【考研类试卷】考博英语(阅读理解)-试卷81及答案解析.doc
《【考研类试卷】考博英语(阅读理解)-试卷81及答案解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《【考研类试卷】考博英语(阅读理解)-试卷81及答案解析.doc(11页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、考博英语(阅读理解)-试卷 81 及答案解析(总分:40.00,做题时间:90 分钟)一、Reading Comprehensio(总题数:4,分数:40.00)Some of the concerns surrounding Turkeys application to join the European Union, to be voted on by the EUs Council of Ministers on December 17th, are economic in particular, the countrys relative poverty. Its GDP per he
2、ad is less than a third of the average for the 15 pre-2004 members of the EU. But it is not far off that of one of the ten new members which joined on May 1st 2004(Latvia), and it is much the same as those of two countries, Bulgaria and Romania, which this week concluded accession talks with the EU
3、that could make them full members on January 1st 2007. Furthermore, the countrys recent economic progress has been, according to Donald Johnston, the secretary-general of the OECD, “ stunning“. GDP in the second quarter of the year was 13. 4% higher than a year earlier, a rate of growth that no EU c
4、ountry comes close to matching. Turkeys inflation rate has just fallen into single figures for the first time since 1972, and this week the country reached agreement with the IMF on a new three-year, $ 10 billion economic programme that will, according to the IMFs managing director, Rodrigo Rato, “h
5、elp Turkey. reduce inflation toward European levels, and enhance the economys resilience“. Resilience has not historically been the countrys economic strong point. As recently as 2001, GDP fell by over 7% . It fell by more than 5% in 1994, and by just under 5% in 1999. Indeed, throughout the 1990s g
6、rowth oscillated like an electrocardiogram recording a violent heart attack. This irregularity has been one of the main reasons(along with red tape and corruption)why the country has failed dismally to attract much-needed foreign direct investment. Its stock of such investment(as a percentage of GDP
7、)is lower now than it was in the 1980s, and annual inflows have scarcely ever reached $ 1 billion(whereas Ireland attracted over $ 25 billion in 2003, as did Brazil in every year from 1998 to 2000). One deterrent to foreign investors is due to disappear on January 1st 2005. On that day, Turkey will
8、take away the right of virtually every one of its citizens to call themselves a millionaire. Six noughts will be removed from the face value of the lira; one unit of the local currency will henceforth be worth what lm are nowie, about 0. 53euro($ 0. 70). Goods will have to be priced in both the new
9、and old lira for the whole of the year, but foreign bankers and investors can begin to look forward to a time in Turkey when they will no longer have to juggle mentally with indeterminate strings of zeros.(分数:10.00)(1).What is Turkeys economic situation now?(分数:2.00)A.Its GDP per head is far lagging
10、 behind that of the EU members.B.Its inflation rate is still rising.C.Its economy grows faster than any EU member.D.Its economic resilience is very strong.(2).We can infer from the second paragraph that_.(分数:2.00)A.Turkey will soon catch the average GDP level of the 15 pre-2004 EU membersB.inflation
11、 rate in Turkey used to be very highC.Turkeys economy will keep growing at present rateD.IMFs economic program will help Turkey join the EU(3).The word “oscillated“(Paragraph 3)most probably means_.(分数:2.00)A.fellB.climbedC.developedD.swang(4).Speaking of Turkeys foreign direct investment, the autho
12、r implies that_.(分数:2.00)A.its stock is far less than that of other countriesB.it does not have much influence on Turkeys economic progressC.steady GDP growth will help Turkey attract more foreign direct investmentD.Turkeys economic resilience relies on foreign direct investment(5).We can draw a con
13、clusion from the text that_.(分数:2.00)A.foreign investment environment in Turkey will become betterB.Turkeys citizens will suffer heavy loss due to the change of the face value of the liraC.the local currency will depreciate with the removal of six noughts from the face valueD.prices of goods will go
14、 upIt was a ruling that had consumers see thing with anger and many a free trader crying foul. On November 20th the European Court of Justice decided that Tesco, a British supermarket chain, should not be allowed to import jeans made by Americas Levi Strauss from outside the European Union and sell
15、them at cut-rate prices without getting permission first from the jeans maker. Ironically, the ruling is based on an EU trademark directive that was designed to protect local, not American, manufacturers from price dumping. The idea is that any brand-owning firm should be allowed to position its goo
16、ds and segment its markets as it sees fit: Levis jeans, just like Gucci handbags, must be allowed to be expensive. Levi Strauss persuaded the court that, by selling its jeans cheaply alongside soap powder and bananas, Tesco was destroying the image and so the value of its brands which could only lea
17、d to less innovation and, in the long run, would reduce consumer choice. Consumer groups and Tesco say that Levis case is specious. The supermarket argues that it was just arbitraging the price differential between Levis jeans sold in America and Europe a service performed a million times a day in f
18、inancial markets, and one that has led to real benefits for consumers. Tesco has been selling some 15, 000 pairs of Levis jeans a week, for about half the price they command in specialist stores approved by Levi Strauss. Christine Cross, Tescos head of global non-food sourcing, says the ruling risks
19、 “creating a Fortress Europe with a vengeance“. The debate will rage on, and has implications well beyond casual clothes(Levi Strauss was joined in its lawsuit by Zino Davidoff, a perfume maker). The question at its heart is not whether brands need to control how they are sold to protect their image
20、, but whether it is the job of the courts to help them do this. Gucci, an Italian clothes label whose image was being destroyed by loose licensing and over-exposure in discount stores, saved itself not by resorting to the courts but by ending contracts with third-party suppliers, controlling its dis
21、tribution better and opening its own stores. It is now hard to find cut-price Gucci anywhere. Brand experts argue that Levi Strauss, which has been losing market share to hipper rivals such as Diesel, is no longer strong enough to command premium prices. Left to market forces, so-so brands such as L
22、evis might well fade away and be replaced by fresher labels. With the courts protecting its prices, Levi Strauss may hang on for longer. But no court can help to make it a great brand again.(分数:10.00)(1).Which of the following is not true according to Paragraph 1 ?(分数:2.00)A.Consumers and free trade
23、rs were very angry.B.Only the Levis maker can decide the prices of the jeans.C.The ruling has protected Levis from price dumping.D.Levis jeans should be sold at a high price .(2).Guccis success shows that_.(分数:2.00)A.Gucci has successfully saved its own image.B.It has changed its fate with its own e
24、ffort.C.Opening its own stores is the key to success.D.It should be the courts duty to save its image.(3).The word “specious“(line 12, paragraph 2)in the context probably means_.(分数:2.00)A.responsible for oneselfB.having too many doubtsC.not as it seems to beD.raising misunderstanding(4).According t
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 考研 试卷 英语 阅读 理解 81 答案 解析 DOC
