ASTM C393 C393M-2011e1 Standard Test Method for Core Shear Properties of Sandwich Constructions by Beam Flexure《用梁弯曲法测定夹层结构核心抗剪性能的标准试验方法》.pdf

《ASTM C393 C393M-2011e1 Standard Test Method for Core Shear Properties of Sandwich Constructions by Beam Flexure《用梁弯曲法测定夹层结构核心抗剪性能的标准试验方法》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ASTM C393 C393M-2011e1 Standard Test Method for Core Shear Properties of Sandwich Constructions by Beam Flexure《用梁弯曲法测定夹层结构核心抗剪性能的标准试验方法》.pdf（8页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Designation: C393/C393M 111Standard Test Method forCore Shear Properties of Sandwich Constructions by BeamFlexure1This standard is issued under the fixed designation C393/C393M; the number immediately following the designation indicates the yearof original adoption or, in the case of revision, the y

2、ear of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.A superscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the Department of Defense.1NOTESections 7 and 11 were editorially co

3、rrected in February 2012.1. Scope1.1 This test method covers determination of the core shearproperties of flat sandwich constructions subjected to flexure insuch a manner that the applied moments produce curvature ofthe sandwich facing planes. Permissible core material formsinclude those with contin

4、uous bonding surfaces (such as balsawood and foams) as well as those with discontinuous bondingsurfaces (such as honeycomb).1.2 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound unitsare to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated ineach system may not be exact equivalents; therefore,

5、eachsystem shall be used independently of the other. Combiningvalues from the two systems may result in non-conformancewith the standard.1.2.1 Within the text the inch-pound units are shown inbrackets.1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of thesafety concerns, if any, associated with it

6、s use. It is theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2C273 Test Method for Shear Properties of Sandwich CoreMaterialsC274 Ter

7、minology of Structural Sandwich ConstructionsD883 Terminology Relating to PlasticsD3878 Terminology for Composite MaterialsD5229/D5229M Test Method for Moisture AbsorptionProperties and Equilibrium Conditioning of Polymer Ma-trix Composite MaterialsD7249/D7249M Test Method for Facing Properties ofSa

8、ndwich Constructions by Long Beam FlexureD7250/D7250M Practice for Determining Sandwich BeamFlexural and Shear StiffnessE4 Practices for Force Verification of Testing MachinesE6 Terminology Relating to Methods of Mechanical TestingE122 Practice for Calculating Sample Size to Estimate,With Specified

9、Precision, the Average for a Characteristicof a Lot or ProcessE177 Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias inASTM Test MethodsE456 Terminology Relating to Quality and StatisticsE1309 Guide for Identification of Fiber-ReinforcedPolymer-Matrix Composite Materials in DatabasesE1434 Guide for R

10、ecording Mechanical Test Data of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Materials in Databases3. Terminology3.1 DefinitionsTerminology D3878 defines terms relatingto high-modulus fibers and their composites. TerminologyC274 defines terms relating to structural sandwich construc-tions. Terminology D883 defines t

11、erms relating to plastics.Terminology E6 defines terms relating to mechanical testing.Terminology E456 and Practice E177 define terms relating tostatistics. In the event of a conflict between terms, TerminologyD3878 shall have precedence over the other terminologies.3.2 Symbols:b = specimen widthc =

12、 core thicknessCV = coefficient of variation statistic of a sample populationfor a given property (in percent)d = sandwich total thicknessDF,nom= effective sandwich flexural stiffnessEf= effective facing chord modulus = measuring strain in facingFu= facing ultimate strength (tensile or compressive)1

13、This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D30 onComposite Materials and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D30.09 onSandwich Construction.Current edition approved Oct. 1, 2011. Published November 2011. Originallyapproved in 1957. Last previous edition approved in 2006 as

14、 C393 06. DOI:10.1520/C0393_C0393M-11.2For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.1Copyright ASTM Interna

15、tional, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.Fc= core compression allowable strengthFs= core shear allowable strengthFsult= core shear ultimate strengthFsyield= core shear yield strengthk = core shear strength factor to ensure core failureL = length of

16、loading spanS = length of support spanlpad= length of loading padn = number of specimensP = applied forcePmax= maximum force carried by test specimen beforefailureFZftu= ultimate flatwise tensile strengthPmax= maximum force carried by test specimen beforefailureSn-1= standard deviation statistic of

17、a sample population fora given propertys = facing stress or strengtht = facing thicknessx1= test result for an individual specimen from the samplepopulation for a given propertyx = mean or average (estimate of mean) of a sample popu-lation for a given property4. Summary of Test Method4.1 This test m

