AASHTO R 80-2017 Standard Practice for Determining the Reactivity of Concrete Aggregates and Selecting Appropriate Measures for Preventing Deleterious Expansion in New Concrete Con.pdf

《AASHTO R 80-2017 Standard Practice for Determining the Reactivity of Concrete Aggregates and Selecting Appropriate Measures for Preventing Deleterious Expansion in New Concrete Con.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《AASHTO R 80-2017 Standard Practice for Determining the Reactivity of Concrete Aggregates and Selecting Appropriate Measures for Preventing Deleterious Expansion in New Concrete Con.pdf（25页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Standard Practice for Determining the Reactivity of Concrete Aggregates and Selecting Appropriate Measures for Preventing Deleterious Expansion in New Concrete Construction AASHTO Designation: R 80-171Technical Section: 3c, Hardened Concrete Release: Group 1 (April 2017) American Association of Stat

2、e Highway and Transportation Officials 444 North Capitol Street N.W., Suite 249 Washington, D.C. 20001 TS-3c R 80-1 AASHTO Standard Practice for Determining the Reactivity of Concrete Aggregates and Selecting Appropriate Measures for Preventing Deleterious Expansion in New Concrete Construction AASH

3、TO Designation: R 80-171Technical Section: 3c, Hardened Concrete Release: Group 1 (April 2017) 1. SCOPE 1.1. This practice describes approaches for identifying potentially deleteriously reactive aggregates and selecting appropriate preventive measures to minimize the risk of expansion when such aggr

4、egates are used in concrete. Both alkalisilica reactive and alkalicarbonate reactive aggregates are covered. Preventive measures for alkalisilica reactive aggregates include avoiding the reactive aggregate, limiting the alkali content of the concrete, using blended cement, using supplementary cement

5、itious materials, using lithium nitrate as an admixture, or a combination of these measures. Preventive measures for alkalicarbonate reactive rocks are limited to avoiding the reactive aggregate. 1.2. The values stated in SI units are the preferred standard. 1.3. This standard may involve hazardous

6、materials, operations, and equipment. This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to consult and establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory lim

7、itations prior to use. 2. REFERENCED DOCUMENTS 2.1. AASHTO Standards: M 240M/M 240, Blended Hydraulic Cement M 295, Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete M 302, Slag Cement for Use in Concrete and Mortars M 307, Silica Fume Used in Cementitious Mixtures T 303, Acceler

8、ated Detection of Potentially Deleterious Expansion of Mortar Bars Due to Alkali-Silica Reaction 2.2. ASTM Standards: C295/C295M, Standard Guide for Petrographic Examination of Aggregates for Concrete C586, Standard Test Method for Potential Alkali Reactivity of Carbonate Rocks as Concrete Aggregate

9、s (Rock-Cylinder Method) 2017 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.TS-3c R 80-2 AASHTO C856, Standard Practice for Petrographic Examination of Hardened Concrete C1105, Standard Test Method for Leng

10、th Change of Concrete Due to Alkali-Carbonate Rock Reaction C1157/C1157M, Standard Performance Specification for Hydraulic Cement C1260, Standard Test Method for Potential Alkali Reactivity of Aggregates (Mortar-Bar Method) C1293, Standard Test Method for Determination of Length Change of Concrete D

11、ue to Alkali-Silica Reaction C1567, Standard Test Method for Determining the Potential Alkali-Silica Reactivity of Combinations of Cementitious Materials and Aggregate (Accelerated Mortar-Bar Method) 2.3. Canadian Standards: CSA A23.2-14A, Potential Expansivity of Aggregates (Procedure for Length Ch

12、ange Due to Alkali-Aggregate Reaction in Concrete Prisms) CSA A23.2-26A, Determination of Potential Alkali-Carbonate Reactivity of Quarried Carbonate Rocks by Chemical Composition 2.4. RILEM Recommendation: RILEM TC 191-ARP, Alkali-Reactivity and PreventionAssessment, Specification, and Diagnosis of

13、 Alkali-Reactivity 3. TERMINOLOGY 3.1. accelerated mortar-bar test (AMBT)test method used to determine aggregate reactivity (AASHTO T 303) or to evaluate the effectiveness of measures to prevent deleterious expansion when reactive aggregates are used (ASTM C1567). 3.2. alkaliaggregate reaction (AAR)

