ASTM E2229-2009(2018) Standard Practices for Interpretation of Psychophysiological Detection of Deception (Polygraph) Data《欺骗(测谎仪)数据心理生理检测解释的标准实施规程》.pdf
《ASTM E2229-2009(2018) Standard Practices for Interpretation of Psychophysiological Detection of Deception (Polygraph) Data《欺骗(测谎仪)数据心理生理检测解释的标准实施规程》.pdf》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《ASTM E2229-2009(2018) Standard Practices for Interpretation of Psychophysiological Detection of Deception (Polygraph) Data《欺骗(测谎仪)数据心理生理检测解释的标准实施规程》.pdf(2页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、Designation: E2229 09 (Reapproved 2018)Standard Practices forInterpretation of Psychophysiological Detection ofDeception (Polygraph) Data1This standard is issued under the fixed designation E2229; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case
2、 of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 These practices establish procedures for the systematicinterpretation and analysis of Psycho
3、physiological Detection ofDeception (PDD) data.1.2 Any test data analysis procedure used shall be correctlymatched to the PDD examination format. Examiners shall useevaluation methods for which they have been formally trained.1.2.1 Acceptable test data analysis procedures are thosepublished in refer
4、eed or technical journals, and for whichpublished replications of the procedures have confirmed theirefficacy.1.3 This international standard was developed in accor-dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-ization established in the Decision on Principles for theDevelopment of In
5、ternational Standards, Guides and Recom-mendations issued by the World Trade Organization TechnicalBarriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.2. Terminology2.1 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:2.1.1 3-position scale, nwhole number values from 1 to1 assigned systematically to responses to releva
6、nt and com-parison questions. These values are summed, and the PDDoutcome is governed by specified decision rules for whichthese sums are used.2.1.2 7-position scale, nwhole number values from 3 to3 assigned systematically to responses to relevant and com-parison questions. These values are summed,
7、and the PDDoutcome is governed by specified decision rules for whichthese sums are used.2.1.3 rank, na number assigned to individual responseswithin a PDD recording hierarchically, according to relativeresponse intensity.2.1.4 rank order scoring, nassignment of ranks accordingto relative magnitude o
8、f the responses. The PDD outcome isgoverned by specified decision rules using these ranks.2.1.5 respiration line length, nsum of the length of therespiration waveform over a fixed time period.2.1.6 response amplitude, nmagnitude of a response fromstimulus onset to maximum expression of the response
9、withinthe response window.2.1.7 response duration, nperiod between a phasic re-sponse onset and return to baseline.2.1.8 response latency, ntime between stimulus and re-sponse onsets.2.1.9 response window, nthe period in which physiologi-cal responding normally occurs and recovers after stimulusonse
10、t. Response windows vary by channel.2.1.10 score, na number systematically assigned to anestablished set of comparisons within a PDD recording.2.1.11 spot score, nsum of scores associated with anindividual relevant question across all test recordings.2.1.12 stimulus onset, ncommencement of stimulus
11、pre-sentation.2.1.13 tonic level, nresting or baseline activity level of theexaminee.2.1.14 total numerical score, nsum of scores for an entireseries of charts and questions.3. Summary of Practices3.1 Global Evaluation:3.1.1 Evaluators utilizing global interpretation shall:3.1.1.1 Be formally traine
12、d in global interpretation.3.1.1.2 Confirm that the recordings are suitable for globalevaluation. If they are not suitable, no evaluation shall beundertaken for the purpose of diagnosing truthfulness ordeception. Nothing shall preclude an evaluator from reportingevidence of countermeasures when this
13、 evidence exists.3.1.1.3 Use analysis methods generally recognized to beaccurate.3.1.2 When possible, numerical evaluation shall be pre-ferred over global evaluation.1These practices are under the jurisdiction ofASTM Committee E52 on ForensicPsychophysiology and are the direct responsibility of Subc
14、ommittee E52.05 onPsychophysiological Detection of Deception (PDD).Current edition approved Feb. 1, 2018. Published February 2018. Originallyapproved in 2002. Last previous edition approved in 2009 as E2229 09. DOI:10.1520/E2229-09R18.Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700,
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
5000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- ASTME222920092018STANDARDPRACTICESFORINTERPRETATIONOFPSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICALDETECTIONOFDECEPTIONPOLYGRAPHDATA

链接地址:http://www.mydoc123.com/p-530625.html