Aligning Outcomes Measurement With Early Learning .ppt

《Aligning Outcomes Measurement With Early Learning .ppt》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《Aligning Outcomes Measurement With Early Learning .ppt（52页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Aligning Outcomes Measurement With Early Learning Guidelines/Standards,Jennifer Olson (OR) Birth-5 Ruth Littlefield (NH) Birth-5April 2006 Albuquerque, NM,Questions to Guide the Session: What was the context in the state that led to the choice to align with the Early Learning Standards/Guidelines?Ho

2、w has the alignment with standards/guidelines influenced your selection of assessment tools?How will you report back on standards/guidelines and/or outcomes to local programs and to OSEP?What other implications have you seen as a result of deciding to align with your standards/guidelines?What do you

3、 feel are the pros and cons for the decision to align with your state standards/ guidelines?,3,Oregon Early Childhood Foundations and Assessment Project,OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY, UNIVERSITY OF OREGON AND EDUCATORS FROM OREGON EARLY INTERVENTION/ EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECI

4、AL EDUCATION, PRE-KINDERGARTEN/HEAD START AND CHILD CARE PROGRAMS,4,PROJECT CONTACT INFORMATION,Portland State University Joel Arick: 503-725-4251, arickjpdx.edu Ruth Falco: 503-725-4486, falcorpdx.edu Helen Young: 503-725-5207, younghpdx.eduOregon Department of Education Nancy Johnson-Dorn: 503-378

5、-3600 X2339, nancy.johnson-dornstate.or.us Nancy Latini: 503-378-3600 X2361, nancy.latinistate.or.us Jennifer Olson: 503-378-3600, x2338, jennifer.olsonstate.or.us,5,New Hampshire Early Learning Curriculum Guidelines and Preschool Child Outcomes for Young Children with Disabilities Ages 3-5,New Hamp

6、shire Department of Education/Bureau of Special Education/Preschool Special Education Office,6,Question 1. What was the context in the state that led to the choice to align with the Early Learning Standards/Guidelines?,7,Context for Alignment Federal Requirements,National focus on accountability, st

7、andards-based reform, NCLB, 2001) Good Start, Grow Smart (2002) required research-based, voluntary state guidelines for literacy, language, pre-reading, and numeracy, indicating what young children birth to 5 should know & be able to do prior to kindergarten,8,Context for Alignment ODE Initiatives,O

8、regon Department of Education (ODE) initiated development of child-based outcome standards (expectations for what children should know and be able to do prior to kindergarten) Guidelines in standards development Link preschool outcome standards to statewide, Oregon K-12 Standards Focus on standards

9、for all children, 0 5, including children in Part C, Part B 619, OPK, Head Start, & child care programs Add domains essential to early childhood to the domains in the K-12 standards (e.g., Approaches to Learning and Social Emotional),9,Context for Alignment,Oregon Department of Education (ODE) forme

10、d advisory group of over 100 early childhood professionals to develop initial draft of Oregon Early Childhood Foundations (birth to 5) that align with K 12 standards Oregon Early Childhood Foundations reviewed (Scott-Little, 2005) Revised Foundations drafted (ODE, 2005),10,Context for Alignment,Oreg

11、on Early Childhood Foundations developed in 8 domainsApproaches to LearningSocial Emotional DevelopmentLanguage and Literacy DevelopmentMathematicsScienceSocial StudiesPhysical Education and Health The Arts,11,Context for Alignment Legislature Requirements,Needed easily understood, aggregated child

12、outcome data to present to Oregon state legislators to support funding for Early Intervention/Early Childhood Special Education (EI/ECSE) and Oregon Pre-Kindergarten (OPK) Programs/Head Start Oregon legislature charged Oregon Department of Education (ODE) with developing statewide assessment for EI/

13、ECSE and OPK/Head Start This Oregon Early Childhood (EC) Assessment needed to be linked to standards for school-aged children and provide the ability to monitor overall progress of children from pre-K through school age,12,Context for Alignment in NH,Preschool Special Educators Questions What is the

14、 general preschool curriculum? What standards/guidelines exist for us to follow?,13,Context for Alignment in NH,Creation of the Early Learning Curriculum Guidelines (ELCG) Project 619 funded Create informed dialog across early childhood community Strengthen connections between preschool special educ

