[考研类试卷]考研英语(阅读)模拟试卷164及答案与解析.doc
《[考研类试卷]考研英语(阅读)模拟试卷164及答案与解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《[考研类试卷]考研英语(阅读)模拟试卷164及答案与解析.doc(19页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、考研英语(阅读)模拟试卷 164 及答案与解析Part CDirections: Read the following text carefully and then translate the underlined segments into Chinese. (10 points) 0 【F1】As the price of a college degree continues to rise, theres growing evidence that the monetary payoff isnt quite as big as often advertised. The best e
2、stimate now is that a college degree is worth about $300,000 in todays dollarsnowhere near the $1 million figure that is often quoted.“That $1 million number has driven me crazy!“ says Sandy Baum, a Skidmore economist who studied the value of a college degree for the College Board last year.【F2】Baum
3、s research showed that college graduates earn, on average, about $20,000 a year more than those who finished their educations at high school. Add that up over a 40-year working life and the total differential is about $800,000, she figures. But since much of that bonus is earned many years from now,
4、 subtracting out the impact of inflation means that $800,000 in future dollars is worth only about $450,000 in todays dollars.Then, if you subtract out the cost of a college degreeabout $30,000 in tuition and books for students who get no aid and attend public in-state universitiesand the money a st
5、udent could have earned at a job instead of attending school, the real net value in todays dollars is somewhere in the $300,000 range, a number confirmed by other studies. But, especially these days, that still makes a college degree one of the most lucrative investments a person can make, Baum note
6、s.Better yet, college graduates can go on to earn advanced degrees, which return even bigger payoffs. The average holder of a bachelors degree earns about $51,000 a year, Baum calculates. But those whove gone on to earn MBAs, law degrees, or other professional degrees earn about $100,000 a year.In a
7、ddition, Baum found that there are plenty of other rewards for a degree. The quality of the jobs college graduates get is far better, for example. College graduates are more likely to get jobs with health insurance. And it is easier for them to find and hold jobs.【 F3】The unemployment rate for colle
8、ge graduates was just 2. 2 percent last year, half the unemployment level of those with only high school diplomas.There are lots of other nonmonetary benefits as well.【F4 】College graduates are healthier, contribute more to their communities, and raise kids who are better prepared academically, stud
9、ies show.【F5】Other researchers have found that the payoff of a degree is especially attractive for students from low-income families, since the education and credential give them a chance to break out of low-paying careers.1 【F1】2 【F2】3 【F3】4 【F4】5 【F5】5 Measuring the performance of people, especial
10、ly managers and senior executives, presents a perennial conundrum. Without quantifiable goals, its difficult to measure progress objectively.【F1 】At the same time, companies that rely too much on financial or other “hard“ performance targets risk putting short-term success ahead of long-term healthf
11、or example, by tolerating flawed “stars“ who drive top performance but intimidate others, ignore staff development, or fail to collaborate with colleagues. The fact is that when people dont have real targets and incentives to focus on the long term, they dont; over time, performance declines because
12、 not enough people have the attention, or the capabilities, to sustain and renew it.Yet measuring, let alone strengthening, the capabilities that help companies thrive over the long haul is difficult.【F2】These “soft“ measures of organizational healthfor example, leadership, innovation, quality of ex
13、ecution, employee motivation, or a companys degree of external orientationare tricky to convert into annual performance metrics. Moreover, an organizations health may not change much in a single year, and an employees contribution often comes down to judgments and trade-offs. What risks to take and
14、avoid? Which people to develop, and how? Getting a handle on the employees personal contribution typically requires in-depth conversations and a more thorough 360-degree style of evaluation than most employees(including senior managers)generally receive. Because of all this, few companies manage peo
15、ple in ways that effectively assess their contributions to corporate health or reward them for improving it.When companies do try, they often end up using metrics that are discretionary, weighted less heavily than traditional measures of performance, or applied inconsistently.【F3】One mistake is to b
16、ecome confused about issues that appear related to organizational health but in practice lie at the heart of an individuals operational, day-to-day job. Its fine, for example, to judge a senior product managers contribution to a companys external orientation by tracking the number and quality of the
17、 new external contacts he or she develops over a year. But it makes little sense to apply the same health test to a media relations specialist for whom meeting new people is an essential part of the role. Managers and others quickly recognize flaws such as these and respond accordingly.【F4】At a glob
18、al consumer goods company, for example, the head of HR admitted that managers view the organizations health-related targets as a lever to “top up“ their incentive packages. That was hardly the effect the company intended, and a perception thats proving difficult to change.Against this backdrop, we b
19、elieve its useful for CEOs and their senior teams to step back and collectively examine howand in some cases whethertheir people-management systems give sufficient priority to the long-term health of their organizations.【F5 】Once companies develop the right handful of health metrics, define the beha
20、vior that supports them, and implement assessments of the willingness of employees to practice that behavior, the final step is ensuring that their compensation reflects contributions to health.6 【F1】7 【F2】8 【F3】9 【F4】10 【F5】10 In the last few weeks, a handful of top business schools have reported s
21、ingle-digit, and in some cases double-digit, declines in applications for their full-time MBA classes, including most recently Columbia Business School and New York Universitys Stern School of Business. It turns out theyre not alone. Full-time MBA applications have sunk at least a dozen of the top 3
22、0 B-schools, according to class profile data of 17 business schools obtained this week by Bloomberg Businessweek.Among the schools that have reported declines are the University of Chicagos Booth School of Business, the Yale School of Management and Duke Universitys Fuqua School of Business(down 3.5
23、 percent, 9.5 percent, and 7 percent, respectively).【F1 】A handful of schools reported even steeper drops, including Michigan State Universitys Broad College of Business, where applications fell 18 percent, and Indiana Universitys Kelley School of Business, with a significant dip of nearly 21 percen
24、t.【F2】Timothy Smith, the senior associate director of admissions and financial aid at the Kelley School, attributes the decline in applications to increased competition from rival business schools and a overabundance of available choices, including part-time and online programs. Second-tier schools
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 考研 试卷 英语 阅读 模拟 164 答案 解析 DOC
