Case and Class Advocacy.ppt

《Case and Class Advocacy.ppt》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《Case and Class Advocacy.ppt（49页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Case and Class Advocacy,Step Four of the Decision Tree Chapter 11,Advocacy is a term for which there is no universal agreement. Several different disciplines claim advocacy as a primary focus of their discipline (law, social work). For other disciplines advocacy is a marginal task (medical advocacy,

2、 educational advocacy, political advocacy). The need for advocacy cuts across different client populations and service settings. Advocates utilize power, authority and influence.,Definition,To advocate is to engage in reasoned argument on behalf of another; to give voice (to the voiceless); to inter

3、cede, defend, or plead the cause of another (Bateman, 1995). Step four of the decision tree and chapter 11 present content on case advocacy (direct practice) and class advocacy (indirect practice).,Class Advocacy,Class advocacy can take the form of policy advocacy or advocacy for reform or social ch

4、ange. Class advocacy uses the power and influence of collective action to bring about a just society. The three parties in class advocacy are a marginalized population, a change agent system (collective action), and a target system (what and who maintains the status quo).,Case Advocacy,There are two

5、 models of individual or case advocacy : the broker model and the adversarial model. In case advocacy there are three parties: the client, the worker and the other party. Case advocacy is concerned with individual justice,Advocacy with Individuals The Broker Model,Broker advocacy consists of securin

6、g concrete resources or services for clients. To broker services, the worker must have knowledge of the language and power structures of specific institutional systems e.g. education, justice, welfare. The worker uses networking and negotiation skills to broker services within the system on behalf o

7、f the client.,Advocacy With Individuals Adversarial Model,The adversarial model of case advocacy is used when resources/services have been denied, withdrawn or are non-existent. Adversarial advocacy involves three parties: the client, the advocate, and the other side. The adversarial model is marked

8、 by tension and resistance.,Indicators of the Need for Adversarial Advocacy,When services or benefits to which people are entitled are not given or are provided in a dehumanizing, confrontational or coercive manner. When discriminatory practices occur. When gaps in services cause undue hardships. Wh

9、en people lack representation or participation in decisions that affect their lives.,Core Skills of Adversarial Advocacy,Assertiveness- Does not violate the rights of those whom advocacy targets e.g. the other side (Assertiveness here is distinguished from aggressiveness). Ability to confront those

10、in authority Ability to invoke sanctions to secure a clients right to service.,Characteristics of Effective Advocates,Leadership-use of authority, influence, power Expertise in the method of advocacy Knowledge about the issue being contested Factual accuracy Political adeptness Reputation of profess

11、ional integrity Skills in case presentation A keen moral compass and courage,Consequences of Adversarial Advocacy,The outcome of adversarial advocacy is usually a win-lose situation. Either side may experience serious consequences. The rights of the client are pitted against an organizations effort

12、to protect resources or defend their position. Advocacy can lead to revenge directed at either the client or the worker or both (Bateman, 1995). Only a very small proportion of social workers practice adversarial advocacy.,Six Stages of Adversarial Advocacy,Stage One: Awareness of need for advocacyU

13、sually involves unmet needs for housing, services, money, or treatment. Stage Two: Client consents to release information relevant to the issue being contested. The worker gathers information (facts) as perceived by each side. The worker states the legal or procedural authority for the advocacy requ

14、est being made. Stage Three: Legal research is done to get the law right. Cross checking and interviewing is done to get the facts straight.,Six Stages of Adversarial Advocacy-Continued,Stage Four: The worker consults with the client. Feedback is provided about the status of the case and options for

15、 various courses of action are laid out. The risks and benefits of each option are discussed with the client. Stage Five: Consists of active negotiation with those identified as empowered to make decisions. Stage Six: If negotiations fail, litigation may be pursued. Litigation enforces rights.,Three

16、 Styles of Negotiation,Competitive Negotiation: Threats, intimidation, superiority and blame characterize the dialogue. This minimizes the risk of exploitation but makes it harder to reach an agreement. Co-operative Negotiation: Attempts are made to establish common ground and identify shared values

