ASTM E562-2008e1 6250 Standard Test Method for Determining Volume Fraction by Systematic Manual Point Count《用系统的人工逐点计数法测定体积因数的标准试验方法》.pdf

《ASTM E562-2008e1 6250 Standard Test Method for Determining Volume Fraction by Systematic Manual Point Count《用系统的人工逐点计数法测定体积因数的标准试验方法》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ASTM E562-2008e1 6250 Standard Test Method for Determining Volume Fraction by Systematic Manual Point Count《用系统的人工逐点计数法测定体积因数的标准试验方法》.pdf（7页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Designation: E562 081Standard Test Method forDetermining Volume Fraction by Systematic Manual PointCount1This standard is issued under the fixed designation E562; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last rev

2、ision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1NOTEA1.10 was editorially corrected in August 2011.INTRODUCTIONThis test method may be used to determine the volume fraction of constitue

3、nts in an opaquespecimen using a polished, planar cross section by the manual point count procedure. The samemeasurements can be achieved using image analysis per Practice E1245.1. Scope1.1 This test method describes a systematic manual pointcounting procedure for statistically estimating the volume

4、fraction of an identifiable constituent or phase from sectionsthrough the microstructure by means of a point grid.1.2 The use of automatic image analysis to determine thevolume fraction of constituents is described in Practice E1245.1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded asstandard. No

5、 other units of measurement are included in thisstandard.1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of thesafety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-bili

6、ty of regulatory limitations prior to use.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2E3 Guide for Preparation of Metallographic SpecimensE7 Terminology Relating to MetallographyE407 Practice for Microetching Metals and AlloysE691 Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study toDetermine the Preci

7、sion of a Test MethodE1245 Practice for Determining the Inclusion or Second-Phase Constituent Content of Metals by Automatic ImageAnalysis3. Terminology3.1 DefinitionsFor definitions of terms used in this prac-tice, see Terminology E7.3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:3.2.1 point co

8、untthe total number of points in a test gridthat fall within the microstructural feature of interest, or on thefeature boundary; for the latter, each test point on the boundaryis one half a point.3.2.2 point fractionthe ratio, usually expressed as a per-centage, of the point count of the phase or co

9、nstituent ofinterest on the two-dimensional image of an opaque specimento the number of grid points, which is averaged over n fields toproduce an unbiased estimate of the volume fraction of thephase or constituent.3.2.3 stereologythe methods developed to obtain informa-tion about the three-dimension

10、al characteristics of microstruc-tures based upon measurements made on two-dimensionalsections through a solid material or their projection on asurface.3.2.4 test grida transparent sheet or eyepiece reticle witha regular pattern of lines or crosses that is superimposed overthe microstructural image

11、for counting microstructural featuresof interest.3.2.5 volume fractionthe total volume of a phase orconstituent per unit volume of specimen, generally expressedas a percentage.3.3 Symbols:PT= total number of points in the test grid.Pi= point count on the ithfield.PP(i) =PiPT3 100 = percentage of gri

12、d points, in theconstituent observed on the ithfield.n = number of fields counted.1This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E04 onMetallography and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E04.14 on Quanti-tative Metallography.Current edition approved Oct. 1, 2008. Published

13、November 2008. Originallyapproved in 1976. Last previous edition approved in 2005 as E562 051. DOI:10.1520/E0562-08E01.2For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume information, refer

14、to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.1Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.Pp= 1n(i 5 1nPpi! = arithmetic average of Pp(i).s = estimate of the standard deviation (s) (see (Eq3) in Section 10).95 % CI =

15、95 % confidence interval= 6ts/=n (see Note 1).t = a multiplier related to the number of fieldsexamined and used in conjunction with thestandard deviation of the measurements to de-termine the 95% CI.VV= volume fraction of the constituent or phaseexpressed as a percentage (see (Eq 5) in Section10).%

16、RA = % relative accuracy, a measure of the statisticalprecision = (95 % CI/ Pp) 3 100.NOTE 1 Table 1 gives the appropriate multiplying factors (t) for anynumber of fields measured.4. Summary of Test Method4.1 Aclear plastic test grid or eyepiece reticle with a regulararray of test points is superimp

17、osed over the image, or aprojection of the image, produced by a light microscope,scanning electron microscope, or micrograph, and the numberof test points falling within the phase or constituent of interestare counted and divided by the total number of grid pointsyielding a point fraction, usually e

