[外语类试卷]大学英语六级模拟试卷554及答案与解析.doc
《[外语类试卷]大学英语六级模拟试卷554及答案与解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《[外语类试卷]大学英语六级模拟试卷554及答案与解析.doc(48页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、大学英语六级模拟试卷 554及答案与解析 一、 Part I Writing (30 minutes) 1 For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a short essay on the topic of Chinese Parenting VS Western Parenting. You should write at least 150 words according to the outline given below. 1在教育孩子方面,有人认为中式教育 (从严 )更好 2有人则认为西式教育 (从宽 )更好 3我认为 C
2、hinese Parenting vs Western Parenting 二、 Part II Reading Comprehension (Skimming and Scanning) (15 minutes) Directions: In this part, you will have 15 minutes to go over the passage quickly and answer the questions attached to the passage. For questions 1-4, mark: Y (for YES) if the statement agrees
3、 with the information given in the passage; N (for NO) if the statement contradicts the information given in the passage; NG (for NOT GIVEN) if the information is not given in the passage. 1 Obamas War on Schools The No Child Left Behind Act has been deadly to public education. So why has the presid
4、ent embraced it? Over the past year, I have traveled the nation speaking to nearly 100,000 educators, parents, and school-board members. No matter the city, state, or region, those who know schools best are frightened for the future of public education. They see no one in a position of leadership wh
5、o understands the damage being done to their schools by federal policies. They feel keenly betrayed by President Obama. Most voted for him, hoping he would reverse the ruinous No Child Left Behind (NCLB) legislation of George W. Bush. But Obama has not sought to turn back NCLB. His own approach, cal
6、led Race to the Top, is even more punitive than NCLB. And though over the past week the president has repeatedly called on Congress to amend the law, his proposed reforms are largely cosmetic (装点门面的 ) and would leave the worst aspects of NCLB intact. The theory behind NCLB was that schools would imp
7、rove dramatically if every child in grades 3 to 8 were tested every year and the results made public. Texas did exactly this, and advocates claimed it had seen remarkable results: test scores went up, the achievement gap between students of different races was closing, and graduation rates rose. At
8、the time, a few scholars questioned the claims of a “Texas miracle,“ but Congress didnt listen. In fact, the “Texas miracle“ never happened. On federal tests, the states reading scores for eighth-grade students were flat from 1998 to 2009. And just weeks ago, former first lady Barbara Bush wrote an
9、opinion piece in the Houston Chronicle opposing education budget cuts on the grounds that Texas students ranked in the bottom 10 percent in math and literacy nationally. After two decades of testing and accountability, Texas students have certainly not experienced a miracle when judged by the very m
10、easures that were forced on students across the nation. NCLB required that 100 percent of students be proficient in reading and math by 2014. Any school not on track to meet this Utopian goal one never reached by any nation in the world would face a series of sanctions, culminating in the firing of
11、the staff and the closing of the school. As 2014 nears, tens of thousands of schools have been branded as failures, thousands of educators have been fired, and schools that were once the anchors of their communities are closing, replaced in many cases by privately managed schools. NCLB turns out to
12、be a timetable for the destruction of public education. Because of the punitive character of the federal law, educators struggle to meet their testing targets. Many districts have reduced time for the arts, history, science, civics, foreign languages, physical education, literature, and geography. T
13、hey devote more time to preparing students for the state tests in basic skills, which will determine the life or death of their schools. Some districts, such as Atlanta, have experienced cheating scandals. Some states, such as New York, lowered the passing mark on their tests to increase the number
14、of students who were allegedly proficient. Standardized-test scores can provide useful information about how students are doing. But as soon as the scores are tied to firing staff, giving bonuses, and closing schools, the measures become the goal of education, rather than an indicator. So now come P
15、resident Obama and Education Secretary Arne Duncan with their Race to the Top program. The administration invited the states to compete for $4.3 billion in a time of fiscal distress. To qualify, states had to agree to evaluate teachers by student test scores, to award bonuses to teachers based on st
16、udent scores, to permit more privately managed charter schools, and to “turn around“ low-performing schools by such methods as firing the staffs and closing the schools. Race to the Top went even beyond NCLB in its reliance on test scores as the ultimate measure of educational quality. It asserts th
17、at teachers alone not students or families or economic status are wholly responsible for whether test scores go up or down. Now teachers rightly feel scapegoated (被当作替罪羊 ) for conditions that are often beyond their control. They know that if students dont come to school regularly, if they are chroni
18、cally ill, if they are homeless or hungry, their test scores will suffer. But teachers alone are accountable. The Obama agenda for testing, accountability, and choice bears a striking resemblance to the Republican agenda of the past 30 years, but with one significant difference. Republicans have tra
19、ditionally been wary of federal control of the schools. Duncan, however, relishes the opportunity to promote his policies with the financial heft of the federal government. The confluence between the Obama agenda and the Republican agenda became clear in the fall of 2009, when Duncan traveled the co
20、untry with Newt Gingrich to promote Race to the Top. And on March 5 of this year, President Obama flew to Florida to celebrate the test-score gains at a high school in Miami with former governor Jeb Bush, one of the nations most vocal proponents of conservative approaches to education reform. In his
21、 recent State of the Union address, Obama rightly asserted that we must encourage innovation, imagination, and creativity so we can “win the future“. But the federal governments emphasis on standardized tests subverts (破坏 ) that lofty goal. Drilling children on how to take tests discourages innovati
22、on and creativity, punishes divergent thinking, and prioritizes skills over knowledge. And the endless hours devoted to test preparation certainly deaden students interest in school. Emboldened (鼓励 ) by the Obama administration, as well as by hundreds of millions of dollars from the Bill a supposedl
23、y revenge-free system for complaints that led to women being fired. The lower courts ruled that this and other evidence provide compelling reasons for the case to move forward. 53 What will it mean if the Supreme Court dismisses the Wal-Mart case, according to the author? ( A) Wal-Mart didnt discrim
24、inate against its women employees before. ( B) Some large companies can escape punishment if they break the law. ( C) It is difficult for employees to win an employment discrimination lawsuit. ( D) The decision of the Supreme Court was apparently partial to Wal-Mart. 54 After Stephanie Odle complain
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 外语类 试卷 大学 英语六级 模拟 554 答案 解析 DOC
