ASTM E1398-1991(2003) Standard Practice for the in vivo Rat Hepatocyte DNA Repair Assay《鼠体内肝细胞DNA修复化验》.pdf
《ASTM E1398-1991(2003) Standard Practice for the in vivo Rat Hepatocyte DNA Repair Assay《鼠体内肝细胞DNA修复化验》.pdf》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《ASTM E1398-1991(2003) Standard Practice for the in vivo Rat Hepatocyte DNA Repair Assay《鼠体内肝细胞DNA修复化验》.pdf(8页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、Designation: E 1398 91 (Reapproved 2003)Standard Practice forIn Vivo Rat Hepatocyte DNA Repair Assay1This standard is issued under the fixed designation E 1398; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revis
2、ion. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 This practice covers a typical procedure and guidelinesfor conducting the rat in vivo hepatocyte DNA repair assay. Theprocedure
3、s presented here are based on similar protocols thathave been shown to be reliable (1, 2, 3, 4, 5).21.2 Mention of trade names or commercial products aremeant only as examples and not as endorsements. Othersuppliers or manufacturers of equivalent products are accept-able.1.3 This standard does not p
4、urport to address all of thesafety concerns associated with its use. It is the responsibilityof the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety andhealth practices and determine the applicability of regulatorylimitations prior to use.2. Significance and Use2.1 Measurement of chemically ind
5、uced DNA repair is ameans of assessing the ability of a chemical to reach and alterthe DNA. DNA repair is an enzymatic process that involvesrecognition and excision of DNA-chemical adducts, followedby DNA strand polymerization and ligation to restore theoriginal primary structure of the DNA (6). Thi
6、s process can bequantitated by measuring the amount of labeled thymidineincorporated into the nuclear DNA of cells that are not inS-phase and is often called unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS)(7). Numerous assays have been developed for the measure-ment of chemically induced DNA repair in various cell
7、linesand primary cell cultures from both rodent and human origin(4). The primary culture rat hepatocyte DNA repair assay hasproven to be particularly valuable in assessing the genotoxicactivity of chemicals (8). Genotoxic activity often results frommetabolites of a chemical. The in vitro rat hepatoc
8、yte assayprovides a system in which a metabolically competent cell isalso the target cell. Most other in vitro short-term tests forgenotoxicity employ a rat liver homogenate (S-9) for metabolicactivation, which differs markedly in many important waysfrom the patterns of activation and detoxification
9、 that actuallyoccur in hepatocytes. An extensive literature is available on theuse of in vitro DNA repair assays (9-19).2.2 A further advance was the development of an in vivo rathepatocyte DNA repair assay in which the test chemical isadministered to the animal and the resulting DNA repair isassess
10、ed in hepatocytes isolated from the treated animal (20).Numerous systems now exist to measure chemically inducedDNA repair in specific tissues in the whole animal (4). Theaverage of in vivo assays is that they reflect the complexpatterns of uptake, distribution, metabolism, detoxification,and excret
11、ion that occur in the whole animal. Further, factorssuch as chronic exposure, sex differences, and different routesof exposure can be studied with these systems. This isillustrated by the potent hepatocarcinogen 2,6-dinitrotoluene(DNT). Metabolic activation of 2,6-DNT involves uptake,metabolism by t
12、he liver, excretion into the bile, reduction ofthe nitro group by gut flora, readsorption, and further metabo-lism by the liver once again to finally produce the ultimategenotoxicant (21). Thus, 2,6-DNT is negative in the in vitrohepatocyte DNA repair assay (22) but is a very potent inducerof DNA re
13、pair in the in vivo DNA repair assay (23, 24).Aproblem with tissue-specific assays is that they may fail todetect activity of compounds that produce tumors in othertarget tissues. For example, no activity is seen in the in vivoDNA repair assay with the potent mutagen benzo(a)pyrene(BP), probably bec
14、ause limited tissue distribution and greaterdetoxification in the liver yields too few DNA adducts toproduce a measurable response (3). In contrast, BP is readilydetected in the less tissue-specific in vitro hepatocyte DNArepair assay (11). An extensive literature exists on the use ofthe in vivo hep
15、atocyte DNA repair assay (1-3, 5, 9, 25-33).3. Procedure3.1 Treatment:3.1.1 All personnel must be knowledgeable in the proce-dures for safe handling and proper disposal of carcinogens,potential carcinogens, and radiochemicals. Disposable glovesand lab coats must be worn.3.1.2 Any strain or sex of ra
16、t may be used. The largestdatabase is for male Fischer-344 rats. Young adult animals arepreferred. It is possible that factors such as sex, age, and strainof the rat could affect the outcome of the DNA repair1This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F04 on Medical andSurgical Materi
17、als and Devices and is the direct responsibility of SubcommitteeF04.16 on Biocompatibility Test Methods.Current edition approved Sept. 10, 2003. Published September 2003. Originallypublished in 1991. Last previous edition published in 1998 as E 1398 91 (1998).2The boldface numbers in parentheses ref
18、er to the list of references found at theend of this practice.1Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.experiments. Therefore, for any one series of experiments(including controls) these variables should be kept constant.3.1.3
19、 Administration is usually by gavage with chemicalsdissolved or suspended in an appropriate vehicle such as wateror corn oil, depending on solubility. An advantage of the assayis that various routes of administration may be chosen. Thus,chemicals may also be administered by intraperitoneal injec-tio
20、n or inhalation or in the diet. For gavage administration, 0.2to 1.0 mL of test chemical solution is administered per 100 gbody weight. Controls receive the appropriate vehicle solution.Stock corn oil should be replaced with fresh monthly.3.1.4 For DNA repair studies, animals may be taken off feedfo
21、r a few hours prior to sacrifice to make the process ofperfusion a little easier with less food in the stomach. Theperiod without food should never exceed 12 h because of thepossibility of altered metabolism or uptake. Water should becontinuously available.3.1.5 Dose selection will depend on the cha
22、racteristics ofeach chemical and the purpose of the experiment. If one isinvestigating whether a chemical can produce a genotoxiceffect in the animal, even at massive doses and by routes ofadministration that may overwhelm natural defense mecha-nisms, then high doses (such as the LD50, or higher) th
23、at donot kill the animal before the 16-h sacrifice point may beemployed. Even in such a case, doses above 1000-mg/kg bodyweight are not recommended. In some instances hepatotoxicityat high doses may result in inhibition of cell attachment orDNA repair. More commonly, the purpose of employing thewhol
24、e animal is to evaluate the genotoxic effects of realisticexposures and routes of administration in the target tissue. Inthis case, doses above 500 mg/kg and the intraperitoneal routeof administration are not recommended. The usual range ofdoses is from 10 to 500 mg compound per kilogram bodyweight.
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
5000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- ASTME139819912003STANDARDPRACTICEFORTHEINVIVORATHEPATOCYTEDNAREPAIRASSAY 体内 肝细胞 DNA 修复 化验 PDF

链接地址:http://www.mydoc123.com/p-528611.html