 Product pricing to include change orders, sched-ules, etc.,6.1.1.13 Compliance clauses to include HIPAA, and6.1.1.14 Selection process to include the weighting criteriaand timeline scheduled for selection.6.2 The RFPshould be set up in such a way

43、that it will allowthe MTSO an adequate opportunity to present the full scope ofservices to the healthcare institution as a partner in achievingthe healthcare institutions goals. It should not be so rigid thatthe MTSO cannot demonstrate creative solutions and ap-proaches to service and pricing. This

44、sort of openness, whilemaking clear the requirements of the institution, promotes aresponse of cooperation toward a common goal.6.3 In each of the sections of the RFP, the document shouldset out the requirements in such a way that the compliance ornoncompliance of the MTSO can be verified. This shou

45、ld befollowed by a field for comment by the MTSO. In areas wherethe healthcare institution has a preference, but not necessarilya demand, the same format can be followed. Some sectionsmay be an invitation for information from the MTSO andshould be so arranged. Such an invitation acknowledgesrespect

46、for the MTSOs expertise in its field, while wiselyprotecting the interests of the healthcare institutions.7. Structure of the RFP Document7.1 Current Status of the Healthcare Institution:7.1.1 A complete description of the healthcare institutionsexisting technology and transcription practices and cu

47、rrentstatus enables the MTSO to formulate comprehensive answersto the requirements listed in the RFP.7.1.2 Organizational PictureA general description of thehealthcare institutions corporate structure (that is, number andtype of locations for healthcare facilities) should be specified.The healthcare

48、 institutions relevant policies and procedures(that is, Notice of Privacy Practices, etc.) should be provided tothe MTSO.7.1.3 Healthcare DocumentsA description of healthcaredocuments presently generated for each site should be specifiedand described:7.1.3.1 Healthcare document type (See Specificati

49、onE2184).7.1.3.2 The actual or anticipated, or both, volume to becontracted by document type and by unit of measurement asdefined in 7.12.1.7.1.3.3 The percentage of each document type relative to thetotal volume.7.1.3.4 The percentage of total healthcare documentationcurrently being dictated and transcribed.7.1.3.5 The number of authors by specialty and percentageof English-second language dictators.7.1.4 Document Format and DistributionSpecificationsas to the actual documents presently produced should includethe following area