17、. This style is vulnerable to manipulation and exploitation. Principled or Problem-solving negotiation.,Principled Negotiation Six Elements.,Negotiate on the merits of the case (dont bargain) Focus on interests rather than positions. Find solutions that produce mutual gain. Avoid tricks and posturin

18、g. Insist that the end result is based on an objective standard and is fair. Dont let the negotiations get personal.,Power Levels of Intensity,Recognize that there are times when a rational argument presented in a highly civil manner does no good. In those circumstances, apply power using the princi

19、ples of least contest and controlled escalation.,Principles of Least Contest and Controlled Escalation,Least contest refers to applying the minimum degree of conflict that will bring about the desired result. Controlled escalation refers to arriving at an optimal outcome with a minimal expenditure o

20、f strategic resources.,Levels of Power Intensity,Level 1: low conflict, marked by discussion and persuasion. Level 2: moderate conflict- prodding occurs. Level 3: high conflict some coercion occurs.,Case Scenario and Advocacy Schema,The case advocacy scenario “K” presented in this chapter illustrate

21、s the move from broker advocacy to moderate conflict adversarial advocacy. The decision schema at the end of the chapter guides the practitioner in the use of case advocacy.,Class Advocacy Just and Humane Society,There are two types of social work class advocacy: (1) public policy advocacy (2) right

22、s advocacy-reform and social change through social activism.,Public Policy Advocacy,Public policy advocacy is a collective strategy used to address inequalities in the distribution of goods and services including the resources of wealth, power, health, knowledge and services. Fairness and equality d

23、emand that distribution of goods and services not be left to: a) those in power, b) chance, or c) a flawed economic system.,Rights Advocacy,Rights advocacy addresses discriminatory and oppressive environments through social activism. The goal of social activism is to reform or change those structura

24、l barriers that contribute to an unjust society. In policy and rights advocacy, the social problems are unbounded. There is less clarity as to the source of the problem and its solution. The timeframe for resolution of social problems is uncertain.,Declarative Knowledge Needed for Policy Advocacy,De

25、scriptive content on social welfare policies and programs; past and current Content on the political theories of social justice.,Declarative Knowledge for Policy Advocacy- Continued,Research competency in documenting needs/resources and evaluating policy-based program outcomes. Knowledge of economic

26、s. Skill in the use of group dynamics, leadership and organizing.,Sociology of Social Problems,Texts on social problems usually provide quantitative data documenting the prevalence and incidence of large scale social problems such as poverty, crime, health/illness, aging, urban blight, racism, gende

27、r discrimination, etc. Such data is usually accompanied by an argument of social causality,Social Causality,In broad strokes, the argument for social causality states that social problems result from oppressive and discriminatory practices associated with existing societal structures and their funct

28、ions e.g.the link between capitalism and poverty. To understand social causality, students must have knowledge of social forces that contribute to the dysfunction of societal institutions. This content is taught in sociology 101 and/or in the human behavior and social environment sequence in the fou

29、ndation year.,The Normative Basis of Social Welfare Public Policy,It is important to understand the normative(value and ideological) base of social policy. According to Popple and Leighninger (2000) two dominant value streams have influenced American social policies: (1) capitalist-puritan(2) humani

30、st-positivist-utopian,Capitalist-Puritan Norm,The values of reciprocity (link between work and benefits) and individualism (personal responsibility) characterize this norm. This value stream holds that individuals are responsible for their own success or failure. It holds that material prosperity is

31、 achieved through hard work. The primary purpose of society is to maintain law and order to protect the acquisition of wealth and property.,Capitalist-Puritan Norm -Continued,It holds that the free market, though flawed, is the best mechanism for economic growth. Social policies are therefore needs-

32、based and means-tested This value stream holds that those who are unsuccessful or deviant should be provided temporary and limited assistance.,Humanitarian-Positivist-Utopian Norm,Humanitarianism holds that the primary purpose of society is to fulfill the material and emotional needs of the citizenr

33、y. Positivism holds that scientific knowing can understand and correct flawed or dysfunctional social dynamics; progress is possible. Utopianism holds that individuals and society are ultimately perfectible; change is possible. This value stream holds that structural barriers limit individual opport

