ASTM E709-2008 430 Standard Guide for Magnetic Particle Testing《磁粒子检查标准指南》.pdf

《ASTM E709-2008 430 Standard Guide for Magnetic Particle Testing《磁粒子检查标准指南》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ASTM E709-2008 430 Standard Guide for Magnetic Particle Testing《磁粒子检查标准指南》.pdf（41页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Designation: E 709 08Standard Guide forMagnetic Particle Testing1This standard is issued under the fixed designation E 709; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicate

2、s the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the Department of Defense.1. Scope1.1 This guide2describes techniques for both dry and wetmagnetic particle testing, a no

3、ndestructive method for detect-ing cracks and other discontinuities at or near the surface inferromagnetic materials. Magnetic particle testing may beapplied to raw material, semifinished material (billets, blooms,castings, and forgings), finished material and welds, regardlessof heat treatment or l

4、ack thereof. It is useful for preventivemaintenance testing.1.1.1 This guide is intended as a reference to aid in thepreparation of specifications/standards, procedures and tech-niques.1.2 This guide is also a reference that may be used asfollows:1.2.1 To establish a means by which magnetic particle

5、testing, procedures recommended or required by individualorganizations, can be reviewed to evaluate their applicabilityand completeness.1.2.2 To aid in the organization of the facilities and person-nel concerned in magnetic particle testing.1.2.3 To aid in the preparation of procedures dealing witht

6、he examination of materials and parts. This guide describesmagnetic particle testing techniques that are recommended fora great variety of sizes and shapes of ferromagnetic materialsand widely varying examination requirements. Since there aremany acceptable differences in both procedure and techniqu

7、e,the explicit requirements should be covered by a writtenprocedure (see Section 21).1.3 This guide does not indicate, suggest, or specify accep-tance standards for parts/pieces examined by these techniques.It should be pointed out, however, that after indications havebeen produced, they must be int

8、erpreted or classified and thenevaluated. For this purpose there should be a separate code,specification, or a specific agreement to define the type, size,location, degree of alignment and spacing, area concentration,and orientation of indications that are unacceptable in a specificpart versus those

9、 which need not be removed before partacceptance. Conditions where rework or repair is not permittedshould be specified.1.4 This guide describes the use of the following magneticparticle method techniques.1.4.1 Dry magnetic powder (see 8.4),1.4.2 Wet magnetic particle (see 8.5),1.4.3 Magnetic slurry

10、/paint magnetic particle (see 8.5.7),and1.4.4 Polymer magnetic particle (see 8.5.8).1.5 Personnel QualificationPersonnel performing exami-nations in accordance with this guide should be qualified andcertified in accordance withASNT Recommended Practice No.SNT-TC-1A, ANSI/ASNT Standard CP-189, NAS 41

11、0,orasspecified in the contract or purchase order.1.6 Nondestructive Testing AgencyIf a nondestructivetesting agency as described in Practice E 543 is used toperform the examination, the nondestructive testing agencyshould meet the requirements of Practice E 543.1.7 The numerical values shown in inc

12、h-pound units are tobe regarded as the standard. SI units are provided for informa-tion only.1.8 This standard does not purport to address all of thesafety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health prac

13、tices and determine the applica-bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:3A 275/A 275M Practice for Magnetic Particle Examinationof Steel ForgingsA 456/A 456M Specification for Magnetic Particle Exami-nation of Large Crankshaft ForgingsD93 Test Methods

14、for Flash Point by Pensky-MartensClosed Cup TesterD 445 Test Method for Kinematic Viscosity of Transparent1This guide is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E07 on Nondestruc-tive Testing and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E07.03 on LiquidPenetrant and Magnetic Particle Methods.Cu

15、rrent edition approved Feb. 15, 2008. Published April 2008. Originallyapproved in 1980. Last previous edition approved in 2001 as E709 - 01.2For ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Applications see related GuideSE-709 in Section II of that Code.3For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website

16、, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.1Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.

