[外语类试卷]大学英语四级模拟试卷1011及答案与解析.doc
《[外语类试卷]大学英语四级模拟试卷1011及答案与解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《[外语类试卷]大学英语四级模拟试卷1011及答案与解析.doc(43页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、大学英语四级模拟试卷 1011及答案与解析 一、 Part I Writing (30 minutes) 1 For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a short essay entitled College Students in Talent Shows following the outline given below. You should write at least 120 words but no more than 180 words. 1现在很多大学生参加 “选秀 ”节目 2 “选秀 ”节目给他们带来了许多好处,
2、但也存在一些问题 3我的看法 College Students in Talent Shows 二、 Part II Reading Comprehension (Skimming and Scanning) (15 minutes) Directions: In this part, you will have 15 minutes to go over the passage quickly and answer the questions attached to the passage. For questions 1-7, mark: Y (for YES) if the statem
3、ent agrees with the information given in the passage; N (for NO) if the statement contradicts the information given in the passage; NG (for NOT GIVEN) if the information is not given in the passage. 1 How to Reinvent College Rankings: Show the Data Students Need Most All rankings are misleading and
4、biased(有偏见的 ). But theyre also the only way to pick a school. Ive heard those exact words dozens of times and inferred their sentiment hundreds more. They undoubtedly were a major contributing factor in the 250,000 applications to the top colleges this past year. With only 14, 000 chances available,
5、 there will be a lot of disappointed families when decisions are announced in a few days. For 30 years, Ive co-authored bestselling books and provocative articles about how to improve ones chances of being accepted at a “top“ college. The first edition of our book Getting In ! revealed what went on
6、behind the admission committees closed doors, and introduced the concepts of packaging and positioning to the college-application vocabulary. The newest edition adapts the same principles to the digital age. But the core message remains: good colleges are not looking for the well-rounded kidtheyre l
7、ooking to put together the well-rounded class. What were revelations in 1983 are common knowledge todayat least among college-bound students, parents, and counselors. They also dont have to be told that the odds of getting into a “highly selective“ school are ridiculously low. Brown and Dartmouth wi
8、ll each accept about 9 percent of applicants; Cornell, Northwestern, and Georgetown about 16 percent. And Harvard, Yale, and Stanford? Forget about it: less than 7 percent! Wanting to attend a “name“ school isnt illogical. And there is nothing illogical in parents wanting a better return on their in
9、vestment. A colleges brand valuewhether that schools name will be recognized and open employers door. Colleges, counselors, and parents talk a lot about finding the right “fit“ between a school and a student. In reality, the process is dominated by reputation. The problem is that college reputations
10、 have been controlled by rankings. Far too many “ highly ranked“ colleges are gaming the rankings and trying to attract more and more applicantswhen the particular college is actually a poor “fit“ for many of the kids applying. Colleges want to attract and reject more kids because that “selectivity“
11、 improves the institutions ranking. College presidents publicly complain there are too many college rankings. Privately, they admit they have to provide the data that feed that maw(大胃口 ). They cant afford to be left off a rankings list. The real losers in this system are students and their parents.
12、A bad fit is costly, not just in dollars, but in time, energy, and psychological well-being. The emphasis should be on finding the right fit. But finding the right fit is not easy. Subjective guidebooks like Edward Fiskesoriginally titled The New York Times Selective Guide to Collegesare very useful
13、 and consciously do not include rankings. Ted changed his three-category rating system to make it more difficult to simply add “ stars“ and rank-list colleges. Even families who can afford to visit lots of colleges and endure the backward-walking tours find that campus personalities soon blur in the
14、ir memory. Thus it is not surprising that anxious, busy parents turn to rankings for shorthand comfort. Unfortunately, the data that U. S. News and other media companies are collecting are largely irrelevant. As a result, the rankings they generate are not meaningless, just misleading. Some examples
15、: U. S. News places a good deal of emphasis on the percentage of faculty who hold a “terminal degree“typically a Ph. D. Unfortunately, a terminal degree does not correlate(相关的 )in any way with whether that professor is a good teacher. It also doesnt improve that professors accessibility to students.
16、 In fact, there is usually such a correlation: the more senior the professor, the less time they have for undergraduates. U. S. News second most heavily weighted factorafter a colleges six-year graduation rateis a peer assessment of colleges by college presidents and admissions deans. You read that
17、right; administrators are asked to evaluate colleges that are competitive with their own school. If not an complete conflict of interest, this measure is highly suspect. Even some seemingly reasonable “inputs“ are often meaningless. U. S. News heavily weights the number of classes with fewer than 20
18、 students. But small classes are like comfort food: it is what high-school kids are familiar with. They have never sat in a large lecture hall with a very interesting speaker. So it is not something they could look forward or value. While most rankings suffer from major problems in criteria(标准 )and
19、inputs, the biggest problem is simpler; all the ranking systems use weightings that reflect the editors personal biases. Very simply, some editors priorities are undoubtedly going be different from what is important to me. Assuredly, my preferences are different from my kids. And both will differ ma
20、rkedly from our neighbors objectives. Colleges say they truly want to attract kids for whom the school will be a good fit. To make good on that promise, colleges need to provide families with insight, not just information; and they need to focus on outputs, not just inputs. Collecting and sharing fo
21、ur sets of very different data would be a good start;Better insight into the quality of education a student will get on that campus. Colleges need to share the exam scores for all students applying to medical school, law school, business school, and graduate programs. These tests reflect not just th
22、e ability of the kids whove gone to that college, but what theyve learned in the three-plus years theyve attended.Colleges need to assess a campus “happiness“ coefficient(系数 ). A happy campus is a more productive learning environment; and one that has a lower incidence of alcohol and drug abuse.The
23、full debt that families incur(招致 ); not just student debt.The salaries of graduates one, five, and 10 years after graduation. A fifth useful metric is what employersboth nationally and regionallythink of graduates from particular colleges. Hiring preferences are a useful proxy(代表 )for reputation. Th
24、e last piece in enabling families to find a better fit will come from entrepreneurs. Some smart “ kid“ will develop an online tool that will allow students and parents to take this new college-reported data and assign weighting factors to the characteristics that are important to them. The tool woul
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 外语类 试卷 大学 英语四 模拟 1011 答案 解析 DOC
