NASA-CR-1677-1971 Brayton cycle vapor chamber (heat pipe) radiator study《布雷登循环蒸发室(热管)散热器研究》.pdf
《NASA-CR-1677-1971 Brayton cycle vapor chamber (heat pipe) radiator study《布雷登循环蒸发室(热管)散热器研究》.pdf》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《NASA-CR-1677-1971 Brayton cycle vapor chamber (heat pipe) radiator study《布雷登循环蒸发室(热管)散热器研究》.pdf(283页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、AS*NTR%T* - L- REPORT I h h - F I = u 4 r/, * Z BRAYTON CYCLE VAPOR CHAMBER (HEAT PIPE) RADIATOR STUD by E. E. Gerrels and J. W. Larson I I Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-2. Government Accesson No. I - 4. Title and Subtltie ERAYTON C
2、YCLE VAPOR CHR141BER (HEAT PIPE) RADIATOR STUDY 6. perform in; Orgenizotro Code 7. Author(s) I E. E. Gerrels and J. W. Larson 8. Performin Or anization Report No. I GESP-?POSB 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. General Electric Company King of Prussia Park Philadelphia, Pe
3、nnsylvania 1910 1 112. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address I Contractor Reort I 1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration I I I Washington, D. C. 20546 I14 Sponsoring Agency Code I 16. Abstract The vapor chamber (heat pipe) radiator is defined and evaluated as a potential candidate for rejectin
4、g waste heat from a Radioisotope Brayton Cycle space power system. A comparison is made with an operationally equivalent conduction fin radiator. Both rad- iators employed DC-200 heat transfer fluid within the primary ducts and aluminum as the basic structural material. Vapor chamber fluids are eval
5、uated and selected for thermal performance and containment within the radiator. Vapor chamber compatibility and performance tests are made for a number of candidate fluids. Preliminary designs are developed for both conduction fin and vapor chamber radiator concepts. A compar- ison shows no signific
6、ant advantages attributable to the Brayton cycle vapor chamber radiator where reliability and meteoroid criteria specify 0.99 to 0.999 probability of survival over a five-year lifetime. Brayton cycle Unclassified - unlimited Nuclear space power systems Radiators Unclassified - For sale by the Nation
7、al Teciinical Inforrnatioin Service, Springfield, Virginia 22151 Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-FOREWORD The work described in this rep
8、ort was conducted by the General Electric Missile and Space Division under NASA contract NAS 3- 106 15. Mr. James P. Couch, Space Power Systems Division, NASA Lewis Research Center, was the Project Manager. The report was originally issued as General Electric report GESP-9036. Provided by IHSNot for
9、 ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-See tion INTRODUCTION . . 1.1 General Discussion 1.2 Study Objectives. Goals and Tasks . 1.3 Report Contents SUMMARY . 2.1 Int
10、roduction 2.2 Vapor Chamber Evaluation and Selection 2.3 Vapor Chamber Fin Radiator Design 2.4 Conduction Fin Radiator Design 2.5 Vapor Chamber (Heat Pipe) Tests . 2.6 Radiator Evaluation and Comparison . 2.7 Conclusion. RADIATOR REQUIREMENTS 3.1 General Discussion 3.2 Powerplant and Configuration S
11、pecifications . 3.3 Performance Criteria 3.4 Vapor Chamber Working Fluid Criteria 3.5 Life Expectancy Considerations . 3.6 Meteoroid Criteria 3.7 Structural Criteria . 3.8 Structural Environiiental Criteria 3.8.1 Ground Handling Criteria 3.8.2 Launch. Lift-off. Boost Criteria . 3.8.3 Orbital Operati
12、on Criteria 3.9 Atmospheric Environmental Criteria WORKING FLUID SELECTION . 4.1 General Discussion 4.1.1 Specific Work Requirements 4.1.2 Vapor Chamber Fin Principles . 4. 2 Physical Properties of Worlting Fluids 4.2. 1 Fluid Requirements . 4.2.2 lciematifiestiorr of Candidate Fltricls Provided by
13、IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-4,2.3 Preliminary Fluid Perfornlanee Analysis 4.2-4 Compatibility of Candidate Working Fluids with Aluminum 4.3 Analytical Comparative Evaluation 4.3.1 Analytical Model of Vapor Chamber Fin 4.3.2 Comparison of Vapo
14、r Chamber Performance Using Candidate Working Fluids 4.4 Tests for Compatibility of Materials 4.4.1 Technical Approach 4.4.2 Capsule Design and Fabrication . 4.4.3 Capsule Filling and Sealing . 4.4.4 Capsule Test Apparatus . 4.4.5 Capsule Test Results 4.4.6 Evaluation and Conclusions for the Selecti
15、on of Vapor Chamber Working Fluids . RADIATOR DESIGN . . 5.1 Design Concepts . 5.1.1 General Discussion 5.1.2 Vapor Chamber Fin Radiator Design . 5 1.3 Conduction Fin Radiator Design . 5.2 Performance Analysis 5.2.1 Methodology 5.2.2. Results . 5.3 Structural Analysis . 5.3.1 General Discussion 5.3.
