CEPT ERC REC 01-08 E-1998 Exchange of Information between Monitoring Stations (Izmir 1997)《监控站之间的信息交换 1997年伊兹密尔》.pdf

《CEPT ERC REC 01-08 E-1998 Exchange of Information between Monitoring Stations (Izmir 1997)《监控站之间的信息交换 1997年伊兹密尔》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《CEPT ERC REC 01-08 E-1998 Exchange of Information between Monitoring Stations (Izmir 1997)《监控站之间的信息交换 1997年伊兹密尔》.pdf（4页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、STD-CEPT CEPT/ERC/REC 01-OB E-ENGL 3998 II 2326434 0034851 340 m CEPTERCIREC 0148 E Page 1 Distribution: B CEPT/ERC RECOMMENDATION 01-08 E (Irniir 1997) EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION BETWEEN MONITORING STATIONS Recommendation adopted by the Working Group ”Frequency Management” (WGFM): The European Confere

2、nce of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations, INTRODUCTION One of the aims of the Intemational Telecommunications Union is to ensure efficient and economic use of the frequency spectrum and help towards the mpid eiimination of hannful interference. The Radio Regulations contain the provision

3、s governing the establishment and operation of the Intemational Monitoring System The Eusopean Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Admlliistrations (CEPT), considering the need to develop common and coordjnated procedures and measurement techniques for monitoring within the GEIT framework an

4、d the need for timely exchange of monitoring information between Administrations: the need for a simple, effective means of exchanging such information; the desirability of using current coirniunication means; the advantages resulting from the use of a standard format, that under the Intemational Mo

5、nitoring System, requests for mnitoring information shouid be sent to the Centraiizing Office (see IT document Kit of Addresses”) designated by each Administration which then assembles the information for transmission back to the orighating Admbistration; that in Resolution ITU-R 23 the ITU Radiococ

6、ations Assembly (1993) reconfirmed the need to extend the International Monitoring System on a worldwide scale and also decided that cooperation between monitoring stations of different Administrations should be encouraged and improved with a view to exchanging information; that most monitoring stat

7、ions have sufficient communication facilities available and in cases of responding to interference, the fastest methcd of commmication should be used, Editionof February 26,1998 CEPTERCmEC 01-08 E Page 2 recognsng a) that there is a need for ail monitoring stations to be able to request from each ot

8、her clearly defined information; b) c) d) that such information could relate to emissions in any frequency band; that the need for the request could be to deal with urgent cases of interference to legitimate users of radio; that there will be occasions when mnitonng stations have resource problem an

9、d will be unable, for example, to provide bearing requests on ali emissions; that it will usually be seif-evident why information is being requested, particuiiuly in the case of the clearance of interference. There may, however, be occasions when the requesting station is asked to justify the reason

10、 for the infomtion exchange and nationai security my prevent a fui1 reply. In these circumstances Administrations are asked to co-operate and understand the nature of the problem, e) recommends 1) that comn formats for the exchange of infomation between mnitoring stations be adopted as shown in Anne

11、x 1 (for communication via facsimile) or Armex 2 (for communication via telex); that a request from one station to another for information relating to any emission should include the foilowing details: a. Frequency b. ClassofEmission c. Field strength, power flux density or signai strength (QSA) d.

12、Bearing (QTE) or estimated location e. Ciassificationof bearing f. Bandwidth g. other characteristics 2) Of these parameters, the minimumreqkment that eachmnitoring station should be able to provide is: a. Frequency b. Class of Emission c. Pield strength, power flux density or signai strength (QSA)”

13、 STD*CEPT CEPT/ERC/REC 05-08 E-ENGL 1998 232b414 0034853 113 CEPTERCIREC 01-08 E Page 3 Annex 1 FACSIMILE REQUEST FOR MONITORING INFORMATION Q. From Monitoring Station, Country, Telephone & Fax zumbers) D. To: Destination Address, bonitoring Station & Country) (Name of Operator) (Datenime (UTC) I E.

14、 Please provide the Emission details provided following idormation: I El. (Frequency) E2. (Class of Emission) E3. (Field strengtWSigna1 strength (QSA) E4. (Bearing or estimated location) I E5. (Classification of bearing) E6. (Bandwidth) E7. (Other Information) REPLY TO A FACSIMILE REQUEST FOR MONITO

15、RING INFORMATION DatelTime (UTC) El. (Frequency measured) m. (Bearing or estimated location) E2. (CZass ofEmission) ES. (Classification of bearing) E3. Field strengtWSignal strength measured (QSA) E6. (Bandwidth measured) E7. (Other Information) STDoCEPT CEPT/ERC/REC 01-08 E-ENGL 1998 m 2326414 0014

16、854 OST m CEPTERCIREC O1 -08 E Page 4 Annex 2 TELEX REQUEST FOR MONITORING INFORMATION From (Monitoring Station & Country): To (Monitoring Station & Country): Datemime (UTC): Please monitor the emission specified below and provide your observations against the headings marked (X): El. E2. E3. E4. E5

17、. m. E7. )(Frequency) )(Class of Emission) )(Field strength or signal strength (QSA) )(Bearing or estimated location) )(Ciussification of bearing) )(Bandwidth) )(Other information) TELEX REPLY TO A REQUEST FOR MEASUREMENTS Prom (Monitoring Station & Country) To: (Monitoring Station & Country) Datemi

18、me (UTC): In reply to your request for information, the foilowing parameters for your emission of interest have been observed and measured: EI. )(Frequency) E2. )(Class of Emission) E3. E4. )(Bearing or estimated location) E5. )(Classification of bearing) E6. )(Bandwidth) E7. )(Other information) )(Field strength or signal strength (QSA)