REG NASA-LLIS-0687--2000 Lessons Learned Spacecraft Deployed Appendage Design Guidelines.pdf
《REG NASA-LLIS-0687--2000 Lessons Learned Spacecraft Deployed Appendage Design Guidelines.pdf》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《REG NASA-LLIS-0687--2000 Lessons Learned Spacecraft Deployed Appendage Design Guidelines.pdf(9页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、Best Practices Entry: Best Practice Info:a71 Committee Approval Date: 2000-03-09a71 Center Point of Contact: GSFCa71 Submitted by: Wil HarkinsSubject: Spacecraft Deployed Appendage Design Guidelines Practice: This guideline describes design practices for deployable appendages which can improve accur
2、acy of analyses, simplify and optimize designs, and minimize fabrication and test problems to produce reliable deployables. This guideline includes techniques used on successful missions and will help avoid past deployment problems.Programs that Certify Usage: N/ACenter to Contact for Information: G
3、SFCImplementation Method: This Lesson Learned is based on Reliability Guideline Number GD-ED-2209 from NASA Technical Memorandum 4322A, NASA Reliability Preferred Practices for Design and Test.Benefit:Increases confidence in designs and their operational reliability. Ensures accuracy of design analy
4、ses, completeness of requirements in procurement documents and thoroughness of test planning. Ensures functional compatibility of assembly and test fixtures.Implementation Method:Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Designs must factor in
5、effects of the space environment. Relevant differences between ground test conditions and flight deployment should be identified for consideration at the design and test stages to assure operation with adequate margins. G-negation pickup points can be designed in. Historically, some deployables have
6、 passed ground tests but failed in space. Space imposed conditions include thermal gradients and thermally induced loads, outgassing, low moisture, zero gravity and ballooned thermal blankets. Handbook material values do not always apply for the space environment. Physical parameters vary such as so
7、lid film lubricant friction which varies with moisture content. The space environment is not easy to simulate in earthbound tests and allowance should be made for expected parameter variations.Deployed appendages should be designed using the following guidelines:1. Avoid complication; simple designs
8、 are more reliable.2. 3. Avoid single point failures. If unavoidable, assure generous margins. Where practical, design them out or employ redundancy unless redundant complication reduces reliability. Assure redundancy is truly independent, not coupled.4. 5. Margins - Provide minimum torque/force mar
9、gin: Tt= 1.25 Tf+ 4.0* Tvwhere: Tt= minimum total available torque/forceTf= fixed and non-variable loads such as Ia termsTv= worst case variable torques/forces such as coulomb friction and other loads which vary with environmental conditions and operating life.*Factor 4.0 is the Design Goal, reduced
10、 where excessive mass, power or volume is required, e.g., motor driven mechanisms. Maintain a minimum factor of 2.0 under worst case degraded conditions.6. Force analyses should use best available loads and forces and examine the full range of expected minimum and maximum parameter values, make adeq
11、uate allowance for uncertainty. Torque requirements are higher with high friction, deployment velocity and momentum higher with low friction. Use test verified values where available for such critical parameters as friction (if only handbook values available, multiply by 3 to cover uncertainties), c
12、able flexure torque, bearing drag torque. Include worst case thermal effects, wearout, friction changes and end-of-life conditions.7. 8. Designs should tolerate moderate increases in friction. Maintain calculated torque/force margins above 2 with m assumed up to 0.5 for typical material combinations
13、. Friction force Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-estimates are untrustworthy, handbook values represent controlled conditions. Use cautiously, test if possible. Consider case differences between published numbers and actual conditions
14、 such as effects of part surface treatments, differences between ground test conditions and space environment (humidity, pressure, loads). Use appropriate fits, alignment tolerances, surface treatments, deburring and hardness differentials to avoid galling which nullifies friction estimates.9. 10. T
15、emperature effects at deployment should be accounted for, e.g., torque/force changes at hingelines and separation points from temperature gradients within assemblies, bulk temperature effects and differential temperatures between deployables and mounting structure.11. 12. Humidity effects, e.g., mol
16、ybdenum disulfide (MoS2) friction varies and nonmetals change size with moisture content, can affect torque margins and fit clearances. Moly lube should not contain graphite.13. 14. Rolling element bearing loads for long life devices should be kept below 320,000 psi mean Hertzian stress for launch,
17、200,000 psi or lower for operation, less if lubrication is marginal.15. 16. Consider effects on bearing preload, torque and life due to thermal gradients and bulk temperature variations.17. 18. Analysis. Loads analyses and load sharing between deployed appendages and spacecraft structure can be grea
18、tly affected by compliance of typical appendage joints. Examples are bolt preloaded joints, separation joint clamping devices, bearing supported hinge lines, and movable mechanical joints such as gimbals and solar array drives. Accurate stiffness knowledge of these devices is crucial for valid loads
19、 analyses. Verification and validation should be addressed in design, and plans made to acquire sufficient data to verify models. Kinematic diagrams should be constructed including all degrees of freedom and constraints. For accurate loads and stress analyses, assure correct component parameters are
20、 used in the Finite Element Analysis (e.g., bearing stiffness, friction coupling, compliance of bonded joints, stiffness of movable joints - clearance fit or preloaded, transmissibility across joints). Perform loads analysis based on true compliance of individual members for accurate assessment of l
21、oad sharing. Cross-check with deflection analyses, compare with measured values. Incorporate proper deployment angles, velocity, acceleration and impacts to size components with adequate predicted margins. Include critical component parameters in analysis based on actual measured unit data where pos
22、sible, eg. bearing friction, compliance of assemblies. Account for fabrication and assembly variables which affect design Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-parameters used in analysis.Evaluate zero-g case to determine impact on design a
23、nd verification. Jerking (non-uniform acceleration) can be critical in deployment. Its effects should be evaluated. Stick-slip friction conditions can worsen the condition.Stowed and deployed frequencies should be evaluated. These affect launch loads and Flight Attitude Control.19. 20. Separation Pl
24、anes Employ kickoff springs where practical in the separation joints; especially important for long appendages. Use anti-seize, anti-weld coatings, dissimilar materials. Provide retention joint flexure capability to accommodate launch loads, e.g., spherical, vs conical cup-cones. Assure adequate dyn
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
10000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- REGNASALLIS06872000LESSONSLEARNEDSPACECRAFTDEPLOYEDAPPENDAGEDESIGNGUIDELINESPDF

链接地址:http://www.mydoc123.com/p-1018334.html