DIN EN 1027-2016 Windows and doors - Water tightness - Test method German version EN 1027 2016《门窗 水密性 试验方法 德文版本EN 1027-2016》.pdf

《DIN EN 1027-2016 Windows and doors - Water tightness - Test method German version EN 1027 2016《门窗 水密性 试验方法 德文版本EN 1027-2016》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《DIN EN 1027-2016 Windows and doors - Water tightness - Test method German version EN 1027 2016《门窗 水密性 试验方法 德文版本EN 1027-2016》.pdf（18页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、September 2016 English price group 11No part of this translation may be reproduced without prior permission ofDIN Deutsches Institut fr Normung e. V., Berlin. Beuth Verlag GmbH, 10772 Berlin, Germany,has the exclusive right of sale for German Standards (DIN-Normen).ICS 91.060.50!%ZS“2559648www.din.d

2、eDIN EN 1027Windows and doors Watertightness Test method;English version EN 1027:2016,English translation of DIN EN 1027:2016-09Fenster und Tren Schlagregendichtheit Prfverfahren;Englische Fassung EN 1027:2016,Englische bersetzung von DIN EN 1027:2016-09Fentres et portes Etanchit leau Mthode dessai;

3、Version anglaise EN 1027:2016,Traduction anglaise de DIN EN 1027:2016-09SupersedesDIN EN 1027:2000-09www.beuth.deDTranslation by DIN-Sprachendienst.In case of doubt, the German-language original shall be considered authoritative.Document comprises 18 pages 08.16 2 A comma is used as the decimal mark

4、er. National foreword This document (EN 1027:2016) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 33 “Doors, windows, shutters, building hardware and curtain walling” (Secretariat: AFNOR, France). The responsible German body involved in its preparation was DIN-Normenausschuss Bauwesen (DIN Standard

5、s Committee Building and Civil Engineering), Working Committee NA 005-09-01 AA Tren, Tore, Fenster, Abschlsse, Baubeschlge und Vorhangfassaden. Amendments This standard differs from DIN EN 1027:2000-09 as follows: a) Clause 2: “Normative references” has been deleted; b) Clause 3: definition “closing

6、 condition” has been added; c) Subclause 3.2: definition “test pressure” has been simplified; d) Subclause 3.3: definition “watertightness” has been revised; e) Subclause 3.4: definition “water penetration” has been revised; f) Subclause 5.4: definition “accuracy” has been revised; g) Subclause 6.2:

7、 has been editorially revised; h) Subclauses 6.2.4.1 and 6.2.4.2: the description is more detailed; i) Subclause 7.1: definition “closing condition” has been added; j) Clause 8: a necessary description of the test specimen has been added; k) New Annex A: former Figures 1 and 2 have been revised, Fig

8、ures are now separated into Figure A.1 to Figure A.4; l) New Annex A: Figure A.5 has been added. Previous editions DIN 18055-2: 1973-08 DIN EN 86: 1981-01 DIN EN 1027: 2000-09 DIN EN 1027:2016-09 EUROPEAN STANDARD NORME EUROPENNE EUROPISCHE NORM EN 1027 March 2016 ICS 91.060.50 Supersedes EN 1027:20

9、00English Version Windows and doors - Watertightness - Test methodFentres et portes - Etanchit leau - Mthode dessai Fenster und Tren - Schlagregendichtheit - Prfverfahren This European Standard was approved by CEN on 9 January 2016. CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regul

10、ations which stipulate the conditions for giving this European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre or to any CEN membe

11、r. This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre has the same status as the official versions. CE

12、N members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland,

13、Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey andUnited Kingdom. EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION COMIT EUROPEN DE NORMALISATION EUROPISCHES KOMITEE FR NORMUNG CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels 2016 CEN All rights of exploitation in an

14、y form and by any means reserved worldwide for CEN national Members. Ref. No. EN 1027:2016 EEN 1027:2016 (E) 2 Contents Page European foreword . 3 1 Scope 4 2 Normative references 4 3 Terms and definitions . 4 4 Principle of test 5 5 Test apparatus 5 6 Preparation of test specimen 6 6.1 Set-up of th

15、e test specimen 6 6.2 Set-up spraying system (see Figures A.1 to A.6) 6 6.2.1 General 6 6.2.2 Positioning of the line connecting the nozzle tips (the nozzle line) . 6 6.2.3 Positioning relative to test specimen width 7 6.2.4 Direction of nozzle spray 7 6.2.5 Number of nozzle rows 7 6.3 Water charact

