ASTM E570-2009 317 Standard Practice for Flux Leakage Examination of Ferromagnetic Steel Tubular Products《铁磁钢管形制品的磁力泄漏检验的标准实施规程》.pdf

《ASTM E570-2009 317 Standard Practice for Flux Leakage Examination of Ferromagnetic Steel Tubular Products《铁磁钢管形制品的磁力泄漏检验的标准实施规程》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ASTM E570-2009 317 Standard Practice for Flux Leakage Examination of Ferromagnetic Steel Tubular Products《铁磁钢管形制品的磁力泄漏检验的标准实施规程》.pdf（7页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Designation: E 570 09Standard Practice forFlux Leakage Examination of Ferromagnetic Steel TubularProducts1This standard is issued under the fixed designation E 570; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last r

2、evision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the Department of Defense.1. Scope1.1 This practice covers the application and st

3、andardizationof equipment using the flux leakage test method for detectionof outer surface, inner surface, and subsurface discontinuitiesin ferromagnetic steel tubular products (Note 1) of uniformcross section such as seamless and welded tubing.NOTE 1The term “tube” or “tubular product” will be used

4、 to refer toboth pipe and tubing.1.2 This practice is intended for use on tubular productshaving outside diameters from approximately12 to 24 in. (12.7to 610 mm) with wall thicknesses to12 in (12.7 mm). Thesetechniques have been used for other sizes, however, and maybe so specified upon contractual

5、agreement between thepurchaser and the supplier.1.3 This practice does not establish acceptance criteria; theymust be specified by the using parties.1.4 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regardedas the standard. The values given in parentheses are mathemati-cal conversions to SI units

6、that are provided for informationonly and are not considered standard.1.5 This standard does not purport to address the safetyconcerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibilityof the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety andhealth practices and determine the applicab

7、ility of regulatorylimitations prior to use.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2E 543 Specification for Agencies Performing Nondestruc-tive TestingE 1316 Terminology for Nondestructive Examinations2.2 Other Documents:SNT-TC-1A Recommended for Personnel Qualification andCertification of Nondes

8、tructive Testing Personnel3ANSI/ASNT CP-189 ASNT Standard for Qualification andCertification of Nondestructive Testing Personnel3NAS-410 NAS Certification and Qualification of Nonde-structive Personnel (Quality Assurance Committee)43. Terminology3.1 Definitions of terms relating to flux leakage exam

9、inationare provided in Terminology E 1316.4. Summary of Practice4.1 This method consists of the following steps:4.1.1 The tube wall is magnetized at the area under exami-nation to a proper level approaching magnetic saturation.NOTE 2Tubes subjected to magnetic inspections can retain variousstrengths

10、 and configuration of residual magnetic fields depending upon themagnetization technique. If the residual field resulting from a giventechnique can interfere with subsequent applications of the tube, then asupplemental demagnetization process may be required.4.1.2 A flux sensor containing magnetic t

11、ransducers isplaced on or above the outside surface of the tube in themagnetized area.4.1.3 Either the tube or the flux sensor is moved at aconstant speed in the direction of the magnetic field so that thesensor scans the entire surface of the tube.4.1.4 Each magnetic transducer in the flux sensor i

12、s con-nected to an electronic console which amplifies, filters, andelectronically processes the signals such that significant dis-continuities are indicated (visually, audibly), and marked withpaint, or automatically removed from the production line, orboth.4.1.5 Asuitable means for assuring near ma

13、gnetic saturationof the product (subject to periodic check or calibration) must beprovided as part of the examination to verify the capability ofdetection of outside diameter and inside diameter discontinui-ties.1This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E07 on Nonde-structive Testin

14、g and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E07.07 onElectromagnetic Method.Current edition approved June 1, 2009. Published June 2009. Originallyapproved in 1976. Last previous edition approved in 2004 as E 570 - 97(2004)1.2For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org,

15、 orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.3Available fromAmerican Society for Nondestructive Testing (ASNT), P.O. Box28518, 1711 Arlingate Ln., Columbus, OH 43228-0518, htt

16、p:/www.asnt.org.4Available from Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc., 1250 EyeSt., NW, Washington, DC 20005.1Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.5. Significance and Use5.1 This practice outlines a procedure fo

17、r examining ferro-magnetic tubular products using the flux leakage method. Ifproperly applied, this method is capable of detecting thepresence and location of significant longitudinally or trans-versely oriented discontinuities such as pits, scabs, slivers,gouges, roll-ins, laps, seams, cracks, hole

