[外语类试卷]大学英语四级模拟试卷1010及答案与解析.doc
《[外语类试卷]大学英语四级模拟试卷1010及答案与解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《[外语类试卷]大学英语四级模拟试卷1010及答案与解析.doc(47页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、大学英语四级模拟试卷 1010及答案与解析 一、 Part I Writing (30 minutes) 1 For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a short essay entitled On Students Running an Online Shop. You should write at least 120 words following the outline given below. 1很多大学生在业余时间开网店 赚钱 2有人支持,有人反对 3我的看法 On Students Running an Online
2、 Shop 二、 Part II Reading Comprehension (Skimming and Scanning) (15 minutes) Directions: In this part, you will have 15 minutes to go over the passage quickly and answer the questions attached to the passage. For questions 1-7, mark: Y (for YES) if the statement agrees with the information given in t
3、he passage; N (for NO) if the statement contradicts the information given in the passage; NG (for NOT GIVEN) if the information is not given in the passage. 1 Fight unhealthy food, not fat people Its hardly breaking news that junk food is bad for us. But just how bad and just how much food companies
4、 know about the addictive(添加剂 )components of certain foods, and just how much they deliberately target the most vulnerable consumers knowing they are doing damage is still being discovered. The New York Times offers the latest installment in this weekends magazine with an article about the science o
5、f junk food addiction. Nearly everything written about food in the mainstream media relies on the same narrative: Obesity is bad. That kind of reporting is part of whats keeping us sick. Theres no denying the fact that the American public has gotten larger in recent decades. Along with getting fatte
6、r, weve also seen a rise in illnesses like heart disease and certain cancers. Instead of focusing on how our health is hurting, most of the media coverage uses the term “ obesity,“ making the story more about weight than about health to the point where its become an accepted truth that “ fat“ equals
7、 “unhealthy“. Thats not actually the case, though. While “the obesity epidemic“ may be a convenient catch-all for the illnesses and health problems related to our food chain, its a lazy term and an inaccurate one. Are we actually worried about public health? Or are we offended by fat bodies that don
8、t meet our thin ideals? In all seriousness: What good does a focus on body size actually do? If were actually concerned about health, then we should focus on health. The addictive qualities of our food, the lack of oversight(监督 ), the high levels of chemicals and the government subsidies(补贴 )to make
9、 prices lower making the worst foods the most accessible should concern us and spur us to action. Nutrient-deficient(营养缺乏 )chemically-processed “food“ in increasingly larger sizes is bad for all of our bodies, whether were fat or thin or somewhere in between. So is the culture in which fast food is
10、able to thrive. Americans work more than ever before; we take fewer vacation days and put in longer hours, especially since the recession hit. The US remains the only industrialized country without national paid parental leave and without compulsory annual vacation time; we also have no federal law
11、requiring paid sick days. 85% percent of American men and 66% of women work more than 40 hours per week. In Norway, for comparison, 23% of men work more than 40-hour weeks, and only 7% of women. Despite all this work, American income levels remain remarkably divided into the poorest and the richest,
12、 with the richest few controlling nearly all of the wealth. In one of the wealthiest countries on earth, one in seven people rely on federal food aid, with most of the financial benefits going to big food companies who are also able to produce cheap, nutritionally questionable food thanks to agricul
13、tural subsidies. The prices of the worst foods are artificially depressed, the big food lobbies have enormous power, and the biggest loser is the American public, especially low-income folks who spend larger proportions of their income on food but face systematic impediments(妨碍 )to healthy eating an
14、d exercise. With demanding work days, little time off and disproportionate amounts of our incomes going toward things like health insurance and childcare that other countries provide at a lower cost, is it any surprise that we eat fast-food breakfast on our laps in the car and prefer dinner options
15、that are quick and cheap? Reforming our food system requires major structural changes, not just saying no to put down that bag of chips. We need to push back against corporate interests. Food companies are incredibly good at positing themselves as crusaders(拥护者 )for personal choice and entities simp
16、ly dedicated to giving the public what it wants. Somehow, big food companies have convinced us that drinking a 32oz soda is a matter of personal liberty, and that the government has no place in regulating how much liquid sugar can be sold in a single container. In fact, we know and they certainly kn
17、ow that human beings are remarkably bad at judging how much were eating. Food companies use that information to encourage over-consumption, and to target certain consumers who tend to have less disposable income to invest in healthy food poor people, people of color, kids. Food is a social justice i
18、ssue that has disproportionately negative impacts on groups already facing hardship. That should be an issue for every socially conscious person. But when looking at the large number of problems caused not only by our big food industry but by the policies that enable them and our cultural norms that
19、 incentivize poor health choices, too many people simply turn “ obesity“ into the boogeyman(具有超人力量的恶巫 ). Doctors even blame fatness for all sorts of medical conditions and people dont get proper treatment. Fat women go to the doctor less often for routine cancer screenings, and patients report docto
20、rs focusing on their weight and ignoring real medical problems like broken bones and asthma(哮喘 ). On the policy side, promoters of laws that incentivize health or push back on corporate food interests such as Michelle Obamas Lets Move! initiative, bans on extra-large sodas, and extra SNAP benefits a
21、t farmers markets inevitably target “ obesity“ in their campaigns. That strategy has the effect of maligning(诽谤 )the beauty of certain bodies instead of encouraging everyone to be healthier and countering the enormous influence of big companies. As a result, many people who should be the natural all
22、ies of health-promoting initiatives are put off by the shaming fat language. “Obesity epidemic“ language has also fed into the idea of body size and eating habits as social group. Thinner kale(甘蓝 ) eating elite liberals in the Northeast are trying to force-feed cabbage to heavier real Americans in t
23、he South and Midwest. No one wins with that kind of cultural polarization. Yes, lets push back against big food companies and question their outsized influence in Washington and in our daily lives, and lets focus on making healthy food more widely accessible. Lets realize that the challenges extend
24、beyond just what we eat. Lets fight for the humane(仁爱的 )work policies that will make us all healthier. But lets do that because public health is all of our concern, not because its culturally easy to point the finger at fat people. Giving every member of a society the chance to be as healthy as poss
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 外语类 试卷 大学 英语四 模拟 1010 答案 解析 DOC