18、ethod consists of subjecting a beam ofsandwich construction to a bending moment normal to theplane of the sandwich. Force versus deflection measurementsare recorded.4.2 The only acceptable failure modes are core shear orcore-to-facing bond. Failure of the sandwich facing precedingfailure of the core

19、 or core-to-facing bond is not an acceptablefailure mode. Use Test Method D7249/D7249M to determinefacing strength.5. Significance and Use5.1 Flexure tests on flat sandwich construction may beconducted to determine the sandwich flexural stiffness, the coreshear strength and shear modulus, or the fac

20、ings compressiveand tensile strengths. Tests to evaluate core shear strength mayalso be used to evaluate core-to-facing bonds.5.2 This test method is limited to obtaining the core shearstrength or core-to-facing shear strength and the stiffness of thesandwich beam, and to obtaining load-deflection d

21、ata for use incalculating sandwich beam flexural and shear stiffness usingPractice D7250/D7250M.NOTE 1Core shear strength and shear modulus are best determined inaccordance with Test Method C273 provided bare core material isavailable.5.3 Facing strength is best determined in accordance withTest Met

22、hod D7249/D7249M.5.4 Practice D7250/D7250M covers the determination ofsandwich flexural and shear stiffness and core shear modulususing calculations involving measured deflections of sandwichflexure specimens.5.5 This test method can be used to produce core shearstrength and core-to-facing shear str

23、ength data for structuraldesign allowables, material specifications, and research anddevelopment applications; it may also be used as a qualitycontrol test for bonded sandwich panels.5.6 Factors that influence the shear strength and shalltherefore be reported include the following: facing material,c

24、ore material, adhesive material, methods of material fabrica-tion, core geometry (cell size), core density, adhesive thick-ness, specimen geometry, specimen preparation, specimenconditioning, environment of testing, specimen alignment,loading procedure, speed of testing, and adhesive void content.Fu

25、rther, core-to-facing strength may be different betweenprecured/bonded and co-cured facings in sandwich panels withthe same core and facing material.NOTE 2Concentrated loads on beams with thin facings and lowdensity cores can produce results that are difficult to interpret, especiallyclose to the fa

26、ilure point. Wider load pads with rubber pads may assist indistributing the loads.6. Interferences6.1 Material and Specimen PreparationPoor materialfabrication practices and damage induced by improper speci-men machining are known causes of high data scatter incomposites and sandwich structures in g

27、eneral. A specificmaterial factor that affects sandwich cores is variability in coredensity. Important aspects of sandwich core specimen prepa-ration that contribute to data scatter include the existence ofjoints, voids or other core discontinuities, out-of-plane curva-ture, and surface roughness.6.

28、2 GeometrySpecific geometric factors that affect coreshear strength include core orthotropy (that is, ribbon versustransverse direction for honeycomb core materials) and corecell geometry.6.3 EnvironmentResults are affected by the environmen-tal conditions under which specimens are conditioned, as w

29、ellas the conditions under which the tests are conducted. Speci-mens tested in various environments can exhibit significantdifferences in both strength behavior and failure mode. Criticalenvironments must be assessed independently for each specificcombination of core material, facing material, and c

30、ore-to-facing interfacial adhesive (if used) that is tested.6.4 Core MaterialIf the core material has insufficientshear or compressive strength, it is possible that the core maylocally crush at or near the loading points, thereby resulting infacing failure due to local stresses. In other cases, faci

31、ng failurecan cause local core crushing. When there is both facing andcore failure in the vicinity of one of the loading points it can bedifficult to determine the failure sequence in a post-morteminspection of the specimen as the failed specimens look verysimilar for both sequences. For some core m

32、aterials, the shearstrength is a function of the direction that the core is orientedrelative to the length of the specimen.7. Apparatus7.1 Micrometers and CalipersA micrometer having a flatanvil interface, or a caliper of suitable size, shall be used. Theinstrument(s) shall have an accuracy of 6.025

33、 mm 60.001in. for thickness measurement, and an accuracy of 60.254mm 60.010 in. for length and width measurement.NOTE 3The accuracies given above are based on achieving measure-ments that are within 1 % of the sample length, width and thickness.C393/C393M 11127.2 Loading FixturesThe loading fixture

34、shall consist ofeither a 3-point or 4-point loading configuration with twosupport bars that span the specimen width located below thespecimen, and one or two loading bars that span the specimenwidth located on the top of the specimen (Fig. 1), The forceshall be applied vertically through the loading