16、2 Conduction Fin Radiator . 5.3.3 Vapor Chamber Fin Radiator . 5.4 Fabrication and Assembly 5.4.1 Vapor Chamber Fin Radiator . 5.4.2 Conduction Fin Radiator . . 5.5 Weight Conparison VAPOR CmMBER TEST PROGRAM 6. 1 neraX.seussion . 6-2 Test Program Objectives Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduct
17、ion or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-TABLE 01“ CONTENTS (Cot“LLfd) Section 6. 3 Vapor Chinber Test Co;-LfigraMcns . 6.3.1 Design considerations . 6.3.2 Vapor Chamber Design 6.4 Test Program . 6.4.1 Test Setup . 6.4.2 Instrumentation . 6.4.3 Test Procedure . 6.5 Test Results . 6.5
18、.1 Test Data . 6.5.2 Test Accuracy 6.6 Test Conclusions VAPOR CHAMBER RADIATOR EVALUATION AND CONCLUSIONS . 7.1 General . 7.2 Evaluation Criteria Summary . 7.3 Evaluation Summary . 7.4 Conclusions . 8 REFERENCES APPENDIX A: TABULATED VALUES OF FLUID PROPERTIES . APPENDIX B: SPECIFICATION NO . P1224-
19、2-BRAYTON CYCLE SPACE POWER SYSTEM ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIFICATION Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Power Module Configuration Eight MW Vehicle Concept Interplanetary Configuration Vapor Chamber Radiator Design Characteristics
20、Summary Conduction Fin Radiator Design Characteristics Summary . Comparison of Vapor Chamber Fin to Conduction Fin Primary Radiators Trend in Launch Vehicle Dynamic Loads Acoustic Noise Frequency Spectrum Vapor Chamber Flow Dynamics Capillary Flow Parameters vs Temperature for Vapor . Chamber Workin
21、g Fluids Dimensionless Capi.llary Flow Parameter vs Temperature for Various Fluids Vapor Flow Parameter vs Temperature for Various Fluids Cichelli and Bonilla Correlation Critical Heat Flux vs Temperature for Various Fluids . Vapor Pressure vs Temperature for Various Fluids Total Yearly Ionization D
22、ose (1 gm/cm2 Aluminum Shielding. Polar Orbits) Vapor Chamber Radiator Panel . Individual Vapor Chamber Element Vapor Chamber Thermal Schematic Variation of Fin Effectiveness with Radiation Modulus for . Fin Radiating from Two Sides Heat Transfer Rate vs Temperature of A Single Vapor Chamber . a Vap
23、or Chamber Heat Radiated Per Unit Radiator Mass Conduction Fin Thickness vs Vapor Chamber Tube Diameter . and Temperature Conduction Fin Length vs Vapor Chamber ?Cube Diameter and Temperature. Individual Vapor Fin Evaporation Surface Thermal Flux . vs Temperature . Evaporative Vapor AT Comparison Pr
24、ovided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-LSSrY“ OF IS. LSJSTRATIOWS (ConlVd) Page . . Condensing Temperature Loss . Condenser Length Limit Effect of Tube Wall Thickness and Temperature on Vapor . Chamber Fin Heat Radiated Per Unit Radiator Mass
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
10000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- NASACR16771971BRAYTONCYCLEVAPORCHAMBERHEATPIPERADIATORSTUDY 布雷 循环 蒸发 热管 散热器 研究 PDF

链接地址:http://www.mydoc123.com/p-836648.html