18、xpressed as a percentage, forthat field. The average point fraction for n measured fieldsgives an estimate of the volume fraction of the constituent. Thismethod is applicable only to bulk opaque planar sectionsviewed with reflected light or electrons.5. Significance and Use5.1 This test method is ba

19、sed upon the stereological prin-ciple that a grid with a number of regularly arrayed points,when systematically placed over an image of a two-dimensional section through the microstructure, can provide,after a representative number of placements on different fields,an unbiased statistical estimation

20、 of the volume fraction of anidentifiable constituent or phase (1, 2, 3).35.2 This test method has been described (4) as beingsuperior to other manual methods with regard to effort, bias,and simplicity.5.3 Any number of clearly distinguishable constituents orphases within a microstructure (or macros

21、tructure) can becounted using the method. Thus, the method can be applied toany type of solid material from which adequate two-dimensional sections can be prepared and observed.5.4 A condensed step-by-step guide for using the method isgiven in Annex A1.6. Apparatus6.1 Test Grid, consisting of a spec

22、ified number of equallyspaced points formed by the intersection of very thin lines. Twocommon types of grids (circular or square array) are shown inFig. 1.6.1.1 The test grid can be in the form of a transparent sheetthat is superimposed upon the viewing screen for the measure-ment.6.1.2 Eyepiece Ret

23、icle, may be used to superimpose a testgrid upon the image.6.2 Light Microscope, or other suitable device with aviewing screen at least 100 mm 3 125 mm, preferably withgraduated x and y stage translation controls, should be used toimage the microstructure.6.3 Scanning Electron Microscope, may also b

24、e used toimage the microstructure; however, relief due to polishing orheavy etching must be minimized or bias will be introduced asa result of deviation from a true two-dimensional sectionthrough the microstructure.6.4 Micrographs, of properly prepared opaque specimens,taken with any suitable imagin

25、g device, may be used providedthe fields are selected without bias and in sufficient quantity toproperly sample the microstructure.6.4.1 The applicable point counting grid shall only beapplied once to each micrograph. Point counting measurementsshould be completed on different fields of view and, th

26、erefore,different micrographs. Repeated point count measurements onan individual micrograph is not allowed.6.4.2 The magnification of the micrograph should be as highas needed to adequately resolve the microstructure withoutresulting in adjacent grid points overlaying a single constituentfeature.7.

27、Sample Selection7.1 Samples selected for measurement of the phase orconstituent should be representative of the general microstruc-ture, or of the microstructure at a specified location within a lot,heat, or part.7.2 Adescription of the sample locations should be includedas a part of the results.7.3

28、 Any orientation of the prepared section (that is, whetherlongitudinal or transverse) can be used. However, it should berecorded since it may have an effect upon the precisionobtained.7.4 If the sample microstructure contains gradients or inho-mogeneities (for example, banding) then the section shou

29、ldcontain or show the gradient or inhomogeneity.3The boldface numbers in parentheses refer to the list of references at the end ofthis standard.TABLE 1 95 % Confidence Interval MultipliersNo. of Fields n t No. of Fields n t5 2.776 19 2.1016 2.571 20 2.0937 2.447 21 2.0868 2.365 22 2.0809 2.306 23 2.

30、07410 2.262 24 2.06911 2.228 25 2.06412 2.201 26 2.06013 2.179 27 2.05614 2.160 28 2.05215 2.145 29 2.04816 2.131 30 2.04517 2.120 40 2.02018 2.110 60 2.000 1.960E562 08128. Sample Preparation8.1 The two-dimensional sections should be prepared usingstandard metallographic, ceramographic, or other po

31、lishingprocedures, such as described in Methods E3.8.2 Smearing or other distortions of the phases or constitu-ents during preparation of the section or sections should beminimized because they tend to introduce an unknown biasinto the statistical volume fraction estimate.8.3 Etching of the sections

32、, as described in Test MethodsE407, should be as shallow (that is, light) as possible becausedeviations from a planar two-dimensional section will cause abias toward over estimation of the volume fraction.8.4 Stain- or coloring-type etchants are preferable to thosethat cause attack of one or more of

33、 the constituents or phases.8.5 Description of the etchant and etching procedure shouldbe included in the report.8.6 If etching is used to provide contrast or distinguishabil-ity of constituents then the volume fraction estimates should beobtained as a function of etching time to check the significa

34、nceof any bias introduced.9. Procedure9.1 Principle:9.1.1 An array of points formed by a grid of lines or curvesis superimposed upon a magnified image (that is, a field ofview) of a metallographic specimen.9.1.2 The number of points falling within the microstruc-tural constituent of interest is coun

35、ted and averaged for aselected number of fields.9.1.3 This average number of points expressed as a percent-age of the total number of points in the array (PT)isanunbiased statistical estimation of the volume percent of themicrostructural constituent of interest.9.1.4 A condensed step-by-step descrip

36、tion of the procedureis provided in Annex A1.9.2 Grid Selection:9.2.1 The grid should consist of equally spaced pointsformed by the intersection of fine lines. Diagrams of twopossible grids, one with a circular pattern and one with a squarepattern, which are recommended for use, are shown in Fig. 1.