35、 bar(s), with thesupport bars fixed in place in the test machine.7.2.1 Standard ConfigurationThe standard loading fixtureshall be a 3-point configuration and shall have the centerlinesof the support bars separated by a distance of 150 mm 6.0 in.7.2.2 Non-Standard ConfigurationsAll other loading fix-

36、ture configurations are considered non-standard, and details ofthe fixture geometry shall be documented in the test report. Fig.3 shows a typical 4-point short beam test fixture. Non-standard3- and 4-point loading configurations have been retained withinthis standard (a) for historical continuity wi

37、th previous ver-sions of Test Method C393, (b) because some sandwich paneldesigns require the use of non-standard loading configurationsto achieve core or bond failure modes, and (c) load-deflectiondata from non-standard configurations may be used withPractice D7250/D7250M to obtain sandwich beam fl

38、exural andshear stiffnesses.7.2.3 Support and Loading BarsThe bars shall be de-signed to allow free rotation of the specimen at the loading andsupport points. The bars shall have sufficient stiffness to avoidsignificant deflection of the bars under load; any obviousbowing of the bars or any gaps occ

39、urring between the bars andthe test specimen during loading shall be considered significantdeflection. The recommended configuration has a 25 mm 1.0in. wide flat steel loading block to contact the specimen(through rubber pressure pads) and is loaded via either a(a) 3-Point Loading (Standard Configur

40、ation)(b) 4-Point Loading (Non-Standard Configuration)Configuration Support Span (S) Load Span (L)Standard 3-Point (Mid-Span) 150 mm 6.0 in. 0.0Non-Standard 4-Point (Quarter-Span) SS/24-Point (Third-Span) /3FIG. 1 Loading ConfigurationsFIG. 2 Sandwich Panel Thickness DimensionsFIG. 3 Short Beam4-Poi

41、nt (Third-Span) Short BeamLoading ConfigurationC393/C393M 1113cylindrical pivot or a V-shaped bar riding in a V-groove in thetop of the flat-bottomed steel loading pad. The tips of theV-shaped loading bars shall have a minimum radius of 3 mm0.12 in. The V-groove in the loading pad shall have a radiu

42、slarger than the loading bar tip and the angular opening of thegroove shall be such that the sides of the loading bars do notcontact the sides of the V-groove during the test. Loading barsconsisting of 25 mm 1.0 in. diameter steel cylinders may alsobe used, but there is a greater risk of local speci

43、men crushingwith cylindrical bars. Also, the load and support span lengthstend to increase as the specimen deflects when cylindricalloading bars without V-grooved loading pads are used (forexample, rolling supports).7.2.4 Pressure PadsRubber pressure pads having a ShoreA durometer of approximately 6

44、0, a nominal width of 25 mm1.0 in., a nominal thickness of 3 mm 0.125 in. and spanningthe full width of the specimen shall be used between theloading bars and specimen to prevent local damage to thefacings.7.3 Testing MachineThe testing machine shall be inaccordance with Practices E4 and shall satis

45、fy the followingrequirements:7.3.1 Testing Machine ConfigurationThe testing machineshall have both an essentially stationary head and a movablehead.7.3.2 Drive MechanismThe testing machine drive mecha-nism shall be capable of imparting to the movable head acontrolled velocity with respect to the sta

46、tionary head. Thevelocity of the movable head shall be capable of beingregulated in accordance with 11.4.7.3.3 Force IndicatorThe testing machine force-sensingdevice shall be capable of indicating the total force beingcarried by the test specimen. This device shall be essentiallyfree from inertia la

47、g at the specified rate of testing and shallindicate the force with an accuracy over the force range(s) ofinterest of within 61 % of the indicated value.7.4 DeflectometerThe deflection of the specimen shall bemeasured in the center of the support span by a properlycalibrated device having an accurac

48、y of 61 % or better.NOTE 4The use of crosshead or actuator displacement for the beammid-span deflection produces inaccurate results, particularly for 4-pointloading configurations; the direct measurement of the deflection of themid-span of the beam must be made by a suitable instrument.7.5 Condition

49、ing ChamberWhen conditioning materialsat non-laboratory environments, a temperature/vapor-levelcontrolled environmental conditioning chamber is required thatshall be capable of maintaining the required temperature towithin 63C 65F and the required relative humidity levelto within 63 %. Chamber conditions shall be monitored eitheron an automated continuous basis or on a manual basis atregular intervals.7.6 Environmental Test ChamberAn environmental testchamber is required for test environments other than ambienttesting laboratory