CEPT T R 25-03 E-1988 Co-Ordination of Frequencies for the Land Mobile Service in the 80 160 and 460 MHz Bands and the Methods to Be Used for Assessing Interference《80、160和460 MHz频.pdf

《CEPT T R 25-03 E-1988 Co-Ordination of Frequencies for the Land Mobile Service in the 80 160 and 460 MHz Bands and the Methods to Be Used for Assessing Interference《80、160和460 MHz频.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《CEPT T R 25-03 E-1988 Co-Ordination of Frequencies for the Land Mobile Service in the 80 160 and 460 MHz Bands and the Methods to Be Used for Assessing Interference《80、160和460 MHz频.pdf（7页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、 25-03 Page E 1 Recommendation T/R 25-03 (Stockholm 1976) CO-ORDINATION OF FREQUENCIES FOR THE LAND MOBILE SERVICE IN THE 80,160 AND 460 MHz BANDS AND THE METHODS TO BE USED FOR ASSESSING INTERFERENCE Recommendation proposed by “Radiocommunications” Working Group T/WG 3 (R) Text of the Recommendatio

2、n adopted by the “Telecommunications” Commission: “The European Conference of Posts and Telecommunications Administrations, considering (a) that it is necessary to harmonize procedures for the Co-ordination of frequencies for the land mobile service in frontier regions, O O (b) that it is important

3、that a simple method of Co-ordination be established which Administrations will be able to implement as widely as possible, (c) that it is a matter of utmost necessity that the available spectrum be used with maximum efficiency, in particular avoiding according land mobile service radio stations gre

4、ater protection than justified by operating requirements, (d) that exceptionally some stations require increased protection, for example stations of the public land mobile radio telephone service, (e) that in practice it is advantageous both for determining the field strength of the wanted signal an

5、d for determining that of the interfering signal to use the same propagation curves, (f) that it may be very useful to determine a maximum permissible value for the field strength of the interfering signal, (g) that account needs to be taken of the variable nature of propagation phenomena, which dep

6、end on location and (h) that the use of certain selective calling devices can to a certain extent improve the quality of the service by time, eliminating a large amount of interference, recommends that in Co-ordinating frequencies in frontier regions for the land mobile service Administrations shoul

7、d be guided by the following provisions: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. for determining field strength, the CCIR propagation curves valid for 50% of locations and 50% of the time shall be used in every case, calculations shall be made foliowing the procedure set out in part A of the Annex to this Recommendation, th

8、e parameters contained in part B of the Annex shall be used to determine the need for Co-ordination and for dealing with practical cases of Co-ordination, Administrations shall divide stations into 3 groups: Group 1 : stations requiring an exceptional quality of service and consequently a high level

9、 of protection; Group 2: stations requiring a normal quality of service; Group 3: stations requiring no protection, Administrations shall classify under group 2 the largest possible number of stations not classified under group 3. For this purpose users may, for example, be invited to use, as approp

10、riate, selective calling devices and effective methods of coding so as to reduce the effects of interference in the absence of the wanted signal.” Edition of September 15, 1988 CEPT T/R*25-03*E 8 9 2326414 0012409 bT8 TIR 25-03 E Page 3 O Annex A. CALCULATION OF FIELD STRENGTH 1. PRINCIPLE O The sen

11、sitivity of a receiver is determined by the electromotive force which enables a given value for the output signal to noise ratio to be obtained; if the gain of the antenna and the feed line losses are known, the minimum value Co of the electrical field can be deduced from this. The electrical field

12、produced at a distance by a radio-electrical transmitter of known characteristics is subject to propagation variations and its strength varies with time and according to the location. It is accepted that, according to the laws of probability, its value will follow a normal distribution in dB. In tha

13、t case, if the value of the standard deviation is known, it is possible to determine the median value of the field so as to obtain the value Co with a given probability P. The median value must be where O is the value of the standard deviation and x a coefficient. The relationship between P and x is

14、 given by tables or curves. Given the random nature of the distribution of the field, a service quality may be characterised by the percentage of locations where, in a given zone, the field exceeds the value Co. However, this is inadequate if unwanted transmissions reach the receiver, thus causing i

15、nterference. If reception of the wanted signal is not to be disturbed by the interfering signal, the ratio between their values at any given time must be sufficiently high. The minimum value of this ratio is the protection ratio (R,). Given that the variations in the interfering field obey the same

16、statistical laws as those affecting the wanted field, the ratio between them also varies according to a statistical law of the same kind, in accordance with the following rules: - the median value of the ratio between the wanted field and the interfering signal, expressed in dB, is equal - the value

17、 of the standard deviation for the statisticatdistribution of this ratio is: c, = Co + XG to the difference between the median values of these fields; -0 2 G = JO, + 02b where O, = standard deviation for the wanted field ob = standard deviation for the interfering field Since the nature of the two f

18、ields is the same, G, = ub = O and or = fi In order to arrive at a complete definition of a quality of service it is therefore necessary not only to define the percentage of locations in which the zone to be served must be covered, but also at what percentage of locations protection against interfer