18、s, and improper weldsin ferromagnetic tubes under inspection. In addition, theseverity of a discontinuity may be estimated and a rejectionlevel set with respect to the magnitude of the electromagneticindication produced by the discontinuity.5.2 The response from natural discontinuities can be signif

19、i-cantly different from the response for artificial discontinuitiessuch as drilled holes or notches of equivalent depth. For thisreason, sufficient work should be done to determine theconditions necessary to detect and mark natural discontinuitieswhose characteristics will adversely affect the servi

20、ceability ofthe tube, in order to establish acceptance criteria between thesupplier and purchaser.6. Basis of Application6.1 The following criteria may be specified in the purchasespecification, contractual agreement, or elsewhere, and mayrequire agreement between the purchaser and supplier:6.1.1 Ac

21、ceptance criteria.6.1.2 Type, dimensions, location, and number of artificialdiscontinuities to be placed on the reference standard.6.1.3 Size and type of tubing to be examined.6.1.4 Extent of examination (that is, full length, weld zoneonly if welded, etc.).6.1.5 Disposition of material with discont

22、inuity indications.6.1.6 Methods of verifying dimensions of artificial discon-tinuities and allowable tolerances.6.1.7 Time of inspection, that is, the point(s) in the manu-facturing process at which the material will be inspected.6.1.8 Nondestructive testing (NDT) personnel shall bequalified in acc

23、ordance with a nationally recognized NDTpersonnel qualification practice or standard such as ANSI/ASNT CP-189, SNT-TC-1A, MIL-STD-410, NAS-410, or asimilar document. The practice or standard used and itsapplicable revision shall be specified in the purchase specifi-cation or contractual agreement be

24、tween the using parties.NOTE 3MIL-STD-410 is canceled and has been replaced with NAS-410, however, it may be used with agreement between contracting parties.6.1.9 If specified in the purchase specification or contractualagreement, NDT agencies shall be evaluated and qualified asdescribed in Practice

25、 E 543. The applicable edition of PracticeE 543 shall be identified in the purchase specification orcontractual agreement between the using parties.7. Interferences7.1 There are some manufacturing processes that producetubing with surface conditions that could interfere with orobscure signals relate

26、d to inner surface discontinuities. In theexamination of heavy-walled tubing having these conditions,the ability to examine reliably for inner surface discontinuitiesmay be affected.7.2 When examining tubes with large rapid surface varia-tions, false signals may be caused by the sensors bouncingalon

27、g the surface of the tubes.7.3 For active pole magnetizing systems, a small air gapbetween the magnetizing system and material under examina-tion could cause a heavy accumulation of scale buildup on thepole pieces.DETECTION OF LONGITUDINALDISCONTINUITIES8. Apparatus8.1 Rotary MechanismThe rotary mec

28、hanism shall becapable of rotating a magnetizing system or flux leakagesensors, or both, in unison around tubing that is beingtranslated axially through the mechanism, thereby producing ahelical scan over the surface. Good examination practicesrequire that the pole pieces of the magnetizing system r

29、otateuniformly about the tube and that the flux sensor ride on thetube or be spaced uniformly above the surface of the tubeduring rotation.8.2 Spin Feed MechanismThe spin feed mechanism shallbe capable of positioning a magnetizing system or flux leakagesensors, or both, on or near the surface of a t

30、ranslating rotatingtube such that there is a uniform spacing between the polepieces of the magnetizing system and the tube. The fluxleakage sensors shall ride on the surface of the tube or be helduniformly from the surface of the tube during examination.8.3 Magnetizing System:8.3.1 An active field m

31、agnetizing system consists of asuitable means of applying a strong adjustable transversemagnetic field to the region of the tube under the flux sensorsand shall be capable of bringing that region of the tube to nearsaturation. Typical systems employ either permanent magnetsor controllable electromag

32、nets. If permanent magnets are used,a means shall be provided to adjust the spacing of the polepieces in order to reach the proper magnetization level. Referto Section 13 for application of longitudinal magnetic fields.8.3.2 A residual field magnetizing system consists of ameans of applying a circul

33、ar residual magnetic field to an entiretube before the tube is inspected. Typical systems employ acentrally positioned conducting rod through which a highdirect current is passed; alternatively, the current may beconducted through the tube itself. The current produces acircular active magnetic field

