ASTM C1590-2004(2014) Standard Practice for Alternate Actinide Calibration for Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry《电感耦合等离子体质谱法的交替锕系校正的标准操作规程》.pdf

《ASTM C1590-2004(2014) Standard Practice for Alternate Actinide Calibration for Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry《电感耦合等离子体质谱法的交替锕系校正的标准操作规程》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ASTM C1590-2004(2014) Standard Practice for Alternate Actinide Calibration for Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry《电感耦合等离子体质谱法的交替锕系校正的标准操作规程》.pdf（6页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Designation: C1590 04 (Reapproved 2014)Standard Practice forAlternate Actinide Calibration for Inductively CoupledPlasma-Mass Spectrometry1This standard is issued under the fixed designation C1590; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the cas

2、e of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 This practice provides guidance for an alternate linearcalibration for the determination of

3、 selected actinide isotopesin appropriately prepared aqueous solutions by InductivelyCoupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS). This alternatecalibration is mass bias adjusted using thorium-232 (232Th) anduranium-238 (238U) standards. One of the benefits of thisstandard practice is the ability to ca

4、librate for the analysis ofhighly radioactive actinides using calibration standards atmuch lower specific activities. Environmental laboratories mayfind this standard practice useful if facilities are not available tohandle the highly radioactive standards of the individualactinides of interest.1.2

5、The instrument response for a series of determinationsof known concentration of232Th and238U defines the massversus response relationship. For each standard concentration,the slope of the line defined by232Th and238U is used to derivelinear calibration curves for each mass of interest usinginterfere

6、nce equations. The mass bias corrected calibrationcurves, although generated from interference equations, arespecific to the instrument operating parameters and tuning ineffect at the time of data acquisition. Because interferenceequations are part of the normal ICP-MS manufacturerssoftware package,

7、 this calibration methodology is widelyapplicable.1.3 For this standard practice, the actinide atomic massrange that has been studied is from amu 232244. Guidance foran extended range of amu 228248 is given in this practice.1.4 Using this practice, analyte concentrations are reportedat each amu and

8、not by element total (that is,239Pu versusplutonium).1.5 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded asstandard. No other units of measurement are included in thisstandard.1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of thesafety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is theresponsi

9、bility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2C859 Terminology Relating to Nuclear MaterialsC1168 Practice for Preparation and Dissolution of

10、 PlutoniumMaterials for AnalysisC1347 Practice for Preparation and Dissolution of UraniumMaterials for AnalysisC1411 Practice for The Ion Exchange Separation of Ura-nium and Plutonium Prior to Isotopic AnalysisC1414 Practice for The Separation of Americium fromPlutonium by Ion ExchangeC1463 Practice

11、s for Dissolving Glass Containing Radioac-tive and Mixed Waste for Chemical and RadiochemicalAnalysisD1193 Specification for Reagent Water3. Terminology3.1 Definitions:3.1.1 For definitions of terms relating to nuclear materials,refer to Terminology C859.3.1.2 AMUatomic mass unit.4. Summary of Pract

12、ice4.1 Calibration for the actinides by ICP-MS can be per-formed in a variety of ways with varying degrees of dataquality. An alternative calibration method has been developedto compensate for instrument mass bias using a generated massresponse curve defined by the232Th and238U data points. Themass

13、response curve defined by232Th and238U approximatesthe mass response curve from amu 232244 as verifiedexperimentally and graphically depicted in Fig. 1. The massresponse curve shown reflects the operating parameters and1This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee C26 on NuclearFuel Cyc

14、le and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee C26.05 on Methods ofTest.Current edition approved Jan. 1, 2014. Published February 2014. Originallyapproved in 2004. Last previous edition approved in 2009 as C1590 04 (2009).DOI: 10.1520/C1590-04R14.2For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM w

15、ebsite, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United St

16、ates1tune of the particular instrument in use at the time of datacollection. Different tuning parameters or instrumentationcould result in varying degrees of negative, neutral, or positivemass bias. Because the mass response curve defined by232Thand238U used in this standard practice is determined d

17、uringeach calibration, all potential linear variations in mass bias arecompensated for.4.2 The alternative calibration in this standard practicecombines the features of an external linear calibration at eachmass of interest with the mass bias correction of a mass/response curve. The correction for m

18、ass bias is integrated intothe acquisition of the standard data through the use ofinterference equations which, are part of the normal softwarepackage for correction of isobaric interferences in ICP-MSanalyses. Multipoint calibration curves are generated at eachmass of interest, resulting in more ac

19、curate quantification thanthat of the typical “semi-quantitative” single point calibrationbased on the mass/response curve alone.4.3 Sample analyses for blanks and samples are performedusing a data acquisition method file without the interferenceequations that were used to derive the calibration cur

