ASTM D8131 D8131M-2017 1250 Standard Practice for Tensile Properties of Tapered and Stepped Joints of Polymer Matrix Composite Laminates《聚合物基复合层压制品锥形和阶形接头拉伸性能的标准实施规程》.pdf

《ASTM D8131 D8131M-2017 1250 Standard Practice for Tensile Properties of Tapered and Stepped Joints of Polymer Matrix Composite Laminates《聚合物基复合层压制品锥形和阶形接头拉伸性能的标准实施规程》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ASTM D8131 D8131M-2017 1250 Standard Practice for Tensile Properties of Tapered and Stepped Joints of Polymer Matrix Composite Laminates《聚合物基复合层压制品锥形和阶形接头拉伸性能的标准实施规程》.pdf（9页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Designation: D8131/D8131M 17Standard Practice forTensile Properties of Tapered and Stepped Joints ofPolymer Matrix Composite Laminates1This standard is issued under the fixed designation D8131/D8131M; the number immediately following the designation indicates theyear of original adoption or, in the

2、case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of lastreapproval. A superscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 This test practice defines the procedure for determina-tion of the tensile strength of a

3、 tapered or stepped joint ofpolymer matrix composite materials. It is applicable to second-ary bonded or co-bonded laminates with either unidirectionalplies or woven fabric reinforcements. The materials to bebonded may be different material systems. In the bondline, aseparate adhesive material may o

4、r may not be used (example:adhesives may be used with a prepreg system or may not beused with a wet lay-up repair system). The range of acceptabletest laminates and thicknesses is described in 8.2.1.1.2 This practice supplements Test Method D3039/D3039Mfor tensile loading. Several important test spe

5、cimen parameters(for example, joint length, ply overlaps, step depth, and taperratio) are not mandated by this practice, however, theseparameters are required to be specified and reported to supportrepeatable results.1.3 Unidirectional (0 ply orientation) tape composites,textile composites, as well

6、as multidirectional compositelaminates, can be tested.1.4 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound unitsare to be regarded separately as standard.1.4.1 Within the text the inch-pound units are shown inbrackets. The values stated in each system are not exactequivalents; therefore, each syst

7、em must be used indepen-dently of the other. Combining values from the two systemsmay result in nonconformance with the standard1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of thesafety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish

8、appro-priate safety, health and environmental practices and deter-mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.1.6 This international standard was developed in accor-dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-ization established in the Decision on Principles for th

9、eDevelopment of International Standards, Guides and Recom-mendations issued by the World Trade Organization TechnicalBarriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2D792 Test Methods for Density and Specific Gravity (Rela-tive Density) of Plastics by DisplacementD883 Ter

10、minology Relating to PlasticsD3039/D3039M Test Method for Tensile Properties of Poly-mer Matrix Composite MaterialsD3171 Test Methods for Constituent Content of CompositeMaterialsD3878 Terminology for Composite MaterialsD5229/D5229M Test Method for MoistureAbsorption Prop-erties and Equilibrium Cond

11、itioning of Polymer MatrixComposite MaterialsE4 Practices for Force Verification of Testing MachinesE6 Terminology Relating to Methods of Mechanical TestingE122 Practice for Calculating Sample Size to Estimate, WithSpecified Precision, the Average for a Characteristic of aLot or ProcessE177 Practice

12、 for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias inASTM Test MethodsE456 Terminology Relating to Quality and StatisticsE2533 Guide for Nondestructive Testing of Polymer MatrixComposites Used in Aerospace Applications2.2 Other Documents:3CMH-17 Composite Materials Handbook-17 Volume I3. Terminology3.1 Termin

13、ology D3878 defines terms relating to high-modulus fibers and their composites. Terminology D883 de-fines terms relating to plastics. Terminology E6 defines termsrelating to mechanical testing. Terminology E456 and PracticeE177 define terms relating to statistics. In the event of a1This practice is

14、under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D30 on CompositeMaterials and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D30.05 on Structural TestMethods.Current edition approved Aug. 1, 2017. Published August 2017. Originallyapproved in 2017. DOI: 10.1520/D8131_D8131M-17.2For referenced ASTM standards,

15、visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.3Available for purchase in print and e-book format from SAE International,http:/books.sae.org

16、/r-422/.Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United StatesThis international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for theDevelopment

17、of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.1conflict between terms, Terminology D3878 shall have prece-dence over the other terminology standards.NOTE 1If the term represents a physical quantity, its analy