16、eristics 7 7 Test procedure . 7 7.1 Preliminaries 7 7.2 Spraying phase . 8 7.3 Test result 8 8 Test report . 8 Annex A (informative) Watertightness . 10 Bibliography . 16 DIN EN 1027:2016-09 .EN 1027:2016 (E) 3 European foreword This document (EN 1027:2016) has been prepared by Technical Committee C

17、EN/TC 33 “Doors, windows, shutters, building hardware and curtain walling”, the secretariat of which is held by AFNOR. This European Standard shall be given the status of a national standard, either by publication of an identical text or by endorsement, at the latest by September 2016, and conflicti

18、ng national standards shall be withdrawn at the latest by September 2016. Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent rights. CEN and/or CENELEC shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. This documen

19、t supersedes EN 1027:2000. The revision of this European Standard clarifies only the test method and does not affect existing test evidence of EN 1027:2000. This European Standard is one of a series of standards for windows and doorsets. In comparison with EN 1027:2000, the following significant cha

20、nges were made: a) Clause 2: Deletion of Normative references ; b) Clause 3: Supplement of definition “closing condition”; c) Sub-clause 3.2: Simplification of definition “test pressure”; d) Sub-clause 3.3: Revision of definition “watertightness ; e) Sub-clause 3.4: Revision of definition “water pen

21、etration”; f) Sub-clause 5.4: Revision of definition accuracy ; g) Sub-clause 6.2: Editorial changes; h) Sub-clause 6.2.4.1 and 6.2.4.2: More precise description; i) Sub-clause 7.1: Addition of closing condition ; j) Clause 8: Supplement of necessary description of test specimen; k) New Annex A: Rev

22、ision of former Figures 1 and 2, separation of Figures into Figure A.1 up to Figure A.4; l) New Annex A: Supplement of Figure A.5. According to the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organizations of the following countries are bound to implement this European Standard: Austria

23、, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden,

24、Switzerland, Turkey and the United Kingdom. DIN EN 1027:2016-09 “ ”“ ”“ ”EN 1027:2016 (E) 4 1 Scope This European Standard defines the test method to be used to determine the watertightness of completely assembled windows and doorsets of any materials. This test method is designed to take account of

25、 conditions in use, when the window or doorset is installed in accordance with the manufacturers specification and the requirements of relevant European Standards and codes of practice. This European Standard does not apply to the joints between the window or door frame and the building construction

26、. 2 Normative references Not applicable. 3 Terms and definitions For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply. 3.1 closing condition 3.1.1 closed movable parts rest in or at the fixed parts in a way in which they may be fastened (latched and/or locked) 3.1.2 fastened

27、where the movable part is restrained at one or more points and shall be described by at least one of the two as listed below 3.1.2.1 latched movable part is returned to its closed position and restrained by either a) a self - engaging fastener or b) a roller catch or c) a latch 3.1.2.2 locked movabl

28、e part is further restrained in the closed position by additional operations (of e.g. handle, key, automatic devices or electronic devices) to engage integrated locking devices (e.g. nutbolts or deadbolts) which will affect the products characteristics 3.1.3 secured any action(s) which prevent unaut

29、horised release of the fastening device(s) to allow exit or entry (e.g. child safety, burglary) DIN EN 1027:2016-09 EN 1027:2016 (E) 5 3.2 test pressure difference between the static air pressures inside and outside of the test chamber Note 1 to entry: The test pressure is positive if the static air

30、 pressure inside the chamber of the test apparatus is higher than that outside the test chamber. Note 2 to entry: The test pressure is negative if the static air pressure inside the chamber of the test apparatus is lower than that outside the test chamber. 3.3 watertightness ability of the test spec

31、imen to resist water penetration under the test conditions up to a pressure (Pmax= limit of the watertightness) 3.4 water penetration continuous or repeated wetting of 1) parts of the inside face of the test specimen or 2) any parts of the test specimen intended to remain dry, not being part of the

32、water drainage system to the outside, or 3) any parts of the test specimen where water does not drain to the outside in a controlled way Note 1 to entry: Continuous wetting could be described as an uninterrupted sequence of water, e.g. thin line of water, repeated wetting could be described as frequ

33、ent intervals of water, e.g. more than one drop of water. 3.5 limit of watertightness maximum test pressure Pmaxup to which the test specimen remains watertight under the test conditions for the specified time 4 Principle of test Constant spraying of a specified quantity of water onto the external s

34、urface of the test specimen while increments of positive test pressure are applied at regular intervals during which details are recorded of test pressure and location of water penetration. 5 Test apparatus 5.1 A chamber with an open side to which the test specimen can be fitted. It shall be constru