20、ves. Aftercalibration curves are generated, the calibration files are copiedor linked to the analytical acquisition method. The sampleresponses are acquired at each mass, and concentrationscalculated from the mass bias corrected calibration curves.Some ICP-MS vendor supplied control software will pe

21、rmit thelinking of separate calibration and acquisition files (that is, youcan choose which calibration files to use to quantitate anyparticular data set regardless of the acquisition file that wasused to acquire the data).4.4 Mixed calibration standard solutions are preparedthrough dilution of sing

22、le element stock standards of thoriumand known abundance uranium (normally depleted in235U)with dilute nitric acid to develop a calibration series coveringthe desired concentration range. Standard concentrations arecalculated for232Th and238U for each calibration solution.4.5 Bismuth-209 (209Bi) is

23、used as an internal standard andis added in a fixed quantity in all standards and samples tocorrect for both instrument drift and physical sample transportfluctuations.5. Significance and Use5.1 One of the benefits of this standard practice is the abilityto calibrate for the analysis of highly radio

24、active actinidesusing calibration standards at much lower specific activities(that is,232Th and238U). Environmental laboratories may findthis standard practice useful if facilities are not available tohandle the highly radioactive standards of the individualactinides of interest.5.2 The degree of ac

25、tual mass bias is variable and isdependent upon instrument tune parameters. This standardpractice uses universal interference equations to derive a massbias correction that is specific to the instrument parameters andtune used for sample data acquisition and not based on ahistorical average.5.3 Mass

26、 bias correction uses the instrument software inter-ference equations and does not require additional subsequentoff-line calculations.5.4 The methodology that this standard practice is based onhas been used for the determination of232Th and237Np inenriched uranium solutions and the determination of2

27、41Am inplutonium and uranium legacy oxides following dissolutionand ion extraction chromatography separation.6. Interferences6.1 Isotopes of different elements forming atomic ions withthe same nominal mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) may causeisobaric interferences in ICP-MS if present in sufficient quan-

28、tity (that is,238U with238Pu and241Pu with241Am). Becausethe isotopic abundance of actinides vary widely, it is notpractical to apply an interference correction unless the isotopicabundance of the interference is well characterized. In addition,the hydride of an abundant isotope can interfere with t

29、headjacent higher mass (that is,238U1Hon239Pu). For thesereasons, it is prudent to implement actinide separation methodsutilizing extraction chromatography resins prior to ICP-MSanalysis to significantly reduce these interferences.36.2 Analyte memory can occur when there are large con-centration dif

30、ferences between standards and/or samples thatare analyzed sequentially. Thorium can exhibit memory withinthe sample introduction system. A rinse solution containing0.2M Nitric acid and 0.2M Sulfuric acid has been found to bebeneficial in reducing thorium carryover.7. Apparatus7.1 ICP-MS, computer c

31、ontrolled with associated softwareand peripherals.7.2 Autosampler, optional, with tube racks, disposable plas-tic sample tubes.3Maxwell, S. L, “ Rapid Actinide-Separation Methods,” Journal of AppliedRadioactivity Measurements, Vol 8, No. 4, 1997, pp. 36-44.FIG. 1 Atomic Mass versus Average Normalize

32、d ResponseC1590 04 (2014)27.3 Variable Micro and Macro Pipettes .8. Reagents8.1 Argon (Ar) Gas, high purity 99.99 %.8.2 Deionized Water, high purity, conforming to Specifica-tion D1193, Type I.8.3 Nitric Acid, (specific gravity 1.42), concentrated nitricacid (HNO3), trace metal grade or better.8.4 S

33、ulfuric Acid, (specific gravity 1.84), concentrated sul-furic acid (H2SO4), trace metal grade or better.8.5 Bismuth Stock Solution, (1000 g/mL Bi), matrix nomi-nal 10 % HNO3.8.6 Thorium Stock Solution, (1000 g/mL Th), matrix nomi-nal 2 % HNO3.8.7 Uranium Stock Solution, (1000 g/mL U), matrix nomi-na

34、l 2 % HNO3.8.8 Radioisotope Standards (241Am,242Pu,244Cm, etc.) canbe purchased4to verify calibration curves if laboratory andICP-MS have proper engineering and procedural controls tosafely handle radiological material.9. Hazards9.1 Personnel using this procedure shall be knowledgeableof the safety

35、precautions necessary for normal chemical,radiological handling protocol and instrumental operation ofICP-MS.9.2 Nitric and sulfuric acids are strong oxidizers, avoidcontact with flammable, powdered, or combustible materials.Avoid contact with skin, eyes and clothing. Do not breathe oringest vapors.