18、ticaldimensions are stated immediately following the term (or letter symbol) infundamental dimension form, using the following ASTM standard sym-bology for fundamental dimensions, shown within square brackets: Mfor mass, L for length, T for time, for thermodynamic temperature,and nd for nondimension

19、al quantities. Use of these symbols is restrictedto analytical dimensions when used with square brackets, as the symbolsmay have other definitions when used without the brackets.3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:3.2.1 co-bonded (repair) laminatethe co-bonded laminateis the laminate

20、that is bonded to the parent pre-cured laminateand cured in a second cure cycle.3.2.2 joint tensile strengthultimate tensile force experi-enced by the test specimen divided by the initial width of thejoint area and the nominal thickness of the parent laminate.3.2.3 nominal valuea value, existing in

21、name only, as-signed to a measureable property for the purpose of convenientdesignation. Tolerances may be applied to a nominal value todefine and acceptable range for the property.3.2.4 parent laminatethe parent laminate is the laminatethat is cured during the first cure cycle.3.2.5 secondary bonde

22、d (repair) laminatethe secondarybonded laminate is a pre-cured laminate that is bonded to theparent pre-cured laminate using a separate adhesive material(sometimes referred to as a pre-cured patch repair).3.3 Symbols:3.3.1 CVsample coefficient of variation, in percent3.3.2 Fptuultimate tensile stren

23、gth, based on parent lami-nate thickness3.3.3 Frtuultimate tensile strength, based on repair lami-nate thickness3.3.4 hpspecimen nominal parent laminate thickness asspecified by the test requestor (nominal ply thickness may beavailable from the relevant material specification)3.3.5 hrspecimen nomina

24、l repair laminate thickness asspecified by the test requestor (nominal ply thickness may beavailable from the relevant material specification)3.3.6 Njultimate joint running force per ply3.3.7 nnumber of specimens3.3.8 npnumber of parent laminate plies3.3.9 Pfmaximum force carried by test specimen at

25、 failure3.3.10 Sn1standard deviation statistic of a sample popu-lation for a given property3.3.11 wspecimen width3.3.12 xitest result for an individual coupon from thesample population for a given property3.3.13 xmean or average (estimate of mean) of a samplepopulation for a given property4. Summary

26、 of Practice4.1 Tapered or Stepped Joint Tensile StrengthIn accor-dance with Test Method D3039/D3039M, but using a taperedor stepped joint configured specimen (Fig. 1 or Fig. 2), performa uniaxial tension test of the composite laminate joint speci-men.5. Significance and Use5.1 This test practice is

27、 designed to produce tensile propertydata for material specifications, research and development,quality assurance, and structural design and analysis. Factorsthat influence the tensile response and should therefore bereported include the following: materials (laminates andadhesive), methods of mater

28、ial preparation including surfacepreparation prior to bonding, lay-ups, specimen stackingsequence, joint taper ratio or step length, ply overlap length,material relative thicknesses and stiffness of the parent andrepair laminates, adhesive bond stiffness, specimenpreparation, specimen conditioning,

29、environment of testing,specimen alignment and gripping, speed of testing, time attemperature, void content, and volume percent reinforcement.Properties in the test direction, which may be obtained fromthis test practice, include the following:5.1.1 Ultimate tensile strength (based on the nominal par

30、entmaterial thickness), (Fptu).5.1.2 Ultimate tensile strength (based on the nominal repairmaterial thickness), (Frtu).5.1.3 Ultimate running force per repair ply, (Nj).6. Interferences6.1 Material and Specimen PreparationPoor material fab-rication practices, lack of control of fiber alignment, andd

31、amage induced by improper coupon machining are knowncauses of high material data scatter in composites. For thebonded joint specimens, the quality of the co-cured laminate(ply positioning, lengths, impregnation for wet lay-up materialsystems), lack of orientation control of the parent laminate orpre

32、-cured patch, and quality of the bond between the parentand pre-cured or co-cured bonded laminates will have signifi-cant effects on the test results.6.2 GrippingA high percentage of grip-induced failures,especially when combined with high material data scatter, is anindicator of specimen gripping p

33、roblems. Specimen grippingmethods are discussed further in Test Method D3039/D3039M.Specimen shall not be gripped within 25 mm 1.0 in. of thebondline (joint) area.6.3 System AlignmentExcessive bending will cause pre-mature failure, as well as highly inappropriate load-versus-deflection response. Eve

