AIAA S-102.1.5-2009 Performance-Based Failure Review Board (FRB) Requirements《基于性能的故障复核委员会(FRB)要求》.pdf
《AIAA S-102.1.5-2009 Performance-Based Failure Review Board (FRB) Requirements《基于性能的故障复核委员会(FRB)要求》.pdf》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《AIAA S-102.1.5-2009 Performance-Based Failure Review Board (FRB) Requirements《基于性能的故障复核委员会(FRB)要求》.pdf(37页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、 Standard ANSI/AIAA S-102.1.5-2009 Performance-Based Failure Review Board (FRB) Requirements AIAA standards are copyrighted by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Reston, VA 20191-4344 USA. All rights reserved. AIAA grants you a license as follow
2、s: The right to download an electronic file of this AIAA standard for storage on one computer for purposes of viewing, and/or printing one copy of the AIAA standard for individual use. Neither the electronic file nor the hard copy print may be reproduced in any way. In addition, the electronic file
3、may not be distributed elsewhere over computer networks or otherwise. The hard copy print may only be distributed to other employees for their internal use within your organization. ANSI/AIAA S-102.1.5-2009 American National Standard Performance-Based Failure Review Board (FRB) Requirements Sponsore
4、d by American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Approved 17 November 2008 American National Standards Institute Abstract This Standard provides the basis for developing the performance-based Failure Review Board (FRB), which is a group consisting of representatives from appropriate project o
5、rganizations with the level of responsibility and authority to assure that root causes are identified and corrective actions are effected in a timely manner for all significant failures. Although good engineering practice suggests that most product development projects should include a formal FRB, t
6、he basic FRB functions may devolve to a single individual on small projects. Planning and reporting requirements and analytic tools are provided for contractors. The linkage of this Standard to the other standards in the new family of performance-based reliability and maintainability (R the names of
7、 all voting FRB members that participated, and those of other attendees acting in an advisory capacity; the objectives of the FRB meeting; status of prior FRB action items, with special attention to the status of action items relating to the FRACAS reports currently under consideration; for each ano
8、maly report under consideration, identification of the affected item including part number, nomenclature, and serial number; description of the test conditions at the time of anomaly, including identification of the test procedure and revision, test paragraph, environmental conditions, and previous
9、environments the item was subjected to, if pertinent; symptoms of the item under test at the time of the anomaly; results of attempts to reproduce the anomaly, where applicable; name of the person initiating the anomaly report; name of the person verifying the anomaly; steps taken to determine the c
10、ause of the anomaly and their results; a statement regarding the effects of the anomaly and anomaly analysis on the affected item under test; action items from the FRB meeting and the names of assignees; if a redundant item, an assessment of the impact of the anomaly on the operation of the system u
11、sing the redundant path; identification and location of other items with the same configuration as the affected item under test (These items are considered suspect); a description of corrective actions taken with the affected item under test and other suspect items, scheduled accomplishment and appr
12、opriate concurrences; a description of corrective actions taken to eliminate the root cause and prevent its recurrence, scheduled accomplishment, and appropriate concurrences; and actions taken to verify corrective actions, including the extent of retest, the results, and the names of the individual
13、 verifying the corrective action. ANSI/AIAA S-102.1.5-2009 7 5 Detailed Requirements The following detailed requirements pertain to the performance-based FRB process defined in Annex B. 5.1 Operating Procedures Prior to implementing the FRB process, the contractor shall document and approve FRB oper
14、ating procedures that include the following activities. a) establishing minimum qualifications for FRB members and defining the scope or extent of their authority; b) allowing the acquisition activity to appoint a representative to the FRB as an observer; c) reviewing each verified failure report fr
15、om appropriate developmental activities such as inspections and tests, including the subcontractors verified failures, each anomaly analysis option, and each corrective action option; d) authorizing appropriate anomaly investigations and analyses, as needed, to assure root causes are identified; e)
16、authorizing appropriate corrective actions; f) documenting the results of each FRB meeting, including minutes and action items, as a controlled record; and g) summarizing the status of the FRACAS (e.g., significant failures, impact of anomaly management on project budget, status of delinquent correc
17、tive actions, and number of open/closed anomalies) in a report to project management at significant milestones or as directed. 5.2 Anomaly Investigations and Analyses Anomaly investigations and analyses shall be approved and initiated, as needed, to ensure that the root cause and appropriate correct
18、ive actions are identified. The output of an anomaly investigation or analysis shall include the following information. configuration controlled documentation of the anomaly; verification of the anomaly; identification of candidate anomaly root-cause sites using an appropriate tool, such as fishbone
19、 analysis; identification of candidate singular and multiple anomaly mechanisms that can result in the observed anomaly, using an appropriate tool such as fault tree analysis; mapping of candidate anomaly mechanisms with possible root-causes, using an appropriate tool such as fault tree analysis; an
20、d identification of the sequence of events that occurred prior to the observed anomaly using an appropriate tool such as event tree analysis. NOTE This is done to identify confirmed or candidate root cause(s). The severity classification for verified failures shall be defined and qualified or rated
21、based on the down stream effect(s) on the system/mission. Table 1 provides the baseline failure severity classification criteria. ANSI/AIAA S-102.1.5-2009 8 Table 1 AIAA S-102 Failure Severity Classification Failure Severity Classification Failure Effect Description CATASTROPHIC failure would cause
22、loss of life or total disability to personnel, or failure would cause identifiably catastrophic damage to system and repairs that are beyond the capability of the user or contractor to resolve the effects. CRITICAL failure would cause severe disabling injury or severe occupational illness to personn
23、el, or failure would cause identifiably critical damage to the system and extensive repairs to resolve the effects. MARGINAL failure would cause minor injury or minor occupational illness to personnel, and those injuries or illness may require hospitalization but they are not disabling, or failure w
24、ould cause identifiably marginal damage to the system and acceptable level of repairs and downtime to resolve effects. MINOR failure would cause minor injury or minor occupational illness to personnel, but those injuries or illness would not require hospitalization, or failure would cause identifiab
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
5000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- AIAAS102152009PERFORMANCEBASEDFAILUREREVIEWBOARDFRBREQUIREMENTS 基于 性能 故障 复核 委员会 FRB 要求 PDF
链接地址:http://www.mydoc123.com/p-426714.html