[考研类试卷]考研英语(一)模拟试卷35(无答案).doc
《[考研类试卷]考研英语(一)模拟试卷35(无答案).doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《[考研类试卷]考研英语(一)模拟试卷35(无答案).doc(20页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、考研英语(一)模拟试卷 35(无答案)一、Section I Use of EnglishDirections: Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D. (10 points) 0 Throughout the 19th century and into the 20th, citizens of the United States maintained a bias against big cities. Most lived on farm
2、s and in small towns and believed cities to be centers of 1 , crime, poverty and moral 2 Their distrust was caused, 3 , by a national ideology that 4 fanning the greatest occupation and rural living 5 to urban living. This attitude 6 even as the number of urban dwellers increased and cities became a
3、n essential 7 of the national landscape. Gradually, economic reality overcame ideology. Thousands 8 the precarious (不稳定的) life on the farm for more secure and better paying jobs in the city. But when these people 9 from the countryside , they carried their fears and suspicions with them. These new u
4、rbanities already convinced that cities were 10 with great problems; eagerly 11 the progressive reforms that promised to bring order out of the 12 of the city.One of many reforms came 13 the area of public utilities. Water and sewerage systems were u-sually operated by 14 governments, but the gas an
5、d electric networks were privately owned. Reformers feared that the privately owned utility companies would 15 exorbitant (过度的 ) rates for these essential services and 16 them only to people who could afford them. Some city and state governments responded by 17 the utility companies, but a number of
6、 cities began to supply these services themselves. 18 of these reforms argued that public ownership and regulation would 19 widespread access to these utilities and guarantee a 20 price.(A)eruption(B) corruption(C) interruption(D)provocation(A)disgrace(B) deterioration(C) dishonor(D)degradation(A)by
7、 origin(B) in part(C) at all(D)at random(A)proclaimed(B) exclaimed(C) claimed(D)reclaim(A)superb(B) super(C) exceptional(D)superior(A)predominated(B) dominated(C) commanded(D)prevailed(A)feature(B) peculiarity(C) quality(D)attribute(A)deserted(B) departed(C) abolished(D)abandoned(A)reallocated(B) mi
8、grated(C) replaced(D)substituted(A)overwhelmed(B) overflowed(C) overtaken(D)preoccupied(A)embraced(B) adopted(C) hugged(D)contained(A)chaos(B) chores(C) chorus(D)outbreaks(A)at(B) by(C) out(D)in(A)public(B) municipal(C) republican(D)national(A)charge(B) take(C) cost(D)spend(A)distribute(B) deliver(C
9、) transfer(D)transport(A)degenerating(B) generating(C) regenerating(D)regulating(A)Proponents(B) Opponents(C) Sponsors(D)Rivals(A)secure(B) ensure(C) reassure(D)incur(A)fair(B) just(C) square(D)objectivePart ADirections: Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing
10、 A, B, C or D. (40 points)21 The right to a trial by jury is a fundamental part of the United States legal system. It is a right firmly rooted in our democratic tradition. The jury system provides a buffer between the complex and often inflexible legal system and the average citizen on trial. The ri
11、ght to be judged by a jury is a right that most Americans feel very strongly about. However, due to recent jury decisions, some critics are questioning the value of this institution.Our jury system is by no means flawless. It is subject to constant scrutiny and debate concerning its merit and its do
12、wnfalls. As is true in all institutions, juries are capable of making mistakes. Psychological studies have been done on many aspects of jury behavior. Political scientists are also intrigued by juries and the manner in which they arrive at important decisions. Although most Americans believe in the
13、jury system, there has been considerable controversy surrounding it lately. The public has become even more concerned about this institution recently. The outcomes of the Rodney King, the O.J. Simpson, and the Menendez brothers trials in Los Angeles and the dissatisfaction that followed the jurys de
14、cisions are three examples of instances when the effectiveness of the jury system has come under fierce attack. From the public reaction to these decisions and others like them, it is very clear that the way in which juries reach their decisions is often as important to the American people as it is
15、to the specific person on trial. Many people feel that the average jurist is not equipped to make the kinds of decisions they are faced with. These critics suggestions range from restructuring the system up to tally eliminating it.Most average Americans, I believe, feel that the right to a jury tria
16、l is a fundamental one, and its guarantees should be honored. These people would argue that laws are inflexible. They cannot deal with the individual circumstances in each case, but juries can take these into account. Still others believe that juries are favorable because they reflect the morals and
17、 values of the community they come from. Indeed, many proponents of the jury support the system because of a particular kind of jury bias, the tendency for jurors, to place justice above the law.Opponents of the system argue that juries are uneducated in legal procedures and should not be given the
18、type of responsibility they have traditionally had. These people also argue that juries are biased. In fact, the psychological literature provides many examples of this bias. Jurors are less likely to punish a sad or distressed defendant, as opposed to a joyful one, apparently because the defendant
19、is already being punished emotionally. Some opponents say that although juries are instructed not to pay attention to the media, they are more easily influenced by the news than judges. Critics of the jury system also point out that juries are expensive and are often unable to reach an agreement. Th
20、ey argue that the decision making should be left up to the people who know the law, judges and lawyers.In between these two extremes are those people who agree with the jury system as a whole, but feel that some changes need to be implemented to improve its effectiveness. These people suggest that j
21、uries receive instruction prior to hearing testimony. They argue that this would improve the system by providing some working legal knowledge for the jury as well as giving them an idea of what they are to listen for. Research has shown that exposing jurors to the laws involved in their decision mak
22、ing resulted in significantly fewer verdicts of guilty. This finding suggests that lawyers and judges should have the responsibility of insuring that the jury is adequately informed of the legal issues at hand and the laws available to handle those issues.On the whole, though, I feel that the Americ
23、an guarantee of trial by jury is a valuable one. I do feel, however, that in order to improve its utility, judges and lawyers need to accept the responsibility for educating the jury on relevant legal issues.21 Some critics are questioning the value of the jury system probably because_.(A)the jury s
24、ystem is unnecessarily complex and rigid(B) recent jury decisions are made against the democratic tradition(C) there is constant debate about its merit and its downfalls(D)Some juries.have made mistakes recently22 Opponents of the jury system accuse jurors of_.(A)placing justice above the law(B) kno
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 考研 试卷 英语 模拟 35 答案 DOC