37、9.2.2 Determine the number of points (that is, the grid size,PT) from a visual estimate of the area fraction occupied by theconstituent of interest. Table 2 provides guidelines for thisselection. The values in Table 2 do not correspond to theoreti-cal constraints; but, by using these values, empiric

38、al observa-tions have shown that the method is optimized for a givenprecision.9.2.2.1 The user may choose to employ a 100 point gridover the entire range of volume fractions. The use of 100pointgrid facilitates easy volume percent calculations. the use ofonly one overlay or eyepiece reticle for all

39、volume percentdeterminations may save both time and money.9.2.2.2 For constituents present in amount of less than 2%,a 400point grid may be used.9.2.3 Superimpose the grid, in the form of a transparency,upon a ground glass screen on which the section image isprojected.9.2.4 A grid in the form of an

40、eyepiece reticle may also beused.Circular GridSquare GridNOTE 1The entire 24 points can be used, or the outer 16, or the inner8 points.FIG. 1 Examples of Possible Grid Configurations That Can BeUtilizedTABLE 2 Guidelines for Grid Size SelectionANOTE 1A grid size selection which gives a significant n

41、umber offields having no grid points on the constituent of interest should beavoided.Visual Area Fraction EstimateExpressed as a PercentageGrid Size (Number of Points, PT)2to5% 1005to10% 4910 to 20 % 2520 % 16AThese guidelines represent an optimum for efficiency for the time spentcounting and for th

42、e statistical information obtained per grid placement.E562 08139.2.5 If the constituent areas form a regular or periodicpattern on the section image, avoid the use of a grid having asimilar pattern.9.3 Magnification Selection:9.3.1 Select the magnification so that it is as high as neededto clearly r

43、esolve the microstructure without causing adjacentgrid points to fall over the same constituent feature.9.3.2 As a guideline, choose a magnification that gives anaverage constituent size that is approximately one half of thegrid spacing.9.3.3 As the magnification is increased, the field areadecrease

44、s, and the field-to-field variability increases, thusrequiring a greater number of fields to obtain the same degreeof measurement precision.9.4 Counting:9.4.1 Count and record for each field the number of pointsfalling on the constituent of interest.9.4.2 Count any points falling on the constituent

45、boundaryas one half.9.4.3 In order to minimize bias, any point that is doubtful asto whether it is inside or outside of the constituent boundaryshould be counted as one half.9.4.4PPi!5Pi3 100PT(1)9.4.5 The values of PP(i)are used to calculate Ppandstandard deviation, s.9.5 Selection of the Number of

46、 Fields:9.5.1 The number of fields or images to measure depends onthe desired degree of precision for the measurement. Table 3gives a guide to the number of fields or images to be countedas a function of PT, the selected relative accuracy (statisticalprecision), and the magnitude of the volume fract

47、ion.9.6 Selection of the Array of Fields:9.6.1 Use a uniformly spaced array of fields to obtain theestimated value, Pp, and the estimated standard deviation, s.9.6.2 If gradients or inhomogeneities are present, then auniform spacing of fields may introduce a bias into theestimate. If another method

48、of field selection is used, forexample, random, then describe it in the report.9.6.3 When the microstructure shows a certain periodicityof distribution of the constituent or phase being measured, anycoincidence of the points of the grid and the structure must beavoided. This can be achieved by using

49、 either a circular grid ora square grid placed at an angle to the microstructuralperiodicity.9.7 Grid Positioning Over FieldsMake grid positioningof each field without viewing the microstructure to eliminateany possibility of operator bias. This can be accomplished bymoving the x and y stage mechanism a fixed amount whileshifting to the next field without looking at the microstructure.9.8 Improving Measurement Precision It is recommendedthat the user attempt to sample more of the microstructureeither by multiple specimens or by completely repeating themeta