ITU-R BT 419-3-1992 Directivity and Polarization Discrimination of Antennas in the Reception of Television Broadcasting - Section 11E - Planning of Television Networks Protection R.pdf

《ITU-R BT 419-3-1992 Directivity and Polarization Discrimination of Antennas in the Reception of Television Broadcasting - Section 11E - Planning of Television Networks Protection R.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ITU-R BT 419-3-1992 Directivity and Polarization Discrimination of Antennas in the Reception of Television Broadcasting - Section 11E - Planning of Television Networks Protection R.pdf（3页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、CCIR RECMN*439-3 92 4855232 0539409 032 Rec. 419-3 127 RECOMMENDATION 419-3 DIRECTIVITY AND POLARIZATION DISCRIMINATION OF ANTENNAS IN THE RECEPTION OF TELEVISION BROADCASTING (Question 26/ 1 1) (1963-1986- 1990-1992) The CCIR recommends .that the characteristics of directivity of the receiving ante

2、nnas of Fig. 1 can be used for planning terrestrial television services in broadcasting Bands I, III, IV and V. FIGURE 1 Discrimination obtained by the use of directional receiving antennas in broadcasting (The number of the broadcasting band is shown on the curve) O -5 -10 a - 15 -20 Angle relative

3、 to direction of main response Note 1 - It is considered that the discrimination shown wiil be available at the majority of antenna locations in built-up areas, At clear sites in open country, slightly higher values will be obtained. Note 2 - The curves in Fig. 1 are valid for signals of vertical or

4、 horizontal polarization, when both the wanted and the unwanted signals have the same polarization. Note 3 - In the case of orthogonal polarization the combined discrimination provided by directivity and orthogonality cannot be calculated by adding together the separate discrimination values. Howeve

5、r, it has been found in practice that a combined discrimination value of 16 dB may be applied for all angles of azimuth in the terrestrial television Bands I to V. This value could be expected to be exceeded at more than 50% of locations (see Annexes 1 and 2). Note 4 - Bands I, III, IV and V are def

6、ined in Note 4 of Recommendation 417. Note 5 - For planning purposes, antenna systems for collective and cable distribution systems will be assumed to have directivity values at least equal to those set out in Fig. 1. ANNEX1 Advantages to be gained by using orthogonal wave polarizations in the plann

7、ing of television broadcasting services in the VHF and HF bands Investigations have been conducted in several countries to ascertain the advantages which can be obtained in television broadcasting by using polarization discrimination in reception. CCIR RECMN*437-3 72 4855232 0519430 834 128 Rec. 419

8、-3 1. Bands I and III (VHF) In this band of frequencies, between 30 and 300 MHz, the median value of discrimination that can be achieved at domestic receiving sites by the use of orthogonal polarization may be as much as 18 dB, and under these conditions, the values exceeded at 90% and 10% of the re

9、ceiving sites are about 10 dB and 25 dB respectively. The values of discrimination are likely to be better in open country and worse in built-up areas or places where the receiving antenna is surrounded by obstacles. For domestic installations in densely populated districts, the median values of 18

10、dB will usually be realized only at roof level; and this value may be reduced to 13 dB or less at street level. No significant changes in the polarization of waves at VHF due to transmission through the troposphere have been observed over distances exceeding 200 km. Furthermore, there have been no r

11、eports of systematic changes in polarization effects with frequency in the metric band, neither with distance nor with type of terrain. It must be emphasized, however, that to realize the discrimination ratios mentioned above, certain precautions are necessary at both the transmitting and receiving

12、installations; cases have been reported in which, for a transmitter of horizontally polarized waves, some 7% of the radiated power was vertically polarized. It is clear that if the best discrimination is to be obtained for co-channel operation, the transmitters and antenna systems must be designed a

13、nd installed so as to radiate as much as possible of the total power on the assigned polarization. In the same way, to achieve the desired discrimination at the home receiving installation, the reception of the undesired orthogonally polarized waves on the antenna feeder and on the receiver itself m