34、ry effort should be made to eliminateexcess bending from the test system. Bending may occur as aresult of misaligned grips or from specimens themselves ifimproperly installed in the grips or out-of-tolerance caused bypoor specimen preparation. If there are differences in materialthickness and stiffn

35、ess of the parent versus repair laminates, itmay be necessary to intentionally induce distortion and mis-alignment upon gripping or to employ the use of a shim(s) onthe thinner part of the specimen and accept the inducedmoment. If there is any doubt as to the alignment inherent in agiven test machin

36、e, then the alignment should be checked asdiscussed in Test Method D3039/D3039M.D8131/D8131M 1726.4 Specimen DesignThe bonded joint test specimen in-volves a parent and a repair laminate. These two laminatestypically do not use the same material system. There are anumber of variables and factors whi

37、ch influence the selectionof the repair laminate lay-up relative to the parent laminate.Generally the repair lay-up is designed to match or slightlyexceed the stiffness of the parent laminate, and ideally therepair material type (fabric or tape) and the ply thicknesses arethe same as for the parent

38、material. When they are different,repair design compromises are necessary to obtain sufficientrepair stiffness and strength while not making the repair thickerthan the parent laminate. Details of repair design are beyondthe scope of this test practice. When filler plies or extra repairplies are used

39、, or when the repair material thicknesses do notmatch the parent material thicknesses, a difference in joint testspecimen thickness on the two ends will occur, leading to someinduced bending, even if shims are applied. Also, any unbal-ance or asymmetry in the repair lay-up from filler plies, therepa

40、ir laminate, or from extra repair plies may also lead tosome induced bending. The results from this test practice areNotes:1) Interpret drawing in accordance with ANSI Y14.5M-1982, subject to the following:2) All dimensions in millimeters with decimal tolerances as follows:No Decimal .X .XX3 1 .33)

41、All angles have a tolerance of 65.4) Ply orientation direction tolerance relative to -A- within 6.5.5) Finish on machine edges not to exceed 1.6= (symbology in accordance with ASA B46.1, with roughness height in micrometers).6) Values to be provided for the following, subject to any ranges shown in

42、the field of drawing: material, lay-up, ply orientation reference relative to -A-, overall length,gage length, coupon thickness, tab material, tab thickness, tab length, tab bevel angle, tab adhesive.7) Repair specimen length design should not exceed scarf joint length by more than 20 %.FIG. 1 Tensi

43、le Tapered and Stepped Joint Specimen Geometry (SI)D8131/D8131M 173reported as simple stress and force-per-width values; the jointspecimen design will influence the validity of these reportedresults for use with bonded repair analysis methods.6.4.1 Step Joint Filler PliesThe stepped joint specimensh

44、ould have a filler ply to avoid wrinkles in the repair plies.The filler ply should ideally be the same thickness as thebottom ply in the parent laminate. The standard test specimenconfiguration in this practice for unidirectional tape materialsuses a +45 ply as the filler ply; this may induce some b

45、endingor twisting in the specimen under load. If an equivalentthickness fabric repair material is available, that could be usedfor the filler ply to provide a balanced lay-up.6.5 Edge Effects in Angle Ply LaminatesPremature failurecan occur as a result of edge softening in laminates containingoff-ax

46、is plies. Because of this, the strength for angle plylaminates can be lower than expected. For multidirectionallaminates containing significant axial fibers, the effect is not assignificant.Notes:1) Interpret drawing in accordance with ANSI Y14.5M-1982, subject to the following:2) All dimensions in

47、inches with decimal tolerances as follows:No Decimal .X .XX.1 .03 .013) All angles have a tolerance of 65.4) Ply orientation direction tolerance relative to -A- within 6.5.5) Finish on machine edges not to exceed 64= (symbology in accordance with ASA B46.1, with roughness height in microinches).6) V

48、alues to be provided for the following, subject to any ranges shown in the field of drawing: material, lay-up, ply orientation reference relative to -A-, overall length,gage length, coupon thickness, tab material, tab thickness, tab length, tab bevel angle, tab adhesive.7) Repair specimen length des

49、ign should not exceed scarf joint length by more than 20 %.FIG. 2 Tensile Tapered and Stepped Joint Specimen Geometry (Inch-Pound)D8131/D8131M 1746.6 EnvironmentResults are affected by the environmentalconditions under which the tests are conducted. Laminatestested in various environments can exhibit significant differ-ences in both failure force and failure mode. Experience hasdemonstrated that cold-temperature environments can be criti-cal for laminate tensile strength, however, elevated-temperature, humid environments