[考研类试卷]考研英语(翻译)模拟试卷9及答案与解析.doc
《[考研类试卷]考研英语(翻译)模拟试卷9及答案与解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《[考研类试卷]考研英语(翻译)模拟试卷9及答案与解析.doc(12页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、考研英语(翻译)模拟试卷 9 及答案与解析Part CDirections: Read the following text carefully and then translate the underlined segments into Chinese. (10 points) 0 【F1】Were moving; into another era, as the toxic effects of the bubble and its grave consequences spread through the financial system. Just a couple of years
2、 ago investors dreamed of 20 percent returns forever. Now surveys show that theyre down to a “realistic“ 8 percent to 10 percent range. But what if the next few years turn out to be below normal expectations? Martin Barners of the Bank Credit Analyst in Montreal expects future stock returns to avera
3、ge just 4 percent to 6 percent. Sound impossible?【F2】After a much smaller bubble that burst in the mid-1960s Standard Iraq would be even more unstable as a result of its liberation; and a conflict would increase the threat posed by terrorists.【F1 】What we did not know was that Tony Blair had receive
4、d intelligence and advice that raised the very same points.Last weeks report from the Intelligence and Security Committee included the revelation that some of the intelligence had warned that a war against Iraq risked an increased threat of terrorism. Why did Mr. Blair not make this evidence availab
5、le to the public in the way that so much of the alarmist intelligence on Saddams weapons was published?【F2】Why did he choose to ignore the intelligence and argue instead that the war was necessary, precisely because of the threat posed by international terrorism?There have been two parliamentary inv
6、estigations into this war and the Hutton inquiry reopens tomorrow.【F3 】In their different ways they have been illuminating, but none of them has addressed the main issues relating to the war. The Foreign Affairs Committee had the scope to range widely, but chose to become entangled in the dispute be
7、tween the Government and the BBC. The Intelligence Committee reached the conclusion that the Governments file on Saddams weapons was not mixed up, but failed to explain why the intelligence was so hopelessly wrong. The Hutton inquiry is investigating the death of Dr. David Kelly, a personal tragedy
8、of marginal relevance to the war against Iraq.Tony Blair has still to come under close examination about his conduct in the building-up to war. Instead, the Defence Secretary, Geoff Hoon, is being fingered as if he were master-minding the war behind everyones backs from the Ministry of Defence. Mr.
9、Hoon is not a minister who dares to think without consulting Downing Street first. At all times he would have been dancing to Downing Streets tunes. Mr. Blair would be wrong to assume that he can draw a line under all of this by making Mr. Hoon the fall-guy.【F4】It was Mr. Blair who decided to take B
10、ritain to war, and a Cabinet of largely skeptical ministers that backed him. It was Mr. Blair who told MPs that unless Saddam was removed, terrorists would pose a greater global threateven though he had received intelligence that suggested a war would lead to an increase in terrorism.Parliament shou
11、ld be the forum in which the Prime Minister is called more fully to account, but Iain Duncan Smiths support for the war has neutered an already inept opposition.【F5 】In the absence of proper parliamentary scrutiny, it is left to newspapers like this one to keep asking the most important questions un
12、til the Prime Minister answers them.6 【F1】7 【F2】8 【F3】9 【F4】10 【F5】10 【F1】Sending your child to piano or violin lessons in a bid to boost their academic achievement is a waste of money, according to scientists.Although research has shown that youngsters who take music lessons are more likely to be t
13、op of their class, Professor Schellenberg claims this link is misleading.【 F2】Instead, improved academic performance may be because brighter children from privileged backgrounds are more likely to learn an instrument, rather than music classes helping to boost their intelligence. “Music may change y
14、ou a bit, but its also the case that different children take music lessons.“ said Professor Schellenberg, who added that parents education was the most influential factor on musicality.【 F3】Children who take music lessons come from families with higher incomes, they come from families with more educ
15、ated parents, they also do more extracurricular activities, they have higher IQs, and they do better at school.【F4】In tests on 167 children who played piano or other instruments, they found their answer to personality tests could predict how likely it was for them to continue their music lessons. Th
16、ose who were more outgoing and conscientious were more likely to continue to play. “We were motivated by the fact that kids who take music lessons are particularly good students, in school they actually do better than you would predict from their IQ, so obviously something else is going on.“ Profess
17、or Schellenberg told the American Association for the Advancement of Science(A A AS)annual conference in Boston.【F5】Asked if so-called helicopter parents were wasting their money sending their children to music lessons in the belief they could boost their school results, he said “yes“. “Clearly stud
18、ying music changes the brain, but so does any learning. In fact, that is what learning is.“ he said.11 【F1】12 【F2】13 【F3】14 【F4】15 【F5】15 Relativity theory has had a profound influence on our picture of matter by forcing us to modify our concept of a particle in an essential way.【F1】In classical phy
19、sics, the mass of an object had always been associated with an indestructible material substance, with some “stuff“ of which all things were thought to be made. Relativity theory showed that mass has nothing to do with any substance, but is a form energy. Energy, however, is a dynamic quantity assoc
20、iated with activity, or with processes.【F2 】The fact that the mass of a particle is equivalent to a certain of energy means that the particle can no longer be seen as a static object, but has to be conceived as a dynamic pattern.This new view of particles was initiated by Dirac when he formulated a
21、relativistic equation describing the behavior of electrons.【F3】Diracs theory was not only extremely successful in accounting for the fine details of atomic structure, but also revealed a fundamental symmetry between matter and anti-matter. It predicted the existence of an anti-matter with the same m
22、ass as the electron but with an opposite charge. This positively charged particle, now called the positron, was indeed discovered two years after Dirac had predicted it. The symmetry between matter and anti-matter implies that for every particle there exists an antiparticles with equal mass and oppo
23、site charge. Pairs of particles and antiparticles can be created if enough energy is available and can be made to turn into pure energy in the reverse process of destruction.【F4】These processes of particle creation and destruction had been predicted from Diracs theory before they were actually disco
24、vered in nature, and since then they have been observed millions of times.The creation of material particles from pure energy is certainly the most spectacular effect of relativity theory, and it can only be understood in terms of the view of particles outlined above.【F5 】Before relativistic particl
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 考研 试卷 英语 翻译 模拟 答案 解析 DOC