36、9.3 Actinide bearing materials are radioactive and toxic.Adequate laboratory facilities and ventilation hoods along withsafe handling techniques must be used.Adetailed discussion ofall safety precautions needed is beyond the scope of thisstandard practice. Follow site and facility specific radiation

37、protection and chemical hygiene protocol.10. Procedure10.1 Calibration Standard PreparationBecause the focusof this practice is on mass bias correction and not on anyparticular calibration concentration range or sample matrix,minimal instruction is given for the preparation of calibrationstandards.1

38、0.1.1 Mixed Calibration Standard solutions are preparedthrough the quantitative dilution of single element bench stockstandards of thorium and known abundance uranium (normallydepleted in235U) with bismuth as an internal standard innominal 1 % nitric acid or other acid concentration appropriateto ma

39、tch sample matrix.10.1.2 Calibration Blank consists of the same acid matrix asthe standard solutions with the same concentration bismuthinternal standard.10.1.3 Reagent Blank consists of the same acid and chemi-cal matrix as the samples (if different from the calibrationblank) with the same concentr

40、ation bismuth internal standard.Consideration should be given to processing the reagent blankthrough any sample prep evolutions such as digestion or ionextraction chromatography separation.10.2 Sample Preparation:10.2.1 Prior to analysis, digest/dissolve samples as neededusing methods appropriate to

41、 the sample matrix such asPractices C1168, C1347, C1463, or other laboratory specificprocedures.10.2.2 Use actinide separation procedures when necessaryto reduce matrix and isobaric interferences between overlap-ping isotopes of interest in the digest solutions; such as4Isotope Products Laboratories

42、, 3017 N. San Fernando Blvd., Burbank, CA91504; (818) 843-7000.TABLE 1 Universal Interference Equations Used to Perform Calibration Mass Bias CorrectionMass Bias Corrected Calibration Response Calibration Interference EquationCorrected (228) = Response (228) 0(238) 0.6667 + (232) 1.6667Corrected (22

43、9) = Response (229) 0(238) 0.5 + (232) 1.5Corrected (230) = Response (230) 0(238) 0.3333 + (232) 1.3333Corrected (231) = Response (231) 0(238) 0.1667 + (232) 1.1667Corrected (232) = Response (232) 1Corrected (233) = Response (233) 0+(238) 0.1667 + (232) 0.8333Corrected (234) = Response (234) 0+(238)

44、 0.3333 + (232) 0.6667Corrected (235) = Response (235) 0+(238) 0.5 + (232) 0.5Corrected (236) = Response (236) 0+(238) 0.6667 + (232) 0.3333Corrected (237) = Response (237) 0+(238) 0.8333 + (232) 0.1667Corrected (238) = Response (238) 1Corrected (239) = Response (239) 0+(238) 1.1667 (232) 0.1667Corr

45、ected (240) = Response (240) 0+(238) 1.3333 (232) 0.3333Corrected (241) = Response (241) 0+(238) 1.5 (232) 0.5Corrected (242) = Response (242) 0+(238) 1.6667 (232) 0.6667Corrected (243) = Response (243) 0+(238) 1.8333 (232) 0.8333Corrected (244) = Response (244) 0+(238) 2(232) 1Corrected (245) = Res

46、ponse (245) 0+(238) 2.1667 (232) 1.1667Corrected (246) = Response (246) 0+(238) 2.3333 (232) 1.3333Corrected (247) = Response (247) 0+(238) 2.5 (232) 1.5Corrected (248) = Response (248) 0+(238) 2.6667 (232) 1.6667C1590 04 (2014)3Practices C1411 and C1414, Maxwells “Rapid Actinide-Separation Methods,

47、”3or other laboratory specific procedures.10.2.3 Dilute sample into appropriate acid matrix (1 to 2 %HNO3typical) with the same concentration internal standard asin the calibration standards. Dilution of samples should beconsistent with the span of calibration standards.10.3 ICP-MS Instrumental Anal

48、ysis:10.3.1 Set up the ICP-MS for the analysis using the param-eters given in the manufacturers operating manual. Followingplasma initiation, allow the instrument to reach thermal equi-librium (generally at least 30 min). Optimize the ICP-MS usingroutine tuning protocol for elemental analysis or tun

49、e specificto the mass range of interest. Limit oxide formation throughinstrument tuning. Oxides are typically monitored using the %ratio of CeO/Ce, usually 1%.10.4 Actinide Calibration w/Mass Bias Correction:10.4.1 Actinide calibration with mass bias correction isperformed through the use of external linear calibration stan-dards consisting of232Th and238U with209Bi as an internalstandard. Multi-point calibration curves are generated for eachmass