大学四级-1897及答案解析.doc
《大学四级-1897及答案解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《大学四级-1897及答案解析.doc(42页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、大学四级-1897 及答案解析(总分:710.00,做题时间:90 分钟)一、Part Writing(总题数:1,分数:103.00)1.Attitude Is Everything(分数:103.00)_二、Part Reading Compr(总题数:1,分数:70.00)Starting over: Rebuilding Civilisation from ScratchThe way we live is mostly down to accidents of history. So what if we thought it through properly?In just a f
2、ew thousand years, we humans have created a remarkable civilisation: cities, transport networks, governments, vast economies full of specialised labour and a host of cultural labels. It all just about works, but its hardly a model of rational design-instead, people in each generation have done the b
3、est they could with what they inherited from their predecessors. As a result, weve ended up trapped in what, in review, look like mistakes. What sensible engineer, for example,would build a sprawling, low-density megalopolis (巨大城市) like Los Angeles on purpose?Suppose we could try again. Imagine that
4、 Civilisation 1.0 evaporated tomorrow, leaving us with unlimited manpower, a willing populace and-most important-all the knowledge weve accumulated about what works, what doesnt, and how we might avoid the errors we got locked into last time. If you had the chance to build Civilisation 2.0 from scra
5、tch, what would you do differently?Take cities, for starters. Historically, they have generally arisen near resources that were important at the time-say harbours, farmland or minerals-and then grown higgledy-piggledy (杂乱无章的). How would we design cities without the constraints of historical developm
6、ent?In many ways, the bigger cities are, the better. City dwellers have, on average, a smaller environmental footprint than those who live in smaller towns or rural areas. Indeed, when Geoffrey West of the Santa Fe Institute in New Mexico and his colleagues compared cities of different sizes, they f
7、ound that doubling the size of a city leads to a 15 per cent decrease in the energy use per capita, the amount of roadway per capita, and other measures of resource use. For each doubling in size,city dwellers also benefit from a rise of around 15 per cent in income, wealth, the number of colleges,a
8、nd other measures of socioeconomic well-being. Put simply,bigger cities do more with less.Of course,there are limits to a citys size. For one thing, West notes, his study leaves out a crucial part of the equation:happiness. As cities grow, the increasing buzz that leads to greater productivity also
9、quickens the pace of life. Crime, disease, even the average walking speed, also increase by 15 per cent per doubling of city size. “Thats not good, I suspect, for the individual,“ he says. “Keeping up on that treadmill (跑步机), going faster and faster, may not reflect a better quality of life.“City li
10、vingToday,online social networking gives individual users tools to coordinate and cooperate like never before. “I would build the cities in an open-source way, where everybody can actually participate to decide how its used and how it changes,“ says Carlo Ratti, an urban designer at the Massachusett
11、s Institute of Technology. “Its a similar process to what happens in Wikipedia.“ By tapping into this sort of crowd-sourcing, the residents themselves could help plan their own wiki-neighbourhood, Ratti proposes. An entrepreneur seeking to start a sandwich shop, for example, could consult residents
12、to find out where it is most needed. Likewise, developers and residents could collaborate in deciding the size, placement and amenities for a new housing block-even, perhaps, the placement of roads and walking paths.Referring to the problem of energy, virtually everyone agrees the answer should be r
13、enewables. “We cant say it should all be solar or it should all be wind. Its really critical that we have all of them,“ says Lena Hansen, an electric system analyst with the Rocky Mountain Institute, an energy-efficiency think tank in Boulder,Colorado. That would help ensure a dependable supply. And
14、 instead of massive power plants, the best route would be small dispersed systems like rooftop solar panels. This decentralised generation system would be less vulnerable to extreme events like storms or attacks.While were messing around with the economy, we might want to move away from using GDP as
15、 a measure of success. When nations began focusing on GDP after the second world war, it made sense to measure an economy by its production of goods and services. “At that time, what most people needed was stuff. They needed more food, better building structures-stuff that was lacking-to make them h
16、appy,“ says Ida Kubiszewski of the Institute for Sustainable Solutions at Portland State University in Oregon. “Now times have changed. Thats no longer the limiting factor to happiness.“Instead, we may want to broaden our indicator to include environmental quality, leisure time, and human happiness-
17、 a trend a few governments are already considering. With Gross Domestic Happiness as our guide, people might be more likely to use gains in productivity to reduce their work hours rather than increase their salaries. That may sound utopian, but at least some societies routinely put greater value on
18、happiness than on material things-such as the kingdom of Bhutan and the aboriginal potlatch (冬季赠礼节) cultures of the west coast of North America that redistribute their property. “I dont think its contrary to human nature to have a system like this,“ says Robert Costanza, an ecological economist also
19、 at Portland State.New world viewOn the other hand, increases in mobility, communication and technology-as well as the sheer size of the human population-mean that many of the worlds problems are now truly global. Just as events drove medieval city states to integrate into nations centuries ago, glo
20、bal problems are now pressing for global solutions, he says. And that requires some form of global governance, at least to set broad g0als-biodiversity standards, say, or global emissions caps-toward which local governments can find their own solutions.All our design efforts to this point have been
21、aimed at creating a sustainable, equitable and workable new civilisation. But if we want our new society to last through the ages,many sustainability researchers stress one more point: be careful not to make it too efficient.In the end, though, no human civilisation can last forever. Every society e
22、ncounters problems and solves them in whatever way seems most helpful, and every time it does so, it raises its complexity-and its vulnerability.“ You can never fully anticipate the consequences of what you do,“ notes Tainter. Every civilisation sows the seeds of its own eventual doom-and no matter
23、how carefully we plan our new built-from-scratch civilisation, the most we can hope for is to delay the inevitable.(分数:70.00)(1).Why does the author think we are trapped in mistakes today?A. The world we live in has too many accidents. B. The remarkable civilizations were all works of the past.C. Th
24、e civilization we built is not a rational design. D. The cities today have too much population.(分数:7.00)A.B.C.D.(2).When our ancestors were building their cities, they would_.A. pick the places near resources B. randomly choose a place for residenceC. first consider their religious beliefs D. usuall
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 大学 1897 答案 解析 DOC
