大学英语六级分类模拟题444及答案解析.doc
《大学英语六级分类模拟题444及答案解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《大学英语六级分类模拟题444及答案解析.doc(12页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、大学英语六级分类模拟题 444及答案解析(总分:707.00,做题时间:90 分钟)一、Part Reading Compr(总题数:0,分数:0.00)Reform and Medical CostsA. Americans are deeply concerned about the relentless rise in health care costs and health insurance premiums. They need to know if reform will help solve the problem. The answer is that no one has
2、an easy fix for rising medical costs. The fundamental fixreshaping how care is delivered and how doctors are paid in a wasteful, abnormal systemis likely to be achieved only through trial and error and incremental (渐进的) gains. B. The good news is that a bill just approved by the House and a bill app
3、roved by the Senate Finance Committee would implement or test many reforms that should help slow the rise in medical costs over the long term. As a report in The New England Journal of Medicine concluded, “Pretty much every proposed innovation found in the health policy literature these days is cont
4、ained in these measures.“ C. Medical spending, which typically rises faster than wages and the overall economy, is propelled by two things: the high prices charged for medical services in this country and the volume of unnecessary care delivered by doctors and hospitals, which often perform a lot mo
5、re tests and treatments than a patient really needs. D. Here are some of the important proposals in the House and Senate bills to try to address those problems, and why it is hard to know how well they will work. E. Both bills would reduce the rate of growth in annual Medicare payments to hospitals,
6、 nursing homes and other providers by amounts comparable to the productivity savings routinely made in other industries with the help of new technologies and new ways to organize work. This proposal could save Medicare more than $100 billion over the next decade. If private plans demanded similar pr
7、oductivity savings from providers, and refused to let providers shift additional costs to them, the savings could be much larger. Critics say Congress will give in to lobbyists and let inefficient providers off the hook (放过). That is far less likely to happen if Congress also adopts strong “pay-go“
8、roles requiring that any increase in payments to providers be offset by new taxes or budget cuts. F. The Senate Finance bill would impose an excise tax (消费税) on health insurance plans that cost more than $8,000 for an individual or $21,000 for a family. It would most likely cause insurers to redesig
9、n plans to fall beneath the threshold. Enrollees would have to pay more money for many services out of their own pockets, and that would encourage them to think twice about whether an expensive or redundant test was worth it. Economists project that most employers would shift money from expensive he
10、alth benefits into wages. The House bill has no similar tax. The final legislation should. G. Any doctor who has wrestled with multiple forms from different insurers, or patients who have tried to understand their own parade of statements, know that simplification ought to save money. When the healt
11、h insurance industry was still cooperating in reform efforts, its trade group offered to provide standardized forms for automated processing. It estimated that step would save hundreds of billions of dollars over the next decade. The bills would lock that pledge into law. H. The stimulus package pro
12、vided money to convert the inefficient, paper-driven medical system to electronic records that can be easily viewed and transmitted. This requires open investments to help doctors convert. In time it should help restrain costs by eliminating redundant tests, preventing drug interactions, and helping
13、 doctors find the best treatments. I. Virtually all experts agree that the fee-for-service systemdoctors are rewarded for the quantity of care rather than its quality or effectivenessis a primary reason that the cost of care is so high. Most agree that the solution is to push doctors to accept fixed
14、 payments to care for a particular illness or for a patient“s needs over a year. No one knows how to make that happen quickly. The bills in both houses would start pilot projects within Medicare. They include such measures as accountable care organizations to take charge of a patient“s needs with an
15、 eye on both cost and quality, and chronic disease management to make sure the seriously ill, who are responsible for the bulk of all health care costs, are treated properly. For the most part, these experiments rely on incentive payments to get doctors to try them. J. Testing innovations do no good
16、 unless the good experiments are identified and expanded and the bad ones are dropped. The Senate bill would create an independent commission to monitor the pilot programs and recommend changes in Medicare“s payment policies to urge providers to adopt reforms that work. The changes would have to be
17、approved or rejected as a whole by Congress, making it hard for narrow-interest lobbies to bend lawmakers to their will. K. The bills in both chambers would create health insurance exchanges on which small businesses and individuals could choose from an array of private plans and possibly a public o
18、ption. All the plans would have to provide standard benefit packages that would be easy to compare. To get access to millions of new customers, insurers would have a strong incentive to lower their prices, perhaps by accepting slimmer profit margins or demanding better deals from providers. L. The f
19、inal legislation might throw a public plan into the competition, but thanks to the fierce opposition of the insurance industry and Republican critics, it might not save much money. The one in the House bill would have to negotiate rates with providers, rather than using Medicare rates, as many refor
20、mers wanted. M. The president“s stimulus package is pumping money into research to compare how well various treatments work. Is surgery, radiation or careful monitoring best for prostate (前列腺) cancer? Is the latest and most expensive cholesterol-lowering drug any better than its common competitors?
21、The pending bills would spend additional money to accelerate this effort. N. Critics have charged that this sensible idea would lead to rationing of care. (That would be true only if you believed that patients should have an unrestrained right to treatments proven to be inferior.) As a result, the b
22、ills do not require, as they should, that the results of these studies be used to set payment rates in Medicare. O. Congress needs to find the courage to allow Medicare to pay preferentially for treatments proven to be superior. Sometimes the best treatment might be the most expensive. But overall,
23、we suspect that spending would come down through elimination of a lot of unnecessary or even dangerous tests and treatments. P. The House bill would authorize the secretary of health and human services to negotiate drug prices in Medicare and Medicaid. Some authoritative analysts doubt that the secr
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 大学 英语六级 分类 模拟 444 答案 解析 DOC