34、 which is concentric with thecurrent distribution. When the current ceases, there remains aresidual magnetic field which is circular, concentric with thetube, and wholly contained within the tube wall.8.4 Flux Leakage Sensors:8.4.1 The flux sensor shall consist of magnetic field trans-ducers that re

35、spond to variations in magnetic flux density.These sensors generally consist of one of the following types:electromagnetic coils, Hall probes, magneto diodes, magnis-tors, or magnetoresistors. These sensors are normally used todetect the flux leakage directly from the discontinuity in thetube; howev

36、er, they may also be used to detect flux leakagepatterns that have been transferred from the tube to a strip ofmagnetic tape. The flux sensors should be of sufficient numberand length so as to provide 100 % coverage while scanning theE570092tube surface to be examined at the desired examination spee

37、d.Their location (with respect to the magnetic pole pieces and thetubular product) should result in maximum response to theleakage field caused by a discontinuity in the tubular product.8.4.2 The depth and orientation of a discontinuity below theoutside surface will affect the magnitude of the signa

38、l receivedfrom it. Sensitivity decreases significantly as the distancebetween the flux leakage sensor and the tube under examina-tion is increased. Therefore, the sensors should remain cleanand have uniform contact with the tube surface, or if air ridingthe sensors should be held at a uniform distan

39、ce above thesurface of the tube.8.5 Electronic InstrumentationThe electronic apparatusshall be capable of amplifying signals from the flux sensors andprocessing them for the operation of alarms. Multiple probesmay be used to increase the speed of examination. The signalsmay be processed in two separ

40、ate channels to result in adifferentiation between inner and outer surface discontinuities.Each of the two sets of electronic channels should contain itsown sensitivity and threshold triggering controls for indepen-dent setting of percentage of wall rejection levels.8.6 Driving MechanismA mechanical

41、 drive mechanismshall be used which is capable of rigidly holding and passingthe tube through the inspection apparatus at constant speed andconcentric with the inspection apparatus. As required, thedriving mechanism shall be capable of rotating and advancing,or just advancing the tube with a constan

42、t speed.9. Principles of Examination9.1 Conduct the examination of tubular products for longi-tudinal discontinuities employing a transverse magnetic fieldand flux leakage detectors using one or more of the followingtechniques:9.1.1 Obtain a transverse magnetic field by either (1)positioning north a

43、nd south poles of a magnet on opposite sidesof a tube on a diameter or chord as shown in Fig. 1(a) and 1(b);or (2) passing a high direct current through a conducting rodcentrally positioned in the tube under examination.9.1.2 Position a flux sensor (or sensors) containing magneticfield transducers o

44、n or near the tube surface and move at auniform speed over the area being magnetized.9.1.3 At a discontinuity in the tube wall, the flux lines aredistorted, producing a leakage field. The maximum flux leak-age for a discontinuity normally occurs when magnetization isperpendicular to the discontinuit

45、y.9.1.4 For active pole magnetization, rotation of the magne-tizing system about the tube results in transverse magnetizationof the tube wall that is periodically perpendicular to all radii ofthe tube (Fig. 2(a). Rotation of the tube with the magnetizingpoles held stationary will also produce the sa

46、me effect (Fig.2(b).9.1.5 Relative motion between the flux sensor and the fluxleakage field caused by the discontinuity is generally utilized togenerate a voltage in the flux sensor. The amplitude of thevoltage generated by the sensor is generally indicative of theseverity of the discontinuity when

47、all other factors are constant.The flux leakage field measured at the outside surface of thetube resulting from an inside surface discontinuity is muchbroader than the leakage field from a discontinuity of equalseverity located on the outer surface of the tube, resulting in alower signal frequency f

48、or the inner surface discontinuity (Fig.3(a) and 3(b). Several types of equipment utilize this infor-mation to determine whether the discontinuity is located on theinner or outer surface of the tube.9.1.6 Near saturation is required to provide repeatable andreliable indications for the presence of o

49、uter surface, innersurface, or subsurface discontinuities. A suitable measuringmeans or reference samples or both are required to properlyadjust the equipment for operation at the required sensitivityand magnetization level.9.2 The examination of tubular products for transversediscontinuities utilizing a longitudinal magnetic field is dis-cussed in Section 14.10. Reference Standard10.1 The tubes selected for reference standards should befirst examined to ascertain that they are free of interferingnatural discontinuities prior to the introduction of artificialdefects. The