[外语类试卷]大学英语四级模拟试卷690及答案与解析.doc
《[外语类试卷]大学英语四级模拟试卷690及答案与解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《[外语类试卷]大学英语四级模拟试卷690及答案与解析.doc(44页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、大学英语四级模拟试卷 690及答案与解析 一、 Part I Writing (30 minutes) 1 For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a short essay entitled Should Children Be Paid by Parents for Doing Housework? You should write at least 120 words following the outline given below. 1一些家长付钱给孩子做家务 2付钱给孩子做家务的利和弊 3在我看来 Should Chil
2、dren Be Paid by Parents for Doing Housework? 二、 Part II Reading Comprehension (Skimming and Scanning) (15 minutes) Directions: In this part, you will have 15 minutes to go over the passage quickly and answer the questions attached to the passage. For questions 1-7, mark: Y (for YES) if the statement
3、 agrees with the information given in the passage; N (for NO) if the statement contradicts the information given in the passage; NG (for NOT GIVEN) if the information is not given in the passage. 1 Is Higher Education a Bubble? My colleague at Democracy in America draws attention to an ongoing debat
4、e over the nature of higher education, and, in particular, steady increases in the cost of getting one. The question of the hour is: is higher education a bubble? Consider: If you can only afford to go to a state university, dont be too annoyed. Except this: Kevin Drum went to a state university tha
5、t does not exist anymore. When he graduated from Cal State Long Beach in 1981, he paid $ 160 in fees. If he graduated from the same institution today, the tuition he would have paid for this year would be $ 4,335. They officially call it “tuition“ now, because its not meant to be a nominal (名义上的 ) “
6、fee“ anymore. Its simply the price you pay for your education, as a customer, and next year it will be higher, a lot higher. Unless the direction of things changes soon, it will be $6,450. And the year after that? It will be even higher. Fees/Tuition in the California State system have risen signifi
7、cantly every year since when Kevin Drum went there, and they have risen by around 400% since 2002. Given the complete intransigence (不妥协 ) of California republicans, tuition will most likely rise by another 32% next year. A diploma is a kind of investment. It is a guarantor of higher lifetime earnin
8、gs: The “ college wage premium“ for highly educated workers is in the tens of thousands of dollars per year. It is also an insurance policy against unemployment, a signaling device to employers and peers, a prestige line for your resume or New York Times wedding announcement, and a place to make fri
9、ends and connections. Most importantly, it is a way to learn new skills and information. It could be that college students are overpaying for their educations. But it seems more likely that some college students attending certain types of schools are overpaying. If you want to be an aerospace engine
10、er and have the chops to get into Caltech, the quality of the education, contacts, and fellow students on offer might really be worth $ 200, 000 to you. A diploma from the school practically guarantees a good salary. Its much harder to talk about a bubble in education than it was one in housing. In
11、housing, there was a clear metric: prices, in absolute terms and as a ratio of just about everything, were soaring. And there was a clear debate: are these increases justified by some real economic shift or are they a bubble associated with new mortgage products and loose credit. In higher education
12、, the questions are much more difficult. For one thing, its hard to agree on what price should be the focus. Advertised topline tuition? Few people pay that. Average tuition paid? Average student loan debt? Is the bubble in higher education present at all universities, or just top universities, or j
13、ust for-profit universities? And how is whatever rising price that is the focus connected to changes in the benefits of a higher education? Indeed, what are those benefits? The ultimate benefit seems to be a substantial wage premium, and comparisons of that premium to average levels of tuition or in
14、curred debt make college look like an incredibly good deal. The tricky thing is that there may well be an identification problem: it could simply be the case that students who go to college earn more, because the types of students that go to college are the types that have characteristics (intellige
15、nce, discipline) that translate into higher earnings. University degrees could simply be expensive signaling mechanisms at best, in this world, and massively wasteful cultural institutions at worst. Because we cant select high school seniors at random, send some to universities and some into the wor
16、kforce, and see what happens, were going to be limited in what we can say about the extent to which this is true. But let me tell you how I think about this. I think the gains from higher education are mostly, though not at all entirely, about actual learning, though I should say that a healthy port
17、ion of these learning gains arent academic in nature, but have to do with things like social capital. Given the cost of higher education, it seems unlikely that signaling can be the main value of a college degree. There are so many other available means to accomplish the same thing. Why wouldnt an e
18、mployer be as happy with a set of scores on the SAT and GRE and a letter of acceptance from Harvard? The potential market for a cheaper means to signal worth and to network seems so large that its absence is just very difficult to explain. There are highly successful firms that do opt to recruit lar
19、ge numbers of skilled young people away from universities and toward an early professional career: Americas professional sports teams. Why havent other companies followed suit? If college doesnt teach anything, how can we explain this enormous market failure? One potential explanation is that there
20、are multiple balances and at present we are stuck in a bad one. So long as the vast majority of talented youths get traditional college educations, it is too risky and costly for young people to defect from the higher-education strategy. Defection could, indeed, signal a lack of professional fitness
21、. But this is a very vulnerable equilibrium (平衡 ). If even a small number of those students accepted to top universities opt instead to strike out on their own, the bad record of missing out on college could quickly erode. One can even imagine a young student leaving to pursue an entrepreneurial vis
22、ion directly targeted at potential college dropouts setting up support networks, alternative signaling mechanisms, and so on. But why hasnt this already happened? My guess is that most people, including parents, students, and employers, consider a university education to be a good value. The full se
23、t of returns to the investment signaling and networking, yes, but also the actual investments in intellectual and social capital justifies the sticker price, and certainly the $20,000 or so in average student loan debt. What would we look for in a higher education bubble? College educations have lon
24、g been incredibly cheap given the (apparent) long-run benefit to the degree-holder. Students today are now paying for a larger share of the benefit they receive. And in some cases, universities appear to be getting better at gaining some of the surplus created by degree completion. Is this problemat
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 外语类 试卷 大学 英语四 模拟 690 答案 解析 DOC