14、ust be reduced to the minimum practicable value. It should, however, be noted that the above-mentioned advantage from the use of orthogonal polarizations can only be obtained when, in general, the polarization of the receiving antennas conforms to that of the wanted signal. Due to problems with mult

15、ipath reception in hilly and wooded terrain a comparison of vertical and horizontal polarization for VHF TV transmissions was made in Norway. The measurements show, in spite of higher field strengths for vertical polarization, that horizontal polarization in almost every measured site gave a better

16、picture quality. 2. Bands IV and V (m) Investigations have been carried out in the United Kingdom to determine the polarization discrimination in band 9 (UHF) of antennas at typical urban and rural domestic receiving sites. The results showed that for orthogonally polarized signals the median value

17、of discrimination was 18 dB, and under the same conditions, the values exceeded at 90% and 10% of the receiving sites were about 9 dB and 25 dB respectively. There is also some small variation of discrimination with angle relative to the direction of main response. However, for television planning p

18、urposes in the United Kingdom, a value of 15 dB is used for ail relative bearings. As at VHF, care is necessary to ensure that the transmitter and receiver respectively do not emit or receive radiation of the undesired polarization. Apart from this, however, experience indicates that at UHF, the use

19、 of horizontal polarization offers advantages, because of the greater directivity obtainable at the receiving antennas; this reduces the effect of reflected waves, particularly in town areas. The European Broadcasting Union, therefore, considers that frequency assignments in these bands should be ba

20、sed on the general use of horizontal polarization, though exceptions may be made in cases where orthogonal polarization is necessary to achieve the desired protection. 3. Summary From the studies described above, it is clear that the use of orthogonal polarization for broadcasting stations operating

21、 in the same frequency channel is of material assistance in discriminating against the reception of undesired signals. Worthwhile advantages are obtainable over the whole band of frequencies from 40 to 500 MHz and within Rec. 419-3 129 the normal broadcasting service ranges. From the uniformity of t

22、he discrimination obtained over these frequencies, it is considered to be almost certain that the advantages wiil extend to the top of the broadcasting band in Band V at nearly 1 o00 MHz. ANNEX2 Polarization of emission in television broadcasting 1. Linear polarization Linear polarization of emissio

23、ns is in almost universal use in television broadcasting. The plane of polarization is usually horizontal but from the viewpoint of planning there is much to be gained from allowing the possibility of also using vertical polarization. The available evidence suggests that the use of horizontal polari

24、zation provides improved picture quality in hilly and wooded terrain compared with vertical polarization, at least for the VHF bands (see Annex 1). The use of orthogonally polarized transmissions, together with appropriately polarized receiving antennas, offers significant advantages in terms of spe

25、ctrum utilization. Planning based on the use of receiving antennas not offering polarization discrimination does not give this advantage. 2. Circular or elliptical polarization There is a lack of information concerning the use of circular or elliptical polarization in planning the television broadca

26、sting services. However, some administrations permit the use of circular or elliptical polarization as an alternative to the more usual horizontal or vertical. It is reported that the reception of circular polarized television emissions by simple portable or indoor antennas is improved because the o

27、rientation of these antennas by individual receivers is less critical than for the case of linear polarization. However, it should be remembered that the use of simple portable or indoor antennas can lead to poor quality reception as a result of multipath propagation and low input signal levels. The

28、oretically, the use of circularly polarized transmissions offers the possibility of filtering out most of the first order reflections. However, this advantage can only be achieved by the use of a circularly polarized receiving antenna and at this time such an antenna is not in practical use for indi

29、vidual television reception. For a given transmitter power, a circularly polarized transmitting antenna wil result in a field strength lower by 3 dB in the horizontal or in the vertical plane than that provided using a linearly polarized transmitting antenna, thus effectively giving a reduced coverage area. 3. Summary From the foregoing it can be concluded that for optimum planning it is necessary to take full advantage of polarization discrimination, and that this can only be done economically and realistically by using horizontal and/or vertical polarizations.