【考研类试卷】考研英语阅读理解B节(新题型)分类精讲文化教育类-(二)及答案解析.doc
《【考研类试卷】考研英语阅读理解B节(新题型)分类精讲文化教育类-(二)及答案解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《【考研类试卷】考研英语阅读理解B节(新题型)分类精讲文化教育类-(二)及答案解析.doc(15页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、考研英语阅读理解 B 节(新题型)分类精讲文化教育类-(二)及答案解析(总分:100.00,做题时间:90 分钟)一、Section Reading Co(总题数:5,分数:100.00)A. Communication makes both parties know more about each other which makes an agreement.B. The argument itself cannot expand knowledge.C. Reasonable debate plays a positive role in knowledge advances.D. A b
2、asic common knowledge makes contribution to the argument from which people learn something.E. Generally, knowledge is gained by argument.F. Learning can be interrupted by the argument.G. Communication is closely associated with argument.Do we learn more from people whose views we share in common tha
3、n from those whose ideas contradict? The speaker claims so, for the reason that disagreement can cause stress and inhabit learning. I concede that undue discord can impede learning. Otherwise, in my view we learn far more from discourse and debate with those whose ideas we oppose than from people wh
4、ose ideas are in accord with our own.(1) .Admittedly, under some circumstances disagreement with others can be counterproductive to learning. For supporting examples, one need look no further than a television set. On todays typical television or radio talk show, disagreement usually manifests itsel
5、f in meaningless rhetorical bouts and shouting matches, during which opponents vie to have their own message heard, but have little interest either in finding any common ground with or in acknowledging the merits of the opponents viewpoint. Understandably, neither the combatants nor the viewers lear
6、n anything meaningful. In fact, these battles only serve to reinforce the predispositions and biases of all concerned. The end result is that learning is impeded.(2) .Disagreement can also inhibit learning when two opponents disagree on fundamental assumptions needed for meaningful discourse and deb
7、ate. For example, a student of paleontology learns little about the evolution of an animal species under current study by debating with an individual whose religious belief system precludes the possibility of evolution to begin with. And, economics and finance students learn little about the dynamic
8、s of a laissez-faire system by debating with a socialist whose view is that a centralized power should control all economic activity.(3) .Aside from the foregoing two provisions, however, I fundamentally disagree with the speakers claim. Assuming common ground between two rational and reasonable opp
9、onents willing to debate on intellectual merits, both opponents stand to gain much from that debate. Indeed it is primarily through such debate that human knowledge advances, whether at the personal, community, or global level.(4) .At the personal level, by listening to their parents rationale for t
10、heir seemingly oppressive rules and policies, teenagers can learn how certain behaviors naturally carry certain undesirable consequences. At the same time, by listening to their teenagers concerns about autonomy and about peer pressures parents can learn the valuable lesson that effective parenting
11、and control are two different things. At the community level, through dispassionate dialogue an environmental activist can come to understand the legitimate economic concerns of those whose jobs depend on the continued profitable operation of a factory. Conversely, the latter might stand to learn mu
12、ch about the potential public-health price to be paid by ensuring job growth and a low unemployment rate. Finally, at the global level, two nations with opposing political or economic interests can reach mutually beneficial agreements by striving to understand the others legitimate concerns for its
13、national security, its political sovereignty, the stability of its economy and currency, and so forth.(5) .In sum, unless two opponents in a debate are each willing to play on the same field and by the same rules, I concede that disagreement can impede learning. Otherwise, reasoned discourse and deb
14、ate between people with opposing viewpoints is the very foundation upon which human knowledge advances. Accordingly, on balance the speaker is fundamentally correct.(分数:20.00)填空项 1:_填空项 1:_填空项 1:_填空项 1:_填空项 1:_Nonverbal communication is hugely important in any interaction with others; its importance
15、 is multiplied across cultures. This is because we tend to look for nonverbal cues when verbal messages are unclear or ambiguous, as they are more likely to be across cultures. (1) .Low-context cultures like the United States and Canada tend to give relatively less emphasis to nonverbal communicatio
16、n. This does not mean that nonverbal communication does not happen, or that it is unimportant, but that people in these settings tend to place less importance on it than on the literal meanings of words themselves. In high-context settings such as Japan or Colombia, understanding the nonverbal compo
17、nents of communication is relatively more important to receiving the intended meaning of the communication as a whole.(2) . For instance, it may be more socially acceptable in some settings in the United States for women to show fear, but not anger, and for men to display anger, but not fear. At the
18、 same time, interpretation of facial expressions across cultures is difficult. In China and Japan, for example, a facial expression that would be recognized around the world as conveying happiness may actually express anger or mask sadness, both of which are unacceptable to show overtly.(3) . For a
19、Westerner who understands smiles to mean friendliness and happiness, this smile may seem out of place and even cold, under the circumstances. Even though some facial expressions may be similar across cultures, their interpretations remain culture-specific. It is important to understand something abo
20、ut cultural starting-points and values in order to interpret emotions expressed in cross-cultural interactions.(4) . In a comparison of North American and French children on a beach, a researcher noticed that the French children tended to stay in a relatively small space near their parents, while US
21、 children ranged up and down a large area of the beach.(5) .These examples of differences related to nonverbal communication are only the tip of the iceberg. Careful observation, ongoing study from a variety of sources, and cultivating relationships across cultures will all help develop the cultural
22、 fluency to work effectively with nonverbal communication differences.A. These differences of interpretation may lead to conflict. Suppose a Japanese person is explaining her absence from negotiations due to a death in her family. She may do so with a smile, based on her cultural belief that it is n
23、ot appropriate to inflict the pain of grief on others.B. Another variable across cultures has to do with ways of relating to space. Crossing cultures, we encounter very different ideas about polite space for conversations and negotiations. North Americans tend to prefer a large amount of space, perh
24、aps because they are surrounded by it in their homes and countryside. Europeans tend to stand more closely with each other when talking, and are accustomed to smaller personal spaces.C. Americans are serious about standing in lines, in accordance with their beliefs in democracy and the principle of
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 考研 试卷 英语 阅读 理解 题型 分类 文化教育 答案 解析 DOC
