ASTM D4520-2018 Standard Practice for Determining Water Injectivity Through the Use of On-Site Floods.pdf

《ASTM D4520-2018 Standard Practice for Determining Water Injectivity Through the Use of On-Site Floods.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ASTM D4520-2018 Standard Practice for Determining Water Injectivity Through the Use of On-Site Floods.pdf（7页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Designation: D4520 18Standard Practice forDetermining Water Injectivity Through the Use of On-SiteFloods1This standard is issued under the fixed designation D4520; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last re

2、vision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope*1.1 This practice covers a procedure for conducting on-sitecore flood tests to determine the filtration and chemicaltreatment re

3、quirements for subsurface injection of water.2, 31.2 This practice applies to water disposal, secondaryrecovery, and enhanced oil recovery projects and is applicableto injection waters with all ranges of total dissolved solidscontents.1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded asstandard.

4、The values given in parentheses are mathematicalconversions to inch-pound units that are provided for informa-tion only and are not considered standard.1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of thesafety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is theresponsibility of the user of thi

5、s standard to establish appro-priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.1.5 This international standard was developed in accor-dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-ization established in the Deci

6、sion on Principles for theDevelopment of International Standards, Guides and Recom-mendations issued by the World Trade Organization TechnicalBarriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:4D653 Terminology Relating to Soil, Rock, and ContainedFluidsD1129 Terminology Rel

7、ating to WaterD2434 Test Method for Permeability of Granular Soils(Constant Head) (Withdrawn 2015)5D4404 Test Method for Determination of Pore Volume andPore Volume Distribution of Soil and Rock by MercuryIntrusion Porosimetry2.2 API Standards:6API RP27 Recommended Practice for Determining Perme-abi

8、lity of Porous MediaAPI RP40 Recommended Practice for Core-Analysis Pro-cedure3. Terminology3.1 Definitions:3.1.1 For definitions of terms relating to water and waterchemistry, refer to Terminology D1129. For definitions ofterms relating to soil and rock, refer to Terminology D653.3.2 Definitions of

9、 Terms Specific to This Standard:3.2.1 filtration requirement, nthe maximum suspendedsolids size (in micrometres) allowed in an injection water tominimize formation plugging.3.2.2 test core, na sample cut from a full-core that hasbeen recovered from the formation into which water is in-jected.3.2.3

10、permeability, nthe capacity of a rock (or otherporous medium) to conduct liquid or gas; permaeability ismeasured as the proportionality constant between flow velocityand hydraulic gradient.3.2.4 pore volume, nthe porous mediums void-volumethat can be saturated with the transmitted fluid.3.2.5 porosi

11、ty, nthe ratio (usually expressed as a percent-age) of the volume of voids of a given soil, rock mass, or otherporous medium to the total volume of the soil, rock mass, orother porous medium.3.2.6 rock-water interaction, na reaction between a po-rous rock and the injected water causing precipitation

12、 orswelling or release of fines (clays) within the rock.1This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D19 on Water andis the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D19.05 on Inorganic Constituents inWater.Current edition approved May 1, 2018. Published June 2018. Originallyapproved in 19

13、86. Last previous edition approved in 2013 as D4520 13. DOI:10.1520/D4520-18.2Farley, J. T., and Redline, D. G., “Evaluation of Flood Water Quality in theWest Montalvo Field,” Journal Petroleum Technology, July 1968, pp. 683687.3McCune, C. C., “On-Site Testing to Define Injection Water QualityRequir

14、ements,” Journal Petroleum Technology, January 1977, pp. 1724.4For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website

15、.5The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced onwww.astm.org.6Available from American Petroleum Institute (API), 1220 L. St., NW,Washington, DC 20005-4070, http:/www.api.org.*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standardCopyright ASTM International, 100 Bar

16、r Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United StatesThis international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for theDevelopment of International Standards, Guides and Recomm

17、endations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.14. Summary of Practice4.1 This practice assumes that the injection water has beencharacterized in terms of dissolved and suspended solidscontents (including hydrocarbons and other organics as appli-cable) b

18、y established standard practices and methods.4.2 Test core material is selected by consultation betweengeologists and engineers and prepared for the tests by standardpractices.4.3 In the on-site core flood the permeability of the test coreis monitored to detect interactions between the formation roc

