[外语类试卷]专业英语八级(阅读)模拟试卷60及答案与解析.doc
《[外语类试卷]专业英语八级(阅读)模拟试卷60及答案与解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《[外语类试卷]专业英语八级(阅读)模拟试卷60及答案与解析.doc(18页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、专业英语八级(阅读)模拟试卷 60及答案与解析 0 The other day, I walked into an airport mens room, which was empty except for one man, who appeared to be having a loud, animated conversation with a urinal. Ten years ago, I would have turned right around and walked briskly back out of there. One rule my parents stressed w
2、hen I was a child was: “ Never stay in a restroom with a man who talks to the plumbing.“ But, of course, as a modern human, I knew that this man was talking on his cell phone, using one of those earpiece thingies, with the little microphone on the wire, the kind that people feel they must shout at,
3、to make sure their vital messages are getting through. Its not clear to me why so many people in airports use the earpiece thingies. Why do they need to keep their hands free? Do they expect some emergency to suddenly arise that will require them to have both hands free while talking? Or maybe theyr
4、e afraid that if they hold the phone next to their head, the radiation will give them brain cancer. If so, an option they might consider is wrapping their heads in aluminum foil. Granted, this would make them look stupid. But not nearly as stupid as they look shouting into their earpiece wires. So a
5、nyway, there I was, in this restroom, standing maybe six feet from this guy, both of us facing the wall, him shouting at his urinal about some business thing involving specifications, and at some point he said “I swear this is a direct quote I am handling it. “This caused me to emit an involuntary s
6、norting sound(not loud; certainly nowhere near as loud as this guy was talking; just a little snortlet),which caused the guy to stop talking and violating the No. 1 Guy Rule of Restroom Etiquette? turn his head and look directly at me, so I could see(using peripheral vision)that he was irritated by
7、my rude interruption of his conversation. Then he went back to shouting at the urinal. The point is that every key element of this scenario the cell phone, the airplane, the zipper is made possible by technology. We know that technology is a wonderful thing. But at what point does technology go too
8、far? Is it fair to say that cell phones, if used thoughtfully and politely, are OK, but that if a person attaches an earpiece thingy and walks around shouting in public, bystanders should be allowed to snatch the wire and sprint off down the airport concourse, with the shouters earphone, and possibl
9、y even the shouters detached ear, bouncing gaily behind on the floor? I think we all agree that the answer is: Yes. When technology goes too far, ordinary citizens must take action. But the question is: How do we define“too far“? I will tell you. We define“too far“ as“when scientists start putting w
10、eapons on cockroaches. “This is actually happening, according to an article in the Sept.6 issue of Science magazine, brought to my attention by alert reader Richard Sweetman. This article states that researchers at the University of California at Berkeley have been “mounting tiny cannons on the back
11、s of cockroaches. “That is correct: These researchers have been outfitting live cockroaches with backpacks containing“plastic tubes filled with explosives. “ Of course, the researchers have a scientific reason for doing this: They are on LSD. No,really, it has something to do with figuring out how c
12、ockroaches have such good balance(You almost never see a cockroach fall off a bicycle.). The researchers have used their findings to construct a working robot roach that is, according to Science,the size of a breadbox. Swell! If theres anything this world needs more than armed cockroaches, its giant
13、, mechanized cockroaches! Newspaper story from the year 2010:“A homeowner in Santa Rosa, California, was found shot to death in his kitchen Friday. Police said the man apparently was felled by 500 rounds of small-bore cannon fire, mostly in his ankles, indicating that this was the work of the gang o
14、f armed research cockroaches that escaped from a Berkeley lab. Police said the motive in the slaying was apparently a Ring Ding. In a related development, an escaped robot cockroach broke into an Oakland Wal-Mart and made off with an estimated 17,000 AA batteries. “Ask yourself: Is that the kind of
15、story you want to read in your newspaper? No, seriously, this is bad. We need somebody in authority to look into this right away. Maybe Dick Cheney could handle it. 1 We can infer from “ Never stay in a restroom with a man who talks to the plumbing“ in Paragraph One that people_. ( A) presumed such
16、a man was more or less insane ( B) were afraid that the man would talk to them ( C) thought there was something wrong with the plumbing ( D) believed that the man had mistaken them for other people 2 Which of the following adjectives describes the authors attitude to using the earpiece thingies? ( A
17、) Surprised. ( B) Considerate. ( C) Contemptuous. ( D) Ambiguous. 3 The mention of a conflict between people with earpiece thingies and bystanders in the sixth paragraph is to_. ( A) support the authors opinion in the previous part ( B) elicit the authors opinion in the following paragraph ( C) veri
18、fy the trueness of the authors statement ( D) refute other peoples sympathy for the man 4 Which of the following is INCORRECT of the story mentioned in the last paragraph? ( A) It is imaginary. ( B) It is a warning. ( C) It is a science fiction. ( D) It is set in California. 5 A suitable title for t
19、he passage might be_. ( A) A Man Talking to Plumbing ( B) Putting Weapons on Cockroaches ( C) Modern Technology ( D) Cannons, Cell Phones and Zippers 5 About two-thirds of the worlds population is expected to live in cities by the year 2020 and, according to the United Nations, approximately 3.7 bil
20、lion people will inhabit urban areas some ten years later. As cities grow, so do the number of buildings that characterize them: office towers, factories, shopping malls and high-rise apartment buildings. These structures depend on artificial ventilation systems to keep clean and cool air flowing to
21、 the people inside. We know these systems by the term“air-conditioning“. Although many of us may feel air-conditioners bring relief from hot, humid or polluted outside air, they pose many potential health hazards. Much research has looked at how the circulation of air inside a closed environment suc
22、h as an office building can spread disease or expose occupants to harmful chemicals. One of the more widely publicised dangers is that of Legionnaires disease, which was first recognised in the 1970s. This was found to have affected people in buildings with air-conditioning systems in which warm air
23、 pumped out of the systems cooling towers was somehow sucked back into the air intake, in most cases due to poor design. This warm air was, needless to say, the perfect environment for the rapid growth of disease-carrying bacteria originating from outside the building, where it existed in harmless q
24、uantities. The warm, bacteria-laden air was combined with cooled, conditioned air and was then circulated around various parts of the building. Studies showed that even people outside such buildings were at risk if they walked past air exhaust ducts. Cases of Legionnaires disease are becoming fewer
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 外语类 试卷 专业 英语 阅读 模拟 60 答案 解析 DOC