15、ation and K-12 system Develop shared language and frames of reference for communication Enhance educational and developmental outcomes for young children with disabilities Support access to general early childhood curriculum and appropriate preschool activities for young children with disabilities,1

16、4,Context for Alignment in NH,NH Department of Health & Human Services: Child Development charge to create early learning standards for children birth through 5 Domain Categories Indicators of progress GSEG Grant: NH Cornerstones Project Subcommittee on preschool outcomes,15,Question 2: How has the

17、alignment with standards/guidelines influenced your selection of assessment tools?,16,Alignment with Standards and Assessment Selection Addressing Federal and State Requirements,Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) requires reporting of (a) % of children who reach or maintain functioning at l

18、evel comparable to same-age peers (b) % of children who improve functioning (but were not included in a) (c) % of children who do not improve functioningState requires Assessment aligned with Early Childhood Foundations Child outcome data the Legislature will easily understand,17,Alignment with Stan

19、dards and Assessment Selection Current Program Practices,ODE currently requires EI/ECSE Programs to use one of four different curriculum-based assessments (CBAs) annually for each child Each OPK/Head Start Program uses one of at least two different curriculum-based/criterion-referenced assessments w

20、ith all children ODE continues to value the use of comprehensive CBAs to link assessment to program planning,18,Alignment of Standards and Assessment Selection Concerns with CBAs,Not feasible to aggregate data from the various CBAs Not feasible to require all EI/ECSE and all OPK/Head Start Programs

21、to use a common CBA CBAs Not designed to provide aggregated data on developmental progress Not designed to compare child progress to that of typical peers Previous attempts to use CBA data to share outcomes with Legislature were unsatisfactory CBAs do not hold a clear relationship to Oregon Early Ch

22、ildhood Foundations and do not include all Foundation Domains or Areas,19,Alignment of Standards with Assessment - Oregon Early Childhood Assessment,ODE professionals decided federal and state needs will most effectively be met through development of the Oregon Early Childhood Assessment System, dev

23、eloped to be compatible with current CBAs while aligning with Oregon Early Childhood Foundations and Oregon K-12 Standards ODE partnered with researchers at Portland State University (PSU) and University of Oregon (UofO) to develop the system,20,Alignment of Guidelines with Assessment Tools,Tools no

24、t yet selected: Assessment Fair on May 18th NH Early Learning Guidelines (Good Start Grow Smart Framework, not developmental skills checklist or curriculum Articulate a common visions and commitment to children Provide a map of what children should know, understand and be able to do Basis for what a

25、dults working with young children should know, understand and be able to do,21,Alignment of Guidelines with Assessment Tools,Created as a companion document: NH Early Learning Curriculum Guidelines and Preschool Outcomes Guiding Principals Written in educational rather than early childhood terms Mir

26、rors Early Learning Guidelines Preschool Outcomes presented with sub-outcomes Expands on preschool indicators and what you may observe Connects Outcomes and sub-outcomes to Domain areas,22,Question 3. How will you report back on standards and/or outcomes to local programs and to OSEP?,23,Process to

27、Report on Outcomes: Statewide EC Assessment System,Portland State University & University of Oregon are collaborating with the Oregon Department of Education to develop an assessment that measures the skills and abilities identified in the Early Childhood Foundations for all programs that serve birt

28、h to age 5 childrenThis assessment system will be used to report back to local programs and OSEP,24,Development of Assessment Items,Research regarding early childhood development and important skills in each of the foundation domains and areas was reviewed Numerous research-based assessments (both s

29、tandardardized and non-standardized) were reviewed to identify important skills across development from birth to 6 years old 128 items across 16 foundation areas were developed based on the research to assess a sample of skills or abilities from the foundation areas Items were selected that are: Obs

30、ervable Functional Developmentally appropriate (Sampling skills from 6 months 6 years of age),25,Criteria Used by Developers to Design the Assessment,Developmentally appropriate Conducted in natural environments Activity-based assessment (play, table-time, snack, group) Measure progress over time Ag

31、gregate/combine data across children/programs Relate to currently used CBAs (e.g., AEPS, HELP, Carolina, Galileo, Creative Curriculum) Valid and reliable Easy for staff to use,26,EC Assessment System,On-Line assessment system Uses combination of Checklist Rating Scale and Direct Observation of child