19、ence must be provided, in other words, for what percentage of locations the ratio between the wanted field and the interfering field must be greater than R, in dB. If this probability is fixed at P, the median value for this ratio must be Since C, the median value of the wanted field, has been deter

20、mined by the quality of service, the level of protection enables R, to be determined, thus giving the median value for the interfering field: R, = Ro + X. O B, = C, - R, 2. SENSITIVITY OF RECEIVERS The sensitivity to be taken into account for Co-ordination at frontiers shall be 6 dB in relation to o

21、ne microvolt (e.m.f.). Edition of September 15, 1988 CEPT T/R*25-03*E 8 W 232b4/4 OOL24LO 3LT W TIR 25-03 E Page 4 3. CORRESPONDING VALUE OF THE FIELD Power received CL g;hL p, = 120n 4n which gives If the antenna and the receiver have the same impedance of 75 ohms the power received is therefore PI

22、 = C + G, - 20 log f - 105 e2 e p=-=- 4 Z 300 which gives It follows that P, = E - 145 C = E + 20 log f - G, - 40 Account is taken of mismatching loss caused by using antennas and receivers with different input impedances by making a correction D, and of antenna inefficiency by making a correction A

23、, depending on the type of installation. We then obtain For example, in the case of an antenna h/4 and receiver input impedance of 50 ohms, we can admit from which it follows that This gives the following values for the field C in the different frequency bands: C = E + 20logf - G, - 40 + D +A (6) Gd

24、 = 3dB D = 2dB A= 3dB C = E + 20 log f - 38 80 MHz 160 MHz 460 MHz 6 dB 12 dB 21 dB p, P, c C gi = isotropic gain Gd h = wavelength in metres f = frequency in MHz e E Z = receiver input impedance D = antenna mismatch correction A = antenna efficiency correction = power received in watts = power rece

25、ived in dB in relation to the watt = field in volts per metre = field in dB in relation to pV/m = gain in relation to h/2 dipole in dB = electromotive force in volts = electromotive force in dB in relation to pV 4. EFFECT OF EXTERNAL NOISE SOURCES The effect of external noise sources is negligible i

26、n the 460 MHz band. However, it is very considerable in the 80 MHz and 160 MHz bands in high-density urban area. Measurements have shown that to obtain the same quality of reception as is obtained in the absence of external noise, the e.m.f. of the signal must be 10 pV at 80 MHz and 5 pV at 160 MHz.

27、 Since these figures apply only to particular areas, no account will be taken of them below, in view of the statistical nature of the problem. Edition of September 15, 1988 CEPT T/R*25-03*E 88 m 232b414 0012411 256 m Wanted field Protection ratio Interfering field TIR 25-03 E Page 5 80 MHz 160 MHz 4

28、60 MHz 11.4 dB 17.4 dB 27.7 dB 15.6 dB 15.6 dB 17.5 dB -4.2 dB 1.8 dB 10.2 dB 5. QUALITY OF SERVICE AND NECESSARY FIELD In the case of group No. 1, if at 75% of locations the field must be greater than the minimum value for Ca, the corresponding value for x is 0.675. In the view of the CCIR, the sta

29、ndard deviation assumes the following values: 8 dB 460 MHz band (A h = 50 m): 10 dB This gives the following median values for the wanted field: 80 and 160 MHz bands: 80 MHz 160 MHz 460 MHz (A h = 50 m) 21 + 0.675 x 10 = 27.7 dB In the case of group No. 2, where the percentage of locations is 50%, x

30、 is equal to O and the median values for the field are respectively : 80 MHz 160 MHz 460 MHz 6 dB 12 dB 21 dB 6 + 0.675 x 8 = 11.4 dB 12 + 0.675 x 8 = 17.4dB Wanted field Protection ratio Interfering field O 80 MHz 160 MHz 460 MHz 6 dB 12 dB 21 dB 8 dB 8 dB 8 dB -2 dB 4 dB 13 dB O O 6. PROTECTION RA

31、TIO Where the wanted transmission and the interference are both in class F3, which is the most usual case, an instantaneous value of 8 dB is admitted for the protection ratio. If reception has to be protected for 75% ) of locations in the case of group 1, the median value must therefore be Rm = Ra +

32、 0.675 . o. It follows that for 80 MHz 160 MHz o = o& = 11.3 R, = 8 + 0.675 x 11 = 15.6 dB o = O & = 11.3 R, = 8 + 0.675 x 11 = 15.6dB 460 MHz C = o & = 14.1 R, = 8 + 0.675 x 14 = 17.5 dB In the case of group 2, the median value of the protection ratio is 8 dB since x = O. 7. THEORETICALLY TOLERABLE

33、 INTERFERING FIELDS (median values) Group 1 Group 2 )A protection probability of P% means that for a link operating alternately on two frequencies, the probability of interference is (100-P)% for a call to a mobile unit at the edge of the service zone, assuming that the interfering base station is p

