JEDEC JP002-2006 Current Tin Whiskers Theory and Mitigation Practices Guideline《锡流理论和缓解实践指南》.pdf

《JEDEC JP002-2006 Current Tin Whiskers Theory and Mitigation Practices Guideline《锡流理论和缓解实践指南》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《JEDEC JP002-2006 Current Tin Whiskers Theory and Mitigation Practices Guideline《锡流理论和缓解实践指南》.pdf（30页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、JEDEC/IPC JOINT PUBLICATION Current Tin Whiskers Theory and Mitigation Practices Guideline JP002 MARCH 2006 JEDEC SOLID STATE TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION IPC NOTICE JEDEC standards and publications contain material that has been prepared, reviewed, and approved through the JEDEC Board of Directors level

2、and subsequently reviewed and approved by the JEDEC legal counsel. JEDEC standards and publications are designed to serve the public interest through eliminating misunderstandings between manufacturers and purchasers, facilitating interchangeability and improvement of products, and assisting the pur

3、chaser in selecting and obtaining with minimum delay the proper product for use by those other than JEDEC members, whether the standard is to be used either domestically or internationally. JEDEC standards and publications are adopted without regard to whether or not their adoption may involve paten

4、ts or articles, materials, or processes. By such action JEDEC does not assume any liability to any patent owner, nor does it assume any obligation whatever to parties adopting the JEDEC standards or publications. The information included in JEDEC standards and publications represents a sound approac

5、h to product specification and application, principally from the solid state device manufacturer viewpoint. Within the JEDEC organization there are procedures whereby a JEDEC standard or publication may be further processed and ultimately become an ANSI standard. No claims to be in conformance with

6、this standard may be made unless all requirements stated in the standard are met. Inquiries, comments, and suggestions relative to the content of this JEDEC standard or publication should be addressed to JEDEC at the address below, or call (703) 907-7559 or www.jedec.org Published by JEDEC Solid Sta

7、te Technology Association 2006 2500 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, VA 22201-3834 This document may be downloaded free of charge; however JEDEC retains the copyright on this material. By downloading this file the individual agrees not to charge for or resell the resulting material. PRICE: Please refer t

8、o the current Catalog of JEDEC Engineering Standards and Publications online at http:/www.jedec.org/Catalog/catalog.cfm Printed in the U.S.A. All rights reserved PLEASE! DONT VIOLATE THE LAW! This document is copyrighted by JEDEC and may not be reproduced without permission. Organizations may obtain

9、 permission to reproduce a limited number of copies through entering into a license agreement. For information, contact: JEDEC Solid State Technology Association 2500 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, Virginia 22201-3834 or call (703) 907-7559 JEDEC/IPC Joint Publication No. 002 -i- CURRENT TIN WHISKER TH

10、EORY AND MITIGATION PRACTICES GUIDELINE Foreword This publication provides guidance in understanding the prevalent tin whisker formation theories, driving forces and mitigation practices used to minimize tin whisker formation. This publication serves as a source of background information for JESD22-

11、A121, Measuring Whisker Growth on Tin and Tin Alloy Surface Finishes and JESD 201, Environmental Acceptance Requirements For Tin Whisker Susceptibility of Tin and Tin Alloy Surface Finishes. Introduction Sn whiskers have been an industrial concern and interesting problem for many years. They are kno

12、wn to cause short circuits in fine-pitch pretinned electrical components 1. Sn whiskers grow by the addition of material at their base not at their tip (i.e., they grow out of the substrate) 2. They can grow from as-formed electrodeposits, vapor deposited material 3, and intentionally deformed coati

13、ngs of Sn 4. Similar whiskers are observed in Cd, In, and Zn 5. Whiskers appear to be a local response to the existence of residual stress. Compressive residual or external stress is usually considered a precondition for whisker growth 4. Annealing or melting (reflow in solder terminology) may mitig

14、ate the growth for an undetermined period of time. In 1959, Pb additions of a few percent to Sn electroplate were found to greatly reduce the tendency to form whiskers 6 and interest in the subject waned. Legislation that will restrict the use of lead in electronic products sold in the European Unio

15、n, due to be in effect on July 1, 2006, has led many electronic component suppliers to propose the removal of Pb from tin-lead plating, leaving essentially pure Sn. This approach is the most convenient and the least costly lead-elimination strategy for the majority of component manufacturers. Howeve

