ACCA考试F4公司法与商法(china)部分真题2015年6月及答案解析.doc
《ACCA考试F4公司法与商法(china)部分真题2015年6月及答案解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《ACCA考试F4公司法与商法(china)部分真题2015年6月及答案解析.doc(7页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、ACCA 考试 F4 公司法与商法(china)部分真题 2015 年 6 月及答案解析(总分:30.00,做题时间:180 分钟)一、Section B ALL FIVE(总题数:5,分数:30.00)1.Mr Dong, the majority shareholder of Lide Company, provided his residential house as a mortgage for a loanagreement between Lide Company and the Bank. Both parties appropriately registered the loa
2、n agreement and themortgage agreement with the relevant government agent. Before the loan agreement matured, Mr Dong intended to sell the mortgaged house to Ms Lee and disclosed to Ms Lee the fact that the house had been mortgaged. Mr Dong also notified the Bank with respect to the transactionbetwee
3、n Ms Lee and himself. Mr Dong and Ms Lee entered into a sales contract of real estate to proceed with thetransaction. However, their application for registration was denied by the relevant government authority, because theBank did not give consent in writing to this transaction. Required: In accorda
4、nce with the relevant provisions of the Property Law:(分数:6.00)(1).(a)State whether the real estate contract was a valid one if the Bank disagrees with the transaction betweenMr Dong and Ms Lee.(2 marks)(分数:2.00)_(2).(b) Explain whether the government authority should register the contract if Ms Lee
5、promises to repay theoutstanding amount of the loan, even though the Bank did not give consent to this transaction.(2 marks)(分数:2.00)_(3).(c)State whether the government authority should register the contract if Ms Lee repaid the outstanding amountof the loan, even though the Bank refused to give co
6、nsent to this transaction.(2 marks)(分数:2.00)_2.Food Shop sent a fax to Sanyi Farm to inquire about the price of tomatoes as follows: 100,000 kg of tomatoes isurgently needed. Reply as soon as possible. Upon receipt of the fax, Sanyi Farm shipped 100,000 kg of tomatoes to Food Shop. The latter took d
7、elivery of thegoods without any objection. On selling the goods Food Shop found that the quality of tomatoes did not meet thestandard required and had to sell the goods at a 20% discount. Food Shop considered that there was no contractbetween the two parties, since its fax to Sanyi Farm did not cont
8、ain the price, which was one of the essential factorsto be an effective offer. Required: In accordance with the Contract Law:(分数:6.00)(1).(a)Explain the legal nature of the fax sent by Food Shop.(2 marks)(分数:2.00)_(2).(b) Describe the legal nature of the act to take delivery of the goods by Food Sho
9、p.(2 marks)(分数:2.00)_(3).(c)Explain whether there was a contract between the two parties.(2 marks)(分数:2.00)_3.Zhao, Qian, Sun and Lee were four shareholders of a limited liability company specialising in bio-technology, eachholding 25% of the shares of the company. Several months later Qian intended
10、 to transfer his shares to a listed company for profit and sent notices to the otherthree shareholders asking for their consent. Zhao agreed and also expressed his willingness to buy Qians shares ifthe price was reasonable. Sun disagreed and claimed his right of priority to buy Qians shares. However
11、, Zhao andSun could not reach an agreement as to the proportion of shares to buy. Lee kept silent upon receipt of the notice. Since Sun offered a price lower than that of the listed company, Qian entered into a contract to sell his shares to thelisted company, which caused a dispute among the four s
12、hareholders. Under such circumstances, Lee decided toleave the company and requested the company to purchase his shares. Required: In accordance with the relevant provisions of the Company Law:(分数:6.00)(1).(a)State how Zhao and Suns failure to reach an agreement on the proportion of shares to purcha
13、se should bedealt with. (2 marks)(分数:2.00)_(2).(b) State whether Lees request for the company to purchase his shares should be upheld if the dispute wasbrought to court. (2 marks)(分数:2.00)_(3).(c)State whether Qian was entitled to transfer his shares to the listed company.(2 marks)(分数:2.00)_4.Stine,
14、 the owner of an office building, and Mering concluded a three-year leasing agreement in January 2012. Meringwould use the first floor to open a restaurant. The annual rental should be paid on the first of each month.In 2013 Stine and Mering entered into a service agreement, by which Mering would pr
15、ovide meals to the employeesof Stine. The service fees would be paid on a quarterly basis. In June 2014, Mering was declared bankrupt by a court which designated a bankruptcy administrator responsible forthe liquidation. The bankruptcy administrator found that Mering had failed to pay the rental for
16、 2014. Stine claimedthe rental due for the year of 2014 as his credit and requested to offset the meal service fees for the first and secondquarters of 2014. Stine also declared dissolution of the leasing agreement between the two parties. Required: In accordance with the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law:(
17、分数:6.00)(1).(a)State whether Stines request to offset the meal service fees was in conformity with the law.(2 marks)(分数:2.00)_(2).(b) State how to deal with Stines request to dissolve the leasing contract.(2 marks)(分数:2.00)_(3).(c)State what benefit Stine could have if its request to offset was acce
18、pted.(2 marks)(分数:2.00)_5.Ms Huang, a shareholder of the Daqing Limited Liability Company (Daqing), found that the general manager, Mr Ding,had accepted bribes from several suppliers, which materially caused losses to Daqing, and adversely affected theinterests of all shareholders. Further examinati
19、on, through a Certified Public Accountant firm, disclosed that there were a lot of affiliatedtransactions between Daqing and Everbright Co, which was the majority shareholder of Daqing. Mr Ding wasrecommended by Everbright Co and appointed by Daqings board of directors, which was substantially influ
20、enced byEverbright Co. With a series of such transactions Daqing transferred huge profits to Everbright Co and adverselyaffected Daqing. Required:(分数:6.00)(1).(a)State whether Ms Huang was entitled to take legal action against Mr Ding for his illegal behaviour ofaccepting bribes which adversely affe
21、cted all the shareholders.(2 marks)(分数:3.00)_(2).(b) State TWO different legal actions Ms Huang was entitled to take to protect the rights of Daqing and itsshareholders due to the affiliated transactions with Everbright Co.(4 marks)(分数:3.00)_ACCA 考试 F4 公司法与商法(china)部分真题 2015 年 6 月答案解析(总分:30.00,做题时间:
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
5000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- ACCA 考试 F4 公司法 商法 CHINA 部分 2015 答案 解析 DOC