17、and Opaque Liquids (and Calculation of Dynamic Viscos-ity)E 165 Test Method for Liquid Penetrant ExaminationE 543 Specification for Agencies Performing Nondestruc-tive TestingE 1316 Terminology for Nondestructive ExaminationsE 1444 Practice for Magnetic Particle TestingE 2297 Guide for Use of UV-A a

18、nd Visible Light Sourcesand Meters used in the Liquid Penetrant and MagneticParticle Methods2.2 Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE): AerospaceMaterials Specifications:4AMS 2300 Premium Aircraft Quality Steel CleanlinessMagnetic Particle Inspection ProcedureAMS 2301 Aircraft Quality Steel Cleanline

19、ss Magnetic Par-ticle Inspection ProcedureAMS 2303 Aircraft Quality Steel Cleanliness MartensiticCorrosion Resistant Steels Magnetic Particle InspectionProcedureAMS 2641 Vehicle Magnetic Particle InspectionAMS 3040 Magnetic Particles, Non-fluorescent, DryMethodAMS 3041 Magnetic Particles, Non-fluore

20、scent, WetMethod, Oil Vehicle, Ready to UseAMS 3042 Magnetic Particles, Non-fluorescent, WetMethod, Dry PowderAMS 3043 Magnetic Particles, Non-fluorescent, Oil Ve-hicle, Aerosol PackagedAMS 3044 Magnetic Particles, Fluorescent, Wet Method,Dry PowderAMS 3045 Magnetic Particles, Non-fluorescent, WetMe

21、thod, Oil Vehicle, Ready to UseAMS 3046 Magnetic Particles, Non-fluorescent, WetMethod, Oil Vehicle, Aerosol PackagedAMS 5062 Steel, Low Carbon Bars, Forgings, Tubing,Sheet, Strip, and Plate 0.25 Carbon, MaximumAMS 5355 Investment CastingsAMS-I-83387 Inspection Process, Magnetic RubberAS 4792 Water

22、ConditioningAgents forAqueous MagneticParticle InspectionAS 5282 Tool Steel Ring Standard for Magnetic ParticleInspectionAS 5371 Reference Standards Notched Shims for MagneticParticle Inspection2.3 American Society for Nondestructive Testing:5SNT-TC-1A Personnel Qualification and Certification inNon

23、destructive TestingCP-189 ASNT Qualification and Certification of Nonde-structive Testing Personnel2.4 Federal Standards:6A-A-59230 Fluid, Magnetic Particle Inspection, SuspensionFED-STD 313 Material Safety Data Sheets Preparation andthe Submission of2.5 OSHA Document:729CFR 1910.1200 Hazard Communi

24、cation2.6 AIA Documents:8NAS 410 Nondestructive Testing Personnel Qualificationand Certification3. Terminology3.1 For definitions of terms used in the practice, refer toTerminology E 13164. Summary of Guide4.1 PrincipleThe magnetic particle method is based onestablishing a magnetic field with high f

25、lux density in aferromagnetic material. The flux lines must spread out whenthey pass through non-ferromagnetic material such as air in adiscontinuity or an inclusion. Because flux lines can not cross,this spreading action may force some of the flux lines out of thematerial (flux leakage). Flux leaka

26、ge is also caused by reduc-tion in ferromagnetic material (cross-sectional change), a sharpdimensional change, or the end of the part. If the flux leakageis strong enough, fine magnetic particles will be held in placeand an accumulation of particles will be visible under theproper lighting condition

27、s. While there are variations in themagnetic particle method, they all are dependent on thisprinciple, that magnetic particles will be retained at thelocations of magnetic flux leakage. The amount of flux leakageat discontinuities depends primarily on the following factors;flux density in the materi

28、al, and size, orientation, and proximityto the surface of a discontinuity. With longitudinal fields, all ofthe flux lines must complete their loops though air and anexcessively strong magnetic field may interfere with examina-tion near the flux entry and exit points due to the highflux-density prese

29、nt at these points.4.2 MethodWhile this practice permits and describesmany variables in equipment, materials, and procedures, thereare three steps essential to the method:4.2.1 The part must be magnetized.4.2.2 Magnetic particles of the type designated in thecontract/purchase order/specification sho

30、uld be applied whilethe part is magnetized or immediately thereafter.4.2.3 Any accumulation of magnetic particles must beobserved, interpreted, and evaluated.4.3 Magnetization:4.3.1 Ways to MagnetizeA ferromagnetic material can bemagnetized either by passing an electric current through thematerial o

31、r by placing the material within a magnetic fieldoriginated by an external source. The entire mass or a portionof the mass can be magnetized as dictated by size andequipment capacity or need.As previously noted, in order to bedetectable, the discontinuity must interrupt the normal path ofthe magneti

32、c field lines. If a discontinuity is open to the4Available from Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), 400 CommonwealthDr., Warrendale, PA 15096-0001, http:/www.sae.org.5Available fromAmerican Society for NondestructiveTesting (ASNT), P.O. Box28518, 1711 Arlingate Ln., Columbus, OH 43228-0518, http:

33、/www.asnt.org.6Available from Standardization Documents Order Desk, DODSSP, Bldg. 4,Section D, 700 Robbins Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19111-5098, http:/www.dodssp.daps.mil.7Available from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), 200Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20210, http:/www.osha