32、 during typical routines Provides users with a student report Interactive computer functions make data entry easy and provide immediate information to staff,27,PILOT STUDY: Demonstration of how data can be reported to local programs and OSEP,28,Pilot Study,Pilot Study to “try-out” the assessment was

33、 conducted from February 2005 to September 2005Educators gave children a pre-assessment and a post-assessment(each childs pre and post-assessments were 2-4 months apart),29,Pilot Study Purposes,To determine if assessment items would measure progress of children over time in several settingsTo get fe

34、edback on assessment items, assessment process, and the on-line systemTo conduct preliminary validity and reliability studiesTo develop initial process for reporting on child outcomes to OSEP,30,Demographics Pilot Study: Preliminary Data,Number of Children Assessed:Child Care (no-disabilities) 239EI

35、/ECSE 140Head Start (non-EI/ECSE) 108Total: 487,31,32,Internal Consistency Reliability All Subjects in Pilot Study less than 60 months,33,Demographics: EI/ECSE,34,Federal Outcomes Data for Part C & B: Monitoring Criteria,(a) Percent of children who reach or maintain functioning at a level comparable

36、 to same-aged peers (b) Percent of children who improve functioning (not included in a) (c) Percent of children who did not improve functioning,35,Pilot Study Results: A) Comparison with Same-aged Peers,Preliminary Aggregate DataComparable to same-aged peer= within one standard deviation of same age

37、 peers (child care subjects)Pre-post intervention period was 4 months* Post data collection was not available for all subjects at this time,36,37,38,39,Teacher Perceptions of Online Assessment System Survey Results (N=48),40,What We Learned From the Pilot Study,All agencies (Preschools/Child Care, H

38、ead Start, and EI/ECSE) were supportive of the project The on-line system efficiently allowed the assessment to be implemented across programs All programs had access to the online system In 4 months or less, all children in EI/ECSE, Head Start and Childcare programs showed progress Child Care/presc

39、hool sites were very excited about being included in this project Preliminary pilot data appears to validate the use of the assessment to monitor child development,41,NH Planning to Report Back,Still under construction Strong stakeholder and state commitment to make this useful at local, state and f

40、ederal level Working with publishers of Assessment tools to: minimize labor, maximize usefulness of information to staff, provide state level data that can easily be reported to OSEP, be a cost-effective as possible NHSES Statewide special education data system,42,Question 4. What other implications

41、 have you seen as a result of deciding to align with your standards?,43,Implications of Alignment of Standards and Assessment,Assessment data will be more valued by Oregon Legislature as well as OSEP Increased knowledge of quality in EC settings Linking the EC Assessment to K-12 standards and assess

42、ments may enable longitudinal progress monitoring,44,Implications of Alignment with Guidelines,Family input indicates this is useful for parents to see their childs progress Promotes better quality community child care/preschool options for all children Strengthens the discussion with policy makers

43、in the educational community Reinforces the bridge between Part C and 619,45,Implications of Alignment with Guidelines,Brought preschool special education to the child care table in a very positive manner Provides a foundation and framework for the conversations about the two burning questions for p

44、reschool special educators: What is the general preschool curriculum? What standards/guidelines exit for us to follow?,46,Question 5. What do you feel are the pros and cons for the decision to align with your state standards?,47,Pros,Assessment will meet both Federal and State needs Assessment will

45、address common curriculum goals for infants, toddlers and preschool children across EI/ECSE, OPK/Head Start, and child care Assessment will link EI/ECSE, OPK/Head Start, and child care outcomes to outcomes in K-12 school programs GSEG grant, in addition to State funding, will provide opportunity to

46、further field-test unique measure to meet Federal and State needs,48,Cons,Perception that assessment is not as credible as other assessments Perception that CBM could be used instead of adding another asessment tool. Development of a valid and reliable measure, aligned with Oregon Early Childhood Fo

47、undations, requires time and funding,49,EC ASSESSMENT SYSTEM,If time or for those interested, we can view the on-line Oregon EC Assessment system,50,Pros,Resource documents have more stakeholder buy-in Final products are more comprehensive and useful More useful for a wider variety of players (famil

48、ies, early care and special education providers, administrators, etc) One framework for all rather than parallel systems,51,Pros,Based on Early Childhood best practices and improvement rather than on compliance and federally reporting Brought Preschool Special Education to the Child Development table in a positive, pro-active way,52,Cons,More time to complete,