35、cted so as to be able to withstand the test pressures without deflecting to an extent likely to influence the test results. 5.2 Means for applying controlled test pressure to the test specimen. 5.3 Means of producing rapid changes in test pressure, controlled within defined limits. 5.4 Instrument su

36、itable for measuring the quantity of water supplied within an accuracy of 10 % of the measured value. DIN EN 1027:2016-09 EN 1027:2016 (E) 6 If several rows of nozzles with different flows are included, the total flow of water has to be checked. It shall be in accordance with 5.6 c). Furthermore the

37、 spraying pattern of the lower row of nozzles has to be checked additionally. It is recommended to use at least two such instruments. NOTE 1 Accuracy = (the sum of the amount of the error plus the amount of the expanded measurement uncertainty). For values of both error and expanded measurement unce

38、rtainty see last calibration certificate of the instrument. NOTE 2 For vocabulary of metrology see ISO/IEC Guide 99:2007. 5.5 Means of measuring the test pressure applied across the test specimen, within an accuracy of 5 %. 5.6 A spraying system capable of applying a continuous regularly dispersed f

39、ilm of water, all over the surface likely to be wetted in real exposure conditions, by means of full circular cone nozzles with the flowing features: a) angle of spray: ( )0- 10120 ; b) pressure working range: 2 bar to 3 bar according to manufacturers specifications; c) nozzle rate: top row (2 0,2)

40、l/min per nozzle, additional rows (1 0,1) l/min per nozzle and (2 0,2) l/min per nozzle (see 6.2.5). 6 Preparation of test specimen 6.1 Set-up of the test specimen The test specimen shall be fixed as intended for use without any twists or bends which may influence the test results. The test specimen

41、 shall be fully operable. The surround shall be prepared and installed so that any water penetration, including that through the frame joints, shall be readily detectable. The test specimen shall be cleaned and surfaces dry. Ventilation devices, if any, shall be taped over. 6.2 Set-up spraying syste

42、m (see Figures A.1 to A.6) 6.2.1 General The method of spraying (Method A or Method B) shall be chosen by the manufacturer based on the location of the test specimen in the intended works (shielded or not)A test shall be carried out using only one set up. A template is recommended to set up the spra

43、ying system. 6.2.2 Positioning of the line connecting the nozzle tips (the nozzle line) The nozzle line shall be located not more than 150 mm above the topmost horizontal joint line of any moving frame or the glazing line of any fixed glazing, in order to provide complete wetting of the adjacent hor

44、izontal frame member(s).The nozzle line shall be located at a distance of ( )10 0 250+mm from the external face of the test specimen as defined by the outermost external joint plane of moving parts or the glazing plane of fixed parts. DIN EN 1027:2016-09 EN 1027:2016 (E) 7 6.2.3 Positioning relative

45、 to test specimen width Nozzles shall be spaced at (400 10) mm along the axis of the spray bar and the nozzles shall be arranged in order that the lateral distance c“ between the outer edge of the surround and the outermost nozzles shall be greater than 50 mm but not exceeding 250 mm (see Figure A.6

46、). 6.2.4 Direction of nozzle spray The nozzle axis shall lie on a line ( )2024+ below the horizontal line for test according to Method 1A, and (84 2) for test according to Method 1B (see Figures A.1 and A.2). 6.2.5 Number of nozzle rows 6.2.5.1 For test specimens with a height up to 2,5 m, including

47、 e.g. extension profiles and/or shutter boxes (see Figure A.5) a single row of nozzles shall be used, with each nozzle spraying, on average, 2 l/min for spraying Method 1A and spraying Method 1B. NOTE The prescribed spraying rates above are appropriate for 2,5 m high test specimen. For smaller test

48、specimen the nozzles spray water beyond the sill, hence the actual flow on the sprayed area is approximately 2 l/(minm2) when test is carried out according to Method 1A, 1 l/(minm2) when test is carried out according to Method 1B. 6.2.5.2 For test specimens exceeding 2,5 m height (see Figures A.3 an

49、d A.4), including e.g. extension profiles and/or shutter boxes (see Figure A.5), an upper row of nozzles shall be fixed as described in 6.2.5.1. Additional rows of nozzles shall be fixed at vertical intervals at 1,5 m (within a tolerance of 150 mm) below the top nozzle line. Where any horizontal projection occurs, these additional rows shall be installed at a level such that no water is sprayed upwards under the projection. The flow of eac