ASTM C1773-2017 Standard Test Method for Monotonic Axial Tensile Behavior of Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Advanced Ceramic Tubular Test Specimens at Ambient Temperature《在环境温度下连续纤维增强.pdf

《ASTM C1773-2017 Standard Test Method for Monotonic Axial Tensile Behavior of Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Advanced Ceramic Tubular Test Specimens at Ambient Temperature《在环境温度下连续纤维增强.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ASTM C1773-2017 Standard Test Method for Monotonic Axial Tensile Behavior of Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Advanced Ceramic Tubular Test Specimens at Ambient Temperature《在环境温度下连续纤维增强.pdf（27页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Designation: C1773 17Standard Test Method forMonotonic Axial Tensile Behavior of Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Advanced Ceramic Tubular Test Specimens atAmbient Temperature1This standard is issued under the fixed designation C1773; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of

2、original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 This test method determines the axial tensile strengthand s

3、tress-strain response of continuous fiber-reinforced ad-vanced ceramic composite tubes at ambient temperature undermonotonic loading. This test method is specific to tubegeometries, because fiber architecture and specimen geometryfactors are often distinctly different in composite tubes, ascompared

4、to flat plates.1.2 In the test method a composite tube/cylinder with adefined gage section and a known wall thickness is fitted/bonded into a loading fixture. The test specimen/fixture assem-bly is mounted in the testing machine and monotonicallyloaded in uniaxial tension at ambient temperature whil

5、e record-ing the tensile force and the strain in the gage section. The axialtensile strength and the fracture strength are determined fromthe maximum applied force and the fracture force. The strains,the proportional limit stress, and the tensile modulus ofelasticity are determined from the stress-s

6、train data.1.3 This test method applies primarily to advanced ceramicmatrix composite tubes with continuous fiber reinforcement:uni-directional (1-D, filament wound and tape lay-up), bi-directional (2-D, fabric/tape lay-up and weave), and tri-directional (3-D, braid and weave). These types of cerami

7、cmatrix composites are composed of a wide range of ceramicfibers (oxide, graphite, carbide, nitride, and other composi-tions) in a wide range of crystalline and amorphous ceramicmatrix compositions (oxide, carbide, nitride, carbon, graphite,and other compositions).1.4 This test method does not direc

8、tly address discontinuousfiber-reinforced, whisker-reinforced or particulate-reinforcedceramics, although the test methods detailed here may beequally applicable to these composites.1.5 The test method describes a range of test specimen tubegeometries based on past tensile testing of ceramic composi

9、tetubes. These geometries are applicable to tubes with outerdiameters of 10 to 150 mm and wall thicknesses of 1 to 25 mm,where the ratio of the outer diameter-to-wall thickness (dO/t)is typically between 5 and 30.1.5.1 This test method is specific to ambient temperaturetesting. Elevated temperature

10、testing requires high temperaturefurnaces and heating devices with temperature control andmeasurement systems and temperature-capable grips and load-ing fixtures, which are not addressed in this test method.1.6 The test method addresses test equipment, grippingmethods, testing modes, allowable bendi

11、ng stresses,interferences, tubular test specimen geometries, test specimenpreparation, test procedures, data collection, calculation, re-porting requirements, and precision/bias in the followingsections.SectionScope 1Referenced Documents 2Terminology 3Summary of Test Method 4Significance and Use 5In

12、terferences 6Apparatus 7Hazards 8Test Specimens 9Test Procedure 10Calculation of Results 11Report 12Precision and Bias 13Keywords 14AnnexesInterferences Annex A1Test Specimen Geometry Annex A2Grip Fixtures and Load Train Couplers Annex A3Allowable Bending and Load Train Alignment Annex A4Test Modes

13、and Rates Annex A51.7 UnitsThe values stated in SI units are to be regardedas standard.1.8 This standard does not purport to address all of thesafety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health practices

14、and determine the applica-bility of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific precau-tionary statements are given in Section 8.1This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee C28 onAdvanced Ceramics and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee C28.07 onCeramic Matrix Composites

15、.Current edition approved Feb. 1, 2017. Published February 2017. Originallyapproved in 2013. Last previous edition approved in 2013 as C1773 13. DOI:10.1520/C1773-17.Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United StatesThis international st

16、andard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for theDevelopment of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.12.