14、chemical reaction in either mortar or concrete between alkalis (sodium and potassium) present in the concrete pore solution and certain constituents of some aggregates; under certain conditions, deleterious expansion of concrete or mortar may result. Two types of AAR are considered in this standard

15、practice; these are alkalicarbonate reaction (ACR) and alkalisilica reaction (ASR). 3.3. alkalicarbonate reaction (ACR)the reaction between the alkalis (sodium and potassium) present in the concrete pore solution and certain carbonate rocks, particularly argillaceous calcitic dolomite and argillaceo

16、us dolomitic limestone, present in some aggregates; the products of the reaction may cause deleterious expansion and cracking of concrete. 3.4. alkalisilica reaction (ASR)the reaction between the alkalis (sodium and potassium) present in the concrete pore solution and certain siliceous rocks or mine

17、rals, such as opaline chert, strained quartz, and acidic volcanic glass, present in significant quantities in some aggregates; the products of the reaction may cause deleterious expansion and cracking of concrete. 3.5. class of structurein this guideline, structures are classified on the basis of th

18、e severity of the consequences should ASR occur. 3.6. concrete prism test (CPT)test method (ASTM C1293) used to determine aggregate reactivity or to evaluate the effectiveness of measures to prevent deleterious expansion when reactive aggregates are used. Another version of this test, ASTM C1105, ca

19、n be used with a limited alkali content to determine the potential for alkalicarbonate reactivity. 2017 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.TS-3c R 80-3 AASHTO 3.7. deleterious expansionan increas

20、e in volume that is sufficient to cause cracking of the concrete or result in other problems (e.g., misalignment of adjacent components, closing of joints, etc.). 3.8. deleteriously reactiveaggregates that undergo chemical reactions in concrete that subsequently result in deleterious expansion of th

21、e concrete. 3.9. equivalent alkali, Na2Oecalculated from the sodium (Na2O) and potassium oxide (K2O) as follows: Na2Oe = Na2O + 0.658 K2O. 3.10. nondeleteriously reactiveaggregates with no reactive constituents or minor amounts of reactive constituents that may exhibit some small amount of reaction

22、without producing significant damage to the concrete. 3.11. preventive measuresstrategies for suppressing damaging expansion due to alkaliaggregate reaction (AAR). 3.12. supplementary cementitious material (SCM)cementitious materials other than portland cement (i.e., pozzolans and slag). 4. SIGNIFIC

23、ANCE AND USE 4.1. This practice describes a procedure for evaluating aggregate reactivity and determining measures to prevent deleterious expansion due to alkaliaggregate reaction (AAR). 4.2. Following this practice will not completely eliminate the possibility of deleterious expansion occurring in

24、new construction; rather, the practice provides various approaches for minimizing the risk of AAR to a level acceptable to the owner. 4.3. Aggregate reactivity is determined on the basis of one or more of the following: field performance, petrographic examination, or the expansion testing of mortars

25、 or concrete, or both. 4.4. If the aggregate is deemed to be nondeleteriously reactive, it can be accepted for use in concrete with no further consideration of preventive measures (assuming that the physical properties of the aggregate render it suitable for use). 4.5. If the aggregate is found to b

26、e deleteriously reactive, it must then be determined whether the reaction is of the alkalicarbonate or alkalisilica type. 4.6. If the aggregate is alkalisilica reactive, the aggregate may be either rejected for use or accepted with an appropriate preventive measure. There are a number of options for

27、 minimizing the risk of expansion with alkalisilica reactive rocks. This practice allows for preventive measures to be evaluated on the basis of performance testing or to be selected prescriptively from a list of options based on previous experience. The level of prevention required is a function of

28、 the reactivity of the aggregate, the class of structure, the nature of the exposure conditions, the availability of alkali in the system, the type of material used for prevention, and the level of risk the owner is willing to accept. 4.7. If the aggregate is alkali-carbonate reactive, the aggregate

29、 must be rejected for use. There are no proven measures for effectively preventing damaging expansion with alkali-carbonate reactive rocks, and such materials should not be used in concrete without selective quarrying or processing to limit the reactive components to acceptable levels. 4.8. In the a

30、pproach outlined here, the level of testing varies depending on the level of risk that is acceptable to the owner. For example, in regions where occurrences of AAR are rare or where the 2017 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.All rights reserved. Duplication is

31、 a violation of applicable law.TS-3c R 80-4 AASHTO aggregate sources in use have a long history of good field performance, it may be reasonable to continue to rely on the previous field history without subjecting the aggregates to laboratory tests. However, in regions where AAR problems are known an