34、ermanently on the air (1 traffic unit). If the stations traffic is t trafic units, the probability of interference will bet x (100-P)%. Edition of September 15, 1988 CEPT T/R+25-03+E 88 W 2326434 0032432 392 Ah = 50 Ah = 150 = 10 O, = 15 TIR 25-03 E Page 6 O, = o Ah = 300 O, = 18 O, O, = o 8. EFFECT

35、 OF RELIEF AND OF STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION OVER TIME Generally speaking, if the field has a normal distribution in relation to location and to time, with standard deviations of oe and o, respectively, the resulting standard deviation for distribution is o = dm It is dependent on frequency and distan

36、ce. The effect of the effective antenna height is negligible for the heights involved in the land mobile service. For group 2 stations, the maximum tolerable interference field is indepen- dent of ot and of A h. For group 1 stations, the median value of the tolerable interference field for A h x 50

37、m and o, = O is Bmio = Bm2 - 0.675 O, (& - 1. where Bm, = the median value of the tolerable interference field for group 2 stations and The reference median values for the tolerable interference field are given in paragraph 7. The effect of different types of relief (A h) and of the standard deviati

38、on in relation to time of the interfering signal (o,) are accounted for by a correction factor. where Bm, = median value of the tolerable interference field for group 1 stations where A, = x ke,o (J2 - 1) - do,: + Ob.: + ob.? + ou, o+, = standard deviation for the distribution in relation to locatio

39、n for A h = 50 m *e, = mi - Bmi ou,e = standard deviation of the distribution of the wanted field in relation to the locations ob,e = standard deviation of the distribution of the interfering field in relation to the locations ch, = standard deviation of the distribution of the interfering field in

40、relation to time ou,e = oh, (i.e. where the wanted field and the interfering field cross the same type of relief) and, for For P = 75% (x = 0.675), the correction factors are given in the following table: -0.1 - 0.6 - 1.1 VHF (80 MHz, 160 MHz) I UHF (460 MHz) I -1.5 1.4 -2.3 9 -3.3 -1.8 -0.6 -2.6 14

41、 -6.7 -2.2 -1.9 -2.9 20 -10.7 1 O0 150 I sea land Edition of September 15, 1988 CEPT T/R*25-03*E 88 m 232b414 OOL24L3 O29 m -4.4 -4.8 -5.1 TIR 25-03 E Page 7 9 -0.5 14 -2.1 20 -5.6 If the path of the wanted field is characterised by the value o, and the path of the interfering field by different val

42、ues of (T, the correction factors are those given in the following table: Minimum wanted field to be protected Protection ratio 1 1 land 6 dB 12 dB 21 dB 8dB 8dB 8 dB 1 O0 -1.4 150 -2.2 I 175 I il 1 -3.0 MHz) I UHF (460 MHz) sea and I land Ah = 50 -0.5 -1.6 land Ah = 150 = 15 -2.7 -3.1 -3.5 I sea Ah

43、 = 300 I I B. LIST OF VALUES TO BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN CO-ORDINATION AGREEMENTS Administrations responsible for Co-ordination will adapt the values set out below to the various cases they encounter and, in particular, to the type of station concerned (base or mobile stations operating on one or tw

44、o frequencies) and to the characteristics of their antennae (gain, height above ground level, polarisation and, where appropriate, directivity diagram). A height above ground level other than 3 metres may be used in particular Co-ordination agreements where the consulting Administration is aware tha

45、t the stations across the frontier likely to cause interference are base stations. Such agreements must enable the countries concerned to be aware of the distribution of base stations and mobile stations in the different frequency sub-bands. Interference to group 2 stations Co-ordination between the

46、 Administrations concerned is necessary where the following field strength values are exceeded at the frontier at a height of 3 metres above ground levei. 80 MHz 160 MHz 460 MHz -2 dB 4 dB 13 dB (Values expressed in relation to 1 FV/m.) The values taken into account for Co-ordination and which apply

47、 to cases using the antennae most frequently found are: B.l. I I 80 MHz I 160 MHz 1 460 MHz I I Maximum tolerable interfering field I -2 dB 1 4 dB I 13 dB I (The values of the wanted field and the interfering field are expressed in relation to 1 pV/m.) For an antenna of h/4: G, = 3 dB For an antenna

48、 of h/2: G, = O dB (See paragraph 3. of part A.) D = 2 dB A = 3 dB D = 2 dB A = O dB Edition of September 15, 1988 CEPT T/R*25-03*E 88 2326434 OOL24L4 Tb5 Wanted field to be protected Protection ratio T/R 25-03 E Page 8 16.3 dB 22.3 dB 33.8 dB 22.5 dB 22.5 dB 26.1 dB B.2. Interference caused to grou

49、p 1 stations In this case, the percentage of locations and the protection probability to be taken into account are set at 90% (x = 1.3) for a type of relief corresponding to A h = 50 m. (See paragraph 6. of part A.) For other types of relief see paragraph 8. part A. The field strength which must not be exceeded at the frontier at a height of 3 metres above ground level is: 80 MHz 160 MHz 460 MHz -6.2 dB -0.2 dB 7.7 dB (Values expressed in relation to 1 pvjm.) The values taken into account for Co-ordination and under the same conditions as for group 2