19、kand the injection water. The water is filtered at various levels todetermine the filtration required (in micrometres) to minimizepermeability loss (damage) from suspended solids. Backflow-ing injection wells are simulated by reversing the flow direc-tion through the cores.5. Significance and Use5.1

20、 The injectivity of a water is best determined by mea-surements as near to the well as possible to minimize changesin water properties due to air contact and time. This practicedescribes how core flow tests are carried out near the well.5.2 This practice permits the differentiation of permeabilitylo

21、sses from the effects of chemical interaction of water androck and from the effects of plugging by suspended solids. Theprocedure can be utilized to estimate the chemical and filtrationrequirements for the full-scale injection project.5.3 Application of the test results to injection wells requiresco

22、nsideration of test core selection and geometry effects.5.4 This practice as described assumes that the water doesnot contain free oil or other immiscible hydrocarbons. Thepresence of free oil would require the method to be modified toaccount for the effect of oil saturation in the test cores on the

23、water permeability.6. Sources of Rock-Water Interactions6.1 Water injected into a porous rock may interact with therock to reduce the permeability as a result of the formation ofprecipitates, clay swelling, clay dispersion, or the migration ofother fine solids.6.2 Rock-water interactions are more co

24、mmon in sand-stones than in carbonate rocks. However, within carbonaterocks dissolved iron in the injection water may precipitateespecially in the presence of dissolved oxygen. Alkalineprecipitates (CaCO3and Mg(OH)2) may also form in carbonaterocks.6.2.1 Dissolved hydrogen sulfide in the presence of

25、 dis-solved iron and oxygen can also be a problem in watersinjected into carbonate and sandstones resulting in precipita-tion of sulfides and hydroxides of iron.6.3 The iron and alkaline precipitates described in 6.2 canalso form from waters injected into sandstones. Swelling typeclays (montmorillon

26、ite and mixed layer clays) and dispersibleclays (kaolinite and chlorite) are potential sources of perme-ability losses due to changes in salinity or ionic content of theinjected water compared to the natural waters in the formation.In some sandstones fine mica particles have been caused tomigrate by

27、 the injection of a potassium ion deficient water.6.4 In some instances in both sandstones and carbonatessome fine particles are released to migrate as a result of watersaturating the cleaned and dried test cores.FIG. 1 Schematic of Test EquipmentD4520 1827. Apparatus7.1 A schematic diagram of the t

28、est apparatus is shown inFig. 1. The component parts are assembled from commerciallyavailable laboratory apparatus with the exception of the coreholders (Fig. 2). While four cores are shown in Fig. 1 thenumber used in a test is optional. The apparatus essentiallyconsists of a filtration section and

29、a core flood section. Thevarious components are connected with plastic or stainlesssteel flow lines with required valves and gauges as illustrated.7.2 The filtration section is assembled from four cartridgefilter holders mounted two each in series. Valves are installedto permit flow through either f

30、ilter pair or to bypass the filters.Pressure gauges are included for monitoring the inlet anddischarge pressure of the filters. Commercial filters are avail-able with ratings ranging as low as 0.2 m. The rated sizes usedin the on-site core flood tests generally range from 0.45 to 10m. The filter hol

31、ders should be provided with vents to saturatethe filters and purge air from the system.7.3 The core flood section of the apparatus consists of alaboratory constant temperature bath rated for up to 150C(302F) and of adequate capacity to hold up to four coreholders (Fig. 2). Necessary valves and gaug

32、es are provided. Asshown in Fig. 1, two of the core holders (No. 1 and No. 2) areplumbed to allow the flow through the cores to be reversedwithout removing the core holders. The pressure to the coreflood section is controlled with a regulator, and a test gauge isused to accurately monitor the test c

33、ore inlet pressure. The testcore discharge pressure is atmospheric when the apparatus isassembled as shown in Fig. 1.7.3.1 Another option is to control the discharge at a pressureabove atmospheric by the addition of a regulator on each coresample discharge line. This option is recommended if theevol

34、ution of dissolved gas is anticipated from the water as itflows through the test core.7.4 An alternative to the core holders (Fig. 2) is a Hassler-type permeability cell (API RP40) which uses a rubber orplastic sleeve to form the seal around the core sample. Ahigh-pressure air (nitrogen) or liquid s

35、upply to maintain theseal would be required.7.5 The operating gauge pressure of the test apparatus isusually 700 kPa (100 psig) or less.7.6 As shown in Fig. 1, facilities may also be provided forthe addition of chemicals to the water being tested. A chemicalsupply tank and an injection pump with pre