32、d where the reactivity of aggregates is known to vary from source to source, it may be necessary to implement a rigorous testing regime to establish the potential aggregate reactivity and evaluate preventive measures. 5. GENERAL APPROACH 5.1. The flow chart in Figure 1 shows the sequence of testing

33、and decisions that has to be made when evaluating a source of aggregate for potential AAR. It is recommended that the following sequence of testing is followed to determine aggregate reactivity: consideration of field performance history, petrographic examination, accelerated mortar-bar testing, and

34、 concrete prism testing. If the rock is a quarried carbonate, additional tests are required to determine the potential for alkalicarbonate reaction (as shown in Figure 1). Some agencies may adopt one or more of these test procedures, depending on prior experience with AAR and the acceptable level of

35、 risk of AAR in new construction. 2017 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.TS-3c R 80-5 AASHTO a The type of reaction needs to be determined only after the concrete prism test if the aggregate bei

36、ng tested is a quarried carbonate that has been identified as being potentially alkalicarbonate reactive by chemical composition in accordance with test method CSA A23.2-26A. The solid lines show the preferred approach. However, some agencies may want to reduce the amount of testing and accept a hig

37、her level of risk, and this can be achieved by following the direction of the dashed lines. Figure 1Sequence of Laboratory Tests for Evaluating Aggregate Reactivity 5.2. Appropriate preventive measures can be selected either by performance testing using the accelerated mortar-bar test or concrete pr

38、ism test, or by using prescribed measures that have been developed based on previous experience and published research data. The level of prevention prescribed is a function of the class of the structure, the reactivity of the aggregate, the alkali content of the portland cement, the composition of

39、the material used for prevention, the exposure conditions, and the level of risk the owner is willing to accept. 2017 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.TS-3c R 80-6 AASHTO Note 1If desired, perf

40、ormance testing can be conducted on the aggregate with preventive measures, without first establishing aggregate reactivity. 6. DETERMINING AGGREGATE REACTIVITY 6.1. Field Performance History: 6.1.1. The long-term field performance history of an aggregate can be established by consulting the availab

41、le documentation (e.g., specifications and construction files) and conducting a survey of existing structures that were constructed using the same or similar (i.e., from the same geological environment) aggregate source. As many structures as practical should be included in the survey, and these str

42、uctures should, where possible, represent different types of construction (pavements, sidewalks, curb and gutter, elements of bridges, barrier walls, and even nontransportation structures). The following information should be collected for each structure: (1) agestructures should be at least 10 year

43、s old and preferably more than 15 years old as deleterious expansion due to AAR can take more than 10 years to develop; (2) cement content and alkali content of the cement used during construction; (3) use and type of supplementary cementitious materials during construction; (4) exposure conditionav

44、ailability of moisture, use of deicing chemicals; and (5) presence and type of symptoms of distress due to AAR or other causes. 6.1.2. Cores should be taken from a representative number of these structures and petrographic examinations conducted in accordance with ASTM C856 to establish the followin

45、g: (1) the presence or not of evidence of deleterious expansion due to AAR, (2) the aggregate used in the structures surveyed is close in mineralogical composition to that of the aggregate currently being produced, and (3) the presence and an estimate of the quantity of supplementary cementitious ma

46、terials. 6.1.3. If the results of the field survey indicate that the aggregate is nondeleteriously reactive, the aggregate may be used in new construction provided that the new concrete is not produced with a higher alkali loading, a lower amount of or different supplementary cementitious materials,

47、 or more aggressive exposure condition than the structures included in the survey. 6.1.4. If field performance indicates that an aggregate source is deleteriously reactive, laboratory expansion testing is required to determine the level of aggregate reactivity and to evaluate prevention measures. No

48、te 2There is a certain level of risk associated with accepting aggregates solely on the basis of field performance because of difficulties in establishing unequivocally that the materials and proportions used are similar to those to be used in new construction. For example, petrographic examination

49、can estimate only the quantity of pozzolans and slag to the nearest 10 percent or so and is not able to determine the composition of the material (e.g., Class F versus Class C fly ash). The presence of very finely divided pozzolans (silica fume) cannot be detected using a petrographic examination. 6.2. Petrographic Examination: 6.2.1. Petrographic examination of aggregates should be conducted in accordance with ASTM C295/ C295M. Petrography can reveal useful information about the composition of an aggregate, includ