17、Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2C1145 Terminology of Advanced CeramicsC1239 Practice for Reporting Uniaxial Strength Data andEstimating Weibull Distribution Parameters for AdvancedCeramicsC1273 Test Method for Tensile Strength of MonolithicAdvanced Ceramics at Ambient TemperaturesC1557 Test

18、Method for Tensile Strength and Youngs Modu-lus of FibersD3878 Terminology for Composite MaterialsD5450 Test Method for Transverse Tensile Properties ofHoop Wound Polymer Matrix Composite CylindersE4 Practices for Force Verification of Testing MachinesE6 Terminology Relating to Methods of Mechanical

19、 TestingE83 Practice for Verification and Classification of Exten-someter SystemsE122 Practice for Calculating Sample Size to Estimate, WithSpecified Precision, the Average for a Characteristic of aLot or ProcessE251 Test Methods for Performance Characteristics of Me-tallic Bonded Resistance Strain

20、GagesE337 Test Method for Measuring Humidity with a Psy-chrometer (the Measurement of Wet- and Dry-Bulb Tem-peratures)E691 Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study toDetermine the Precision of a Test MethodE1012 Practice for Verification of Testing Frame and Speci-men Alignment Under Tensile

21、 and Compressive AxialForce Application3. Terminology3.1 Definitions:3.1.1 Pertinent definitions, as listed in Terminology C1145,Practice E1012, Terminology D3878, and Terminology E6, areshown in the following with the appropriate source in boldtype. Additional terms used in conjunction with this te

22、stmethod are defined in the following:3.1.2 advanced ceramic, na highly engineered, high per-formance predominantly nonmetallic, inorganic, ceramic ma-terial having specific functional attributes. C11453.1.3 axial strain, nthe average of the longitudinal strainsmeasured at the surface on opposite si

23、des of the longitudinalaxis of symmetry of the test specimen by two strain-sensingdevices located at the mid length of the reduced section. E10123.1.4 bending strain, nthe difference between the strain atthe surface and the axial strain. In general, the bending strainvaries from point to point aroun

24、d and along the reduced sectionof the test specimen. E10123.1.5 ceramic matrix composite, na material consisting oftwo or more materials (insoluble in one another) in which themajor, continuous component (matrix component) is a ceramic,while the secondary component/s (reinforcing component) maybe ce

25、ramic, glass-ceramic, glass, metal, or organic in nature.These components are combined on a macroscale to form auseful engineering material possessing certain properties orbehavior not possessed by the individual constituents. C11453.1.6 continuous fiber-reinforced ceramic matrix composite(CFCC), na

26、 ceramic matrix composite in which the reinforc-ing phase consists of a continuous fiber, continuous yarn, or awoven fabric. C11453.1.7 fracture (breaking) force, Pfracture,nthe force atwhich the test specimen ruptures, breaking into two or morepieces.3.1.8 fracture strength, Sf,nthe tensile stress

27、at which thetest specimen ruptures, breaking into two or more pieces orwhere the applied force drops off significantly. Typically, a10 % force drop off is considered significant.3.1.9 gage length, lO,nthe original length of that portionof the test specimen over which strain or change of length isdet

28、ermined. E63.1.10 matrix-cracking stress, nthe applied tensile stressat which the matrix in the composite cracks into a series ofroughly parallel blocks normal to the tensile stress.3.1.10.1 DiscussionIn some cases, the matrix crackingstress may be indicated on the stress-strain curve by deviationfr

29、om linearity (proportional limit) or incremental drops in thestress with increasing strain. In other cases, especially withmaterials which do not possess a linear portion of the stress-strain curve, the matrix cracking stress may be indicated as thefirst stress at which a permanent offset strain is

30、detected in theunloading stress-strain (elastic limit).3.1.11 modulus of elasticity, E, nthe ratio of stress tocorresponding strains below the proportional limit. E63.1.12 modulus of resilience, Ur,nstrain energy per unitvolume required to elastically stress the material from zero tothe proportional

31、 limit indicating the ability of the material toabsorb energy when deformed elastically and return it whenunloaded.3.1.13 modulus of toughness, Ut,nstrain energy per unitvolume required to stress the material from zero to finalfracture indicating the ability of the material to absorb energybeyond th

32、e elastic range (that is, damage tolerance of thematerial).3.1.13.1 DiscussionThe modulus of toughness can also bereferred to as the cumulative damage energy and as such isregarded as an indication of the ability of the material to sustaindamage rather than as a material property. Fracture mechanics

33、methods for the characterization of CFCCs have not beendeveloped. The determination of the modulus of toughness asprovided in this test method for the characterization of thecumulative damage process in CFCCs may become obsoletewhen fracture mechanics methods for CFCCs become avail-able.3.1.14 propo