36、ssure and flowratings corresponding to specific needs would be required.7.7 The apparatus is attached to a line carrying the waterbeing tested. Usually, the line pressure of the water source(regulated as required) satisfies the pressure requirement forflowing the water through the filters and test c

37、ores. If thesupply pressure is insufficient, a small pump capable ofdelivering about 1 L/min at 700 kPa is used.7.8 Other required apparatus are the following:7.8.1 Mechanical (non-aspirator type) vacuum pump,7.8.2 Assorted beakers (250 to 1000 mL),7.8.3 Assorted graduated cylinders (10 to 100 mL),7

38、.8.4 Stopwatch,7.8.5 Vacuum tubing, and7.8.6 Assorted tools for assembling and disassembling theequipment as required.8. Procedure8.1 Core Selection:8.1.1 Choose proper core samples to yield the most mean-ingful test results through close coordination with geologists,chemists, and engineers responsi

39、ble for the water injectionproject.8.1.2 To assist in that choice include well logs, mineralogy,porosity, pore size distribution, permeability, and other coredescriptive data.8.1.3 Choose test cores to represent the zones that willreceive the injected water. The best samples are from wholecores cut

40、from those zones. Prepare sufficient samples torepresent the ranges of permeability, porosity, and mineralogyof the injected zones. Consider the presence of natural frac-tures.8.1.4 Select the number and properties of the cores for aparticular test according to one of the following options:8.1.4.1 U

41、se cores having similar properties (porosity,permeability, mineralogy, etc.). Average the results.8.1.4.2 Use a set of cores with one of these propertiesdifferent in each core to test the effect of this property on thetest results.FIG. 2 Schematic Diagram of Sample HolderD4520 1838.1.5 If cores from

42、 the flooded zone are not available,choose another zone with similar properties as the next bestalternative sample source. As a third choice use synthetic corematerial (alumina, silica, porous glass, etc.).8.2 Core Sample Preparation:8.2.1 Follow the recommended procedures for corehandling, preserva

43、tion, cutting, and cleaning described in APIRP40. (This extensive document describes various proceduresand options that the investigator may choose depending on thetype and condition of the cores being tested.) Related ASTMstandards are Test Method D2434 and Test Method D4404.8.2.2 The preferred sam

44、ple dimensions for the core floodtest are 19 mm (0.75 in.) to 38 mm (1.5 in.) outside diameterwith a minimum length to diameter ratio of 1:0.8.2.3 Carry out the following procedure for each coresample in the set to be tested:8.2.3.1 Cut the core sample parallel to the formation bed-ding plane and th

45、en clean by solvent-extraction to removeresidual hydrocarbons and water from the pore space. Dry thesample and determine the porosity according to the recom-mended procedures in API RP40.8.2.3.2 Use the air permeability of the core sample as aguide for choosing representative samples of the formatio

46、nbeing tested. The procedure for measuring air permeabilities isdescribed in API RP27.8.2.3.3 Seal the core sample with an epoxy resin or othersuitable sealant in a metal (stainless steel, aluminum, brass)tube having an inside diameter about 6.4 mm (0.25 in.) largerthan the outside diameter of the s

47、ample.8.2.3.4 Machine the ends of the core sample and metal tubeflat and perpendicular to the tube axis. Generally a stream ofcompressed air on the core ends during machining will preventthe intrusion of fines into the rock pores.8.2.3.5 Mount the metal tube (containing the core sample)in a holder d

48、esigned to allow water to be flowed through thesample. An example of such a sample holder is shownschematically in Fig. 2.8.3 Vacuum Saturation of Test Cores:8.3.1 Install a 10-m rated cartridge in filter No. 1 and a0.45-m cartridge in filter No. 2. Close valves to and fromfilters No. 3 and No. 4, t

49、he filter bypass valve, and valves to allcore sample holders.8.3.2 Open the valve-to-waste upstream and downstream ofthe regulator and the valves to and from filters No. 1 and No.2. Start water flow through the filters to waste.8.3.3 Close the valve-to-waste upstream of the pressureregulator. Set the regulator at about 120 kPa (17 psi) more thanthe pressure planned for the test. After about 2 min, close thevalve-to-waste downstream of the regulator.8.3.4 Mount from one to four sample cores in the holders(lines should not contain water) and attach the core samplehol