34、unities.,Theories of Social Justice,Public social policy is based on the norm of re-distributive social justice. As a grand abstraction, social justice refers to an ideal system of government, economic production and distribution, and freedom from discrimination and oppression. Ideas (ideologies) ab

35、out just social goals are derived from philosophy, theology, and political science.,Theories of Social Justice,Norms (desired end-goals) that direct the redistribution of wealth in a society are driven by competing value-based definitions of the “good” society. There are four major theories of re-di

36、stributive social justice: (1) egalitarianism, (2) utilitarianism,(3) contractarianism, (4) libertarianism.,4 Theories of Social Justice-Continued,A. Egalitarianism- desire for equal and/or equity in the distribution of societys goods. Utilitariansim-desire for the greatest good for the greatest num

37、ber. Contractarianism- justifies some inequality as long as the redistribution does not widen the gap between the rich and the poor. Libertariansim- holds that no re-distribution should occur.,Public Opinion and Political Referendum,Social welfare policies and programs reflect ideological beliefs. S

38、ocial welfare policies and programs vie for support in the arena of public opinion and political referendum. Competition over scarce resources leads to conflict and negotiated trade-offs between population subgroups within a society. Value conflicts are not resolved by science. Power aligns with the

39、 desired end goals of policy.,Rights Advocacy,According to this model of practice. both oppressed and oppressor are in need of liberation. Rights advocacy works for a just society based on gender and racial equality, multi-cultural acceptance, celebration of alternative life styles as well as an app

40、reciation for ages and the differently abled. Rights advocacy has led to several movements: civil rights, womens rights, gay rights, welfare rights, workers rights, and rights of the disabled. l,Rights Advocacy Two Strategies,Rights advocacy relies on two major tools of empowerment:(1) consciousness

41、 raising(2) social action.,Consciousness Raising,Empowerment results from the validation of shared experiential histories and views. Knowledge of group dynamics is essential in consciousness raising. In consciousness raising people are brought together to dialog, reflect and act (praxis),Consciousne

42、ss Raising Dialectic Dialog,Dialectic dialog: Challenges the images of social reality Examines ideas, beliefs, and assumptions that people take for granted Examines individual and collective motives, interests and needs Identifies values and ideologies that guide dominant and dominated group relatio

43、ns.,Consciousness Raising Reflection,Reflection requires members to locate themselves in position; as both oppressor and as oppressed Reflection requires members to examine how they contribute to and maintain an oppressive status quo. Reflection requires members to consider becoming activists by joi

44、ning others in pursuit of social justice.,Social Activism,Social activism is the ability to join with others (form alliances) to exercise power as participants in a political or reform process. The ability to confront oppression and exert influence other others through social activism enhances perso

45、nal power and an individuals sense of well-being Power is increased through collective activism.,Political Social Work,Political action is a distinguishing feature of social work class advocacy practice. According to Gil, conventional politics pursues important short-term goals. Social policy advoca

46、tes provide expert testimony and influence legislation through lobbying activities. Some are elected to political office. Policy advocates write, issue and/or respond to legislative alerts.,Rights Advocacy,Rights activists pursue the root causes of oppression and injustice by seeking fundamental tra

47、nsformation in the key institutions of society. Rights activists seek to influence and change ideological beliefs.,Institutional Oppression,According to Gil, domination of exploited groups has been institutionalized in the form of economic, social, psychological, and cultural systems that establish

48、privileged conditions of living for certain social classes and racial groups and not for others. Those who have stewardship over life-sustaining natural and human resources shape the circumstances of living and the relative power of individuals and social classes.,Institutional Practices Discriminat

49、ion,Societal institutions organize work and production, oversee the exchange and distribution of resources, regulate civil and political rights and responsibilities, and govern and set norms for reproduction, socialization and social control Perceptions of relative status and prestige become interna

50、lized through socialization & indoctrination. This process is at the core of discrimination.,Values Competition and Self-Interest,Values such as competition and self-interest foster inequality; the consequence of which is the creation of an occupationally, spatially, stratified society. Those who are privileged possess greater shares of available goods and services and enjoy different levels of rights, responsibilities, and liberty. Minor inequalities in exchanges tend to become legitimized and institutionalized.,