34、.gov.8Available from Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. (AIA), 1000Wilson Blvd., Suite 1700,Arlington, VA22209-3928, http:/www.aia-aerospace.org.E709082surface, the flux leakage attracting the particles will be at themaximum value for that particular discontinuity. When thatsame disco

35、ntinuity is below the surface, flux leakage evidenton the surface will be a lesser value.4.3.2 Field DirectionIf a discontinuity is oriented parallelto the magnetic field lines, it may be essentially undetectable.Therefore, since discontinuities may occur in any orientation, itmay be necessary to ma

36、gnetize the part or the area of interesttwice or more sequentially in different directions by the samemethod or a combination of different methods (see Section 13)to induce magnetic field lines in a suitable direction in whichto perform an adequate examination.4.3.3 Field StrengthThe magnetic field

37、must be of suffi-cient strength to indicate those discontinuities which areunacceptable, yet must not be so strong that an excess of localparticle accumulation masks relevant indications (see Section14).4.4 Types of Magnetic Particles and Their UseThere arevarious types of magnetic particles availab

38、le for use in mag-netic particle testing. They are available as dry powders(fluorescent and nonfluorescent) ready for use as supplied (see8.4), powder concentrates (fluorescent and nonfluorescent) fordispersion in water or suspending in light petroleum distillates(see 8.5), magnetic slurries/paints

39、(see 8.5.7), and magneticpolymer dispersions (see 8.5.8).4.5 Evaluation of IndicationsWhen the material to beexamined has been properly magnetized, the magnetic particleshave been properly applied, and the excess particles properlyremoved, there will be accumulations of magnetic particlesremaining a

40、t the points of flux leakage. These accumulationsshow the distortion of the magnetic field and are calledindications. Without disturbing the particles, the indicationsmust be examined, classified, compared with the acceptancestandards, and a decision made concerning the disposition ofthe material th

41、at contains the indication.4.6 Typical Magnetic Particle Indications:4.6.1 Surface DiscontinuitiesSurface discontinuities, withfew exceptions, produce sharp, distinct patterns (see AnnexA1).4.6.2 Near-surface discontinuitiesNear-surface disconti-nuities produce less distinct indications than those o

42、pen to thesurface. The patterns tend to be broad, rather than sharp, andthe particles are less tightly held (see Annex A1).5. Significance and Use5.1 The magnetic particle method of nondestructive testingindicates the presence of surface and near-surface discontinui-ties in materials that can be mag

43、netized (ferromagnetic). Thismethod can be used for production examination of parts/components or structures and for field applications whereportability of equipment and accessibility to the area to beexamined are factors. The ability of the method to find smalldiscontinuities can be enhanced by usi

44、ng fluorescent particlessuspended in a suitable vehicle and by introducing a magneticfield of the proper strength whose orientation is as close aspossible to 90 to the direction of the suspected discontinuity(see 4.3.2). A smoother surface or a pulsed current improvesmobility of the magnetic particl

45、es under the influence of themagnetic field to collect on the surface where magnetic fluxleakage occurs.6. Equipment6.1 TypesThere are a number of types of equipmentavailable for magnetizing ferromagnetic parts and components.With the exception of a permanent magnet, all equipmentrequires a power so

46、urce capable of delivering the requiredcurrent levels to produce the magnetic field. The current useddictates the sizes of cables and the capability of relays,switching contacts, meters and rectifier if the power source isalternating current.6.2 PortabilityPortability, which includes the ability toh

47、and carry the equipment, can be obtained from yokes,portable coils with power supplies, and capacitor dischargepower supplies with cables. Generally, portable coils providehigh magnetizing forces by using higher numbers of turns tocompensate for their lower current flow. Capacitor dischargeunits use

48、 high current storage capacity and provide these highcurrent levels for only a very short duration.6.3 YokesYokes are usually C-shaped electromagnetswhich induce a magnetic field between the poles (legs) and areused for local magnetization (Fig. 1). Many portable yokesFIG. 1 Yoke Method of Part Magn

49、etizationE709083have articulated legs (poles) that allow the legs to be adjustedto contact irregular surfaces or two surfaces that join at anangle.6.3.1 Permanent MagnetsPermanent magnets are avail-able but their use may be restricted for many applications. Thisrestriction may be due to application impracticality, or due tothe specifications governing the examination. Permanent mag-nets can lose their magnetic field generating capacity by beingpartially demagnetized by a stronger flux field, being damaged,or dropped. In addition, the particle mobility created by AC