大学四级-688及答案解析.doc
《大学四级-688及答案解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《大学四级-688及答案解析.doc(37页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、大学四级-688 及答案解析(总分:700.00,做题时间:90 分钟)一、BPart Writing(总题数:1,分数:103.00)1.很多人认为文凭能说明一切2. 然而当今社会越来越看重能力3. 你的看法Ability or Diploma(分数:103.00)_二、BPart Reading (总题数:1,分数:70.00)Directions: In this part, you will have 15 minutes to go over the passage quickly and answer the questions on Answer Sheet 1. For que
2、stions 1-7, choose the best answer from the four choices marked A), B), C) and D). For questions 8-10, complete the sentences with the information given in the passage.The Choice MythLast week, The Washington Post ran a front-page story that said most stay-at-home moms arent SUV-driving, daily yoga-
3、doing, latte-drinking white, upper-middle-class women who choose to leave their high-powered careers to answer the call to motherhood. Instead, they are disproportionately low-income, non-college educated, young and foreign-born; in other words, they are women whose horizons are greatly limited and
4、for whom the cost of child care, very often, makes work not a workable choice at all.These findings, drawn from a new report by the Census Bureau, really ought to lead us to reframe our public conversations about who mothers are and why they do what they do. It should lead us away from all the moral
5、istic bombast(大话) about mothers “choices“ and “priorities“. It should get us thinking less about choice, in fact, and make us focus more on the objective conditions that drive womens lives. And they should drive us to think about the choices that we as a society must make to guarantee that the best
6、possible opportunities are available for all families.The basic finding of this latest reportthat the more choices mothers have, the more likely they are to workhas been known, to anyone whos taken the time to seriously look into the issue, for quite some time now. Ever since 2003, when Lisa Belkins
7、 article in The Times Magazine about highly privileged and ultra-high-achieving moms“The Opt-Out Revolution“ was generalized by the news media to claim that mothers overall were choosing to leave the work force in droves, researchers have been revisiting the state of mothers employment and reaching
8、very similar conclusions.In 2005, the Motherhood Project at the Institute for American Values surveyed more than 2,000 women and published a report that said most mothers, given free choice in an ideal world, would choose to be employedprovided their employment didnt impinge (侵占) excessively on thei
9、r time with their kids. Approximately two-thirds said theyd ideally work part time or from home; only 16 percent said theyd prefer to work full-time. (Interestingly, the researchers said, it was the least-educated mothers who expressed the strongest preference for full-time work.)In 2007, the sociol
10、ogists David Cotter, Paula England and Joan Hermsen looked carefully at four decades of employment data and found that women with choicesthose with college educationswere overwhelmingly choosing to stay in the work force. The only women “opting out“ in any significant numbers were the very richestth
11、ose with husbands earning more than $125,000 a yearand the very poorestthose with husbands earning less than $23,400 a year.You might say that the movement of the richest women out of the workforce proves that women will, in the best of all possible worlds, go home. But these women often have husban
12、ds who, in order to earn those top salaries, work 70 or 80 hours a week and travel extensively; someone has to he home. Many left high-powered careers that made similar demands on their time. They are privileged, its true, but very often they have also been cornered by the all-or-nothing non-choices
13、 of our workplaces.The alternative narrativeof constricted horizons, not choicethat might have emerged from recent research has never really made it into the mainstream. It just cant, it seems, find a foothold.“The reason we keep getting this narrative is that there is this deep cultural conflict ab
14、out mothers employment,“ England told me this week. “On the one hand, people believe women should have equal opportunities, but on the other hand, we dont envision(展望) men taking on more child care and housework and, unlike Europe, we dont seem to be able to envision family-friendly work policies. “
15、Why this mattersand why opening this topic up for discussion is importantis very clear: because our public policy continues to rest upon a fictitious idea, eternally recycled in the media, of mothers free choices, and not upon the constraints that truly drive their behavior. “If journalism repeatedl
16、y frames the wrong problem, then the folks who make public policy may very well deliver the wrong solution,“ is how E. J. Graff, the associate director and senior researcher at Brandeis Universitys Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism once put it in the Columbia Journalism Review. “If wom
17、en are happily choosing to stay home with their babies, thats a private decision. But. its a public policy issue if schools, jobs and other American institutions are structured in ways that make it frustratingly difficult, and sometimes impossible, for parents to manage both their jobs and family re
18、sponsibilities.“It looked, not so long ago, as though things were going to change. Barack Obama made increasing womens work/life choices and providing more supports for working families a cornerstone of his campaign. All those lofty ideals, though, seem to have been forgotten in the realities of thi
19、s recession, where plans to expand universal pre-K, paid family leave and subsidies for child care have gone the way of“ state budget revenues. Even workfare, The Times reported this week, is being discarded in California in favor of old-style no-work welfare, because its been deemed too costly to g
20、ive poor mothers job skills while providing decent child care.In Fresno County, one of the first places in California where welfare recipients are being told about the policy change, which is voluntary for now, the new regulations arent being viewed as good news.“Especially when you have kids, you c
21、ant just sit around and collect checks,“ one mother told The Times. For now, 90 percent of beneficiaries in Fresno County are choosing to keep working and receiving child care subsidies.When mothers can choose, they choose self-empowerment (自助自强). Because they know that there is no true difference b
22、etween their advancement and the advancement of their children. Why do we so enduringly deny them the dignity of choice?(分数:70.00)(1).According to the front-page story of the Washington Post, most stay-at-home moms _.(分数:7.00)A.choose to leave their work at their own willsB.have to stay at home rear
23、ing childrenC.have more housework to doD.are usually from upper-middle class(2).The findings from a new report make us _.(分数:7.00)A.pay attention to drive force of mums real situationB.focus more on the choices in moms lifeC.have more conversations with momsD.grow morally concerned with moms(3).Lisa
24、 Belkins articles in Time Magazin has _.(分数:7.00)A.attracted a lot of disagreementB.been misgeneralized by the news mediaC.been taken seriouslyD.been suspected by many researchers(4).According to the survey by the Motherhood Project, most mothers would prefer to _.(分数:7.00)A.leave the work if the jo
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 大学 688 答案 解析 DOC