34、rtional limit stress, o,nthe greatest stressthat a material is capable of sustaining without any deviationfrom proportionality of stress to strain (Hookes law). E62For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book

35、 of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.C1773 1723.1.14.1 DiscussionMany experiments have shown thatvalues observed for the proportional limit vary greatly with thesensitivity and accuracy of the testing equipment, eccentricityof loading,

36、 the scale to which the stress-strain diagram isplotted, and other factors. When determination of proportionallimit stress is required, the procedure and sensitivity of the testequipment should be specified.3.1.15 percent bending, nthe bending strain times 100divided by the axial strain. E10123.1.16

37、 slow crack growth, nsubcritical crack growth (ex-tension) which may result from, but is not restricted to, suchmechanisms as environmentally-assisted stress corrosion ordiffusive crack growth. C11453.1.17 stress corrosion, nenvironmentally induced degra-dation that results in the formation and grow

38、th of cracks and/ordamage in glasses and many ceramics when subjected to thecombined action of a corroding agent and stress. C11453.1.17.1 DiscussionSuch environmental effects com-monly include the action of moisture, as well as other corrosivespecies, often with strong temperature dependence.3.1.18

39、 tensile strength, Su,nthe maximum tensile stresswhich a material is capable of sustaining. Tensile strength iscalculated from the maximum force during a tension testcarried to rupture and the original cross-sectional area of thetest specimen. E63.1.19 tow, nin fibrous composites, a continuous, orde

40、redassembly of essentially parallel, collimated filaments, normallywithout twist and of continuous filaments. D38783.1.20 uniaxial tension, nthe application of tensile forcecoaxially with the long dimension of the test specimen.4. Summary of Test Method4.1 This test method involves the testing of a

41、ceramiccomposite tube/cylinder with a known wall thickness inmonotonic uniaxial tension at ambient temperature. The pre-pared test specimen with a defined gage section is fitted/bondedinto a loading fixture and the test specimen/fixture assembly ismounted in the testing machine. The test specimen is

42、 loaded inaxial tension while recording the applied force and resultingstrain. The axial tensile strength Suand the fracture strength Sfare determined from the maximum applied force and thefracture force. The axial strains, the proportional limit stress,and the tensile modulus of elasticity are dete

43、rmined from thestress-strain response data.4.2 Tensile strength as used in this test method refers to thetensile strength obtained under monotonic uniaxial loading. Inuniaxial loading, the force is applied coaxially with the longdimension of the tube test specimen. Monotonic refers to acontinuous no

44、nstop test rate with no reversals from testinitiation to final fracture.4.3 This test method is applicable to a range of test cylinderspecimen geometries and sizes, which are described andconsidered in the test specimen section. A single fixed testspecimen geometry cannot be defined because there is

45、 a widerange of composite cylinder configurations in use and devel-opment. The different described test specimen geometries aretypically applicable to tubes with outer diameters of 10 to150 mm and wall thicknesses of 1 to 25 mm, where the ratio ofthe outer diameter-to-wall thickness (dO/t) is betwee

46、n 5 and30.5. Significance and Use5.1 This test method provides information on the uniaxialtensile properties and tensile stress-strain response of a ceramiccomposite tubetensile strength and strain, fracture strengthand strain, proportional limit stress and strain, tensile elasticmodulus, etc. The i

47、nformation may be used for materialdevelopment, material comparison, quality assurance,characterization, and design data generation.5.2 Continuous fiber-reinforced ceramic composites(CFCCs) are composed of continuous ceramic-fiber directional(1-D, 2-D, and 3-D) reinforcements in a fine grain-sized(2

48、5 mm and shall be used for high-deformation testsbeyond the strain range of strain gages. Extensometers shall becalibrated periodically in accordance with Practice E83. Forextensometers mechanically attached to the test specimen, theattachment should be such as to cause no damage to thespecimen surf

49、ace. In addition, the weight of the extensometershould be supported, so as not to introduce bending stresses inthe test specimen greater than that allowed in 7.2.4.2.7.3.2 Strain GagesAlthough extensometers are com-monly used for CFCC strain measurement, strain can also bedetermined with bonded resistance strain gages and suitablestrain recording equipment. The strain gages, surfacepreparation, and bonding agents should be chosen to provideadequate performance on the subject materials. Gage calibra-tion certification shall comply with Test Methods E251.A