REG NASA-LLIS-0845-2000 Lessons Learned Vibration Analysis of Rotating Ground Support Machinery.pdf

《REG NASA-LLIS-0845-2000 Lessons Learned Vibration Analysis of Rotating Ground Support Machinery.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《REG NASA-LLIS-0845-2000 Lessons Learned Vibration Analysis of Rotating Ground Support Machinery.pdf（5页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Best Practices Entry: Best Practice Info:a71 Committee Approval Date: 2000-04-20a71 Center Point of Contact: KSCa71 Submitted by: Wil HarkinsSubject: Vibration Analysis of Rotating Ground Support Machinery Practice: Use the noise or vibration created by mechanical equipment to determine the actual c

2、ondition of the equipment. Vibration analysis can be used as a nondestructive method for detecting incipient problems in rotating machinery such as imbalance, misalignment, and damaged or worn components and thereby prevent catastrophic failures from occurring. Vibration analysis also can be used fo

3、r determining what maintenance actions are necessary for a piece of rotating machinery and the frequency of those actions.Programs that Certify Usage: This practice has been used on the following KSC equipment.a71 Cooling Fans for 2000 KW Generators on the Crawler/Transporter.a71 Environmental Contr

4、ol System at the Orbiter Processing Facility and the launch pads of Launch Complex 39.a71 Liquid Oxygen Pumps at the launch pads of Launch Complex 39.a71 Orbiter Dock Seal Blowers at the Payload Changeout Room on the launch pads of Launch Complex 39.a71 Payload Bay Area Access Bridge/Bucket at the O

5、rbiter Processing FacilityCenter to Contact for Information: KSCImplementation Method: This Lesson Learned is based on Maintainability Technique number AT-8 from NASA Technical Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Memorandum 4628, Recommen

6、ded Techniques for Effective Maintainability.Benefit:Vibration analysis allows the maximum interval between repairs to be realized through monitoring the actual mechanical condition of a piece of rotating machinery. Equipment down time is not required for monitoring activities to occur. The monitori

7、ng, in turn, directly minimizes the number and cost of unscheduled machine outages created by component failures. Hence, optimum equipment availability may be obtained.Implementation Method:Vibration Analysis is predicated on two basic facts:1. All common failure modes have distinct vibration freque

8、ncy components that can be isolated and identified.2. The amplitude of each distinct vibration component will remain constant unless there is a change in the operating dynamics of the machinery.Monitoring the vibration from machinery can provide a direct correlation between the mechanical condition

9、and recorded vibration data of each machine. Vibration analysis can be used to identify specific degrading machine components or failure modes of machinery before serious damage occurs.Typically, 80% of the machinery problems experienced can often be classified as either imbalance or misalignment. I

10、mbalance and misalignment can lead to premature bearing, coupling, shaft seal, and gear wear. Most of the problems can be rectified by simply improving maintenance standards and procedures and by eliminating careless or sloppy work.Also, imbalance and misalignment do not only occur in established eq

11、uipment over a period of time, they can be present after initial installation of a new piece of machinery. Vibration analysis can be used to validate that the new equipment has been properly installed. This would prevent the introduction of failure causes which would have a detrimental effect on the

12、 life of the equipment and the process which the equipment supports.Recent advancements in microprocessor technology and the development of PC based software have simplified data acquisition, automated data management, and minimized the need to have professional vibration consultants available to in

13、terpret the data. Commercially available systems are capable of routinely monitoring, trending, evaluating, and reporting the mechanical condition of all mechanical equipment.Vibration analysis was started in 1988 by the Shuttle Processing Contractor (SPC) in an effort to reduce the high failure rat

14、es experienced by the rotating machinery associated with Environmental Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Control System (ECS) located in the Orbiter Processing Facility (OPF) at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC). The vibration analysis pro

15、gram initially monitored 66 pieces of equipment associated with the ECS and the Orbiter Portable Purge Units used at the OPF and the two launch pads of Launch Complex 39. The information gathered was used to effectively reduce the failure rate and down time of the ECS equipment.Because of the succes

16、s achieved with the ECS equipment, the SPC expanded the vibration analysis program to include all other Space Shuttle Program ground system equipment for which it had maintenance responsibility at KSC. The equipment considered was machine-train components. Machine-train components consist of a prima