16、r, for the high-reliability user community, the pure tin strategy presents reliability risks due to the whisker forming tendencies of pure tin and tin alloy plating. This publication discusses the current tin whisker history, theories and driving forces behind tin whisker formation and potential mit

17、igation practices for various applications. It should be noted that for certain applications with special needs (e.g., military or aerospace), the Sn mitigation methods contained in this document may not be sufficient due to additional performance requirements 7. JEDEC/IPC Joint Publication No. 002

18、-ii- JEDEC/IPC Joint Publication No. 002 Page 1 CURRENT TIN WHISKER THEORY AND MITIGATION PRACTICES GUIDELINE (From JEDEC Board Ballot JCB-05-143, Formulated under the cognizance of the JC-14.1 Subcommittee on Reliability Test methods for packaged Devices in conjunction with the IPC.) 1 Scope This d

19、ocument will provide insight into the theory behind tin whisker formation as it is known today and, based on this knowledge, potential mitigation practices that may delay the onset of, or prevent tin whisker formation. The potential effectiveness of various mitigation practices will also be briefly

20、discussed. References behind each of the theories and mitigation practices are provided. 2 Terms and definitions For the purposes of this publication, the following terms and definitions apply. whisker: A spontaneous columnar or cylindrical filament, usually of monocrystalline metal, emanating from

21、the surface of a finish. (See Annex C for example pictures of tin whiskers.) whisker growth: Measurable changes in whisker length and/ or whisker density. tin whisker mitigation practice: Process(es) performed during the manufacture of a component to reduce the propensity for tin whisker growth by m

22、inimizing the surface finish internal compressive stress. matte tin: A tin film with lower internal stresses and larger grain sizes typically of 1m or greater and carbon content less than 0.050% 8. bright tin: A tin film with higher internal stresses and smaller grain size of 0.5 m to 0.8 m and carb

23、on content of 0.2% to 1.0% 8. Underlay: A plated barrier layers between the base metal and the tin finish. 3 History of tin whiskers A metallic whisker is generally a single crystalline filamentary surface eruption from a metal surface, though polycrystalline filamentary surface eruptions have been

24、observed 9,10. Whiskers are usually found on relatively thin, 0.5 m to 50 m , metal films that have been deposited onto a substrate material. A typical whisker is one to five m in diameter and between 1 m and 500 m long 8. Whiskers can be straight, kinked, or even curved, see Annex C. Metallic film

25、deposits have also shown other types of eruptions that are quite different in appearance from the whisker eruption. These eruptions are referred to in the literature as flowers, extrusions, and volcanoes. They have not been of as much general interest as the much-longer whisker eruptions. JEDEC/IPC

26、Joint Publication No. 002 Page 2 3 History of tin whiskers (contd) Metallic whisker formation first became of widespread interest to the scientific community immediately after WWII. In 1948, the Bell Telephone Corporation experienced failures on channel filters used to maintain frequency bands in mu

27、lti-channel telephone transmission lines. Bell Laboratories quickly initiated a series of long-term investigations into the general topic of whisker formation, the results of which were first reported in 1951 by K.G. Compton, A. Mendizza, and S.M. Arnold 11. This Bell Laboratories work established t

28、hat whisker formation occurred spontaneously, on cadmium (Cd), zinc (Zn), and tin (Sn) electroplating. The Bell Lab experiments studied a variety of substrate materials including copper (Cu), copper alloys, steels, and nonmetallic substrates. An excellent annotated bibliography of tin whisker histor

29、y and references is provided 8 that include a comprehensive listing of articles published through Dec. 31, 2004. One reason that the problem of tin whiskers has not been solved is the lack of appropriate analytical tools to study the basic structure of the Sn film. Only in recent years have tools li

30、ke Focused Ion Beam (FIB), Synchrotron X-Ray Diffraction, and Electron Back Scattering Beam (EBSD) become available for researchers to use in investigating this problem. As data from these tools becomes available, the industry may get a better understanding of tin whisker formation and the reasons t

31、hey occur 12. Other reasons that the whisker problem has not been solved are: 1) all of the variables that effect whisker growth are not known, 2) variables known or suspected of affecting whisker growth are not always reported when data is published, 3) Pb has been used as a mitigation method for w

32、hisker growth for decades, 4) current test methods cannot correlate whisker growth in test conditions to field conditions, and 5) as such, test results cannot be used to predict whisker growth in other environments or longer durations. 4 Discussion of and theory behind whisker formation The followin