17、ry driver or drivers (i.e., electric motor, turbine), all intermediate drives (i.e., couplings, belts, gear box), and all driven machine components (i.e., fans, pumps, drums).All the SPC equipment was assessed. A list of equipment that would lend itself to vibration analysis was created. Due to the

18、number of items identified, the SPC categorized the equipment into a priority listing of equipment that would be of benefit to the Space Shuttle Program.Once the equipment to be monitored was identified, a process was established to routinely obtain vibration data from specific locations on the equi

19、pment. Preparation for data collection involved determining what type of data equipment was necessary, what type of data to collect, where to take the measurements (i.e., shaft, bearing, housing, mount, coupling, gears, or fan), how many degrees of freedom for each component were to be measured (i.e

20、., x-axis, y-axis, z-axis, radial), and should the measurement devices be of a permanent or temporary type attachment.All of the data is collected via a portable handheld microprocessor-based instrument. This removes the potential for human error, reduces manpower requirements, and automates the acq

21、uisition of vibration data. Due to the massive amount of data that is collected, a reliable PC based automated data management system was selected that enables the vibration data to be stored, trended, and recalled for use in developing long-term trends.It is important to note that the bearings in a

22、 machine-train are the primary limiting factor for operating life. The first indication of machinery problems often develops in the vibration signature of the machines bearings. However, the bearings are typically not the cause of the problem. But since they are the weakest link in most machinery, t

23、he bearings are usually the first to fail. Vibration checks at points other than the bearings are also taken to check for structural problems.Experience has proven that on new or refurbished equipment, vibration data should be collected once a week for four consecutive weeks. This will enable a tren

24、d to be established for future comparison. The frequency of monitoring a piece of equipment after establishing an initial baseline is based on the following considerations:a71 The machines operating modes (i.e., intermittent or continuous speeds/loads).Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or

25、 networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-a71 The machines operating environment.a71 The importance of the machines function.a71 Data derived from comparison of the initial baseline.a71 Availability of spare parts.To regularly acquire enough data for complete diagnosis of a machines potenti

26、al failure would be “overkill“ and unduly burden the data collection process. The periodic collection of vibration data on a prescribed route for trending purposes should be treated as a tool to indicate pending problems. Industry standards are utilized to determine a problem condition unless specif

27、ic pieces of equipment dictate more stringent or lax alarm limits.Once a possible problem is identified, more data is collected from the equipment in order to aid the vibration analyst in determining the exact cause of the anomaly. In order to resolve the anomaly in an efficient manner, “if“ and “wh

28、at type“ of information is needed. The questions asked are:a71 What is the problem?a71 What is the machines history? What has the operator observed?a71 When did the problem start? Was it sudden or gradual? Did the machine ever run properly?a71 Have any changes been made recently? Modifications? Real

29、ignments? Changes in machine speed?Other NASA centers utilize vibration analysis for their own purposes as shown by Reference 4.References:1. Lockheed Space Operations Company Predictive Engineering Technology Program Implementation Plan.2. Mobley, R. Keith: “An Introduction to Predictive Maintenanc

30、e,“ Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1990.3. P/PM Technology, Volume 5, Issue 3 -May/ June 1992.4. “Absolute Ball Bearing Wear Measurements From SSME Turbopump Dynamic Signals,“ by J. M. Hine. Proceedings of the 59th Shock and Vibration Symposium, Volume III, pp. 45- 55, October 1988.Impact of Non-Practice: P

31、redictive maintenance is a condition driven preventive maintenance program. Instead of relying on industrial average-life statistics to schedule maintenance activities, predictive maintenance uses direct monitoring of the mechanical condition, system efficiency, and other indicators to determine the

32、 most efficient time to service a piece of machinery. Since mechanical systems or machines Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-account for the majority of equipment, vibration monitoring is generally the key component of most predictive m

33、aintenance programs because it can provide the greatest benefits. Also, equipment down time is not required for vibration analysis to occur.Related Practices: N/AAdditional Info: Approval Info: a71 Approval Date: 2000-04-20a71 Approval Name: Eric Raynora71 Approval Organization: QSa71 Approval Phone Number: 202-358-4738Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-