33、g information represents the generally accepted knowledge on the prevailing theory of tin whisker formation available at this time. It is intended to aid suppliers in understanding whisker formation and how tin whiskers formation might be minimized or delayed on products. Many of the mitigation meth

34、ods described in this document are based on interrupting the development of compressive stress in the tin layer. The lead-frame material or substrate has a major impact on whisker formation, and as such, has been one of the factors causing confusion and inhibiting consistent conclusions from being f

35、ormed. It should be noted that the information provided in this publication refers to 100% Sn plating on a copper-based lead frame materials, unless otherwise specified. Another area for confusion in interpreting results has been the use of matte versus bright tin. In general, matte tin films are le

36、ss prone to whisker formation and growth than so-called bright tin films. Many current suppliers claim that a proprietary version of matte tin is whisker-free, but these claims may be premature and should be considered carefully before use. This document refers only to matte tin finishes unless othe

37、rwise noted. In reporting and analyzing results, all pertinent information should be noted including, but not limited to, type of tin used, lead frame material, and any underlay material. JEDEC/IPC Joint Publication No. 002 Page 3 4 Discussion of and theory behind whisker formation (contd) 4.1 Prima

38、ry cause of whisker formation The driving force behind tin whisker formation is stress in the Sn film 13. Stress may come from the as-plated film with its associated texture 14,15, intermetallic formation or mechanical means, such as bending, forming, thermo-mechanical stresses (CTE mismatch induced

39、), or possibly oxygen diffusion and/or oxide formation on the surface. The corrosion of Sn is another possible source for the stress in the Sn finish 9,16. Compressive stresses are fundamental to all whisker formation and provide a driving force for the creation of whiskers. In many cases the drivin

40、g force behind a reaction, such as a compressive stress, is eliminated or reduced by diffusion-based relaxation mechanisms. These mechanisms can slow or stop the reaction. However, there are some cases where the driving force is not relieved by diffusion or other solid state mechanisms. In addition,

41、 it is possible that the driving force can be continuously regenerated or renewed. In these cases the driving force remains active. Intermetallic formation, oxide reactions at the film surface, temperature cycling, and certain kinds of constant mechanical clamping forces are all examples of conditio

42、ns where the compressive stress is continually regenerated or is undiminished by solid state mechanisms. However, stress is a necessary but not solely sufficient condition for whisker formation. It appears that there has to be a specific type of crystalline microstructure required that is favorable

43、to a localized surface eruption or whisker 16, 17. The variation in whisker “incubation times”, which range from minutes to decades, is believed to be due to the mechanisms involved in nucleating these specialized crystalline microstructures and/or the time required to build up sufficient compressiv

44、e stress in the Sn films to start whisker formation 18. If the film stress levels are maintained at a high enough compressive level for a long enough period of time, there will be a very high likelihood of a whisker growth event as a means of further relaxing the stress levels within the film beyond

45、 the extent affected by simple diffusion. It is believed that one of the prime causes of stress that may result in whisker formation, as seen in testing, is the irregular growth of the Cu6Sn5intermetallic, when Sn is plated on Cu based substrates, which occurs rather quickly under room ambient condi

46、tions 19. The irregular growth of intermetallic compounds is also referred to as a chemical reaction. Another source of stress in electronic components is CTE mismatch induced stresses 20. These are particularly significant when the substrate material has a low CTE, such as Alloy 42. In addition to

47、stress associated with component material mismatches, any mechanical stresses associated with the product may play a role in whisker formation. This could include stress in the Sn layer due to the assembly loading conditions associated with specific product. More research is needed in this area to b

48、etter understand the interaction of other mechanical stresses and whisker formation. JEDEC/IPC Joint Publication No. 002 Page 4 4.1 Primary cause of whisker formation (contd) 4.1.1 Effect of Cu6Sn5formation by diffusion Cu6Sn5forms in the Sn layer on Sn plated Cu surfaces at room ambient and is domi

49、nant at temperatures below 60 C, creating compressive stress in the Sn layer. The stress generated by the formation of Cu6Sn5is thought to be caused by two contributing factors: a) At any temperature, such as ambient, the diffusion of Cu into Sn proceeds through grain boundary diffusion and forms intermetallics. At room temperature the primary intermetallic is Cu6Sn5 and grain boundary diffusion is significantly faster than bulk diffusion. This results in irregular growth of Cu6Sn5in the grain boundaries of the Sn. However, at